e17559 Background: Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is the most lethal gynecological malignancy, with the presence of chemoresistance contributing to the poor prognosis. Approximately 80% of cases are diagnosed in stage III C and are treated with cytoreduction surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. However, 70 percent of these patients have pelvic and peritoneal recurrences. Heat Shock Proteins are produced in response to pathophysiological stress and take part in several stages of carcinogenesis, acting primarily as anti-apoptotic agents. They are also implicated in resistance to chemotherapy in several types of tumors. In an attempt to improve oncological results, new therapeutic approaches such as intraperitoneal chemotherapy and HIPEC have been proposed in recent studies with gains in overall survival (OS). However, some questions have not yet been answered. Methods: in the study cultures of ovarian cancer cells were performed TOV-21G (clear cell carcinoma), SK-OV-3 (platinum-resistant serous carcinoma) and OV-90 (high-grade serous). Cell cytotoxicity (MTT) assay was performed. The ovarian cancer cells lines were treated with cisplatin in normothermia (37 degrees Celsius) and cisplatin in hyperthermia (41 degrees Celsius) and a control group treated with PBS saline solution at (37 degrees Celsius and 41 degrees Celsius) for 24 hours followed by new supplementation and a new 3-hours incubation. Clonogenic assay was performed. Then they were submitted to RNA extraction and reverse transcription. qRT-PCR was performed to compare the expression of TRAP1, HSPB1, HSPD1, HSPA1A, HSPA1L and ERCC1 in different treatments. Results: There was no statistical difference in relation to cytotoxicity between treatment with heated cisplatin compared to treatment with normothermia. It was not possible to evaluate the expression of the heat shock genes in the SK-OV3 lineage.The HSPB1, HSPD1, TRAP1 and ERCCC1 genes were positively regulated in OV-90 submitted to hyperthermia in relation to normothermia and there were no significant changes in expression in the TOV-21-G. Conclusions: In conclusion, we suggest that OV-90 Serous ovarian cancer cell line was more susceptibly at hyperthermia by cisplatin. The HSPA1A, HSPA1L, TRAP1 and HSPB1 heat shock genes and ERCC1 genes were upregulated in the heated cisplatin group and contribute to a poor prognosis related to resistance. The HSPB1 and ERCC1 genes had the greatest expression with 1000x higher.Thus, it is necessary to evaluate these genes in a clinical study of HIPEC.
Read full abstract