Poor old sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus is an orphan disease; it has no society or annual meeting on some distant palm-fringed shores. This is bread-and-butter general surgery, without the flashing lights of robotics or the glamorous reps of stapler manufacturers. Perhaps because of this, there are few well-designed, properly powered, randomized, controlled trials of treatments for pilonidal sinus. Roland Andersson and his colleagues are to be congratulated for completing their multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of the use of Collatemp (gentamicin-impregnated collagen sponge) as an adjunct to excision and primary closure of pilonidal sinus. They found that the use of Collatemp did not reduce wound complications or recurrence rate after pilonidal sinus surgery. They also have demonstrated that surgeons working in cooperation with colleagues in different hospitals can together perform good randomized, controlled trials with rapid patient accrual. This collaborative approach is a model that others would do well to copy. As the authors acknowledge in their discussion, excision and midline closure of pilonidal sinus is unfashionable. Evidence pooled from randomized, controlled trials shows a clear benefit to excision and primary closure with a lateral wound compared with closure in the midline [1]. Despite this, excision of pilonidal sinus with closure in the midline is probably the commonest procedure performed around the world for pilonidal sinus. The linked trial was a pragmatic one—reflecting real-life practice in the community rather than theoretical concerns. Indeed, the risk of recurrent pilonidal sinus in the authors’ hands seems to have been very low (reflected by the small numbers of patients needing reoperation: 10% in the Collatemp group and 4% in the control group). This may be due to the use of tie-over dressings, which are designed to reduce accumulation of fluid in the wound cavity and also spread the tension on the skin closure. Perhaps before midline primary closure is completely dismissed, the use of such bolsters should be further evaluated. Pilonidal sinus exhibits a wide spectrum of disease, which may range from a couple of midline pits to a large cavity or unhealed open wound. The surgical approaches to pilonidal sinus also vary from minimal pit-picking procedures to radical excision with complex flap reconstruction. The ‘‘cure rate’’ seems to be higher for some of the more radical approaches, albeit with a corresponding increase in morbidity. It is a wise surgeon who tailors the surgical approach to the severity of the disease and the patient’s symptoms. For ‘‘early’’ disease a minimal approach, such as those advocated by Bascom [2], often will suffice. More extensive or recurrent disease usually requires a major excision. The Karydakis procedure [3] and Bascom’s cleft closure [4] have a similar concept. Both result in a flattening of the natal cleft and a lateral wound, although the depth of excision is greater with the Karydakis procedure. Patients with difficult recurrent disease or a nonhealing central wound may occasionally benefit from the use of a rhomboid rotational flap for reconstruction; such patients need careful preoperative counseling about the extent of the surgery and the expected cosmetic result. The wise surgeon will familiarize himself with one or more of these procedures for these difficult situations. M. Cheetham (&) Royal Shrewsbury Hospital, Shrewsbury, UK e-mail: mark.cheetham@sath.nhs.uk
Read full abstract