In [3, 4, 5], we constructed all degenerate irreducible modules over the exceptional Lie superalgebra E(3, 6). In the present paper, we apply the same method to the exceptional Lie superalgebras E(3, 8) and E(5, 10). The Lie superalgebra E(3, 8) is strikingly similar to E(3, 6). In particular, as in the case ofE(3, 6), themaximal compact subgroup of the group of automorphisms ofE(3, 8) is isomorphic to the group of symmetries of the StandardModel. However, as the computer calculations by Joris van Jeugt show, the fundamental particle contents in the E(3, 8) case is completely different from that in the E(3, 6) case [3]. All the nice features of the latter case, like the CPT symmetry, completely disappear in the former case. We believe that themain reasonbehind this is that, unlikeE(3, 6),E(3, 8) cannot be embedded in E(5, 10), which, we believe, is the algebra of symmetries of the SU5 Grand Unified Model (the maximal compact subgroup of the automorphism group of E(5, 10) is SU5). However, similarity with E(3, 6) allows us to apply to E(3, 8) all the arguments from [3] almost verbatim, and Figure 4.1 of the present paper, that depicts all degenerate E(3, 8)-modules, is almost the same as [3, Figure 3] for E(3, 6). The picture in the E(5, 10) case is quite different (see Figure 5.1). We believe that it depicts all degenerate irreducible E(5, 10)-modules, but we still do not have a proof.