In studies of the activated sludge process of sewage purification, it was shown-1, that the predominant bacteria in activated sludge belonged to a group represented by zoogleal formations. Subsequently it was demonstrated 2 that these bacteria are the active agents in activated sludge, being capable in pure culture of producing not only activated sludge but also possessing the powers of oxidation and purification in herent to natural activated sludge. In the trickling filter process of sewage purification, also biological in nature, the fundamental set-up of the process would suggest that the active agents might be the same organisms as those of activated sludge. That is, with both processes the success of the purification depends on the presence of three essential elements, (1) bacterial masses or floes, (2) food supply for these bacteria, i.e. polluting material, and (3) a con tinuous source of oxygen. The process is also dependent upon a phys ical means of keeping these three elements dispersed and continuously in contact with each other. In the activated sludge process the contact and mixing is brought about by an agitation of the sludge-sewage mix with compressed air which also provides a continuous source of oxygen. In the trickling filter the sludge mass is held dispersed on a framework of stones, or other material, while the sewage trickles over the surfaces of the sludge. The interstices of this framework provide an ample air reservoir and the circulation of this contained oxygen is aided, in part, by the flow of liquid through the system. intermittent flow, time is provided for the sludge to utilize the adsorbed substances. Moreover, the successful perpetuation of both processes is dependent on the fre quent or continuous removal of excess and, frequently, detrimental by products. Soluble fractions of such by-products are removed with the effluent in both processes. Suspended matter is removed continuously in the activated sludge process by the withdrawal of excess sludge while in the trickling filter such withdrawals are accomplished by a continuous but moderate unloading and by a periodic sloughing off of the accumula tions on the filter stones. With both processes the removal of excess material is aided probably by successive growths of various biological forms. The latter factor is probably more significant in the trickling filter where such biological growths are more varied and more abundant. 639