Helmke (2009) stresses that the detailed and temporal sequence of educational and teaching activities whose topic domain is restricted in educational institutions and which are didactically planned should be understood from the concept of teaching. Setting out from this definition, the concept of teaching quality is used for the sum of the teaching properties effective according to the previously set normative targets in a larger sense (Clausen, Reusser, & Klieme, 2003; Einsiedler, 2002). Research studies in this context make attempts at exhibiting the criteria for good teaching. The teaching models based on behavioral and cognitive learning approaches displayed by such educational researchers as Caroll, Ausebel, and Bloom are considered as the pioneers in this field (Hasselhom & Gold, 2006; Lipowski, 2009). So as to research teaching quality, the concepts of effective teaching and a good teacher were discussed, and research studies established different research traditions over time. They are reported as the paradigm of teacher personality, the process-product-paradigm, and expertise paradigm (Doyle, 1977). Several isolated variables are identified for teaching quality in independent research studies performed within the scope of those paradigms. Those variables are brought together on upper dimensions via meta-analysis studies, and attempts are made to determine and describe the criteria for quality teaching. The variables determined in those studies in relation to teaching quality are summarized in Table 1 based on Neuhaus (2007). The principles put forward initially by those attempts are considered to be independent of the field or to be teaching quality criteria.Dimensions determined accordingly mostly contain classroom management and related variables. Examining Tracers' behavioral patterns causing an increase in teachers' maximum performance Kouins (1976) identifies effective classroom management principles based on the paradigm of teacher personality. Classroom management, which is studied in the most detail and which is considered to be the central issue of teaching research, is considered from the following three perspectives: (I) imposing rules preventing time waste and disturbance, (2) time management for successful teaching, and (3) coping with disturbances effectively. Structuring the teaching process is yet another dimension considered in even different ways. Firstly, one way to structure a lesson is to segment the course into specific portable stages and sections and to divide the course content into pieces. On the other hand, teachers' directing students' attention to key points on the basis of cognitive psychological structuring may be regarded as presenting mental ties so as to build connections between old and new information. Managing the cognitive processes of learners in the teaching process in such a way is an important step in the formation of their cognitive structure. In this case, presenting concepts forming the lesson's content with teaching methods and techniques both in general and specific to the subject at hand seem to be of key importance (Eisiedler & Hardy, 2010; Lipowski, 2009). The results of national and international performance comparison studies add a new perspective to traditions. Thus, it is emphasized that the criteria used to ascertain teaching quality in studies be considered along with field specific combinations as well as their complex interactions with variables specific to the field (Ditton, 2002; Helmke, 2010).Normatively determined teaching properties of the biology are available within the didactics of biology (Berck, 2005; Eschenhagen, Kattmann, & Rodi, 2000; Killermann, Hiering, & Starosta, 2009; Kohler, 2004). According to the literature, teaching biology in accordance with scientific processes and skills is the main objective. Neuhaus (2007) suggests a theoretical framework in relation to adapting the general teaching quality criteria into the teaching of biology. …