Expert Panel Recommendations Research Articles

RSSDI Expert Consensus for Optimal Glucose Monitoring in Diabetes Mellitus in India and Recommendations for Clinical Practice

Effective management of diabetes warrants accurate and regular monitoring of glucose levels to prevent serious diabetes-associated complications and long-term health consequences. Hence, achieving target glucose levels and maintaining adequate glycemic control is essential in diabetes to prevent episodes of hypoglycemia. Multiple glucose monitoring tools have been developed over time, each with differing degrees of precision, convenience, and real-time input. The management of diabetes has been considerably improved by using these various glucose monitoring devices, both in terms of treatment outcomes and patient quality of life. However, in India, the lack of awareness, patient education, availability, and affordability of glucose monitoring devices poses a significant concern resulting in poor adherence to glucose monitoring and low medication adherence thereby increasing disease burden. Consequently, there is an urgent need for healthcare professionals and policymakers in India to collaborate and address the challenges associated with glucose monitoring in patients with diabetes, while also providing recommendations to overcome these concerns. This recommendation article offers a comprehensive evaluation of various glucose monitoring tools available for use by patients suffering from different types of diabetes, explores the challenges associated with glucose monitoring in India, and also presents expert panel recommendations to enhance diabetes management effectively.

Presurgical Use of Cenobamate for Adult and Pediatric Patients Referred for Epilepsy Surgery: Expert Panel Recommendations.

Cenobamate has demonstrated efficacy in patients with treatment-resistant epilepsy, including patients who continued to have seizures after epilepsy surgery. This article provides recommendations for cenobamate use in patients referred for epilepsy surgery evaluation. A panel of six senior epileptologists from the United States and Europe with experience in presurgical evaluation of patients with epilepsy and in the use of antiseizure medications (ASMs) was convened to provide consensus recommendations for the use of cenobamate in patients referred for epilepsy surgery evaluation. Many patients referred for surgical evaluation may benefit from ASM optimization; both ASM and surgical treatment should be individualized. Based on previous clinical studies and the authors' clinical experience with cenobamate, a substantial proportion of patients with treatment-resistant epilepsy can become seizure-free with cenobamate. We recommend a cenobamate trial and ASM optimization in parallel with presurgical evaluations. Cenobamate can be started before phase two monitoring, especially in patients who are found to be suboptimal surgery candidates. As neurostimulation therapies are generally palliative, we recommend trying cenobamate before vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), deep brain stimulation, or responsive neurostimulation (RNS). In surgically remediable cases (mesial temporal sclerosis, benign discrete lesion in non-eloquent cortex, cavernous angioma, etc.), cenobamate use should not delay imminent surgery; however, a patient may decide to defer or even cancel surgery should they achieve sustained seizure freedom with cenobamate. This decision should be made on an individual, case-by-case basis based on seizure etiology, patient preferences, potential surgical risks (mortality and morbidity), and likely surgical outcome. The addition of cenobamate after unsuccessful surgery or palliative neuromodulation may also be associated with better outcomes.

Clinical best practices in interdisciplinary management of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 antibody-drug conjugates-induced interstitial lung disease/pneumonitis: An expert consensus in China.

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have demonstrated effectiveness in treating various cancers, particularly exhibiting specificity in targeting human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer. Recent advancements in phase 3 clinical trials have broadened current understanding of ADCs, especially trastuzumab deruxtecan, in treating other HER2-expressing malignancies. This expansion of knowledge has led to the US Food and Drug Administration's approval of trastuzumab deruxtecan for HER2-positive and HER2-low breast cancer, HER2-positive gastric cancer, and HER2-mutant nonsmall cell lung cancer. Concurrent with the increasing use of ADCs in oncology, there is growing concern among health care professionals regarding the rise in the incidence of interstitial lung disease or pneumonitis (ILD/p), which is associated with anti-HER2 ADC therapy. Studies on anti-HER2 ADCs have reported varying ILD/p mortality rates. Consequently, it is crucial to establish guidelines for the diagnosis and management of ILD/p in patients receiving anti-HER2 ADC therapy. To this end, a panel of Chinese experts was convened to formulate a strategic approach for the identification and management of ILD/p in patients treated with anti-HER2 ADC therapy. This report presents the expert panel's opinions and recommendations, which are intended to guide the management of ILD/p induced by anti-HER2 ADC therapy in clinical practice.

Expert Panel Recommendations for a Standardized Ambulatory Glucose Profile Report for Connected Insulin Pens.

Connected insulin pens capture data on insulin dosing/timing and can integrate with continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) devices with essential insulin and glucose metrics into a single platform. Standardization of connected insulin pen reports is desirable to enhance clinical utility with a single report. An international expert panel was convened to develop a standardized connected insulin pen report incorporating insulin and glucose metrics into a single, clinically useful report. An extensive literature review and identification of examples of current connected insulin pen reports was performed serving as the basis for creation of a draft of a standardized connected insulin pen report. The expert panel participated in three virtual standardization meetings and online surveys. The AGP Report: Connected Insulin Pen brings all clinically relevant CGM-derived glucose and connected insulin pen metrics into a single simplified two-page report. The first page contains the time in ranges bar, summary of key insulin and glucose metrics, the ambulatory glucose profile (AGP) curve, and detailed basal (long-acting) insulin assessment. The second page contains the bolus (mealtime and correction) insulin assessment periods with information on meal timing, insulin-to-carbohydrate ratio (ICR), average bolus insulin dose and number of days with bolus doses recorded. The report's second page contains daily glucose profiles with an overlay of the timing and amount of basal and bolus insulin administered. The AGP Report: Connected Insulin Pen is a standardized clinically useful report that should be considered by companies developing connected pen technology as part of their system reporting/output.

Iraqi experts consensus on the management of relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis in adults

Objective In Iraq, a lack of evidence-based management protocols for diagnosing, treating, and managing multiple sclerosis (MS) poses risks of suboptimal outcomes and clinical practice variability and potential harm to the patients. This study aimed to develop consensus recommendations regarding the diagnosis and management of MS in Iraq, specifically focusing on treatment-naïve patients, suboptimal responders, and women of childbearing age during preconception, pregnancy planning, and lactation. Methods A survey was conducted to collect feedback from a panel of ten key opinion leaders (KOLs), who evaluated and discussed the statements to determine agreement levels. The mini-Delphi method was employed to establish a consensus on the management recommendations, and a meeting was held to analyze the responses and ensure that the recommendations were based on current evidence and followed a consensus-driven approach. Results The Revised McDonald Criteria is recommended for MS diagnosis, which includes evidence of dissemination of disease characteristics in space and time. Disease activity and progression can be monitored using relapses, MRI activity, and short-term disability progression. Experts suggest initiating treatment at diagnosis using higher efficacy medications, such as cladribine, ocrelizumab, natalizumab, or rituximab, for patients with high disease activity after careful risk stratification. Injectable interferon preparations have a tolerable risk profile but have drawbacks, such as the route and frequency of administration. Overall, disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) have shown efficacy in reducing relapse rates and short-term disability. Conclusion This article presents expert panel recommendations for managing MS in Iraq, taking into account international guidelines, medication updates, and local resources. However, practical questions remain regarding the real-world use of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). Personalizing treatment based on disease severity, prognosis, and individual risk factors while adhering to guidelines is crucial. A collaborative approach between healthcare providers and patients, considering individual preferences, is vital for achieving treatment goals.

Modified Delphi panel consensus recommendations for management of severe aplastic anemia

AbstractSevere aplastic anemia (SAA) is a rare hematologic condition for which there is no clear management algorithm. A panel of 11 experts on adult and pediatric aplastic anemia was assembled and, using the RAND/University of California, Los Angeles modified Delphi panel method, evaluated >600 varying patient care scenarios to develop clinical recommendations for the initial and subsequent management of patients of all ages with SAA. Here, we present the panel’s recommendations to rule out inherited bone marrow failure syndromes, on supportive care before and during first-line therapy, and on first-line (initial management) and second-line (subsequent management) therapy of acquired SAA, focusing on when transplant vs medical therapy is most appropriate. These recommendations represent the consensus of 11 experts informed by published literature and experience. They are intended only as general guidance for experienced clinicians who treat patients with SAA and are in no way intended to supersede individual physician and patient decision making. Current and future research should validate this consensus using clinical data. Once validated, we hope these expert panel recommendations will improve outcomes for patients with SAA.

Evolution of enhanced recovery for children undergoing elective intestinal surgery

Enhanced recovery protocols (ERP) have been widely adopted in adult populations, with over 30 years of experience demonstrating the effectiveness of these protocols in patients undergoing gastrointestinal (GI) surgery. In the last decade, ERPs have been applied to pediatric populations across multiple subspecialties. The objective of this manuscript is to explore the evolution of how ERPs have been implemented and adapted specifically for pediatric populations undergoing GI surgery, predominantly for inflammatory bowel disease. The reported findings reflect a thorough exploration of the literature, including initial surveys of practice/readiness assessments, consensus recommendations of expert panels, and data from a rapidly growing number of single center studies. These efforts have culminated in a national prospective, multicenter trial evaluating clinical and implementation outcomes for enhanced recovery in children undergoing GI surgery. In short, this historical and clinical review reflects on the evolution of ERPs in pediatric surgery and expounds upon the next steps needed to apply ERPs to future pediatric populations.

ClinGen variant curation expert panel recommendations for classification of variants in GAMT, GATM and SLC6A8 for cerebral creatine deficiency syndromes

Cerebral creatine deficiency syndromes (CCDS) are inherited metabolic phenotypes of creatine synthesis and transport. There are two enzyme deficiencies, guanidinoacetate methyltransferase (GAMT), encoded by GAMT and arginine-glycine amidinotransferase (AGAT), encoded by GATM, which are involved in the synthesis of creatine. After synthesis, creatine is taken up by a sodium-dependent membrane bound creatine transporter (CRTR), encoded by SLC6A8, into all organs. Creatine uptake is very important especially in high energy demanding organs such as the brain, and muscle. To classify the pathogenicity of variants in GAMT, GATM, and SLC6A8, we developed the CCDS Variant Curation Expert Panel (VCEP) in 2018, supported by The Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen), a National Institutes of Health (NIH)-funded resource. We developed disease-specific variant classification guidelines for GAMT-, GATM-, and SLC6A8-related CCDS, adapted from the American College of Medical Genetics/Association of Molecular Pathology (ACMG/AMP) variant interpretation guidelines. We applied specific variant classification guidelines to 30 pilot variants in each of the three genes that have variants associated with CCDS. Our CCDS VCEP was approved by the ClinGen Sequence Variant Interpretation Working Group (SVI WG) and Clinical Domain Oversight Committee in July 2022. We curated 181 variants including 72 variants in GAMT, 45 variants in GATM, and 64 variants in SLC6A8 and submitted these classifications to ClinVar, a public variant database supported by the National Center for Biotechnology Information. Missense variants were the most common variant type in all three genes. We submitted 32 new variants and reclassified 34 variants with conflicting interpretations. We report specific phenotype (PP4) using a points system based on the urine and plasma guanidinoacetate and creatine levels, brain magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) creatine level, and enzyme activity or creatine uptake in fibroblasts ranging from PP4, PP4_Moderate and PP4_Strong. Our CCDS VCEP is one of the first panels applying disease specific variant classification algorithms for an X-linked disease. The availability of these guidelines and classifications can guide molecular genetics and genomic laboratories and health care providers to assess the molecular diagnosis of individuals with a CCDS phenotype.

Cultural competency in dental education: developing a tool for assessment and inclusion.

This study aimed to assess the cultural competency content in selected Doctor of Dental Surgery (DDS) courses and to explore the use of an assessment tool that may be used to standardize the integration of cultural competency in the dental school curriculum. A survey was sent to course directors to determine the inclusion of four topics related to cultural competence, the mechanisms of inclusion, and their comfort level in teaching the topics in their courses. A scan of the same courses was conducted with the use of a tool developed from an Expert Panel's recommendations for knowledge, skills, and attitudes (KSA) to be included in curricula for teaching cultural competence. Twenty-one course directors responded. Fifteen reported they include social determinants of health and twelve include health inequities in their courses. Faculty reported an average of 8.67 comfort level in teaching these topics but there was less comfort level in teaching cultural humility and implicit bias. Course directors used assignments, case studies, lectures, quizzes, and patient care (clinical courses) to include the topics. The scan of courses showed that the use of the Competencies for General Dentists in course syllabi covered the recommended knowledge, skills, and attitudes for cultural competence. The rubric was suitable for assessing cultural competency content. The Competencies for General Dentists in course syllabi will allow the integration of the recommended KSA in dental courses to teach cultural competence. However, dental faculty may need training in the integration of KSA items in course objectives and content.

Expert panel recommendations for topical hemostatic agent use in varied bleeding sites and situations during neuro-spine surgeries

Intraoperative bleeding poses a substantial challenge, particularly in neuro-spine surgeries leading to complications such as hematomas, infections, and hemodynamic instability. Despite their proven efficacy, use of topical hemostatic agents (THAs) lacks comprehensive published literature and guidelines particularly in the Indian setting. The present study provides the first-ever Indian expert panel recommendations for effective adjunct THA use in different intraoperative bleeding sites and situations in neuro-spine surgeries. A comprehensive approach, encompassing a literature review, followed by experience sharing in a meeting using a survey helped integrate expert opinions in the form of practical algorithms to guide THA selection. Our survey results revealed a strong inclination towards specific THAs, flowable gelatin + thrombin being choice of THA for difficult to access and problematic bleeding situations during tumor removal/resection, transsphenoidal hypophysectomy and skull-based procedures. Both oxidized regenerated cellulose (ORC)/Fibrillar and flowable gelatin + thrombin were recommended for continuous oozing. ORC/Fibrillar was preferred for arteriovenous and cavernous malformations. This expert-panel guidance on THA use aims to optimize hemostat use practices and improve surgical outcomes in neuro-spine surgery.

Awareness of sun exposure risks and photoprotection for preventing pigmentary disorders in Asian populations: Survey results from three Asian countries and expert panel recommendations.

In this article, we review and discuss the photoprotection behavior of Asians based on the literature, along with a subanalysis of an original online survey, and make recommendations to optimize photoprotection for Asian populations to prevent photoaging and pigmentary disorders. An international panel of eight dermatologists from Asia (China, Korea, Japan, Singapore, Indonesia, and Vietnam) met to discuss sunscreen photoprotection for Asian patients. Additionally, a subanalysis of an online survey by 3000 respondents from three Asian countries (China, Indonesia, and Japan) investigated general public awareness and attitudes to sun exposure. A pre-meeting survey of the eight experts from Asia showed key concerns of Asian patients consulting dermatologists are pigmentary disorders, especially actinic/senile lentigo, post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation, melasma, vitiligo, and Hori's nevus. The survey subanalysis of participants from China, Indonesia, and Japan with predominantly Fitzpatrick skin types (FST) II to IV revealed that they are particularly concerned about sun exposure causing photoaging and pigmentary disorders. Most of the respondents indicated they have limited knowledge on sunlight radiation and appropriate sunscreen protection factors. Only 22%, 13%, and 3% for China, Indonesia, and Japan, respectively, systematically use multiple protective measures (using sunscreen, avoiding midday sun, staying in the shade, wearing a hat, protective clothing, and sunglasses) when exposed to the sun. Further education is needed for Asian populations on the importance of comprehensive daily photoprotection, including broad-spectrum sunscreen, with high UVA and visible light protection, to reduce and prevent photoaging and pigmentary disorders.

High Disease-Free Survival in Patients with High-Risk MDS Treated with Orca-T

BACKGROUND Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (alloHCT) may be a curative treatment option for patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). The use of investigational therapies that potentially reduce transplant toxicity could improve outcomes in this patient population with difficult to treat disease. Per CIBMTR, survival after alloHCT for MDS using matched donors is approximately 65% at 1 year and relapse-free survival at 1 year was ~69% in MDS patients in the RICMAC trial who received myeloablative conditioning (MAC). Orca-T is a high-precision cell therapy biologic that includes stem and immune cells, derived from allogeneic donors, that leverages highly purified, polyclonal donor regulatory T cells to control alloreactive immune responses. In this phase 1b study, Orca-T was evaluated in MDS patients who were eligible for transplant per 2017 International Expert Panel recommendations. METHODS As of 03/31/23, 16 patients with intermediate to very high risk (HR) MDS with ≤10% blasts in the bone marrow at the time of transplant had received Orca-T in the phase 1b study. IPSS-M prognostic scores were Low (6%), Moderate Low (6%), Moderate High (19%), High (44%), and Very High (25%). Baseline HCT-CI scores were 0 (n=6), 1 (n=3), 2 (n=2), 3 (n=3), and 4 (n=2). The median f/u was 19.1 months (range 6.3 - 32.2). Patients were aged 43 - 65 (median 59) and 56% female. Donors were 8/8 HLA-matched related (n=7) or unrelated (n=9). Patients received a busulfan-based myeloablative chemotherapy regimen prior to Orca-T, followed by single-agent GvHD prophylaxis with tacrolimus. RESULTS Orca-T was successfully manufactured in a single, centralized GMP manufacturing facility for all patients enrolled, distributed, and infused throughout the U.S. Orca-T was delivered within < 72 hours vein-to-vein (i.e. time between end of donor apheresis to start of recipient's Orca-T infusion). Disease-free survival (RFS) at 12 months was 94% (Figure). At 1 year, no patients had experienced grade ≥ 3 acute GvHD and moderate to severe chronic GvHD had occurred in 2 patients. Modified GRFS (survival free of Grade 3-4 aGvHD, moderate-to-severe cGvHD and relapse) at 12 months was 75%. Non-relapse mortality (NRM) and overall survival (OS) were 0% and 94%, respectively, at 12 months. Additionally, one MDS patient with very poor prognosis, characterized by mutated TP53 and complex karyotype, remains in CR without active signs of acute or cGvHD at 500 days post-alloHCT. CONCLUSIONS Orca-T demonstrated promising results in this HR-MDS patient population, including high RFS, low incidence of GvHD, and very high OS at 1 year. A randomized controlled phase 3 multi-center trial comparing Orca-T to SOC in patients with MDS, AML, and ALL is currently enrolling across the US (NCT05316701).

Stage at Diagnosis Following Delay to Interval Scans for Indeterminate Nodules in Lung Cancer Screening: An Observational Study Examining the Outcomes of CHEST Expert Panel Recommendations

Stage at Diagnosis Following Delay to Interval Scans for Indeterminate Nodules in Lung Cancer Screening: An Observational Study Examining the Outcomes of CHEST Expert Panel Recommendations

Standardized Definitions for Cardiogenic Shock Research and Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices: Scientific Expert Panel From the Shock Academic Research Consortium (SHARC).

The Shock Academic Research Consortium is a multi-stakeholder group, including representatives from the US Food and Drug Administration and other government agencies, industry, and payers, convened to develop pragmatic consensus definitions useful for the evaluation of clinical trials enrolling patients with cardiogenic shock, including trials evaluating mechanical circulatory support devices. Several in-person and virtual meetings were convened between 2020 and 2022 to discuss the need for developing the standardized definitions required for evaluation of mechanical circulatory support devices in clinical trials for cardiogenic shock patients. The expert panel identified key concepts and topics by performing literature reviews, including previous clinical trials, while recognizing current challenges and the need to advance evidence-based practice and statistical analysis to support future clinical trials. For each category, a lead (primary) author was assigned to perform a literature search and draft a proposed definition, which was presented to the subgroup. These definitions were further modified after feedback from the expert panel meetings until a consensus was reached. This manuscript summarizes the expert panel recommendations focused on outcome definitions, including efficacy and safety.

Optimization of Tissue Handling and Processing in the Era of Precision Medicine: A Practical Recommendation from a Multidisciplinary Panel of Indian Experts

AbstractMolecular analysis of biospecimens is the key to diagnostic and therapeutic decisions in clinical practice. However, there is a lack of consolidated guidelines for biospecimen collection, tissue handling, and storage in India. Therefore, this study aims to generate expert recommendations for the optimization of tissue handling and processing practices in India in the era of precision medicine. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical gaps related to tissue handling for molecular analysis and develop expert recommendations to mitigate preanalytical issues associated with biospecimen processing. These expert recommendations will help in increasing the diagnostic yield and accuracy of biomarker testing in clinical practice. A virtual advisory board meeting was convened with 19 experts, including pathologists, molecular biologists, medical oncologists, surgical oncologists, interventional radiologists, and a senior histology technician from 10 hospitals in India, along with an accreditation officer for testing and calibration of laboratory procedures. The scientific coordinators developed specific questions to address the salient issues associated with the preanalytic phase of tissue specimen preparation. The experts discussed each question until a complete set of recommendations was obtained. The expert panel provided recommendations for tissue collection, processing, fixation, and block preparation to ensure high-quality biospecimens. As per the expert panel recommendations, tissue sampling can be performed from any easily accessible site, regardless of the primary or metastatic locations. In addition, the cold ischemia time should be <1 hour, 10% neutral-buffered formalin should be used as the fixative, isopropyl alcohol should be used as the dehydrating agent, the volume of tissue to fixative ratio should be 1:10, and all the paraffin blocks should be archived in dry, pest-free conditions at room temperature. The experts suggested that the formalin used for fixation should be freshly prepared and its pH should be checked daily; moreover, the pH and date of formalin preparation should be mentioned on the containers. The experts highlighted the need to educate multidisciplinary teams on the optimization of tissue handling practices and emphasized that a pathologist should always check the tissue for adequate quality and quantity for biomarker testing. The existing routine clinical procedures for collecting and handling biospecimens adversely affect their quality. The expert recommendations for preanalytical quality control would ensure high-quality biospecimens for molecular analysis and precision medicine.

Life-Course Brain Health as a Determinant of Late-Life Mental Health: American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry Expert Panel Recommendations

This position statement of the Expert Panel on Brain Health of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry (AAGP) emphasizes the critical role of life course brain health in shaping mental well-being during the later stages of life. Evidence posits that maintaining optimal brain health earlier in life is crucial for preventing and managing brain aging-related disorders such as dementia/cognitive decline, depression, stroke, and anxiety. We advocate for a holistic approach that integrates medical, psychological, and social frameworks with culturally tailored interventions across the lifespan to promote brain health and overall mental well-being in aging adults across all communities. Furthermore, our statement underscores the significance of prevention, early detection, and intervention in identifying cognitive decline, mood changes, and related mental illness. Action should also be taken to understand and address the needs of communities that traditionally have unequal access to preventive health information and services. By implementing culturally relevant and tailored evidence-based practices and advancing research in geriatric psychiatry, behavioral neurology, and geroscience, we can enhance the quality of life for older adults facing the unique challenges of aging. This position statement emphasizes the intrinsic link between brain health and mental health in aging, urging healthcare professionals, policymakers, and a broader society to prioritize comprehensive strategies that safeguard and promote brain health from birth through later years across all communities. The AAGP Expert Panel has the goal of launching further activities in the coming months and years.

A multi-tiered hierarchical Bayesian approach to derive toxic equivalency factors for dioxin-like compounds

In 2005, the World Health Organization (WHO) re-evaluated Toxic Equivalency factors (TEFs) developed for dioxin-like compounds believed to act through the Ah receptor based on an updated database of relative estimated potency (REP)(REP2004 database). This re-evalution identified the need to develop a consistent approach for dose-response modeling. Further, the WHO Panel discussed the significant heterogeneity of experimental datasets and dataset quality underlying the REPs in the database. There is a critical need to develop a quantitative, and quality weighted approach to characterize the TEF for each congener. To address this, a multi-tiered approach that combines Bayesian dose-response fitting and meta-regression with a machine learning model to predict REPS' quality categorizations was developed to predict the most likely relationship between each congener and its reference and derive model-predicted TEF uncertainty distributions. As a proof of concept, this ‘Best-Estimate TEF workflow’ was applied to the REP2004 database to derive TEF point-estimates and characterizations of uncertainty for all congeners. Model-TEFs were similar to the 2005 WHO TEFs, with the data-poor congeners having larger levels of uncertainty. This transparent and reproducible computational workflow incorporates WHO expert panel recommendations and represents a substantial improvement in the TEF methodology.

Neuromuscular ultrasound standardized scanning techniques and protocols: Expert panel recommendations.

Neuromuscular ultrasound has become an integral part of the diagnostic workup of neuromuscular disorders at many centers. Despite its growing utility, uniform standard scanning techniques do not currently exist. Scanning approaches for similar diseases vary in the literature creating heterogeneity in the studies as reported in several meta-analysis. Moreover, neuromuscular ultrasound experts including the group in this study have different views with regards to technical aspects, scanning protocols, and the parameters that should be assessed. Establishing standardized neuromuscular scanning protocols is essential for the development of the subspeciality to ensure uniform clinical and research practices. Therefore, we aimed to recommend consensus-based standardized scanning techniques and protocols for common neuromuscular disorders using the Delphi approach. A panel of 17 experts participated in the study, which consisted of three consecutive electronic surveys. The first survey included voting on six scanning protocols addressing the general scanning technique and five common categories of suspected neuromuscular disorders. The subsequent surveys focused on refining the protocols and voting on new steps, rephrased statements, or areas of non-agreement. A high degree of consensus was achieved on the general neuromuscular ultrasound scanning technique and the scanning protocols for focal mononeuropathies, brachial plexopathies, polyneuropathies, amyotophic lateral sclerosis, and muscle diseases. In this study, a group of neuromuscular ultrasound experts developed six consensus-based neuromuscular ultrasound scanning protocols that may serve as references for clinicians and researchers. The standardized protocols could also aid in achieving high-quality uniform neuromuscular ultrasound practices.

Second Generation Basal Insulin, Degludec, in the Management of Diabetes; Consensus Report

The best anti-diabetic medication does, in fact, have a low propensity to increase body weight and rate of hypoglycemia as well as glycemic control. The second-generation basal insulins analogues insulin degludec and insulin glargine 300 units/mL have significantly longer half-life and substantially smoother profiles than firstgeneration. The duration of action of glargine 300 is shorter than that of degludec, and significant residual glycemic variability is still present. Degludec has lower risks of hypoglycemia. Evaluating the therapeutic application in various geographical contexts is necessary, given the inter-country variations in the prescription patterns of glucose-lowering medications for persons with diabetes. A Saudi task force gathered to develop an explicit, evidence-based consensus for insulin degludec utilization in the local setting. This work contains the expert panel's recommendations as a contribution to complement the knowledge gap in this area from the national perspective. Results of the local UPDATES study investigating the treatment effect of degludec in adults with T2DM in Saudi Arabia showed that patients treated with degludec experienced clinically significant improvements in glycaemic control and a lower rate of hypoglycemia compared to baseline, with no new safety concerns. Results confirm that previously published data with degludec are generalizable to a broad population of patients with T2DM in routine clinical practice in Saudi Arabia. Moreover, local cost-utility analyses of degludec versus glargine 300 in T1DM and T2DM showed that it is cost-saving. Degludec was associated with less cost with better quality of life. Thus, the reimbursement of degludec will have a positive impact on the budget.

Fifteen Patients Who Can Be Helped by Medicare: Insurance Policy Changes in the Coverage of CPAP Therapy for Obstructive Sleep Apnea.

Insurance coverage policies define the diagnostic criteria and adherence requirements for patients to qualify for initial and ongoing therapy with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment, the most complete therapy for obstructive sleep apnea. Unfortunately, a number of patients who use CPAP and benefit from treatment fail to meet these requirements. We present 15 patients who fail to meet Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' (CMS) criteria, highlighting policies that do not support patient care. Finally, we review expert panel recommendations to improve CMS policies, and we suggest ways that physicians can better support CPAP access within the current regulatory restrictions.