Private Friendship and Political Harmony? Doron Ben-Atar (bio) James Morton Smith, ed. The Republic of Letters: The Correspondence Between Jefferson and Madison, 1776–1826, 3 vols. New York: Norton, 1995. xvii + 2073 pp. Figures, notes, bibliographical essay, and index. $150.00. Lance Banning. Jefferson and Madison: Three Conversations from the Founding. Madison: Madison House, 1995. xiii + 241 pp. Notes and index. $27.95. Revolutionaries are seldom modest. It takes a certain self-righteousness and arrogance to replace an existing order. Revolutionaries often see their struggle in millennial terms and assign it meaning and significance far beyond their time and place. A skirmish in a New England village becomes a shot heard around the world. An uprising on the periphery of the British empire is hailed as “the birthday of a new world.” An event in a specific time and place is charged with “laying the foundations of happiness for countless millions” and for “Generations yet unborn.” 1 Taking the Revolutionary generation at their word, historians frequently assign relevance and universal meaning to the American Revolution. Gordon Wood’s Pulitzer Prize-wining The Radicalism of the American Revolution, for example, proclaimed it the mother of modern democracy and capitalism. Similarly, Lance Banning and James Morton Smith believe in the relevance and timelessness of our revolutionary legacy. Banning urges us to consider “important precedents from our beginnings” (p. 47) when we approach contemporary problems — from the national debt to the widespread alienation of Americans from the political process. His elegant and stimulating narrative is followed by reprints of Jefferson and Madison’s best known statements so readers can “probe” and “learn” (p. xii) more from the Founders’ own words. Smith believes that the American founding, epitomized by Jefferson’s Declaration of Independence and Madison’s Constitution, have become the battle cry of freedom from the New World to Eastern Europe and China. In another passage he writes of “the awesome responsibility that the American people have shouldered when they ratified the Constitution. For the first time in history, an entire people had ordained, established, and ratified an organic law, [End Page 8] creating a new federal government for a new nation” (p. 591, emphasis added). Both works, though very different, focus on the collaboration between the two giants of the American republican tradition, Thomas Jefferson and James Madison. Smith and Banning emphasize the similarities between Jefferson and Madison. Both try to reach out to a wider, less scholarly, public. Banning addresses his Merrill Jensen lectures, collected as Jefferson and Madison: Three Conversations from the Founding, to “Americans who may know less about the era” and not “to scholars” (p. xi). Smith has collected and edited the nearly 1,250 letters Madison and Jefferson wrote each other. Published by a commercial press and handsomely packaged, they would look perfect on a shelf in a prestigious law office or an upper-west-side apartment. Scholarly appearance aside, these volumes target a broader audience. The Norton edition, unlike the Jefferson and Madison papers, does not indicate the source of the documents. The volumes are divided chronologically into fifty chapters, each of which is introduced by a concise essay on the relevant political history to provide historical context for nonspecialists. Smith’s impressive scholarly command of the literature comes through in the essays and extensive notation in which he directs readers to other relevant interpretations. Approaching the history of the early republic through the prism of the great collaboration, however, skews the historical record in two ways. First, Smith reads the Jefferson-Madison cooperation back into the early days of the Revolution. The letters from Governor Jefferson and Virginia’s executive council are entitled “Jefferson, Madison, and the Executive Council to....” The correspondence between Jefferson and Virginia’s congressional delegation is introduced as “Governor Jefferson to Madison and the Virginia Congressional Delegation.” Young Madison, however, was simply a member of the council and of Virginia’s congressional delegation and not the dominant member at that. The focus here on the Jefferson-Madison axis exaggerates the centrality of their collaboration to the Revolutionary struggle. Second, following in the footsteps of Julian P. Boyd’s introductory essays in the Jefferson papers, Smith toes the Jefferson industry’s...