Expression Of Contextual Fear Research Articles

Mechanisms of action of midazolam on expression of contextual fear in rats

Midazolam may suppress conditioned fear after an aversive event by disrupting the memory trace formed during conditioning, by altering the emotional part of the aversive event, or by the combination of both effects. The purpose of the present study was to determine whether affective-related processes contribute to the amnesic-like effects of midazolam on aversive events. The effects of acute administration of low doses of midazolam (0.37-3 mg kg(-1)) on fear conditioning (association between a neutral context and an aversive stimulus) and on innate anxiety in fearful surroundings were examined in rats. The effect of midazolam on the deleterious consequences of pre-exposure to the context (a non-aversive event) for subsequent fear conditioning was then compared with its effect on fear conditioning. The role of midazolam as an affective context was assessed by performing the testing phase under midazolam. Possible locomotor impairment or long-term effects of midazolam were controlled in additional experiments. Midazolam reduced both contextual fear conditioning and spontaneous fear. The deleterious effect of midazolam on pre-exposure to the context was of the same magnitude as its effect on the acquisition phase of fear conditioning. The effects of midazolam on both pre-exposure to the context and fear conditioning were unchanged when rats received a second injection of midazolam before the retention phase. Low doses of midazolam that do not impair locomotion suppress conditioned fear to the context by acting on memory processes rather than on affective or anxiolytic processes.

Contextual fear discrimination is impaired by damage to the postrhinal or perirhinal cortex.

Postrhinal (POR) or perirhinal (PER) cortex damage impairs acquisition and expression of contextual fear, but the nature of the impairment remains unclear. This study used a contextual fear discrimination paradigm that biased subjects toward using a configural, rather than an elemental, strategy to distinguish between 2 contexts, I of which was paired with a mild footshock. Control rats discriminated between 2 contexts when a combination of several cues could be used (Experiment 1), but not when individual sensory cues were manipulated (Experiment 2). Rats with POR or PER lesions could not discriminate between the shock and no-shock contexts when multiple cues differentiated the contexts (Experiment 3). The results indicate that both the POR and PER have a role in configural learning of contextual fear.

Evidence of Contextual Fear after Lesions of the Hippocampus: A Disruption of Freezing But Not Fear-Potentiated Startle

The roles of the dorsal hippocampus and the central nucleus of the amygdala in the expression of contextual fear were assessed using two measures of conditioned fear: freezing and fear-potentiated startle. A discriminable context conditioning paradigm was developed that demonstrated both conditioned freezing and fear-potentiated startle in a context paired previously with foot shock, relative to a context in which foot shock had never been presented. Post-training lesions of the central nucleus of the amygdala completely blocked both contextual freezing and fear-potentiated startle. Post-training lesions of the dorsal hippocampus attenuated contextual freezing, consistent with previous reports in the literature; however, these same lesions had no effect on fear-potentiated startle, suggesting preserved contextual fear. These results suggest that lesions of the hippocampus disrupt the freezing response but not contextual fear itself.

N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors in the basolateral amygdala are required for both acquisition and expression of conditional fear in rats.

Three experiments examined the effects of intra-amygdaloid infusions of an N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist, D,L-2-amino-5-phosphonovalerate (APV), on contextual fear conditioning in rats. In Experiment 1, APV infusion into the basolateral amygdala (BLA), before training, disrupted the acquisition of contextual fear. In Experiment 2, APV produced a disruption of both the acquisition and expression of contextual fear. This blockade of contextual fear was not state dependent, not due to a shift in footshock sensitivity, and not the result of increased motor activity in APV-treated rats. In Experiment 3, fear conditioning was not affected by a posttraining APV infusion into the BLA. These results indicate that NMDA receptors in the BLA are necessary for both the acquisition and expression of Pavlovian fear conditioning to contextual cues in rats.