Extensive-stage Small Cell Lung Cancer Research Articles

Abstract CT253: Results from KEYNOTE-B99: Phase 2 study of first-line (1L) pembrolizumab (pembro) plus investigational agents and chemotherapy (chemo) for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC)

Abstract Background: ES-SCLC is an aggressive cancer with substantial mortality. Current 1L treatments include anti-PD-(L)1 + etoposide-platinum chemo (EP), but with minimal improvements in OS vs chemo. In the phase 3 KEYNOTE-604 study, pembro + EP significantly improved PFS (P = 0.0023) but not OS vs placebo + EP; ORR was also improved (71% vs 62%). We present data from the phase 2 KEYNOTE-B99 study (NCT04924101) of 1L pembro + investigational agents (MK-4830, anti-ILT4; boserolimab, anti-CD27; or lenvatinib), and EP for ES-SCLC. Methods: In this open-label platform study, patients (pts) were aged ≥18 y with previously untreated histologically or cytologically confirmed stage IV ES-SCLC (per AJCC v8) and ECOG PS 0 or 1. Pts were randomized 1:1:1 to receive MK-4830 800 mg Q3W (35 cycles; arm A), boserolimab 30 mg Q6W (18 cycles; arm B), or lenvatinib 8 mg (induction)/20 mg (maintenance) QD (arm C). All pts received pembro 200 mg Q3W (35 cycles) + etoposide 100 mg/m2 Q3W and cisplatin 75 mg/m2 Q3W or carboplatin AUC 5 mg/mL/min Q3W (4 cycles). Primary endpoints were ORR and PFS at 6 mo, both assessed per RECIST v1.1 by BICR. Secondary endpoints included DOR, PFS, OS, and safety. Results: 122 pts received ≥1 dose of study treatment (arm A, 43; B, 41; C, 38). At data cutoff (Sep 15, 2023), median follow-up was 14.1 (range, 6.1-25.7) mo. ORR was 65%, 71%, and 74% in arms A, B, and C, respectively; median DOR was 6.8, 4.7, and 7.1 mo. 6-mo PFS rates were 45%, 38%, and 54%, respectively (Table). AEs (any cause) occurred in 98% of pts in arm A and all pts in arms B and C; most commonly neutropenia and anemia. Serious AEs occurred in 30%, 37%, and 55%; grade ≥3 AEs in 86%, 83%, and 87% of pts; and grade 5 AEs in 5%, 7%, and 21%, respectively. Conclusions: 1L ES-SCLC treatment with pembro + EP and MK-4830, boserolimab, or lenvatinib was associated with similar antitumor activity as in KEYNOTE-604 with pembro + EP. No new safety signals were identified. TABLE 1. NAND Group A MK-4830 + Pembro + EP(n = 43) Group B boserolimab + Pembro + EP(n = 41) Group C Lenvatinib + Pembro + EP(n = 38) ORR (95% CI), % 65.1 (49.1-79.0) 70.7 (54.5-83.9) 73.7 (56.9-86.6) Median DOR (range), mo 6.8 (2.4-13.9) 4.7 (1.4+ to 16.4+) 7.1 (1.8 to 18.4+) PFS - 6-mo PFS rate (95% CI), % 45.2 (29.9-59.4) 37.8 (22.7-52.7) 54.2 (35.8-69.4) - Median PFS (95% CI), mo 5.5 (4.2-8.3) 5.5 (4.0-6.7) 7.2 (5.4-NR) Median OS (95% CI), mo 15.5 (8.3-NR) NR (13.2-NR) 15.8 (7.2-NR) ‘+’, no PD at the time of last disease assessment. NR, not reached. Citation Format: Delvys Rodríguez-Abreu, Maximillian Hochmair, Byoung Chul Cho, Tibor Csőszi, Talia Shentzer Kutiel, Veronika Müller, Myung-Ju Ahn, Dariusz Kowalski, Michele Maio, Vladimir Moiseyenko, Alejandro Navarro, Jianxin Niu, Andrea S. Fung, Carolin Lips, Heng Zhou, Bin Zhao, Humberto Lara-Guerra, Nir Peled. Results from KEYNOTE-B99: Phase 2 study of first-line (1L) pembrolizumab (pembro) plus investigational agents and chemotherapy (chemo) for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(7_Suppl):Abstract nr CT253.

Abstract CT155: Trial in progress: A phase Ia/Ib, an open-label, multicenter study of ZL-1310 to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics in subjects with small cell lung cancer

Abstract Background: ZL-1310, a novel antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) targeting delta-like protein 3 (DLL3) with a camptothecin derivative as its payload via a protease-cleavable linker, employs TMALIN® (Tumor Microenvironment Activable LINker-payload) ADC technology platform. DLL3, an inhibitory Notch pathway ligand and a validated target for directed therapy, is highly expressed in more than 80% of patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and also has variable expression in other neuroendocrine (NE) tumors. There remains an unmet medical need for 2nd-line SCLC, as the standard of care chemotherapy has a modest response rate of ~25%. ZL-1310 is designed to minimize payload toxicity and improve anti-tumor effectiveness. Methods: This is an open-label, multiple-dose, phase 1 study of ZL-1310 administered to subjects with relapsed/refractory (r/r) metastatic SCLC who have progressed after at least one platinum-based chemotherapy regimen. The study consists of two parts: Part 1 (dose escalation) and Part 2 (dose expansion). In Part 1, the Bayesian optimal interval (BOIN) design is employed for dose escalation, while in Part 2, patients will be randomized into two cohorts with different doses of ZL-1310 to further define safety and preliminary antitumor activity. The major inclusion criteria are as follows: (1) Subjects must have histologically or cytologically confirmed metastatic or extensive-stage SCLC with no more than 3 prior regimens in the r/r setting. (2) Subjects must have at least one measurable target lesion as defined by RECIST v1.1. (3) Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1. The major exclusion criteria include: (1) Prior exposure to DLL3-targeted therapy. (2) Subjects with symptomatic or uncontrolled brain metastasis requiring concurrent treatment, impaired major organ functions, active autoimmune disease, or active infections.Part 1 Dose Escalation is recruiting subjects in the US and China. Citation Format: Afshin Dowlati, Alexander Spira, Xiaodong Shen, Yinjia Fu, Yiyuan Pan, Linda Liu, Renke Zhou, Yi-Long Wu. Trial in progress: A phase Ia/Ib, an open-label, multicenter study of ZL-1310 to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics in subjects with small cell lung cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(7_Suppl):Abstract nr CT155.

Impact of immune-related adverse events on survival outcomes in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have recently become the standard of care in the first-line treatment of extensive-stage small cell lung cancer. Although immune-related adverse events have been reported to influence prognosis in non-small cell lung cancer patients, few studies have investigated the prognostic value of immune-related adverse events in small cell lung cancer patients. In this study, we evaluated the prognosis of patients who developed immune-related adverse events after first-line treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitor-based chemotherapy for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer. We enrolled 90 patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer who received immune checkpoint inhibitor-based chemotherapy as first-line treatment from September 2019 to December 2022 in six hospitals in Japan. The patients were categorized into groups with and without immune-related adverse events. There were 23 patients with and 67 without immune-related adverse events. Seventeen patients had grade 1-2 immune-related adverse events, and nine (including overlapping cases) had grade ≥3. The most frequent immune-related adverse event was a skin rash. The median survival time was 22 months in patients with immune-related adverse events and 9.3 months in patients without immune-related adverse events. The hazard ratio was 0.40 (95% confidence interval: 0.19-0.83, p = 0.013). The results of this study show that immune-related adverse events are associated with improved survival outcomes in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer.

Updated cost-effectiveness analysis of adebrelimab plus chemotherapy for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer in China

ObjectiveThe CAPSTONE-1 trial demonstrated that adebrelimab-based immunotherapy yielded a favourable survival benefit compared with chemotherapy for patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). This study aims to evaluate the...

Metabolic Tumor Volume as Significant Predictor for Chemotherapy Containing PD-L1 Blocker in Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Chemo-immunotherapy, including the programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) antibody, is an effective treatment for patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). However, no biomarker has been established for the prediction of chemo-immunotherapy. Therefore, we investigated the potential of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET) as a predictive marker. Forty-six patients with ES-SCLC who received 18F-FDG-PET immediately before combined platinum-based chemotherapy with PD-L1 blockade as a first-line treatment were eligible, and the maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax), metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) on 18F-FDG uptake were evaluated. PD-L1 and tumor infiltrative lymphocytes (TILs) were immunohistochemically analyzed in 36 of the 46 patients. A high MTV was significantly associated with poor performance status and low albumin levels, and there was a significant association between low albumin and high TLG. Univariate analysis identified sex, Brinkman index, and MTV as significant predictors of progression-free survival (PFS), and sex, SUVmax, MTV, and TLG as significant factors of overall survival (OS). Multivariate analysis revealed that sex, Brinkman index, and MTV were independent prognostic factors for PFS, and sex, SUVmax, MTV, and TLG were significant predictors of OS. SUVmax was significantly higher in patients with positive PD-L1 expression than in those with negative expression but was not significantly different between positive and negative TILs. Moreover, the levels of MTV and TLG were not closely associated with the levels of PD-L1 and TILs. MTV or TLG metabolic tumor activity is suitable for the prediction of chemo-immunotherapy outcomes in patients with ES-SCLC.

Prognostic value of pretreatment procalcitonin and neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer

ABSTRACT Background To investigate the influence of pretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and procalcitonin (PCT) on progression-free survival (PFS) in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients. Method A total of 100 extensive-stage SCLC patients were enrolled in our study. Patients were stratified according to the median values of pretreatment NLR and PCT levels: low NLR group (NLR ≤3.17), high NLR group (NLR＞3.17), low PCT group (PCT ≤0.06; ng/ml), high PCT group (PCT＞0.06; ng/ml). The Kaplan-Meier method and multivariable Cox regression model were used to reveal the prognostic effects of pretreatment NLR and PCT on PFS. Results The median PFS of the total extensive-stage SCLC patients was 6.0 months. The median PFS of low pretreatment NLR group (NLR ≤3.17) was not significantly different from that of high pretreatment NLR group (6.2 months vs 5.8 months; p = .675). Patients with low pretreatment PCT (PCT ≤0.06; ng/ml) had significantly better PFS than patients with high pretreatment PCT (PCT＞0.06; ng/ml) (6.9 months vs 5.7 months; p = .043). With the multivariable Cox regression analysis, the response to first-line chemotherapy (p ≤ .001) and pretreatment PCT (HR = 0.516; 95%CI 0.326–0.817; p = .005) were identified as independent factors associated with PFS. Conclusion Pretreatment PCT is an independent factor associated with PFS in extensive-stage SCLC patients treated with first-line chemotherapy, but pretreatment NLR reflects no significant prognostic value in our study.

A real-world multicentre evaluation of atezolizumab plus platinum-etoposide chemotherapy as first-line treatment in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer in Italy.

The aim of this study was to analyze real-life data from a cohort of adult patients receiving atezolizumab in combination with carboplatin and etoposide for first-line treatment of ES-SCLC, in order to assess relative dose intensity (RDI), time-to-treatment discontinuation (TTD), time-to-treatment failure (TTF), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) of treatments as well as the correlation between these outcomes. An observational retrospective study was conducted. All patients treated with atezolizumab combined with carboplatin and etoposide for first-line treatment of ES-SCLC were included. Median TTD, TTF, PFS and OS were calculated in our cohort of patient by the Kaplan Meier method. The curves obtained with the Kaplan Meier method of TTF and TTD are substantially similar, indicating a good concordance of the information extracted by the two different data sources. This tendency was confirmed also when the TTD versus PFS curves were compared. The median OS registered was 11.8 months. Patients with no liver metastases showed a longer median time of OS than patients with liver metastases. The mean value of RDI for the entire cohort was 87.4%. Our study showed that TTD, calculated from the administration data is a useful proxy of TTF as registered in the clinical chart. TTD is a real-world outcome that can be used to demonstrate the efficacy of drugs used for administered therapies. It can be used as an end point for RWE studies, where the evaluation is less structured and standardized.

Abstract 5098: Second-line treatment outcomes in Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer (ES-SCLC) patients after first-line immuno-chemotherapy

Abstract Background: First-line immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has significantly improved overall survival (OS) of ES-SCLC. However, second-line treatment options are still controversial with limited overall survival. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of different second-line regimens for relapsed ES-SCLC after first-line immuno-chemotherapy. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 96 ES-SCLC patients receiving first-line immuno-chemotherapy in Cancer Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, from Jan 2019 to Dec 2022. Clinical data were collected from electronic medical records. The clinical outcomes, including objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed by Kaplan-Meier method and standard log-rank test. Results: From January 4, 2019 to December 18, 2022, a total of 96 ES-SCLC patients received first-line immuno-chemotherapy and 49 of them went through second-line treatment in our center. Patient characteristics were listed as follows : median age 63 (31-79), male 76 (79.2%) , heavy smoker 59 (61.5%), liver metastasis 40 (41.7%), brain metastasis 33 (34.4%) and refractory recurrence 58 (60.4%). Second-line treatments included immunotherapy crossover and combination with chemotherapy (n=40), anlotinib with or without chemotherapy (n=5), chemotherapy alone (n=4). ORR of the whole group in the second-line setting was 22.4%. Median PFS was 3.23 months (95% CI 1.96-4.50). Cross-line immunotherapy failed to improved survival for relapsed ES-SCLC compared with those without ICIs ( mPFS 3.23 vs 3.13m, p=0.829). Anlotinib based treatment showed numerically superior PFS for relapsed SCLC compared with those without anlotinib therapy (mPFS 6.00 vs 3.13m, p=0.089). Conclusion: This retrospective study indicated cross-line ICIs failure to improve clinical outcome for relapsed ES-SCLC, and implied the potential benefits of anlotinib in second-line setting. Citation Format: Rui Wan, Linjie Fan, Jia Zhong, Jianchun Duan, Zhijie Wang, Xuezhi Hao, Jie Wang. Second-line treatment outcomes in Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer (ES-SCLC) patients after first-line immuno-chemotherapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 5098.

Abstract 7567: In-depth mass cytometry analysis reveals different immune cell composition of unique molecular subtypes in extensive stage small-cell lung cancer

Abstract Background: A novel molecular subtype classification was fashionable for small cell lung cancer (SCLC). However, the distribution of SCLC molecular subtype classification in Chinese patients were unknown, especially extensive stage (ES)-SCLC. It should validate and define their associated microenvironments across subtypes in ES-SCLC. Method: We used immunohistochemical (IHC) to evaluate SCLC markers of the subtypes including ASCL1, NEUROD1, POU2F3, SCLC-A/N/P in 135 ES-SCLC tumors. Peripheral blood of 24 ES-SCLC patients was test by mass cytometry using time-of-flight (CyTOF) to evaluate the differences in immune subsets regard to the subtype tumor microenvironment (TME). Validation was performed using flow cytometry and multiplex IF. Results: ASCL1, NEUROD1, POU2F3, and Inflamed were account for 60.7%, 28.9%, 7.4%, and 18.5% of SCLC tumors, respectively. Significant intratumoral heterogeneity was observed with 15.6% of the tumors being both positive for SCLC-A and -N subtype markers, respectively. The SCLC-I type possessed more CD8+ T-cells infiltration and had higher frequency an ‘inflamed’ immunophenotyped. CyTOF data showed greater CD161+CD127+CD8+T cells proportion in SCLC-I than SCLC-N subtypes before and after anti-immunotherapy. Furthermore, we validated that lung tissue of SCLC-I were infiltrated more CD161+CD127+CD8+T cells compared to SCLC-N subpopulation(P=0.0281). Flow cytometry further showed the stronger immune activation of CD161+CD127+CD8+T cells in SCLC-I types induced higher expression of GZMB and GNLY and lower-expression of T-cell exhaustion markers PD-1,TIGIT and LAG3 in comparison with SCLC-N types. We further confirmed that the high level of CD161+CD127+CD8+T associated with a favorable treatment response and prolonged overall survival. Conclusion: The present study validated the molecular subtypes in ES-SCLC patients. Furthermore, SCLC-I subtype has longer PFS and OS than SCLC-A, -N and -P patients. Our research not only provides an insight into the immune landscape of ES-SCLC but also sheds light on a special subset of CD161+CD127+CD8+T cells with prognostic and therapeutic significance. Citation Format: Yuekang Li, Jingjing Qu, Binggen Wu, Qian Shen, Wenjia Sun, Lijun Chen, Bo Wang, Lixiong Ying, Jianya Zhou, Jianying Zhou. In-depth mass cytometry analysis reveals different immune cell composition of unique molecular subtypes in extensive stage small-cell lung cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 7567.

Abstract 6390: Exploratory biomarker analysis of phase 3 ASTRUM-005 study: Serplulimab versus placebo plus chemotherapy for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer

Abstract Background First-line serplulimab plus chemotherapy (chemo) significantly improved OS compared with chemo alone for patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) in the phase 3 ASTRUM-005 study. In this exploratory biomarker analysis, we retrospectively evaluated the association of proteome signature, genetic mutations, and hematological indices with efficacy. Methods: Serum proteomics data were generated via Olink® Explore 3072 platform for 168 patients (training: 80; validation: 88). Genetic mutations were assessed by Med1CDxTM panel for 305 patients. Baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels were analyzed in all 585 patients. Clinical data cutoff date was June 13, 2022. Results: From Olink data, we generated a 15-protein signature. Results in the validation cohort are shown in the table below. Patients with upper signature score derived higher PFS (7.89 vs 4.17 mo, HR 0.37) and OS (17.18 vs 9.74 mo, HR 0.27) benefit from adding serplulimab, than those with lower signature score (PFS: 4.40 vs 4.34 mo, HR 0.68; OS: 9.05 vs 9.22 mo, HR 0.76). Patients with mutations in RB1 or NOTCH pathway had better tumor responses to the treatment of serplulimab-chemo (ORR: 80% and 86%, respectively) when compared to patients without mutations in RB1 or NOTCH pathway (ORR: 58% and 68%). Patients with NLR ≤4.6, PLR ≤338.3, and LDH ≤ upper limit of normal tended to have longer PFS and OS in both treatment groups; NLR and LDH were further proven to be independent prognostic biomarkers in multivariate regression (P = 0.002 and P <0.001, respectively). Conclusions: We found a 15-protein signature showing predictive power for serplulimab-chemo treatment; RB1 or NOTCH pathway mutations were enriched in serplulimab-chemo responders; baseline NLR and LDH were independent prognostic biomarkers for ES-SCLC. The above findings warrant further investigations. Serplulimab-chemo (n=48) Placebo-chemo (n=40) HR (95% CI) P Upper signature score, n 31 34 Median PFS (95% CI), months 7.89 (1.27, 10.74) 4.17 (2.96, 4.34) 0.37 (0.21, 0.66) <0.001 Median OS (95% CI), months 17.18 (11.01, NE) 9.74 (6.90, 12.65) 0.27 (0.15, 0.50) <0.001 Lower signature score, n 17 6 Median PFS (95% CI), months 4.40 (3.61, 5.75) 4.34 (2.66, NE) 0.68 (0.23, 2.02) 0.488 Median OS (95% CI), months 9.05 (6.67, 11.73) 9.22 (4.53, NE) 0.76 (0.29, 1.98) 0.570 Citation Format: Ying Cheng, Liang Han, Lin Wu, Jun Chen, Hongmei Sun, Guilan Wen, Yinghua Ji, Anastasia Zimina, Jianhua Shi, Zhijie Pan, Jinsheng Shi, Xicheng Wang, Fang Yang, Xinyi Yang, Mengkai Chen, Shiqi Zhong, Qingyu Wang, Jing Li, Jiancheng Cheng, Chen Ling, Yongqiang Shan, Jun Zhu, The ASTRUM-005 Study Group. Exploratory biomarker analysis of phase 3 ASTRUM-005 study: Serplulimab versus placebo plus chemotherapy for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 6390.

Tislelizumab Plus Platinum and Etoposide Versus Placebo Plus Platinum and Etoposide as First-Line Treatment for Extensive-Stage SCLC (RATIONALE-312): A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized, Phase 3 Clinical Trial

IntroductionExtensive-stage SCLC (ES-SCLC) prognosis remains poor. The phase 3 RATIONALE-312 study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tislelizumab plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for ES-SCLC. MethodsRATIONALE-312 is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, conducted in the People's Republic of China. Eligible patients with previously untreated ES-SCLC were randomized 1:1 to receive four cycles of tislelizumab 200 mg or placebo, with etoposide plus carboplatin or cisplatin intravenously every 3 weeks, followed by tislelizumab 200 mg or placebo as maintenance. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Secondary end points included progression-free survival and safety. ResultsBetween July 22, 2019 and April 21, 2021, 457 patients were randomized to tislelizumab (n = 227) or placebo (n = 230), plus chemotherapy. Baseline demographics were generally balanced between arms. At the data cutoff (April 19, 2023), the median study follow-up was 14.2 months (interquartile range: 8.6–25.3). Tislelizumab plus chemotherapy exhibited a statistically significant OS benefit versus placebo plus chemotherapy (stratified hazard ratio = 0.75 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.61–0.93]; one-sided p = 0.0040; median: 15.5 [95% CI: 13.5–17.1] versus 13.5 mo [95% CI: 12.1–14.9], respectively). Progression-free survival was significantly improved in the tislelizumab versus placebo arm (stratified hazard ratio = 0.64 [95% CI: 0.52–0.78]; p < 0.0001; median: 4.7 [95% CI: 4.3–5.5] versus 4.3 mo [95% CI: 4.2–4.4], respectively). Grade greater than or equal to 3 treatment-related adverse events were reported in 86% of patients in each treatment arm and were mostly hematologic. ConclusionsTislelizumab plus chemotherapy exhibited statistically significant clinical benefit and manageable safety compared with placebo plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment in patients with advanced ES-SCLC.

A Systemic Immune Inflammation Index and PD-L1 (SP142) Expression as a Potential Combined Biomarker of the Clinical Benefit of Chemo-Immunotherapy in Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

Background: No studies have identified combined biomarkers that may be more reasonable for the assessment of current chemo-immunotherapy in patients with extensive stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). Methods: This study was conducted to investigate a combined biomarker with prognostic or predictive value in ES-SCLC. We determined the best independent prognostic biomarker among the four complete blood-count-derived inflammatory biomarkers (CBC-IBs). Subsequently, we analyzed the prognostic or predictive value of combining this independent CBC-IB with PD-L1 (SP142) expression. We prospectively assessed the SP142 analyses in tumor samples at diagnosis. Results: All in all, 55 patients with ES-SCLC were classified into four groups according to the systemic immune inflammation index (SII) (low/high) and SP142 (positive/negative). The best survival was observed in the low-SII/ SP142-positive group, whereas the worst survival was observed in the high-SII/SP142-negative group (p = 0.002). The combined SII-SP142 biomarker was better for predicting both survival and disease progression in patients with ES-SCLC. Conclusions: The combined SII-SP142 biomarker can be readily and universally obtained at a low cost in clinical practice, without requiring advanced genomics technology or specialized expertise. Although further studies are needed to confirm that the combined SII-SP142 biomarker is widely applicable, it should help clinicians to identify the best patients for combined chemotherapy with atezolizumab in ES-SCLC.

Comparison of Effectiveness of Programmed Death Protein 1 and Programmed Death Ligand 1 Inhibitors in Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Observational Studies.

This meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy of programmed death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors and programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors in patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer. The present meta-analysis was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Relevant studies were identified through searches of databases including PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, as well as prominent oncology conferences. The search was conducted from the inception of the databases up to January 31, 2024. A total of 10 studies were included in this meta-analysis. Among these studies, six were randomized trials, while four were observational studies. The pooled meta-analysis showed that PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors are more effective in improving overall survival and progression-free survival compared to chemotherapy alone. However, when comparing PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors, there was no significant difference between the two groups regarding overall survival and progression-free survival. It is important to note that there is no head-to-head trial comparing these two interventions in patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer. Therefore, future prospective trials are needed to define optimal therapeutic approaches in this patient population.

197MO Final outcome, immunophenotypic and biomarker analysis of intercalated avelumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (PAVE): A pilot phase II study of the Hellenic co-operative oncology group

197MO Final outcome, immunophenotypic and biomarker analysis of intercalated avelumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (PAVE): A pilot phase II study of the Hellenic co-operative oncology group

203P Treatment patterns and real-world outcomes of extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: A retrospective, multicenter study

203P Treatment patterns and real-world outcomes of extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: A retrospective, multicenter study

196MO Anlotinib plus etoposide/carboplatin (EC) versus placebo plus EC in first-line therapy for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC): A randomized, double-blind, parallel controlled, phase III trial (ETER 701)

196MO Anlotinib plus etoposide/carboplatin (EC) versus placebo plus EC in first-line therapy for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC): A randomized, double-blind, parallel controlled, phase III trial (ETER 701)

199P Radiomics analysis predicts chemoimmunotherapy advantage over chemotherapy alone in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES SCLC)

199P Radiomics analysis predicts chemoimmunotherapy advantage over chemotherapy alone in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES SCLC)

Prognostic Nutritional Index Predicts Efficacy and Immune-Related Adverse Events of First-Line Chemoimmunotherapy in Patients with Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

Currently, there is a lack of well-established markers to predict the efficacy of chemoimmunotherapy in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), advanced lung cancer inflammation index (ALI) and prognostic nutritional index (PNI) are associated with prognosis in several tumors, whereas their predictive role in SCLC remains unclear. A retrospective study was conducted at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, involving extensive-stage SCLC (ES-SCLC) patients who received first-line chemoimmunotherapy between January 2020 and December 2021. Peripheral blood biomarkers were extracted from medical records and their correlation with prognosis and immune-related adverse events (IRAEs) was analyzed. A total of 114 patients were included. Patients with a low PLR, high ALI and high PNI had prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) compared to those with a high PLR, low ALI and low PNI. Patients with a low NLR, low PLR, high ALI and high PNI had prolonged overall survival (OS) compared to those with a high NLR, high PLR, low ALI and low PNI. Cox regression model showed that PNI was an independent risk factor for both PFS and OS. ROC curve showed that PNI outperforms NLR, PLR and ALI in predicting both PFS and OS. The PNI-based nomogram demonstrated strong predictive capability for both PFS and OS. In addition, there was a significant correlation between PNI and IRAEs. A high baseline PNI might be associated with improved prognosis and the occurrence of IRAEs in ES-SCLC patients treated with first-line chemoimmunotherapy.

Efficacy and safety of thoracic radiotherapy in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer patients receiving first-line immunotherapy plus chemotherapy: a propensity score matched multicentre retrospective analysis

BackgroundPlatinum-etoposide chemotherapy combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has been recommended as the first-line standard treatment for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). However, the effect of thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) on these patients is still unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TRT for ES-SCLC patients who responded to first-line ICIs and chemotherapy (CHT).MethodsPatients who received 4 to 6 cycles of ICIs and CHT as first-line therapy at three hospitals between 2018 and 2022 were included in the analysis. All patients were divided into two groups based on whether they received TRT as first-line treatment, and propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to ensure that the characteristics of two groups were well-balanced. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoint was toxic effects.ResultsA total of 276 patients were included, and the median follow-up time was 22.3 (range, 4.0-53.73) months. After PSM, 197 patients were further analysed, and 99 of whom received TRT. The baseline characteristics were well-balanced between patients in the TRT and non-TRT groups. There were significant differences in PFS between the TRT and non-TRT groups, with the median PFS of 10.76 and 7.63 months, respectively (P = 0.014). Significantly improved OS was observed in the TRT group (21.67 vs. 16.6 months, P = 0.009). In addition, the use of TRT was an independent prognostic factor for PFS and OS of ES-SCLC patients receiving ICIs plus CHT. In terms of safety, no significant increase of any grades adverse event (AE) (P = 0.874) and G3-4 AE (P = 0.909) was observed for patients receiving TRT. Radiation esophagitis, gastrointestinal and hematologic toxicities were the most common AEs in TRT group, which were tolerable. And high-dose radiotherapy was associated with higher incidence of pneumonitis.ConclusionAddition of TRT showed significant survival benefits and well tolerability in ES-SCLC patients receiving platinum-etoposide CHT and ICIs, which could be a feasible first-line treatment strategy for ES-SCLC patients.

Atezolizumab Plus Carboplatin and Etoposide in Patients with Untreated Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Interim Results of the MAURIS Phase IIIb Trial.

MAURIS is an Italian multicenter, open-label, phase IIIb ongoing trial, aiming at evaluating the safety and effectiveness of atezolizumab + carboplatin/etoposide in patients with newly diagnosed, extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). The primary objective is the safety evaluation. Patients received atezolizumab + carboplatin/etoposide Q3W for 4-6 cycles in the induction phase, followed by atezolizumab maintenance Q3W. We presented the interim analysis on safety (referring to the induction phase) and clinical effectiveness, in all patients (N = 154) and in subgroups that received ≤3 (N = 23), 4 (N = 43), and 5-6 cycles (N = 89) of induction. At a median follow-up of 10.5 months, 139 patients (90.3%) discontinued treatment. Serious adverse events occurred in 29.9% of patients overall, and the rate was lower in patients with 5-6 cycles (19.1%) than in those with 4 (34.9%) or ≤3 (63.6%) cycles. Immune-mediated adverse events were reported in 14.9%, 15.7%, 11.6%, and 18.2% of patients, overall and by subgroup, respectively. The median overall survival and progression-free survival were 10.7 and 5.5 months, respectively. Overall, 111 patients (71.6%) had a tumor response. Interim results provide further evidences about safety and efficacy profile of atezolizumab + carboplatin/etoposide treatment in a ES-SCLC patient population closer to that observed in clinical practice. Eudract No. 2019-001146-17, NCT04028050.