THE relations of the fig and the caprifig, or the cultivated varieties of fig and the wild form of the Mediterranean region, have been variously explained by different writers, including those recent ones whose works are cited below. Intimately connected with this question is the process of caprification, so often and so circumstantially described by ancient and modern authors, amongst the later of whom we may mention Gasparrini. Graf Solms-Laubach's essay is an elaborate work of upwards of one hundred quarto pages, embodying the results of much research. Not the least interesting part is that treating of caprification, or perhaps we might say the manner in which fertilisation is effected. The author regards the cultivated edible varieties of fig as constituting one race, and the wild caprifig as another race of one and the same species; and the former as having developed from the latter under the influences of cultivation. Gasparrini, on the contrary, described them as distinct genera. Dr. Fritz Müller takes an altogether different view. He says it appears to him far more likely that the fig and caprifig represent, as Linnæus supposed, different forms, the male and the female, belonging together, and not proceeding the one from the other, but which developed side by side, before any cultivation, through natural selection. An examination of the facts adduced by Solms-Laubach himself seems to point to the correctness of Müller's view. But we will set them forth as briefly as possible, leaving the reader to judge for himself. The responsibility of their accuracy rests with the author whom we are quoting. It may be well to explain, in the first place, the nature of the fruit of the fig, as it is something more than a seed-vessel of one flower. The fleshy part is a thickened hollow receptacle, closed, except a very narrow aperture at the top, and containing numerous minute flowers crowded together all over the inside of the cavity. Both the fig and caprifig produce three more or less distinct crops of fruit in the course of the year. Each of these crops of fig and caprifig bears a distinctive name; but the three crops of the former do not all reach maturity. In this country only one crop ripens. The varieties of the fig in Naples, whether cultivated or wild, produce fruit at least twice a year, and different varieties exhibit diverse phenomena in the degree of development and maturation of the several crops. In the fig the tissue of the receptacle or infiorescence is fleshy, and the perianth and pedicels of the individual flowers it contains thicken and abound in a sugary juice; whilst the fruit of the caprifig remains hard and milky up to maturity, or only imperfectly softens just at last without any secretion of sugar, and then shrivels and dries up. As long ago as 1770, Colin Milne1 recorded the fact that the varieties of fig cultivated in England contained only female flowers; and Graf Solms found that male flowers were almost invariably altogether wanting in the varieties cultivated in Naples, and in the very rare exceptional instances in which they were present they were imperfectly developed and abnormal, the anthers being commonly replaced by leafy organs. On the other hand the inflorescence of the caprifig, as observed in Naples, usually contained both male and female flowers, the latter covering the greater part of the surface of the cavity, and the former restricted to a zone, variable in breadth, in the neighbourhood of the apical aperture. It is, moreover, noteworthy that the inflorescence exhibits proterogynous dichogamy in a marked degree. At the time when the female flowers are in a receptive condition the male flowers are still in a very early stage of development. The significance of this will perhaps be better understood after reading the description of caprification—that is if we may assume with Müller that this is really a process of fertilisation, in which there is a mutual adaptation of the inflorescences of the fig and caprifig and the insect which is an agent in procuring fertilisation. Before proceeding to that description, it should be mentioned that a variety of the fig exists in Brittany in which normal male flowers are abundantly produced. Yet, as in the caprifig, the males are not developed until long after the females have passed the receptive stage. The position this variety occupies in relation to other varieties and to the caprifig has not been ascertained. It may be a reversion to an original monœcious condition.
Read full abstract