Expanded Disability Status Scale Point Research Articles

Autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation following high-dose immunosuppressive therapy for advanced multiple sclerosis: long-term results

The purpose of the study was to determine the long-term safety and effectiveness of high-dose immunosuppressive therapy (HDIT) followed by autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (AHCT) in advanced multiple sclerosis (MS). Total body irradiation, cyclophosphamide, and antithymocyte globulin were followed by transplantation of autologous, CD34-selected peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC). Neurological examinations, brain MRIs and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) for oligoclonal bands (OCB) were serially evaluated. Patients (n=26, mean EDSS=7.0, 17 secondary progressive, 8 primary progressive, 1 relapsing/remitting) were followed for a median of 48 months after HDIT followed by AHCT. The 72-month probability of worsening ≥ 1.0 EDSS point was 0.52 (95% CI, 0.30 to 0.75). Five patients had an EDSS at baseline of ≤ 6.0; four of these had not failed treatment at last study visit. OCB in CSF persisted with minor changes in the banding pattern. Four new or enhancing lesions were seen on MRI, all within 13 months of treatment. In this population with high baseline EDSS, a significant proportion of patients with advanced MS remained stable as long as 7 years after transplant. Non-inflammatory events may have contributed to neurological worsening after treatment. HDIT/AHCT may be more effective in patients with less advanced relapsing/remitting MS.

A phase III study evaluating the efficacy and safety of MBP8298 in secondary progressive MS

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of MBP8298 in subjects with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS) who express human leukocyte antigen (HLA) haplotype DR2 or DR4 (DR2(+) or DR4(+)). This multicenter randomized 2-year, double-blind, placebo-controlled study included 612 subjects with a diagnosis of SPMS and an Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score of 3.5-6.5, stratified according to baseline EDSS score (3.5-5.0, or 5.5-6.5) and HLA haplotype (DR2(+) or DR4(+), or DR2(-)/DR4(-)). Upon entry of 100 DR2(-)/DR4(-) subjects, further study enrollment was limited to DR2(+) or DR4(+) subjects. Subjects were randomly assigned to either 500 mg MBP8298 or placebo, given by IV injection once every 6 months for 2 years. The primary outcome measure was time to progression by ≥1.0 EDSS point (or 0.5 point if baseline EDSS was 5.5 or higher), confirmed 6 months later. Secondary outcomes included mean change in EDSS, mean change in Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite, MRI changes, annualized relapse rate, and quality of life. There were no significant differences between treatment groups in either the primary or secondary endpoints. MBP8298 was well tolerated in all treated subjects with no safety issues identified. In the population studied, treatment with MBP8298 did not provide a clinical benefit compared to placebo. This study provides Class 1 evidence that MBP8298 is not effective in patients with SPMS who are HLA DR2(+) or DR4(+).

Mitoxantrone prior to interferon beta-1b in aggressive relapsing multiple sclerosis: a 3-year randomised trial

ObjectivesThe long-term impact of interferon-beta-1b (IFN) might be improved by short-term immunosuppression with mitoxantrone (MITOX) in aggressive relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (ARMS) patients.MethodsIn this 3-year clinical and MRI study, 109 ARMS...

Efficacy of natalizumab in second line therapy of relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis: results from a multi‐center study in German speaking countries

Natalizumab has been recommended for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) in patients with insufficient response to interferon-beta/glatiramer acetate (DMT) or aggressive MS. The pivotal trials were not conducted to investigate natalizumab monotherapy in this patient population. Retrospective, multicenter study in Germany and Switzerland. Five major MS centers reported all RRMS patients who initiated natalizumab >or=12 months prior to study conduction. Ninety-seven RRMS patients were included [69% female, mean age 36.5 years, mean Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) 3.4; 93.8% were pre-treated with DMT], mean treatment duration with natalizumab was 19.3 +/- 6.1 months. We found a reduction of the annualized relapse rate from 2.3 to 0.2, 80.4% were relapse free with natalizumab. EDSS improved in 12.4% and 89.7% were progression free (change of >or= 1 EDSS point). Eighty-six per cent of patients with highly active disease (>or= 2 relapses in the year and >or= 1 Gadolinium (Gd)+ lesion at study entry, n = 20) remained relapse free. The mean number of Gd enhancing lesions was reduced to 0.1 (0.8 at baseline). Discontinuation rate was 8.2% (4.1% for antibody-positivity). Natalizumab is effective after insufficient response to other DMT and also in patients with high disease activity.

Change in disability in patients with multiple sclerosis: a 20-year prospective population-based analysis

Background:In patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), the natural history of the disease is of considerable importance to predict and understand long-term outcome and inform choices made by patients and clinicians....

Relationship between MRI lesion activity and response to IFN-β in relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis patients

Objective Our objective in this study is to evaluate whether brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) performed at interferon-beta (IFN-β) onset and after 12 months allow us to identify relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) patients with a disability increase in the first 2 years of therapy. Methods This is a prospective and longitudinal study of patients with RRMS treated with IFN-β. All patients included underwent brain MRI before the onset of therapy with IFN-β and 12 months after. MRI measures (T2, unenhanced T1-weighted and gadolinium-enhancing T1-weighted brain lesion load, brain parenchymal fraction) were undertaken at baseline and after 12 months. The number of active lesions (new or enlarging T2 plus gadolinium-enhancing brain lesions) was also assessed on the 12 months MRI scan. Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) was scored every 3 months. We defined an increase in disability as an increase of at least 1 EDSS point confirmed and sustained during the first 2 years of therapy with IFN-β. Regression analysis was performed in order to identify MRI variables of response. Results We included 152 patients who were followed-up for at least 2 years. After 2 years of therapy, 24 patients (16%) had an increase in disability. The logistic regression model showed that active lesions in the scan performed at 12 months were the most important factor related with the increase of disability after 2 years of therapy (odds ratio 8.3, 95% confidence interval 3.1–21.9; p < 0.0001). Conclusions In RRMS patients treated with IFN-β the MRI changes occurring during the first year may have a prognostic value for identifying patients with a confirmed increase of disability after 2 years of therapy.

How effective are disease-modifying drugs in delaying progression in relapsing-onset MS?

Our objective was to estimate the effectiveness of disease-modifying drugs (DMDs) in delaying multiple sclerosis (MS) disability progression in relapsing-onset (R-onset) definite MS patients under "real-world" conditions. Treatment effect size, for DMDs as a class, was estimated in absolute terms and relative to MS natural history. A basic model estimated annual Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) change before and after treatment. An expanded model estimated annual EDSS change in pretreatment years, treatment years on first drug, treatment years after drugs were switched, and in years after treatment stopped. Models were populated with 1980 through 2004 clinical data, including 1988 through 2004 data for all Nova Scotians treated with DMDs. Estimates were made for relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS), secondary progressive MS (SPMS), and R-onset groups. Estimated pretreatment annual EDSS increases were approximately 0.10 of one EDSS point for the RRMS group, 0.31 for the SPMS group, and 0.16 for the R-onset group. Estimates of EDSS increase avoided per treatment year on the first drug were significant for the RRMS group (-0.103, 0.000), the SPMS group (-0.065, 0.011), and the R-onset group (-0.162, 0.000); relative effect size estimates were 112%, 21%, and 105%. Estimated EDSS progression was faster in years after drug switches and treatment stops. Our estimates of disease-modifying drug (DMD) relative treatment effect size, in the context of "real-world" clinical practice, are similar to DMD treatment efficacy estimates in pivotal trials, though our findings attained statistical significance. DMDs, as a class, are effective in delaying Expanded Disability Status Scale progression in patients with relapsing-onset definite multiple sclerosis (MS) (90%), although effectiveness is much better for relapsing-remitting MS than for secondary progressive MS groups.

Quality Assessment in Multiple Sclerosis Therapy (QUASIMS)

Interferon beta (IFN beta) preparations are the most frequently prescribed therapies for patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS). Several open-label observational studies report similar efficacy among IFN beta preparations. The Quality Assessment in Multiple Sclerosis Therapy (QUASIMS) study is a large, open-label observational study designed to compare the effectiveness and tolerability of available IFN beta preparations as disease-modifying therapies for relapsing MS across a wide range of clinical practice settings. This retrospective, controlled cohort study was conducted by chart review at 510 sites in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland. Enrolled patients had received one of the four available IFN beta preparations/dosing regimens (intramuscular IFN beta-1a 30 microg 1x/week [Avonex], subcutaneous (SC) IFN beta-1a 22 or 44 microg 3 x/week [Rebif], or SC IFN beta-1b 250 microg 3.5x/week [Betaferon/Betaseron]) for >or= 2 years. Pre-planned outcomes at 1 and 2 years included change from baseline Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score, percentage of progression-free patients (< 1.0 EDSS point), annualised relapse rate (RR), percentage of relapse-free patients, and reasons for therapy change. Of 4754 evaluable patients, 3991 (84%) received IFN beta as initial therapy. There were no significant differences among IFN betas when used as initial or follow-up therapy on almost all outcome variables. Relapse rate was consistently higher and percentage of relapse-free patients consistently lower for all products used as follow-up versus initial therapy. Results of QUASIMS showed similar effectiveness among IFN beta products. Benefits were consistently superior when IFN beta was used as initial rather than follow-up therapy. Our results suggest that patients do not benefit in terms of disease outcome from switching between IFN beta preparations/dosing regimens.

Interferon beta-1b in secondary progressive MS

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of interferon beta-1b (IFNbeta-1b) in subjects with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS). This 3-year, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial of IFNbeta-1b included 939 subjects from the United States and Canada with SPMS and Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores ranging from 3.0 to 6.5. Subjects were randomly assigned to receive either placebo or IFNbeta-1b (250 microg or 160 microg/m2 body surface area), administered subcutaneously every other day. The primary outcome was time to progression by > or =1.0 EDSS point (0.5 point if EDSS score was 6.0 to 6.5 at entry) confirmed at 6 months. Secondary outcomes included mean change in EDSS score from baseline, relapse-related measures, MRI activity, and a standardized neuropsychological function test. There was no significant difference in time to confirmed progression of EDSS scores between placebo-treated patients and either of the IFNbeta-1b treatment groups. However, IFNbeta-1b treatment resulted in improvement on secondary outcome measures involving clinical relapses, newly active MRI lesions, and accumulated burden of disease on T2-weighted MRI. Effects were similar for both IFNbeta-1b treatment groups. Neutralizing antibodies to IFNbeta-1b were detected in 23% of 250-microg and 32% of 160-microg/m2 recipients, but their presence did not consistently affect clinical or MRI outcomes. IFNbeta-1b was also well tolerated at both doses. Although no treatment benefit was seen on the time to confirmed progression of disability, relapse- and MRI-related outcomes showed significant benefit with both dosing regimens tested, a result consistent with the outcomes of earlier clinical trials.

Mitoxantrone: a review of its use in multiple sclerosis.

Mitoxantrone: a review of its use in multiple sclerosis.

Mitoxantrone slowed progression of disability and reduced relapses in multiple sclerosis

(2002) Lancet 360, 2018. Hartung HP, Gonsette R, König N, et al. . Mitoxantrone in progressive multiple sclerosis: a placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomised, multicentre trial. . ; . : . –25...

P1. Immunoablation with t cell depleted autologous peripheral blood stem cell rescue produces complete remission in thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) recidivant and refractory to standard treatment

Patients and methods: In 1999–2000 in the Bone Marrow Transplantation Unit of the Military Medical Academy (St Petersburg) three autologous stem cell transplantations (ASCT) were carried out for patients with...

Intravenous Immunoglobulins in Multiple Sclerosis: Results of the Austrian Immunoglobulin in Multiple Sclerosis (AIMS) Trial

Background: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune disorder characterized by inflammatory, demyelinating lesions in the central nervous system. Open studies and experimental evidence suggest beneficial effects of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) by immunomodulating mechanisms and induction of remyelination. Patients and Methods:In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter trial we tested the efficacy of monthly IVIG in 150 patients with relapsing MS. Primary outcome measures were the effect on clinical disability as measured by the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), and the proportion of patients with improved, stable or worsened clinical disability (change by ≧?1.0 EDSS point) in each treatment group. Secondary outcome measures included the annual relapse rate and the proportion of relapse-free patients. IVIG was given over 2 years in a monthly dosage of 0.15–0.2 g/kg body weight. Results:As shown by intent-to-treat analysis, the EDSS significantly decreased in the IVIG-treated patients (–0.23 ??0.89) and increased in the placebo-treated patients (+0.12 ??1.07). The difference between both groups was statistically significant (p = 0.008). In the IVIG group 31% of the patients showed improved, 51% stable, and 16% worsened clinical disability. In the placebo group this distribution was 14%, 63% and 23%, respectively (p = 0.041). Annual relapse rates were 0.52 ??0.85 in the IVIG and 1.26 ??2.2 in the placebo group (p = 0.0037). The proportion of relapse-free patients receiving IVIG was 53% vs. 36% of patients in the placebo group (p=0.03). Adverse events occurred in 4% of patients in the IVIG group and in 5% of patients receiving placebo and did not appear to be directly related to the medication. Conclusion:This study demonstrates that monthly IVIG at a dosage of 0.15–0.2 g/kg body weight improves clinical disability and reduces the frequency of relapses without major side effects in relapsing MS.

The psychometric properties of clinical rating scales used in multiple sclerosis.

OullII;l y Many clinical rating scales have been proposed to assess the impact of multiple sclerosis on patients, but only few have been evaluated formally for reliability, validity and responsiveness. We assessed the psychometric properties of five commonly used scales in multiple sclerosis, the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), the Scripps Neurological Rating Scale (SNRS), the Functional Independence Measure (FIM), the Ambulation Index (AI) and the Cambridge Multiple Sclerosis Basic Score (CAMBS). The score frequency distributions of all five scales were either bimodal (EDSS and AI) or severely skewed (SNRS, FIM and CAMBS). The reliability of each scale depended on the definition of 'agreement'. Inter-and intra-rater reliabilities were high when 'agreement' was considered to exist despite a difference of up to 1.0 EDSS point (two 0.5 steps), 13 SNRS points, 9 FIM points, 1 AI point and 1 point on the various CAMBS domains. The FIM, AI, and the relapse and progression domains of the CAMBS were sensitive to clinical change, but the EDSS and the SNRS were unresponsive. The validity of these scales as impairment (SNRS and EDSS) and disability (EDSS, FIM, AI and the disability domain of the CAMBS) measures was established. All scales correlated closely with other measures of handicap and quality of life. None of these scales satisfied the psychometric requirements of outcome measures completely, but each had some desirable properties. The SNRS and the EDSS were reliable and valid measures of impairment and disability, but they were unresponsive. The FIM was a reliable, valid and responsive measure of disability, but it is cumbersome to administer and has a limited content validity. The AI was a reliable and valid ambulation-related disability scale, but it was weakly responsive. The CAMBS was a reliable (all four domains) and responsive (relapse and progression domains) outcome measure, but had a limited validity (handicap domain). These psychometric properties should be considered when designing further clinical trials in multiple sclerosis.