THE etiology of cancer is still in obscurity. Its clinical appearance and cellular pathology are familiar to every student of medicine. For wellnigh fifty years, the surgical dictum that its origin is entirely local has been accepted, and early radical surgery has been, and still is, urged as the only effective cure. Recently radiation therapy has commanded the attention of many surgeons, and it has been acknowledged to be of much value in cancer, but mostly as an aid to surgery. The greater value of pre-operative over post-operative radiation, however, has not impressed the majority of surgeons. The radiologist has dealt largely with the by-products of surgery—the hopeless cases in which the surgeon has failed. Statistics are quoted by surgeons with large experience, showing about 70 to 80 per cent of so-called “cures” for the five-year period in early cases of cancer of the breast without lymphatic involvement, and around 20 per cent of five-year “cures” where there is only slight involvement of the axillary glands. In a long experience in the radiological treatment of cancer, referred mostly by surgeons, we are impressed with the idea that not 10 per cent of the average run of cases operated upon by the average surgeon, enjoy freedom from relapse for a five-year period. Vital statistics the world over show a steady increase in cancer mortality, every year up to and including 1922. If the number of cases claimed by surgery (and radiation, too) were actually true, surely this number would be reduced instead of increased. But, instead, the mortality statistics continue to increase at a rapid rate, indicating that our present conception of the etiology, pathology, and treatment of cancer is very defective. We doubt if the surgery of cancer has made any advance in ten or fifteen years. If so, it is not apparent in the statistics, nor to those of us doing radiation therapy, who see large numbers of cancer patients who have already been operated upon. Then, too, most of these patients already operated on are not well people. They are sufferers in one way or another because of disfiguring, deforming operations. Mortality records have been closely watched, but not morbidity records. The latter are quite as important as the former. The patient with the elephantiasic arm suffers perhaps more tortures than the patient with advanced carcinoma, and her case is just as hopeless. Great encouragement has been held out by surgeons if only patients will apply for treatment early, and every year of late “Cancer Week” has been observed, to educate the public on cancer, in an endeavor to have it treated early. But in spite of all this, the mortality from the disease continues to increase. With the advent of radiotherapy, without a doubt, the number of cures of superficial cancer, which if uncured, would go on to deep-seated cancer, has been enormously augmented. Every radiotherapist has his dozens and hundreds of cured cases of one to many years' standing.