Neuron modeling has been a fundamental approach in computational neuroscience for understanding the dynamics and function of the central nervous system (CNS). Over the past decades, a plethora of mathematical models, ranging from the seminal Hodgkin-Huxley model to more complex multicompartmental and stochastic models, have been developed to capture the intricate behavior of neurons and their interactions. However, despite the significant advances in modeling, there remains a substantial disconnect between the complexity of the models and their practical applicability in day-to-day medical and laboratory settings. This article explores the challenges and limitations of current neuron modeling approaches, particularly focusing on the trade-off between biological realism and computational tractability. I discuss the variability of neuronal properties within and across different regions of the brain, which poses a significant challenge for developing models that can accurately represent the full complexity of the CNS. I also highlight the computational bottlenecks associated with simulating highly detailed, which often require extensive computational resources and specialized software. Considering these challenges, we emphasize the need for a balance between biological plausibility and practicality in neuron modeling. We discuss the role of simplified models, such as the leaky integrate-and-fire (LIF) and Izhikevich models, which sacrifice some biological detail in favor of computational efficiency and ease of use. These models have proven valuable for large-scale simulations of neural networks and have provided important insights into the collective behavior of neuronal populations. Furthermore, I explore the potential of data-driven approaches, such as machine learning and artificial neural networks, in bridging the gap between biological realism and practical applicability. These approaches can learn the dynamics of neuronal systems directly from experimental data, bypassing the need for explicit mathematical models. I present a simple example using linear regression to predict neuronal firing rates based on input features, showcasing the potential of machine learning techniques in capturing the complex relationships between neuronal variables. I also highlight the need for more extensive validation of models against experimental data and the development of standardized benchmarks for assessing model performance. In conclusion, while the quest for biologically plausible neuron models has driven significant advances in our understanding of the CNS, the disconnect between model complexity and practical applicability remains a major challenge. By embracing simplified models, data-driven approaches, and interdisciplinary collaborations, we can work towards the development of more efficient and practical neuron models that can bridge the gap between biological realism and computational feasibility, ultimately facilitating the translation of theoretical insights into clinical and experimental applications.
Read full abstract