Extended Criteria Donors Research Articles

Outcomes of Lung Transplant Candidates Aged ≥70 Years During the Lung Allocation Score Era

BackgroundWith the increasing age of lung transplant candidates, we studied waitlist and posttransplantation outcomes of candidates ≥70 years during the Lung Allocation Score era. MethodsAdult lung transplant candidates from 2005 to 2020 in the United Network for Organ Sharing database were included and stratified on the basis of age at listing into 18 to 59 years old, 60 to 69 years old, and ≥70 years old. Baseline characteristics, waitlist outcomes, and posttransplantation outcomes were assessed. ResultsA total of 37,623 candidates were included (52.3% aged 18-59 years, 40.6% aged 60-69 years, 7.1% aged ≥70 years). Candidates ≥70 years were more likely than younger candidates to receive a transplant (81.9% vs 72.7% [aged 60-69 years] vs 61.6% [aged 18-59 years]) and less likely to die or to deteriorate on the waitlist within 1 year (9.1% vs 10.1% [aged 60-69 years] vs 12.2% [aged 18-59 years]; P < .001). Donors for older recipients were more likely to be extended criteria (75.7% vs 70.1% [aged 60-69 years] vs 65.7% [aged 18-59 years]; P < .001). Recipients ≥70 years were found to have lower rates of acute rejection (6.7% vs 7.4% [aged 60-69 years] vs 9.2% [aged 18-59 years]; P < .001) and prolonged intubation (21.7% vs 27.4% [aged 60-69 years] vs 34.5% [aged 18-59 years]; P < .001). Recipients aged ≥70 years had increased 1-year (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.19 [95% CI, 1.06-1.33]; P < .001), 3-year (aHR, 1.28 [95% CI, 1.18-1.39]; P < .001), and 5-year mortality (aHR, 1.29 [95% CI, 1.21-1.38]; P < .001) compared with recipients aged 60 to 69 years. ConclusionsCandidates ≥70 years had favorable waitlist and perioperative outcomes despite increased use of extended criteria donors. Careful selection of candidates and postoperative surveillance may improve posttransplantation survival in this population.

Prolonged Normothermic Machine Perfusion: Buying More Time for Liver Graft Assessment and Repair.

Prolonged Normothermic Machine Perfusion: Buying More Time for Liver Graft Assessment and Repair.

The Year in Cardiothoracic Transplant Anesthesia: Selected Highlights From 2021 Part II: Cardiac Transplantation

This article spotlights the research highlights of this year that specifically pertain to the specialty of anesthesia for heart transplantation. This includes the research on recent developments in the selection and optimization of donors and recipients, including the use of donation after cardiorespiratory death and extended criteria donors, the use of mechanical circulatory support and nonmechanical circulatory support as bridges to transplantation, the effect of COVID-19 on heart transplantation candidates and recipients, and new advances in the perioperative management of these patients, including the use of echocardiography and postoperative outcomes, focusing on renal and cerebral outcomes.

Evaluation of the efficacy of HEMO2life®, a marine OXYgen carrier for Organ Preservation (OxyOp2) in renal transplantation: study protocol for a multicenter randomized trial

BackgroundPreventing ischemia‒reperfusion injury (IRI) is a major issue in kidney transplantation, particularly for transplant recipients receiving a kidney from extended criteria donors (ECD). The main consequence of IRI is delayed graft function (DGF). Hypoxia is one of the key factors in IRI, suggesting that the use of an oxygen carrier as an additive to preservation solution may be useful. In the OxyOp trial, we showed that the organs preserved using the oxygen carrier HEMO2life® displayed significantly less DGF. In the OxyOp2 trial, we aim to definitively test and quantify the efficacy of HEMO2life® for organ preservation in a large population of kidney grafts.MethodsOxyOp2 is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, comparative, single-blinded, parallel-group study versus standard of care in renal transplantation. After the selection of a suitable donor according to the inclusion/exclusion criteria, both kidneys will be used in the study. Depending on the characteristics of the donor, both kidneys will be preserved either in static cold storage (standard donors) or on machine perfusion (for ECD and deceased-after-cardiac-death donors (DCD)). The kidneys resulting from one donor will be randomized: one to the standard-of-care arm (organ preserved in preservation solution routinely used according to the local practice) and the other to the active treatment arm (HEMO2life® on top of routinely used preservation solution). HEMO2life® will be used for ex vivo graft preservation at a dose of 1 g/l preservation solution. The primary outcome is the occurrence of DGF, defined as the need for renal replacement therapy during the first week after transplantation.DiscussionThe use of HEMO2life® in preservation solutions is a novel approach allowing, for the first time, the delivery of oxygen to organs. Improving graft survival by limiting ischemic lesions is a major public-health goal in the field of organ transplantation.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT04181710. registered on November 29, 2019.

Impact of Hypothermic Oxygenated Machine Perfusion on Hepatocellular Carcinoma Recurrence after Liver Transplantation.

Machine perfusion may be able to mitigate ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI), which increases hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence after liver transplantation (LT). This study aimed to investigate the impact of dual-hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion (D-HOPE) on HCC recurrence in LT. A single-center retrospective study was conducted from 2016 to 2020. Pre- and postoperative data of HCC patients undergoing LT were analyzed. Recipients of a D-HOPE-treated graft were compared to those of livers preserved using static cold storage (SCS). The primary endpoint was recurrence-free survival (RFS). Of 326 patients, 246 received an SCS-preserved liver and 80 received a D-HOPE-treated graft (donation after brain death (DBD), n = 66; donation after circulatory death (DCD), n = 14). Donors of D-HOPE-treated grafts were older and had higher BMI. All DCD donors were treated by normothermic regional perfusion and D-HOPE. The groups were comparable in terms of HCC features and estimated 5-year RFS according to the Metroticket 2.0 model. D-HOPE did not reduce HCC recurrence (D-HOPE 10%; SCS 8.9%; p = 0.95), which was confirmed using Bayesian model averaging and inverse probability of treatment weighting-adjusted RFS analysis. Postoperative outcomes were comparable between groups, except for lower AST and ALT peak in the D-HOPE group. In this single-center study, D-HOPE did not reduce HCC recurrence but allowed utilizing livers from extended criteria donors with comparable outcomes, improving access to LT for patients suffering from HCC.

Nanoparticle-Based Interventions for Liver Transplantation.

Liver transplantation is the only treatment for hepatic insufficiency as a result of acute and chronic liver injuries/pathologies that fail to recover. Unfortunately, there remains an enormous and growing gap between organ supply and demand. Although recipients on the liver transplantation waitlist have significantly higher mortality, livers are often not allocated because they are (i) classified as extended criteria or marginal livers and (ii) subjected to longer cold preservation time (>6 h) with a direct correlation of poor outcomes with longer cold ischemia. Downregulating the recipient's innate immune response to successfully tolerate a graft having longer cold ischemia times or ischemia-reperfusion injury through induction of immune tolerance in the graft and the host would significantly improve organ utilization and post-transplant outcomes. Broadly, technologies proposed for development aim to extend the life of the transplanted liver through post-transplant or recipient conditioning. In this review, we focus on the potential benefits of nanotechnology to provide unique pre-transplant grafting and recipient conditioning of extended criteria donor livers using immune tolerance induction and hyperthermic pre-conditioning.

Evaluating the Impact of Ex-Vivo Lung Perfusion on Organ Transplantation: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Ex-vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) sustains and allows advanced assessment of potentially useable donor lungs prior to transplantation, potentially relieving resource constraints. We sought to characterize the effect of EVLP on organ utilization and patient outcomes. We performed a retrospective, before-after cohort study using linked institutional data sources of adults wait-listed for lung transplant and donor organs transplanted in Ontario, Canada between 2005-2019. We regressed the annual number of transplants against year, EVLP use, and organ characteristics. Time-to-transplant, waitlist mortality, primary graft dysfunction, tracheostomy insertion, in-hospital mortality, and chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) were evaluated using propensity score-weighted regression. EVLP availability (P=0.01 for interaction) and EVLP use (P<0.001 for interaction) were both associated with steeper increases in transplantation than expected by historical trends. EVLP was associated with more donation after circulatory death (DCD) and extended-criteria donors transplanted, while the numbers of standard-criteria donors remained relatively stable. Significantly faster time-to-transplant was observed after EVLP was available (hazard ratio [HR] 1.64 [1.41-1.92]; P<0.001). Fewer patients died on the waitlist after EVLP was available, but no difference in the hazard of waitlist mortality was observed (HR 1.19 [0.81-1.74]; P=0.176). We observed no difference in the likelihood of CLAD before versus after EVLP was available. We observed a significant increase in organ transplantation since EVLP was introduced into practice, predominantly from increased acceptance of DCD and extended-criteria lungs. Our findings suggest that EVLP-associated increases in organ availability meaningfully alleviated some barriers to transplant.

Lungs From Donors ≥70Years of Age for Transplantation-Do Long-Term Outcomes Justify Their Use?

Donor shortages have led transplant centers to extend their criteria for lung donors. Accepting lung donors ≥70years of age has previously shown good short-term outcomes; however, no mid- and long-term outcome data on these extended criteria donors has been published to date. In this study, all patients who underwent lung transplantation between 06/2010 and 12/2019 were included in the analysis, and the outcomes were compared between patients receiving organs from donors <70years of age and patients transplanted with lungs from donors ≥70years of age. Among the 1,168 lung-transplanted patients, 62 patients received lungs from donors ≥70years of age. The recipient age of those receiving older organs was significantly higher, and they were more likely to suffer from obstructive lung disease. Older donors were exposed to significantly shorter periods of mechanical ventilation prior to donation, had higher Horowitz indices, and were less likely to have smoked. The postoperative time on mechanical ventilation, time on ICU, and total hospital stay were comparable. The overall survival as well as CLAD-free survival showed no differences between both groups in the follow-up period. Utilization of lungs from donors ≥70years of age leads to excellent mid- and long-term results that are similar to organs from younger donors when the organs from older donors are carefully preselected.

(50) Recipient Outcomes with Extended Criteria Donors: An Analysis of the Guardian Heart Registry

(50) Recipient Outcomes with Extended Criteria Donors: An Analysis of the Guardian Heart Registry

Postoperative Outcomes in 415 Patients Following Liver Transplantation Using Extended Donor Criteria: A Study from a Single Center in Germany.

BACKGROUND Because of the massive organ shortage worldwide, marginal organs are increasingly being considered. The aim of this study was to present a comprehensive analysis of donor-related factors clinically supposed to influence the outcome after liver transplantation. This study from a single center in Germany aimed to evaluate postoperative outcomes in 415 patients following liver transplantation using extended donor criteria. MATERIAL AND METHODS Extended donor criteria (EDC) were considered according to the official guidelines issued through the German Medical Association. Other factors and the Eurotransplant Donor Risk Index (ET-DRI) were also considered. Correlation studies, logistic regression, and Kaplan-Meier-estimator were used to evaluate the outcome. RESULTS The postoperative outcomes with or without EDC were comparable. Other factors had an impact on early allograft failure (EAD), including male donors (χ²=14.135, P=0.0001). Other donor-unrelated factors, like cold ischemia time, also had an impact on EAD (r=0.135, P=0.010), especially in patients with model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) <25 (ß=0.001, P=0.008). ET-DRI was a crucial factor in estimating overall and allograft survival after liver transplantation. CONCLUSIONS The findings from this study support the possibility of liver transplantation using organs obtained by EDC. Other factors, like donor sex and cold ischemic time, are not part of the EDC, although they have an impact on EAD. Organs obtained by EDC continue to be an option to address the organ shortage.

How Can Machine Perfusion Change the Paradigm of Liver Transplantation for Patients with Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma?

Perihilar cholangiocarcinomas (pCCA) are rare yet aggressive tumors originating from the bile ducts. While surgery remains the mainstay of treatment, only a minority of patients are amenable to curative resection, and the prognosis of unresectable patients is dismal. The introduction of liver transplantation (LT) after neoadjuvant chemoradiation for unresectable pCCA in 1993 represented a major breakthrough, and it has been associated with 5-year survival rates consistently >50%. Despite these encouraging results, pCCA has remained a niche indication for LT, which is most likely due to the need for stringent candidate selection and the challenges in preoperative and surgical management. Machine perfusion (MP) has recently been reintroduced as an alternative to static cold storage to improve liver preservation from extended criteria donors. Aside from being associated with superior graft preservation, MP technology allows for the safe extension of preservation time and the testing of liver viability prior to implantation, which are characteristics that may be especially useful in the setting of LT for pCCA. This review summarizes current surgical strategies for pCCA treatment, with a focus on unmet needs that have contributed to the limited spread of LT for pCCA and how MP could be used in this setting, with a particular emphasis on the possibility of expanding the donor pool and improving transplant logistics.

Ex-Vivo Preservation of Heart Allografts—An Overview of the Current State

As heart transplantation continues to be the gold-standard therapy for end-stage heart failure, the supply-demand imbalance of available organs worsens. Until recently, there have been no advances in increasing the donor pool, as prolonged cold ischemic time excludes the use of certain donors. The TransMedics Organ Care System (OCS) allows for ex-vivo normothermic perfusion, which allows for a reduction of cold ischemic time and allows for long-distance procurements. Furthermore, the OCS allows for real-time monitoring and assessment of allograft quality, which can be crucial for extended-criteria donors or donation after cardiac death (DCD) donors. Conversely, the XVIVO device allows for hypothermic perfusion to preserve allografts. Despite their limitations, these devices have the potential to alleviate the supply-demand imbalance in donor availability.

Predictive value of portal fibrosis and inflammation in transplanted liver grafts treated with hypothermic oxygenated perfusion.

Hypothermic oxygenated perfusion (HOPE) has become widespread for the preservation of liver grafts, making tangled the relationship among the use of extended criteria donors (ECD), graft histology and transplant outcome. To prospectively validate the impact of the graft histology on transplant outcome in recipient receiving liver grafts from ECD after HOPE. Ninety-three ECD grafts were prospectively enrolled; 49 (52.7 %) were perfused with HOPE according to our protocols. All clinical, histological and follow-up data were collected. Grafts with portal fibrosis stage ≥3 according to Ishak's (evaluated with Reticulin stain) had a significantly higher incidence of early allograft dysfunction (EAD) and 6-month-dysfunction (p=0.026 and p=0.049), with more days in Intensive Care Unit (p=0.050). Lobular fibrosis correlated with post-liver transplant kidney function (p=0.019). Moderate-to-severe chronic portal inflammation was correlated with graft survival on both multivariate and univariate analyses (p<0.001), but this risk factor is sensibly reduced by the execution of HOPE. The use of liver grafts with portal fibrosis stage ≥3 implies a higher risk of post-transplant complications. Portal inflammation represents an important prognostic factor as well, but the execution of HOPE represents a valid tool to improve graft survival.

Introduction: Pushing the boundaries in liver transplantation

Liver disease is a major cause of mortality worldwide and liver transplantation remains the most effective therapeutic modality for the treatment of decompensated cirrhosis, acute liver failure, and small HCC. The field of liver transplantation has dramatically evolved over the past 50 years from an experimental endeavor to a highly successful life-saving procedure for patients with sustained irreversible liver injury. Advances in surgical technique, perioperative and postoperative management, and immunosuppression provided for increased application of liver transplantation with excellent 1-year survival rates reaching 90%. However, the ubiquity of liver transplantation has created its own unique challenges including determining patient eligibility and the shortage of deceased donor organs. The allocation of organs is predicated upon the fine balance between utility and justice. Applying these principles shapes public policy related to patient selection and organ allocation. Candidate selection is increasingly important when optimizing the selection of the recipients who would derive the most benefit from liver transplantation given the scarcity of organs. The trend toward viable organ donation scarcity continues while there has been exponential growth in the number of transplant candidates over the same period of time. The ever-expanding wait list registry reflects the rising tide of NAFLD, specifically the more advanced form, NASH, and alcohol-associated liver disease. Furthermore, ground-breaking success in liver transplantation for hepatic and biliary malignancies paved a path for reaching even more candidates. As perioperative and postoperative management continues to improve, those being considered for liver transplantation have more comorbidities including obesity, diabetes mellitus, and cardiovascular disease. Despite the growing number of potential recipients, the pool of donor organs is failing to keep pace and poses a highly challenging global problem. The mismatch between supply and demand requires the transplant community to ration already limited liver allografts and continually reassess allocation policies based on need versus survival benefit. Efforts were made to expand the pool of potential donors, including utilization of extended criteria donors and donation after cardiac death. Nevertheless, there remains a scarcity of organs. In recent years, the increasing application of living donor liver transplantation has helped mitigate the organ shortage. But this practice is still fraught with contentious elements that have hindered extensive implementation. We are in a new era of liver transplantation. As a transplant community, we must pioneer not only the rising obesity and alcohol epidemics but also successfully manage our aging population while minimizing waitlist mortality. The need for more innovative practices is upon us. In this Clinical Liver Disease series, “Pushing the Boundaries in Liver Transplantation,” the authors review select challenging indications for liver transplantation, the currently accepted practices, and innovative ways that endeavor to expand the reach of liver transplantation.

Extended criteria brain-dead organ donors: Prevalence and impact on the utilisation of livers for transplantation in Brazil.

Despite its association with higher postoperative morbidity and mortality, the use of extended criteria donor (ECD) livers for transplantation has increased globally due to the high demand for the procedure. To investigate the prevalence of ECD in donation after brain death (DBD) and its impact on organ acceptance for transplantation. Retrospective analysis of DBD organ offers for liver transplantation between 2017 and 2020 in a high-volume transplant centre. The incidence of the Eurotransplant risk factors to define an ECD (ET-ECD) among DBD donors and the likelihood of organ acceptance over the years were analysed. The relationship between organ refusal for transplantation, the occurrence, and the number of ET-ECD was assessed by simple and multiple logistic regression adjustment. A total of 1619 organ donors were evaluated. Of these, 78.31% (n = 1268) had at least one ET-ECD criterion. There was an increase in the acceptance of ECD DBD organs for transplantation (1 criterion: from 23.40% to 31.60%; 2 criteria: from 13.10% to 27.70%; 3 criteria: From 6.30% to 13.60%). For each addition of one ET-ECD variable, the estimated chance of organ refusal was 64.4% higher (OR 1.644, 95%CI 1.469-1.839, P < 0.001). Except for the donor serum sodium > 165 mmol/L (P = 0.310), all ET-ECD criteria increased the estimated chance of organ refusal for transplantation. A high prevalence of ECD DBD was observed. Despite the increase in their utilisation, the presence and the number of extended donor criteria were associated with an increased likelihood of their refusal for transplantation.

Declined Organs for Liver Transplantation: A Right Decision or a Missed Opportunity for Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma?

Liver transplantation is the only promising treatment for end-stage liver disease and patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. However, too many organs are rejected for transplantation. We analyzed the factors involved in organ allocation in our transplant center and reviewed all livers that were declined for transplantation. Reasons for declining organs for transplantation were categorized as major extended donor criteria (maEDC), size mismatch and vascular problems, medical reasons and risk of disease transmission, and other reasons. The fate of the declined organs was analyzed. 1086 declined organs were offered 1200 times. A total of 31% of the livers were declined because of maEDC, 35.5% because of size mismatch and vascular problems, 15.8% because of medical reasons and risk of disease transmission, and 20.7% because of other reasons. A total of 40% of the declined organs were allocated and transplanted. A total of 50% of the organs were completely discarded, and significantly more of these grafts had maEDC than grafts that were eventually allocated (37.5% vs. 17.7%, p < 0.001). Most organs were declined because of poor organ quality. Donor-recipient matching at time of allocation and organ preservation must be improved by allocating maEDC grafts using individualized algorithms that avoid high-risk donor-recipient combinations and unnecessary organ declination.

Use of extended criteria donor hearts in combined heart-kidney transplant confers greater risk of mortality

Extended criteria donors (ECD) hearts have demonstrated acceptable outcomes in select populations. However, their use in patients undergoing simultaneous heart-kidney transplantation (SHKT) has not been explored. This study is assessed the effect of ECD hearts in patients undergoing SHKT vs isolated heart transplants (IHT). The United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database was queried for all adult patients undergoing IHT and SHKT. Patients were stratified by receipt of ECD heart, defined as donor hearts failing to meet established acceptable use criteria. Interaction effects between ECDs and simultaneous kidney transplants were generated. Postoperative outcomes, risk factors, and patient/graft survival were compared across cohorts using Fine-Gray, Kaplan Meier, and Cox Proportional Hazards analyses. Among 26,207 patients included, 1,766 (7%) underwent SHKT. ECD hearts were used in 25% of both IHT and SHKT cohorts. Five-year survival among SHKT/ECD patients (67.3%) was reduced (p < 0.01) compared to SHKT/SDC (80.3%), IHT/ECD (78.1%) and IHT/SCD (80.0%) groups. Among SHKT patients, use of ECD hearts was associated with increased risk (SHR: 1.48; p < 0.01) of renal graft failure compared to SCD hearts. Among SHKT patients, receipt of an ECD heart, and individual ECD criteria (coronary disease and size mismatch >20%), predicted mortality. The interaction effect of receiving both ECD and SHKT predicted mortality and graft failure (HR 1.43; p < 0.01). Patients undergoing SHKT with an ECD heart face greater risks of mortality and graft failure in comparison to those undergoing IHT with ECD hearts. Careful selection of donor organs should be applied to this high-risk cohort.

Ascending aorta cannulation for isolated liver procurement in extended criteria donors: a safe option in case of massive infrarenal aortic atherosclerosis.

The chronic organ shortage and the increased number of patients on the waiting list for liver transplantation have led to a progressive increase in the use of extended criteria donors. Nowadays more and more overweight donors with several comorbidities are selected for donation providing acceptable patient and liver graft survival. These donors have often aortic atherosclerosis which can spare the hepatic artery making suitable the liver for procurement. Massive aortic atherosclerosis localized to infrarenal aorta can challenge aortic cannulation for organ cooling. We herein describe in a stepwise approach the aortic cannulation realized at the ascending aorta level in case of massive infrarenal aortic atherosclerosis in ECD donors. This technique represents a safe option when abdominal aorta is not suitable for cannulation and it should be included into the surgical armamentarium of liver transplant surgeon.

The role of normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) in the preservation of ex-vivo liver before transplantation: A review.

The discrepancy between the number of patients awaiting liver transplantation and the number of available donors has become a key issue in the transplant setting. There is a limited access to liver transplantation, as a result, it is increasingly dependent on the use of extended criteria donors (ECD) to increase the organ donor pool and address rising demand. However, there are still many unknown risks associated with the use of ECD, among which preservation before liver transplantation is important in determining whether patients would experience complications survive after liver transplantation. In contrast to traditional static cold preservation of donor livers, normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) may reduce preservation injury, improve graft viability, and potentially ex vivo assessment of graft viability before transplantation. Data seem to suggest that NMP can enhance the preservation of liver transplantation to some extent and improve the early outcome after transplantation. In this review, we provided an overview of NMP and its application in ex vivo liver preservation and pre-transplantation, and we summarized the data from current clinical trials of normothermic liver perfusion.

Lung Transplant Outcome From Selected Older Donors (≥70 Years) Equals Younger Donors (

To describe our experience with lung transplantation (LTx) from donors ≥70 years and compare short and long-term outcomes to a propensity-matched cohort of donors <70 years. Although extended-criteria donors have been widely used to enlarge the donor pool, the experience with LTx from older donors (≥70 years) remains limited. All single-center bilateral LTx between 2010 and 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Matching (1:1) was performed for the donor (type, sex, smoking history, x-ray abnormalities, partial pressure of oxygen/fraction of inspired oxygen ratio, and time on ventilator) and recipient characteristics (age, sex, LTx indication, perioperative extracorporeal life support, and cytomegalovirus mismatch). Primary graft dysfunction grade-3, 5-year patient, and chronic lung allograft dysfunction-free survival were analyzed. Out of 647 bilateral LTx, 69 were performed from donors ≥70 years. The mean age in the older donor cohort was 74 years (range: 70-84 years) versus 49 years (range: 12-69 years) in the matched younger group. No significant differences were observed in the length of ventilatory support, intensive care unit, or hospital stay. Primary graft dysfunction-3 was 26% in the older group versus 29% in younger donor recipients ( P = 0.85). Reintervention rate was comparable (29% vs 16%; P = 0.10). Follow-up bronchoscopy revealed no difference in bronchial anastomotic complications ( P = 1.00). Five-year patient and chronic lung allograft dysfunction-free survivals were 73.6% versus 73.1% ( P = 0.72) and 51.5% versus 59.2% ( P = 0.41), respectively. LTx from selected donors ≥70 years is feasible and safe, yielding comparable short and long-term outcomes in a propensity-matched analysis with younger donors (<70 years).