Extended Colectomy Research Articles

P0899 Previous extended colectomy is associated with particularly high risk of postoperative small bowel fistula in Crohn’s disease patients

Abstract Background Postoperative small bowel fistula is one of the most detrimental complications in abdominal surgery. Patients with Crohn’s disease seem to be at higher risk. Performing small bowel surgery in patients with previous extended colectomy, surgeons face diffuse small bowel adhesions. Moreover, patients with small bowel disease after previous (total) colectomy pose one of the most vulnerable populations. Present analysis was conducted in order to analyze the incidence of small bowel fistula following abdominal surgery in Crohn’s disease patients. Methods Consecutive patients with Crohn’s disease undergoing intestinal resection between 1992 and 2024 were included in current analysis using a prospectively maintained database. “Small bowel fistula” was defined as any small bowel perforation away from any anastomoses, strictureplasties or any other kind of small bowel sutures. “Previous extended colectomies” were total abdominal colectomies or proctocolectomies in patients’ history prior to the current surgery. Results 973 patients undergoing 1096 bowel resections were included. There were 804 ileocolic resections, 254 colonic resections and 38 other resections (small bowel resection, ileostomy resections, pouch excisions and abdominoperineal resections). Postoperative intraabdominal septic complications occurred in 162 patients (15%), 8 patients died (0.7%). Postoperative small bowel fistula occurred in 9 patients (0.8%). 52 patients attended current surgery with a history of previous (procto-)colectomy. Current surgery consisted of 13 resections of ileosigmoid or ileorectal anastomoses, 12 ileostomy resections, 10 abdominoperineal resections, 9 small bowel resections, 5 J-Pouch excisions, 1 Kock pouch excisions, 1 Redo-Pouch and 1 IPAA in the study population. 10 of 52 patients (19%) with a history of previous extended colectomy underwent laparoscopic surgery with one patient converted to open. The history of previous extended colectomy was the only factor associated with an increased risk of postoperative small bowel fistula by a multivariate analysis (7.7% vs. 0.5%, Hazard ratio 7.1, p<0.001) but not for all intraabdominal septic complications (15% in both groups). The risk of postoperative small bowel fistula was not increased in patients with a history of any other previous intestinal resection than extended colectomy. Conclusion Crohn’s disease patients with a history of previous total colectomy or proctocolectomy are at a particularly high risk of postoperative small bowel fistula when they undergo further surgeries. Surgeons must be aware of this complication in cases of unexpected postoperative symptoms.

Segmental versus extended colectomy for colorectal cancer in patients with lynch syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

The decision to perform segmental or extended colectomy in Lynch syndrome (LS) patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) is still controversial. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis aims to provide updated evidence for segmental versus extended colectomy in LS carriers with CRC. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were systematically searched for studies published until January 2024 comparing segmental and extended colectomies for CRC in patients with LS. Risk ratio (RR) was used to evaluate binary endpoints with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity was assessed with the Cochran's Q test and I2 statistics. Statistical analysis was performed using the R Software, version 4.2.3. A total of 14 studies comprising 2303 LS carriers with CRC, of whom 1724 (74.9%) patients underwent segmental colectomy and 579 (25.1%) patients underwent extended colectomy. Segmental colectomy significantly increased metachronous CRC (mCRC) (RR 2.87; 95% CI 2.03-4.07; and p<0.01). There were no significant differences between groups for 5-year overall survival (OS) (RR 0.92; 95% CI 0.82-1.03; and p=0.14), 10-year OS (RR 0.99; 95% CI 0.96-1.04; and p=0.80), and mortality (RR 1.63; 95% CI 0.90-2.97; and p=0.11). There were no significant linear associations between the outcome of mCRC and age at the time of primary CRC, sex, primary CRC location, and pathogenic LS variant. In this meta-analysis, segmental colectomy significantly increased mCRC compared with extended colectomy after the first surgery for CRC in patients with LS. However, there were no significant differences between groups for 5- and 10-year OS and mortality.

Splenic flexure adenocarcinoma: A national cohort analysis of extent of surgical resection and outcomes.

The optimal extent of resection for splenic flexure adenocarcinoma remains debated. These tumours straddle the left- and right-sided vasculature with lymphatic drainage in a watershed area; current guidelines recommend either segmental or extended colectomy. We analysed surgical management of splenic flexure tumours and compared outcomes between approaches. The Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database was searched for adults with Stage I-III splenic flexure adenocarcinoma, 2004-2019. Of 5238 patients, 55% underwent extended colectomy. Compared to segmental colectomy, these patients were more likely to have advanced stage. On multivariable analysis, age ≤ 65 years remained independently associated with extended colectomy. Although fewer nodes were examined in segmental colectomy (median 14 vs. 16, p < 0.001), the number of positive nodes (both, median 0 [interquartile ratio 0-2], p = 0.20) and the lymph node ratio were similar between cohorts. Surgical approach was not significantly associated with increased positive nodal yield in adjusted analyses. Five-year overall and disease-specific survival were 73% and 84% for segmental and 72% and 83% for extended colectomy (p > 0.4); these remained comparable after adjustment. Nationally, we observed similar rates of segmental and extended colectomy for splenic flexure adenocarcinoma. Extended colectomy was not more common in Stage III disease, indicating lack of stage migration, and was not associated with better oncological outcomes. These observations support current practice involving either approach, which should be tailored to patient-related factors and preferences, while considering technical aspects and quality of life.

Modified Rosi–Cahill technique after left extended colectomy for splenic flexure advanced tumors

Advanced splenic flexure tumors are uncommon and have a higher risk of relapse. To ensure that the resection includes the entire area of lymphatic drainage with a complete mesocolic excision (CME), a left extended colectomy is needed. In peritoneal carcinomatosis, there is often extensive involvement of the sigma and splenic flexure of the colon. In many instances, total colectomies are chosen for these patients, even when a significant portion of the colon could be preserved. The potential impact on quality of life after splenic flexure colon resection is discussed, as well as the importance of anatomical knowledge and expertise in performing this type of surgery. Overall, this work presents a modified technique that aims to improve the outcomes and quality of life for patients with splenic flexure colon cancer. Creating a tension-free anastomosis after extended left-sided colorectal resection is challenging. There is a negative impact on quality of life when an ileorectal anastomosis is created. The colorectal anastomosis performed after modified Rosi–Cahill or Deloyers’ technique allows reduced small bowel bacterial overgrowth, achieves better water and sodium absorption, and altogether permits improved stool consistency. There are potential advantages of the Rosi–Cahill technique over other popular options such as Deloyers’ procedure as there is no torsion of the ileocolic vessels and no mesenteric windows. A video was recorded showing a potential pitfall during Deloyers’ technique resulting in the creation of a mesenteric window. The proper rotation of the colon during the modified Rosi–Cahill procedure was also filmed. Overall, this work presents a modified technique for reconstruction after left extended colectomy that aims to improve the outcomes and quality of life for patients with splenic flexure colon cancer.

Surgical approach to splenic flexure adenocarcinoma of the colon: Less is more?

IntroductionDue to the watershed vasculature and lymphatic drainage of splenic flexure (SF) neoplasms, and their exclusion from large clinical trials, optimal management remains debated. This study evaluated extent of resection and surgical approach for SF adenocarcinoma and their respective outcomes. MethodsAdults with stage I-III splenic flexure adenocarcinoma were identified in the National Cancer Database (2004–2020) and categorized by surgical management. ResultsOf 7412 patients, 4264 (58%) underwent extended colectomy (EC). The cohorts were overall similar, though more patients with stage I disease were managed with segmental colectomy (SC) (24% vs. 20%, p < 0.01). Those undergoing EC had longer hospital stays (LOS) and greater odds of readmission. Use of robotic-assisted surgery was higher in SC (9% vs. 7%, p < 0.01) and increased from 1% in 2010 to 24% in 2020. This approach was independently associated with a shorter LOS than open surgery. Despite a higher number of lymph nodes examined (median 18 vs. 16), EC and SC had similar nodal (both 37%, p = 0.95) and margin involvement (both 4%, p = 0.39). Five-year survival after EC and SC was similar (75% vs. 76%, p = 0.6). Patients undergoing robotic surgery had significantly lower odds of positive surgical margins and experienced an improved prognosis. ConclusionsEC and SC were performed at similar rates for SF adenocarcinoma, while the use of robotic surgery increased over time. Neither extent of resection nor surgical approach significantly impacted oncologic outcomes. These data indicate that surgical decision-making should be balanced between tumor- and patient-specific considerations, morbidity of extended colectomy, and surgeon preference. SynopsisIn a national cohort of splenic flexure cancers, segmental and extended colectomy were associated with comparable rates of negative margins, nodal involvement, and survival. Robotic assist increased over time without impacting oncologic outcomes. Surgical procedure and approach should thus be tailored to clinical condition and surgeon preference.

Metachronous colorectal cancer risk according to Lynch syndrome pathogenic variant after extensive versus partial colectomy in the Netherlands: a retrospective cohort study

Extensive colectomy (subtotal or total colectomy) is often advised for carriers of Lynch syndrome with colorectal cancer. However, the risk of metachronous colorectal cancer might differ by Lynch syndrome variant, meaning that partial colectomy, which has better functional outcomes, might be adequate for some patients with low-risk variants. We aimed to assess the risk of metachronous colorectal cancer after partial colectomy and extensive colectomy in carriers of Lynch syndrome with different pathogenic variants. For this retrospective cohort study, carriers of Lynch syndrome with colorectal cancer in the Netherlands were identified by linkage of the Dutch Foundation for the Detection of Hereditary Tumors (StOET) database and the Dutch Nationwide Network and Registry of Histopathology and Cytopathology (PALGA) database. Data on demographics, Lynch syndrome variants, colorectal cancers, surgery types, mortality, and surveillance colonoscopies were extracted. Data on colorectal cancer and surveillance colonoscopies were updated until Feb 28, 2022. Data on survival status was updated until Feb 7, 2022. MLH1, MSH2, and EPCAM were classified as high-risk variants and MSH6 and PMS2 as low-risk variants. Patients for whom the type of surgery was unknown were excluded. Cox regression time-to-event analyses were done to assess the risk of metachronous colorectal cancer in four subgroups based on pathogenic variant (high-risk vs low-risk variants) and the extent of surgery (extensive colectomy vs partial colectomy). Sex, age at the time of primary colorectal cancer, primary colorectal cancer stage, performance of surveillance colonoscopies, adherence to the surveillance guidelines, and time period of primary colorectal cancer diagnosis were added to the model as possible confounders. Metachronous colorectal cancer was defined as colorectal cancer diagnosed more than 6 months after the primary colorectal cancer. Patients were censored at time of death or assembly of the database. Of 1908 carriers of Lynch syndrome registered in StOET, 532 with a history of colorectal cancer were identified after linkage with PALGA. Five carriers were excluded because of an unknown surgery type, leaving 527 in our sample (mean age at primary colorectal cancer 48·7 years [SD 12·1]; 274 [52%] male and 253 [48%] female). 121 (23%) patients developed metachronous colorectal cancer (median time from primary colorectal cancer to metachronous colorectal cancer 11·0 years [IQR 2·1-17·8]). Metachronous colorectal cancer occurred in 12 (12%) of 97 patients with high-risk variants and extensive colectomy, in 85 (32%) of 267 patients with high-risk variants and partial colectomy, in zero (0%) of 11 patients with low-risk variants and extensive colectomy, and in 24 (16%) of 152 patients with low-risk variants and partial colectomy. Partial colectomy was associated with a higher risk of metachronous colorectal cancer than extensive colectomy in the high-risk variant group (hazard ratio 1·97, 95% CI 1·04-3·73; p=0·039). The risk of metachronous colorectal cancer did not differ between carriers of low-risk variants who had partial colectomy and those of high-risk variants who had extensive colectomy (1·14, 0·55-2·36; p=0·72). The risk of metachronous colorectal cancer after partial colectomy in carriers of low-risk variants is similar to the risk after extensive colectomy in carriers of high-risk variants. This finding suggests that partial colectomy followed by endoscopic surveillance is an appropriate management approach to treat colorectal cancer in carriers of low-risk Lynch syndrome variants. None.

Anatomical classification of and laparoscopic surgery for left-sided colorectal cancer with persistent descending mesocolon

Objective: To investigate anatomical morphology and classification of persistent descending mesocolon (PDM) in patients with left-sided colorectal cancer, as well as the safety of laparoscopic radical surgery for these patients. Methods: This is a descriptive study of case series. Relevant clinical data of 995 patients with left colon and rectal cancer who had undergone radical surgery in Fujian Medical University Union Hospital from July 2021 to September 2022 were extracted from the colorectal surgery database of our institution and retrospectively analyzed. Twenty-four (2.4%) were identified as PDM and their imaging data and intra-operative videos were reviewed. We determined the distribution and morphology of the descending colon and mesocolon, and evaluated the feasibility and complications of laparoscopic surgery. We classified PDM according to its anatomical characteristics as follows: Type 0: PDM combined with malrotation of the midgut or persistent ascending mesocolon; Type 1: unfixed mesocolon at the junction between transverse and descending colon; Type 2: PDM with descending colon shifted medially (Type 2A) or to the right side (Type 2B) of the abdominal aorta at the level of the origin of the inferior mesentery artery (IMA); and Type 3: the mesocolon of the descending-sigmoid junction unfixed and the descending colon shifted medially and caudally to the origin of IMA. Results: The diagnosis of PDM was determined based on preoperative imaging findings in 9 of the 24 patients (37.5%) with left-sided colorectal cancer, while the remaining diagnoses were made during intraoperative assessment. Among 24 patients, 22 were male and 2 were female. The mean age was (63±9) years. We classified PDM as follows: Type 0 accounted for 4.2% (1/24); Type 1 for 8.3% (2/24); Types 2A and 2B for 37.5% (9/24) and 25.0% (6/24), respectively; and Type 3 accounted for 25.0% (6/24). All patients with PDM had adhesions of the mesocolon that required adhesiolysis. Additionally, 20 (83.3%) of them had adhesions between the mesentery of the ileum and colon. Twelve patients (50.0%) required mobilization of the splenic flexure. The inferior mesenteric artery branches had a common trunk in 14 patients (58.3%). Twenty-four patients underwent D3 surgery without conversion to laparotomy; the origin of the IMA being preserved in 22 (91.7%) of them. Proximal colon ischemia occurred intraoperatively in two patients (8.3%) who had undergone high ligation at the origin of the IMA. One of these patients had a juxta-anal low rectal cancer and underwent intersphincteric abdominoperineal resection because of poor preoperative anal function. Laparoscopic subtotal colectomy was considered necessary for the other patient. The duration of surgery was (260±100) minutes and the median estimated blood loss was 50 (20-200) mL. The median number of No. 253 lymph nodes harvested was 3 (0-20), and one patient (4.2%) had No.253 nodal metastases. The median postoperative hospital stay was 8 (4-23) days, and the incidence of complications 16.7% (4/24). There were no instances of postoperative colon ischemia or necrosis observed. One patient (4.2%) with stage IIA rectal cancer developed Grade B (Clavien-Dindo III) anastomotic leak and underwent elective ileostomy. The other complications were Grade I-II. Conclusions: PDM is frequently associated with mesenteric adhesions. Our proposed classification can assist surgeons in identifying the descending colon and mesocolon during adhesion lysis in laparoscopic surgery. It is crucial to protect the colorectal blood supply at the resection margin to minimize the need for unplanned extended colectomy, the Hartmann procedure, or permanent stomas.

P783 Symptom Improvement of ulceRative colitis after an Injection dose of Ustekinumab in Japanese clinical practice, measured using patient-reported outcomes (SIRIUS) study, Interim Analysis

Abstract Background Ustekinumab (UST) is treated to moderate to severe adult ulcerative colitis (UC) patients. We conducted the SIRIUS study (Symptom Improvement of ulceRative colitis after an Injection dose of UStekinumab in Japanese clinical practice, measured using patient-reported outcomes (PRO)) to record daily symptoms for 8 weeks after the introduction of intravenous ustekinumab in moderate to severe UC patients, which aimed to reveal early response patterns of symptoms during the induction of remission period with ustekinumab, and to explore symptoms suitable for monitoring and predicting treatment effect. This interim analysis focuses on stool frequency (SF) and rectal bleeding (RB) scores in the PRO-2 during the 8-week induction period. Methods This single-arm prospective observational study conducted in 23 centers in Japan aimed to recruit 140 patients with moderate-to-severe UC between July 2021 and July 2022. RB score, SF score, abdominal pain, nocturnal diarrhea, tenesmus, and patient perception of improvement were recorded daily using a smartphone app. To be eligible for the study, participants must have a documented diagnosis of UC, be ≥16 years of age, have UC (partial Mayo score of 5~9), have had an inadequate response or intolerance to prior UC therapies, and be able to understand and complete PRO instruments using a smartphone. Patients who had prior exposure to UST, history of extensive colectomy, or were hospitalized when UST was started were excluded. Results In this analysis,137 patients were included. Seventy-four (54.4%) patients were male and the median age was 35 years. Seventy-six (55.9%) patients were Bio-naïve. This high proportion of Bio-naïve patients reflects the fact that UST can be used for Bio-naive patients without restrictions in the Japanese health insurance. At weeks 2 and 4, 56 (41.2%) and 57 (41.9%) patients attended outpatient clinics, respectively. The data collection rate of the PROs was 95%. Mean SF and RB scores were demonstrated stratified by prior treatment with Bio (Figure 1&amp;3). Significant decreases in mean SF and RB scores were observed within 1 week in both Bio-naïve and -experienced patients. the time-course change in SF was similar between Bio-naïve and -experienced patients, but the decrease in RB scores was greater in the Bio-naïve patients than the Bio-experienced patients. Conclusion A daily PRO-based analysis was conducted in the Sirius study to monitor symptoms during the first 8 weeks after the introduction of UST in patients with moderate-to-severe UC. This interim analysis revealed that SF and RB scores started to decrease within 1 week, demonstrating a rapid symptomatic response to UST. The analysis of the other PROs and predictors of efficacy will be performed in further studies.

Surgery for synchronous and metachronous colorectal cancer: segmental or extensive colectomy?

To assess the impact of surgical approach on morbidity, mortality, and the oncological outcomes of synchronous (SC) and metachronous (MC) colorectal cancer (CRC). All patients undergoing resection for double location CRC (SC or MC) between 2006 and 2020 were included. The exclusion criteria were polyposis or SC located on the same side. Sixty-seven patients (age, 64.8years; male, 78%) with SC (n = 41; 61%) or MC (n = 26; 39%) were included. SC was treated with segmental colectomy (right and left colectomy/proctectomy; n = 19) or extensive colectomy (subtotal/total colectomy or restorative proctocolectomy with pouch; n = 22). Segmental colectomy was associated with a higher incidence of anastomotic leakage (47.4 vs. 13.6%; p = 0.04) and a higher rate of medical morbidity (47.4 vs. 16.6%; p = 0.04). The mean number of lymph nodes harvested was similar. For MC, the second cancer was treated by iterative colectomy (n = 12) or extensive colectomy (n = 14) and there was no significant difference in postoperative outcomes between the two surgical approaches. The median follow-up period was 42.4 ± 29.1months. The 5-year overall and disease-free survival of the SC and MC groups did not differ to a statistically significant extent. Extensive colectomy should be preferred for SC to reduce morbidity and improve the prognosis. In contrast, iterative colectomy can be performed safely for patients with MC.

Deloyers procedure compared to ileorectal anastomosis as restoration techniques of bowel continuity after extended left colon resection.

Restoration of bowel continuity after left extended colectomy may be challenging because the remaining colon may not reach the rectal stump without tension to perform a safe anastomosis. Performing a total colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis (IRA) is an option, but the quality of life can be significantly impaired due to loose stools and an increase in bowel frequency. In contrast, the preservation of the right colon and ileocaecal valve in the Deloyers procedure (DP) might ensure a better stool consistency and bowel transit, and therefore a superior quality of life. A transverse study comparing patients that underwent DP versus patients with an IRA was performed. Postoperative morbidity, mortality, functional outcomes, and quality of life were analysed between groups. Quality of life after the surgical procedure was assessed with the SF-36 V2® health survey. A total of 16 patients with DP and 32 with IRA were included. The groups had similar demographic characteristics concerning age, sex, body mass index, ASA classification, diagnosis and Charlson comorbidity index. The median follow-up was 55 months for DP and 99 months for IRA. Postoperative complications were similar in both groups. Patients in the DP group had fewer bowel movements (P=0.01), tenesmus (P=0.04) and use of loperamide (P=0.03). DP patients achieved better scores in physical pain (P=0.02) and general health (P < 0.01) than IRA patients. DP for intestinal continuity restoration after extended left colon resection is a safe and feasible alternative, possibly achieving better functional outcomes and quality-of-life compared to IRA.

Long-term Oncological Outcome of Segmental Versus Extended Colectomy for Colorectal Cancer in Crohn's Disease: Results from an International Multicentre Study.

Crohn's disease increases colorectal cancer risk, with high prevalence of synchronous and metachronous cancers. Current guidelines for colorectal cancer in Crohn's disease recommend pan-proctocolectomy. The aim of this study was to evaluate oncological outcomes of a less invasive surgical approach. This was a retrospective database analysis of Crohn's disease patients with colorectal cancer undergoing surgery at selected European and US tertiary centres. Outcomes of segmental colectomy were compared with those of extended colectomy, total colectomy, and pan-proctocolectomy. Primary outcome was progression-free survival. Secondary outcomes included overall survival, synchronous and metachronous colorectal cancer, and major postoperative complications. Ninety-nine patients were included: 66 patients underwent segmental colectomy and 33 extended colectomy. Segmental colectomy patients were older [p = 0.0429], had less extensive colitis [p = 0.0002] and no preoperatively identified synchronous lesions [p = 0.0109].Median follow-up was 43 [31-62] months. There was no difference in unadjusted progression-free survival [p = 0.2570] or in overall survival [p = 0.4191] between segmental and extended colectomy. Multivariate analysis adjusting for age, sex, ASA score, and AJCC staging, confirmed no difference for progression-free survival (hazard ratio [HR] 1.00, p = 0.9993) or overall survival [HR 0.77, p = 0.6654]. Synchronous and metachronous cancers incidence was 9% and 1.5%, respectively. Perioperative mortality was nil and major complications were comparable [7.58% vs 6.06%, p = 0.9998]. Segmental colectomy seems to offer similar long-term outcomes to more extensive surgery. Incidence of synchronous and metachronous cancers appears much lower than previously described. Further prospective studies are warranted to confirm these results.

Deciding the operation type according to mismatch repair status among hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer patients: should a tailored approach be applied, or does one size fit all?

BackgroundAlthough extended colectomy (EC) was recommended for HNPCC patients, previous studies did not show significantly improved overall survival. Immunohistochemical (IHC) stain of mismatch repair (MMR) gene protein expression is now a feasible and reliable test clinically. Therefore, we tried to investigate whether we could use MMR IHC stain to select operation types in HNPCC patients.Patients and methodsBetween 1995 and 2013, 186 HNPCC patients were collected. Status of MMR protein expression, perioperative clinic-pathological variables and post-operative follow up status were analyzed by multivariate analyses.ResultsSixty-five percent (121 of 186) patients of these HNPCC patients demonstrated loss of at least one MMR protein. There were several significant differences existing between deficient MMR (dMMR) and proficient MMR (pMMR) subgroups in terms of clinic-pathological characteristics. With the average follow-up duration of 93.9 months, we observed significantly high risk of developing metachronous CRC between SC and EC subgroups (crude rate 8.5% vs. 0%, p = 0.035). However, no significant difference was observed among the presence of extra-colonic tumors (12.4% vs. 5.8%, p = 0.284). The positive and negative prediction rate of metachronous CRC in dMMR subgroup was 12.8 and 87.2% while 1.9 and 98.1% in the pMMR subgroup.Survival outcomes were significantly affected by MMR status and resection types by multivariate analysis. Significantly better OS in dMMR subgroup (HR = 0.479, 95% CI: 0.257–0.894, p = 0.021) comparing with pMMR subgroup was observed. However, significant improved DFS (HR = 0.367, 95% CI: 0.172–.0787, p = 0.010) but not significant for OS (HR = 0.510, 95% CI: 0.219–1.150, p = 0.103) for EC subgroup compared with SC subgroup.Differences existing among different subgroups by combing extent of resection and MMR status. In dMMR subgroup, SC, compared with EC, demonstrated significantly worse DFS by multivariate analyses (HR = 3.526, 95% CI: 1.346–9.236, p = 0.010) but not for OS (HR = 2.387, 95% CI: 0.788–7.229, p = 0.124), however, no significantly differences of OS and DFS in pMMR subgroup between SC and EC were found.ConclusionsSignificantly better overall survival and higher rate of metachronous CRC exist in dMMR subgroup of HNPCC patients comparing with pMMR subgroup. Extended colectomy significantly improved DFS and was thus recommended for dMMR subgroup but not pMMR subgroup of HNPCC patients.

DOP30 Segmental vs extended colectomy for colorectal cancer in Crohn’s Disease: Results from a multi-centre retrospective comparative study

Abstract Background There is a recognized increased risk for colorectal cancer (CRC) in patients with Crohn’s disease (CD). CD patients with CRC might also show a higher prevalence of synchronous and metachronous cancers. On this basis, current guidelines recommend pan-proctocolectomy (PPC) as a treatment. Aim of this study was to evaluate oncologic outcomes and the actual risk of developing metachronous cancers in CD patients undergoing segmental colectomy (SC) for CRC. Methods All CRC CD patients undergoing surgery in select European and U.S. tertiary referral centres were enrolled. Short and long-term results of SC were compared with those of patients undergoing extended colectomies: total colectomy (TC) and panproctocolectomy (PPC). Primary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes were postoperative complications, 30 days mortality, re-admission, length of stay, incidence of synchronous and metachronous lesions. Results 91 patients were included: 50 (54%) did not have Crohn’s colitis or had cancer developed in a non-involved segment; cancer developed in inflamed colic segment in 41 (46%). Patients without colitis were more often treated with SC (84%). 62 patients underwent segmental colectomies and 29 extended colectomies (EC): 19 PPC and 10 TC. Patients in the SC group were older (p 0.0429), harboured more metastases at diagnosis (p 0.0219) and were less likely to suffer from CD pancolitis (p 0.0022). Incidence of major complications was comparable in SC (8.6%) vs EC (3.45%) (p 0.06602). There was no perioperative mortality and no difference in specific complications, re-admission or length of stay. 28 patients (30%) suffered disease progression: 22 (35%) after SC and 6 (21%) after EC. Of the 19 cancer related deaths (20%), 16 (25%) were in SC and 3 (10%) in EC groups. There was no difference in unadjusted PFS between SC and EC (0.64 vs 0.79 respectively, Wilcoxon p 0.1029) nor in OS (0.74 vs 0.89, Wilcoxon p 0.1591), after a median follow up of 42 months (55.76 vs 31.13 months respectively). Multivariate analysis confirmed no difference in PFS (HR 1.582, p 0.4964) or OS (HR1 428, p 0.4758). 6 synchronous lesions were found in the 29 patients undergoing EC: 3 low grade dysplasia (10%), 1 high grade dysplasia (3.4%) and 2 preoperatively diagnosed cancers (6.8%). 1 patient (1,61%) developed a metachronous colon cancer of the 62 who had SC and none of the 10 TC. Conclusion CRC in CD is a complex situation and choice of procedure is multifaceted. Incidence of synchronous and metachronous cancers appears much lower than previously described. SC offers similar long-term outcomes to more extensive surgery. Current guidelines for the treatment of CRC in CD patients may need to be reconsidered.

What is the best surgical procedure of transverse colon cancer? An evidence map and minireview.

Colorectal cancers comprise a large percentage of tumors worldwide, and transverse colon cancer (TCC) is defined as tumors located between hepatic and splenic flexures. Due to the anatomy and embryology complexity, and lack of large randomized controlled trials, it is a challenge to standardize TCC surgery. In this study, the current situation of transverse/extended colectomy, robotic/ laparoscopic/open surgery and complete mesocolic excision (CME) concept in TCC operations is discussed and a heatmap is conducted to show the evidence level and gap. In summary, transverse colectomy challenges the dogma of traditional extended colectomy, with similar oncological and prognostic outcomes. Compared with conventional open resection, laparoscopic and robotic surgery plays a more important role in both transverse colectomy and extended colectomy. The CME concept may contribute to the radical resection of TCC and adequate harvested lymph nodes. According to published studies, laparoscopic or robotic transverse colectomy based on the CME concept was the appropriate surgical procedure for TCC patients.

Retrospective analysis of a single institute's experience of transverse colectomy vs extended colectomy for the management of mid‐transverse colon cancer

AbstractObjectiveMid‐transverse colon cancers are uncommon. The optimum operative strategy, whether extended colectomy or limited transverse colectomy, is not well established. Herein we share our local experience.MethodologyConsecutive patients with mid‐transverse colon cancer resection from January 2000 to January 2020 were identified from electronic records. Short‐ and long‐term outcomes were analyzed. Additional propensity‐score matching adjusted for potential treatment selection bias.ResultsA total of 107 patients were analyzed. 23 patients (21.5%) underwent transverse colectomy (TC) and 84 (78.5%) underwent extended colectomy (EC) of which 68 were extended right hemicolectomy. 53% of all operations were laparoscopic. Similar postoperative complication rate, postoperative length of stay and 30 day mortality rate were found. Although fewer lymph node (median 11 vs 19, P &lt; .01) and shorter closest axial margin (3.8 vs 5.5 cm, P &lt; .01) were achieved in the TC group, similar 5‐years overall survival, and 1‐year disease‐free survival were found. Subgroup analysis revealed a trend of poorer survival amongst stage III/IV patients with transverse colectomy.ConclusionsOur study verifies the feasibility and safety of transverse colectomy for mid‐transverse colon cancers. Attention should focus on achieving adequate margin length and nodal yield.

Comparison of extended right hemicolectomy, left hemicolectomy, and segmental colectomy for splenic flexure colon cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Comparison of extended right hemicolectomy, left hemicolectomy, and segmental colectomy for splenic flexure colon cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Segmental versus extended colectomy for tumours of the transverse colon: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

There is no consensus on the appropriate extent of oncological resection for tumours of the transverse colon. Concerns regarding tumour factors such as pattern of lymph node spread and technical factors such as anastomotic perfusion lead to a variety of procedures being performed. A comprehensive search for published studies examining outcomes following segmental versus extended colectomy for transverse colon tumours was performed adhering to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items in Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines. Random effects methods were used to combine data. Seven comparative series examining outcomes in 3395 patients were identified. Segmental colectomy results in shorter operating times (mean difference 15.80 min, 95% CI -20.98 to -10.62, P<0.001) and less ileus (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.33-0.81, P=0.004). There was no difference in length of hospital stay (mean difference 1.53days, 95% CI -3.79 to 0.73, P=0.18). Extended colectomy results in a lower rate of anastomotic leak (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.40-0.97, P=0.04). There are fewer nodes retrieved in segmental colectomy (mean difference 7.60 nodes, 95% CI -9.60 to -5.61, P<0.001) but no difference in disease recurrence (OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.59-1.34, P=0.56) or overall survival (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.68-1.4, P=0.9). Available data are limited due to a lack of randomized controlled trials. However, based on current evidence, segmental resection for transverse colon tumours is associated with less ileus but lower lymph node yields and higher anastomotic leak rates. Length of stay is similar. Oncological outcomes are equivalent.

Different surgical outcome and follow-up status between dMMR and pMMR colorectal cancer patients who fulfilled with Amsterdam-II criteria

BackgroundAlthough hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) could be subtyped into proficient or deficient mismatch repair gene expression (pMMR or dMMR), distinct clinical features between these two subgroups patients were rarely reported.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed 175 hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) patients between January 1995 and December 2012. Cox proportional hazards model was used to compare the differences between two subgroups.ResultsSignificant differences of disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) exist between dMMR and pMMR. In addition to other factors including younger mean age of diagnosis for dMMR patients (48.6 years vs. 54.3 years), operation type (more extended colectomy for dMMR 35.8% vs. 14.5%), tumor location (right colon predominance for dMMR 61.7% vs. 27.3% and more rectum cases for pMMR 41.8% vs. 11.7%), tumor differentiation (more poor differentiation for dMMR 23.3% vs. 9.0%), N staging (more N0 cases for dMMR 70.8% vs. 50.9%), more frequently presence of extra-colonic tumors for dMMR (16.7% vs.1.8%), and lower recurrence rates (9.1% vs.35.3%). Significantly different cumulative incidences of developing metachronous colorectal cancer were observed with 6.18 for pMMR patients and 20.57 person-years for dMMR patients (p < 0.001).ConclusionsDistinct clinicopathological features significantly exist between dMMR and pMMR subtypes patient, MMR status should be consider to tailor operation types and follow up surveillance between these two subgroups patients who all fulfilled with Amsterdam-II criteria.

Surgical management of adenocarcinoma of the transverse colon: What should be the extent of resection?

Transverse colon, owing its origin to midgut and hindgut and harbouring a flexure at both ends, continues to pose a surgical challenge. When compared to the rest of the colon, transverse colon adenocarcinoma is relatively uncommon. These cancers usually present late and lie in close proximity to the stomach, omentum, and pancreas. Adequate lymphadenectomy entails dissection around and ligation of the middle colic vessels. Hence, resectional surgery for transverse colon carcinoma is considered difficult. This is more so because of the variation of arterial and venous anatomy. From this perspective, the surgeon is tempted to perform a more radical operation like extended right or left hemicolectomy to secure an adequate lymphadenectomy. Such a cancer has also been dealt with a more limited transverse colectomy with colo‐colic anastomosis. For all these reasons, patients with transverse colon adenocarcinoma were excluded from randomised trials which compared laparoscopic resection with traditional open operation. Surgical literature is yet to establish a definite operation for transverse colon cancer and the exact procedure is often dictated by surgeon's preference. This is primarily because this is an uncommon cancer. The rapid adoption of laparoscopic operation favoured extended colectomy as transverse colectomy can be difficult by minimally invasive technique. However, in the recent past, cohort studies and meta‐analyses have shown equivalent oncological outcome between transverse colectomy and extended colectomy. It is time to resurrect transverse colectomy and consider it equivalent to its radical counterpart for cancers around the mid‐transverse colon.

P493 Segmental colectomy vs. extended colectomy for colonic Crohn’s disease: results from 112 consecutive patients

Abstract Background According to recent literature, extended colectomy (EC) and segmental colectomy (SC) are equally effective for colonic Crohn’s disease (CCD), with no differences in terms of postoperative morbidity, incidence of long-term recurrence and definitive stoma, but earlier recurrence is observed in patients with SC. Our objective was to evaluate our comparative results between EC and SC. Methods All consecutive patients undergoing surgery for CCD (EC vs. SC) in our Centre were included and compared and we evaluated postoperative morbidity, long-term clinical and surgical recurrence. Results One hundred and twelve patients (mean age at diagnosis of CD, 31 ± 17 years, mean age at surgery 42 ± 17 years) with CCD underwent EC (n = 45) or SC (n = 67); 62 (55%) patients presenting concomitant small bowel disease, 10 (9%) an extra-intestinal manifestation and 16 (14%) were active smokers. Postoperative morbidity was 8/45 (18%) in case of EC vs. 9/67 (13%) in case of SC (NS). In EC group, 8/8 (100%) complicated patients vs. 16/37 (43%) uncomplicated patients were under anti-TNF before surgery (p = 0.04). This significant difference was not showed in SC group. After a median follow-up of 40 ± 34 months (range 1–130), clinical recurrence incidence was 15/45 (33%) in EC vs. 27/67 (40%) in SC patients (NS) and surgical recurrence was 8/45 (18%) in CE vs. 13/67 (19%) in CS patients (NS). Recurrence of the disease occurred after 19 ± 20 months (range, 1–74) in EC vs. 14 ± 26 months (range, 1–130) in CS patients (p = NS). Conclusion Our study confirms that in case of surgery for CCD, EC and SC are equally safe and feasible but recurrence happens earlier after SC than EC. Additionally, the role of anti-TNF is confirmed for postoperative complications.