Abstract Extended basis set calculations have been performed for ClF and ClF3 using the CPF method, a size consistent modification of the Cl(SD), to clarify discrepancies between experiment and previous computations. Good agreement is found for ClF for the large 3d2flg polarization basis: re = 163 pm (exp: 162.8). De = 2.45 eV (2.67). μe = 0.85 D (0.89). ΔE for the reaction 1 2 F2 + 1 2 Cl2 ⇌ ClF is already accurate on the 2dlf level: ΔE = −53.7 kJ mol−1 (−56.0). Correlation effects involving the 2s orbital of F are shown to be non-negligible. Agreement is slightly poorer for ClF3, since only the 2dlf basis could be used: reeq = 160.7 pm (159.7), reax = 171 pm (169.8). ∠FClF = 87.1° (87.3°). The computation of ΔE (ClF3 ⇌ ClF+F2) turned out to be difficult: ΔE = 59.3 kJ mol−1 (113) on the 2dlf level. Various extensions of the basis lead to improvements of a few kJ mol−1 each, the estimate for the 3d2flg basis is ΔE ⋍ 80 kJ mol−1. The remaining discrepancy to experiment is attributed to incomplete error cancellation within CPF arising from the very different binding in ClF3 (three-centre-four-electron bonding) as compared to ClF and F2.
Read full abstract