Excellent Test-retest Reliability Research Articles

Development and validation of a novel Barrett's oesophagus patient reported outcome measure (B-PROM)

Patients with Barrett's oesophagus (BO) carry significant cancer worry, burden of symptoms, and lack disease-specific knowledge. Currently there is no validated BO patient reported outcome measure (PROM) to measure these factors for use in clinical practice and research, hence the aim of this study was to devise a novel, validated BO-specific tool, B-PROM. Literature review, quantitative and qualitative research informed the initial item generation. The item bank was refined through a modified Delphi process between May and August 2021. The PROM was then tested through cognitive interviews and validated via multicentre testing between September 2021 and February 2023 with the aim to create a succinct tool which addresses the key important factors to BO patients and has strong psychometric properties. B-PROM covers key themes of disease-specific knowledge, trust in clinicians, burden of symptoms, cancer worry and burden of surveillance. Validation results from 387 participants (response rate 40.8%) showed 93.3% of participants completed >95% of B-PROM. All individual items scored a completion rate of >95%. Mean completion time was 5mins 34s for a sample group. Nineteen items showed a ceiling effect, 3 items showed a floor effect. Internal consistency overall demonstrated a Cronbach Alpha of 0.846, while predetermined subsections showed Cronbach alphas of 0.335, 0.718, 0.736, and 0.896. Inter-item analysis found 2 pairs of items with strong correlation, with only 6 items correlating weakly. Item-total correlation showed 19 items correlated well. Exploratory Factor analysis (EFA) with principal component analysis produced 5 components with Eigenvalues >1 of which 4/5 had satisfactory Cronbach alphas. Test-retest reliability showed no significant differences across single and average measures (p ≤ 0.001). B-PROM is the first BO-specific PROM to be systematically evaluated. Validation findings show strong internal consistency, short completion time, low missingness and excellent test-retest reliability. Medtronic Limited ISR-2016-1077.

Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and psychometric properties of the Arabic version of the MedRisk instrument for measuring patient satisfaction with physical therapy care

Purpose This study aimed to translate, cross-culturally adapt, and validate the MedRisk Instrument for Measuring Patient Satisfaction with Physical Therapy Care into Arabic (MRPS-Ar). Materials and Methods The 20-Item MRPS was translated and cross-culturally adapted into Arabic following international guidelines. Patients (n = 229) with musculoskeletal conditions who received physical therapy care completed the MRPS-Ar and global rating of change scale. Of these patients, 95 completed the MRPS-Ar twice. Factor structure, floor and ceiling effects, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and construct validity of the MRPS-Ar were evaluated. Results Principal component analysis suggested 3-factor solution: a 7-item facility experience, 6-item therapeutic experience, and 3-item positive experience. The MRPS-Ar and its factors showed acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha coefficients ranged from 0.819 to 0.936) and excellent test-retest reliability (ICCs ranged from 0.965 to 0.983). The global measures of satisfaction were significantly correlated with the global rating of change (Spearman’s rho = −0.678, p < 0.001 for item “overall satisfaction” and Spearman’s rho = −0.690, p < 0.001 for item “would return”). Conclusions The 18-item MRPS-Ar displayed adequate psychometric properties for measuring patients’ satisfaction with physical therapy care. The MRPS-Ar is a reliable and valid instrument that can be used in medical, clinical, and research fields.

Development and validation of a quality of life and treatment satisfaction measure in canine osteoarthritis.

Canine osteoarthritis (OA) causes pain and mobility impairment. This can reduce dog quality of life (QoL), owner QoL and owners' satisfaction with, and adherence to, treatments. No existing canine OA-specific instrument assesses all three impacts. This study aimed to develop and psychometrically evaluate an owner-completed canine OA-specific measure of dog QoL, owner QoL and owner treatment satisfaction; the "Canine OA Quality of Life and Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire" (CaOA-QoL-TS). The CaOA-QoL-TS was developed using a conceptual model derived from a meta-synthesis of published literature followed by cognitive interviews with ten owners of dogs with OA, to evaluate content validity. Based on interview findings, ten items were reworded, four removed, and two added; resulting in 26 items that all owners understood and considered relevant. The recall period and response options were well understood and appropriate to almost all owners. To evaluate its psychometric properties, the CaOA-QoL-TS (draft 26-item version) was administered, across six timepoints in a phase 4 field study, to owners of OA treated dogs, recruited from veterinary practices (N = 93). Inter-item correlations suggested items clustered into three distinct domains: Dog QoL, Owner QoL and Treatment Satisfaction, as hypothesized. Confirmatory factor analysis supported deletion of two items and calculation of the three domain scores, with acceptable model fit. The resulting 24-item CaOA-QoL-TS instrument demonstrated strong internal consistency and good to excellent test-retest reliability. Convergent validity was supported by moderate to strong correlations with concurrent measures. Known groups validity was supported by statistically significant differences between groups categorized by owner global impression of QoL. Ability to detect change was demonstrated through statistically significant improvements over time in Owner and Dog QoL, with larger within-group effect sizes reported for the mean of 'improved' dogs compared to the mean of 'stable' dogs. Only a small sample of dogs worsened throughout the study. Anchor-based analyses supported-0.9 and-1.0-point within-group responder definitions for dog and owner QoL domains, respectively. Findings support the content validity of the CaOA-QoL-TS in canine OA. The 24-item CaOA-QoL-TS is a reliable and valid instrument to measure owner and canine QoL and TS and is sensitive to improvements following OA treatment.

Test-retest reliability and time-of-day variations of perfusion imaging at rest and during a vigilance task.

Arterial spin-labeled perfusion and blood oxygenation level-dependent functional MRI are indispensable tools for noninvasive human brain imaging in clinical and cognitive neuroscience, yet concerns persist regarding the reliability and reproducibility of functional MRI findings. The circadian rhythm is known to play a significant role in physiological and psychological responses, leading to variability in brain function at different times of the day. Despite this, test-retest reliability of brain function across different times of the day remains poorly understood. This study examined the test-retest reliability of six repeated cerebral blood flow measurements using arterial spin-labeled perfusion imaging both at resting-state and during the psychomotor vigilance test, as well as task-induced cerebral blood flow changes in a cohort of 38 healthy participants over a full day. The results demonstrated excellent test-retest reliability for absolute cerebral blood flow measurements at rest and during the psychomotor vigilance test throughout the day. However, task-induced cerebral blood flow changes exhibited poor reliability across various brain regions and networks. Furthermore, reliability declined over longer time intervals within the day, particularly during nighttime scans compared to daytime scans. These findings highlight the superior reliability of absolute cerebral blood flow compared to task-induced cerebral blood flow changes and emphasize the importance of controlling time-of-day effects to enhance the reliability and reproducibility of future brain imaging studies.

Cross-cultural Adaptation, Translation, and Validation of Gujarati Version of Neck Disability Index in Patients with Chronic Neck Pain

Background and Aim: Specific to the population of Gujarat state, a need arises to have neck disability index (NDI) in the regional Gujarati language. The aim of present study is to translate NDI in Gujarati language and assess its validity for use in patient care. Materials and Methods: A total of 100 patients suffering from chronic neck pain and aged between 18 and 65 years participated in the study. In phase I, translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the original English version of NDI was performed according to the published guidelines. In phase II, all the patients were asked to complete a questionnaire booklet consisting of Gujarati version of NDI (NDI-G), Neck Pain and Disability (NPAD), and Beck’s depression inventory scales. The psychometric testing included evaluation of factor structure by exploratory factor analysis, reliability by test–retest reliability and internal consistency, agreement by Bland–Altman plots and value of measurement error (standard error of measurement and minimal detectable change), construct validity by assessing hypotheses of NDI-G correlations with the Gujarati version of Neck Pain and Disability (NPAD-G) and Gujarati version of BDI (BDI-G). A panel of 15 expert members assessed the content validity of NDI-G on a 7-point Likert scale for content equivalence, content relevance, and content representativeness. Test–retest reliability for the NDI-G was examined in 50 patients, twice with an interval of 48 h. Results: In phase I, the cross-cultural adaptation process of the NDI-G was successful, and less difficulty was experienced in achieving an acceptable translation. In phase II, the NDI-G showed strong psychometric properties. The translated version of the scale showed high internal consistency (Cronbach α = 0.82) and excellent test–retest reliability (Intra-class correlation coefficient = 0.982). Face and content validity of the NDI-G was well established with no floor and ceiling effects observed. In construct validity, convergent validity was confirmed by a high correlation of NDI-G with NPAD-G (r = 0.941, P &lt; 0.01). Conclusion: The NDI-G was successfully translated into Gujarati, showing good psychometric properties. Its use is recommended for clinical and research purposes.

Measurement Properties of Backward Walking and Its Sensitivity and Feasibility in Predicting Falls in People With Multiple Sclerosis.

People with multiple sclerosis (MS) experience mobility impairments that elevate fall risk, increasing the need to identify clinical measures that accurately predict falls. Backward walking (BW) better differentiates fallers from nonfallers in MS. However, no studies have reported the measurement properties of the backward walking Timed 25-Foot Walk (B-T25-FW) and BW metrics, like BW velocity. Additionally, it is unknown whether BW can predict future falls in MS or its link to activity levels. This study assessed the reliability and responsiveness of B-T25-FW and BW metrics, including BW velocity. It also examined whether BW could predict falls at 3 and 6 months and its association with activity levels. During 2 separate visits, 23 people with MS completed the forward walking Timed 25-Foot Walk (F-T25-FW) and B-T25-FW, as well as forward walking and BW assessments in which spatiotemporal measures were recorded. Test-retest reliability was determined with intraclass correlation coefficients, and minimum detectable changes were calculated. Correlation analyses explored the relationship between BW velocity, B-T25-FW, prospective falls, and activity levels. B-T25-FW and BW velocity exhibited excellent test-retest reliability. Large effect sizes to interpret clinically meaningful change in the B-T25-FW and BW velocity were also found. Both metrics demonstrated modest negative correlations with falls at 3 and 6 months and correlated strongly with very active minutes at 3- and 6-months post study. The B-T25-FW and BW velocity are effective and reliable in clinical use for evaluating functional mobility in people with MS, are sensitive enough to detect subtle changes, and may be a meaningful marker for tracking disease progression and treatment efficacy.

The Wayfinding Questionnaire-Turkish (WQ-TR): A study of cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of validity and reliability

Objectıves: Navigation and wayfinding is a neurocognitive skill that we often use in daily life. The aim of this study is to adapt the Wayfinding Questionnaire-Turkish (WQ-TR), which assesses the navigation complaints of individuals, and to assess psychometric properties of WQ-TR in healthy individuals. Materials and Methods: This study was conducted with 363 healthy participants (203 F, 160 M) aged 18 and 69 (mean: 39.0±13.1). WQ-TR and Money's Road Map Test (RMT) were applied to all participants. Validity analyses were conducted with construct and concurrent validity. Factory structures of the questionnaire were formed with principal axis factoring in construct validity. The correlation between the RMT error counts and WQ-TR scores was evaluated for concurrent validity. Internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) and test-retest reliability were performed in reliability analyses. Results: WQ-TR has 20 items and 3-factor structures: “Navigation and Orientation(NO)”, “Spatial Anxiety-Ambiguous(SA-A)” and “Spatial Anxiety-Organisation(SA-O)”. In line with the correlation between RMT error counts and WQ-TR scores, WQ-TR was found to have moderate validity. High internal consistency (a: 0.906) and high intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC: 0.976) were observed. WQ-TR showed satisfactory internal consistency, excellent test-retest reliability and moderate validity. Conclusion: WQ-TR, the first Turkish questionnaire assessing navigation skills and showed perfect internal consistency, reliability and validity, was presented for clinical and scientific use.

Validation of the Persian Version of the Palin Parent Rating Scales

Introduction: The Palin Parent Rating Scale (Palin PRS) is a structured questionnaire filled out by parents of children who stutter. It is designed to assess the effects of stuttering on both the children and their parents. The goal of this study was to translate the Palin PRS into Persian and to evaluate its validity and reliability for application in preschool children who stutter. Methods: This research was conducted from August 2021 to December 2022, involving 139 parents of children who stutter. The parents completed the Palin PRS and provided their demographic data. Descriptive statistics were used to examine the floor and ceiling effects on all subscales of the Palin PRS. The internal consistency of the scale was assessed using Cronbach’s alpha method, while the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated to determine its test-retest reliability. An exploratory factor analysis was also performed to clarify the factor structure of the scale. Results: The exploratory factor analysis results were highly consistent with the factor structure found in the original version. No floor or ceiling effects were observed for the factors of the Palin PRS. The three factors of the Persian version of the Palin PRS (P-Palin PRS) showed good internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha >0.8) and excellent test-retest reliability (ICC >0.9). Additionally, normative scores were derived by converting raw scores into Stanine scores. Conclusion: The P-Palin PRS showed strong reliability, thereby establishing it as a suitable instrument for evaluating how parents perceive the effects of stuttering on their children and themselves. Further research may explore its application in diverse clinical settings and populations.

The Forgotten Joint Score Is a Valid Outcome Measure for Total Ankle Arthroplasty: A Prospective Study.

The success of total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) involves objective and subjective parameters such as joint motion and implant survival. Patient-reported outcome measures provide key context from the patient's perspective so that we can evaluate the results of these procedures. The Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) has demonstrated validity and reliability in other arthroplasties, but the existing evidence on the FJS in TAA is very limited. We aimed to assess the reliability, validity, responsiveness to change, and floor and ceiling effects, as well as to perform a gender analysis, of the FJS in patients who had undergone TAA. A prospective, observational study enrolled patients who underwent TAA at our institution between June 2021 and May 2023. The three-component TAA was performed through an anterior approach. A total of 120 patients (mean age 62 ± 10 years) participated, which was 83% (120 of 145) of those eligible, and 77% (92 of 120) of those patients underwent follow-up assessments at 12 ± 1 months after surgery. A cross-culturally adapted and validated version of the FJS in our language (Italian) was used. Additionally, three other commonly used patient-reported outcome measures for TAA were administered: the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score, the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ), and the VAS. Reliability was demonstrated by excellent internal consistency (Cronbach α coefficient = 0.95) and excellent test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.99; standard error of measurement = 2.7). Robust validity was observed, in that the FJS had a strong correlation with the AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score, the MOXFQ, and the VAS (Pearson and Spearman values consistently above 0.7 or below -0.7). Responsiveness to change was observed between 6 and 12 months (Cohen d = 0.37). Low ceiling and floor effects at both 6 months (4% and 3% reached top and bottom scores, respectively) and 12 months (10% and 0% reached top and bottom scores, respectively) were demonstrated, below the recommended 15% interpretability threshold. No association between outcomes and patient gender was observed. Test properties and validity of the FJS were strong in patients who underwent TAA. It seems suitable for clinical use, although future studies should seek to replicate or refute our findings in other patient populations. Level II, therapeutic study.

E072 The psoriatic arthritis disease activity score demonstrates excellent test-retest reliability in early, untreated psoriatic arthritis

Abstract Background/Aims Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic inflammatory arthritis characterised by heterogenous clinical features including peripheral arthritis, spondylitis, enthesitis, dactylitis, skin and nail disease. Historically, outcome measures in PsA trials focused on the articular manifestations of disease, with a recent emphasis in composite tools. The Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Score (PASDAS) is a validated, composite measure with defined cut-off and excellent responsiveness when compared with other PsA-specific and non-specific composite measures. Although PASDAS is one of the recommended GRAPPA measures for research trials, data on its test-retest reliability are limited particularly in PsA of short disease duration. Aims and Objectives - To assess the test-retest reliability of the PASDAS composite index in a cohort of early, untreated PsA patients. Methods Data were collected from a subset of participants recruited to the GOLMePsA clinical trial (EudraCT Number: 2013-004122-28), after a minor protocol amendment enabling additional data collection at the screening visit. The test-retest reliability of PASDAS was performed by calculating the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) between measurements collected at screening and baseline time-points (maximum 4 weeks apart, by protocol). Table 1 details the sample size calculation. Baseline variables collected in the GOLMePsA trial were described by absolute numbers, percentages, means, medians, absolute and inter-quartile ranges (IQR). Results The PASDAS test-retest reliability was assessed in 37 consecutive participants. Average time between the two time-points was 1.9 weeks (range 0.4 to 4.0). Baseline characteristics of test-retest subset compared to all GOLMePsA participants were similar (table 1). The ICC was 0.85 (95% confidence interval 0.73-0.92). The observed ICC was identical to the value assumed in the sample size calculation for this analysis, yielding an acceptably narrow confidence interval around the estimate. There was no substantial correlation between the means of the two measurements and the differences between them (Pearson’s r=-0.26). The Bland-Altman limits of agreement were -0.11 ± 1.24 (-1.35 to 1.13). Conclusion These results confirm the excellent test-retest reliability of PASDAS in early, untreated PsA, supporting its use as an outcome measure in interventional studies in newly diagnosed disease of short-duration. Disclosure G. De Marco: Consultancies; Janssen, Novartis. E.M.A. Hensor: None. D.G. McGonagle: Consultancies; AbbVie, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB. Grants/research support; AbbVie, BMS, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB. A. Tan: None. L.C. Coates: Consultancies; AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Galapagos, Janssen, Moonlake, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB. Honoraria; AbbVie, Amgen, Biogen, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, GSK, Janssen, Medac, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB. Grants/research support; AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB. P. Emery: None. P.S. Helliwell: None. H. Marzo Ortega: Consultancies; AbbVie, Celgene, Eli-Lilly, Janssen, Moonlake, Novartis, Pfizer, Takeda and UCB. Grants/research support; Janssen, Novartis and UCB.

Development, validity and reliability of the systematic screening for handwriting difficulties tool

Background The purpose of this study was to develop an Arabic handwriting screening test and establish its psychometric properties. Methods Handwriting quality was evaluated using seven criteria from the Systematic Screening for Handwriting Difficulties Arabic (SOS-ARB) and writing speed were measured by counting the number of letters produced in 5 minutes. Construct validity was evaluated using hypothesis testing (learning disabilities, sex and age differences). Convergent validity was examined using data from 106 children with dysgraphia who were also administered the French version of the “Concise Assessment Methods of Children’s Handwriting” (BHK). Intrarater, interrater, and test-retest reliability were established for total and item scores. Results Handwriting test data were collected from 1274 children (6–10 years) in regular education, of whom 194 were diagnosed with Learning Disabilities (LD). The SOS-ARB scores differed between children with and without LD (F (1, 1273) = 330.90, p &lt;.001, η2 = 0.209), males and females, and different age groups. In addition, significant differences in writing speed were shown between children with and without LD (F (1, 1273) = 60.26, p &lt;0.001, η2 = 0.046), between females and males (F (1, 1273) = 7.57, p =0.01, η2 = 0.006), and between the different age groups (F (4, 1270) = 21.762, p &lt;0.001, η2 = 0.065). A correlation coefficient of 0.72 for the quality score between the SOS-ARB and BHK confirmed convergent validity. Intrarater and interrater reliability were excellent in terms of quality scores (ICC coefficients = 0.988 and 0.972, respectively) and letter speed (ICC coefficients = 0.993 and 0.990, respectively). The quality score and letter speed had excellent and good test-retest reliability (ICC co-efficient = 0.968 and 0.784, respectively). Conclusions Results indicate that the SOS-ARB is a valid and reliable tool for scoring Arabic handwriting abilities in elementary school children.

Tran slation , cultural adap tation an d psycho metric anal ysis of U rd u ver sion of Vic torian; institu te of sp or ts ass es sme nt: Achill es quest i onnaire fo r athletes with achilles tendinopathy.

To translate, culturally adapt and psychometrically analyse the Urdu version of the Victorian Institute of Spor t Assessment-Achilles questionnaire. The cross-sec tional study was conducted at the Pak istan Sports Board, Lahore, Pakistan, from June 17, 2021, to February 15, 2022, and comprised patients with Achilles tendinopathy in group A and healthy controls in group B. Beaton's guidelines for cultural adaptation and validation for self-repor ted measures were followed to translate and validate the Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment-Achilles questionnaire in Urdu language. Data was analysed using SPSS 23. Of the 180 subjects with mean age 28.06±5.95 years, 125(69.6%) were males. There were 130(72.2%) patients in group A and 50(27.8%) controls in group B. The overall mean score of the Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment- Achille s questionnaire was 55.99±25.43; group A 41.14±9.54 and group B 94.60±4.22. The Urdu version exhibited excellent internal consistency with Cronbach's alpha values 0.95, and excellent test-retest reliability (p<0.001). Absolute reliability was expressed by standard error of measurement 5.317 and minimal detectable change (6.38). Convergent validity demonstrated strong correlation with the physical domain (r=0.81) of the Urdu version of the World Health Organisation Quality of Life Brief Version. The Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment-Achilles questionnaire could be utilised for assessing severity of Achilles tendinopathy among Urdu-speaking population for clinical as well as research purposes.

32 HANDFULS: A New Clinically Feasible Measure of Hand Outcome for Children with Burns and Trauma

Abstract Introduction Fine motor dexterity is important for children's normal hand function and development. In-hand manipulation (the collection and repositioning of items in the hand) and palmar workspace (functional volume in the palm) are two aspects of hand function that often become simultaneously impaired after hand trauma or burn injury. Rehabilitation emphasizes recovery of these hand functions yet few functional outcome measures address both of these constructs and even fewer are appropriate for children. Methods This study developed a new hand outcome measure to specifically assess these constructs and tested it on 192 children between the ages of 2-21. The test, called ‘HANDFULs’, uses simple instructions and inexpensive materials (i.e. marbles) shown in Figure 1. Means, standard deviations, and 95% confidence limits were estimated for children in seven age groups. Associations between age and the HANDFULs variables were examined using one-factor ANOVA. Multiple regressions were fit to test for associations between age and the HANDFULs variables after controlling for height, hand size, and hand strength. A stepwise selection procedure was then implemented, holding age into the model, to remove otherwise non-significant variables. Test-retest reliability was tested with the Shrout Fleiss Reliability Index and significance was set at p&amp;lt; 0.05. Results Expected normal values are reported in Figure 2 for palmar workspace volume (marbles that fit in the hand) and in-hand manipulation (collection time per marble) by age group. Age (0.16 (0.06), p=0.009), hand span (0.47 (0.09), p&amp;lt; 0.0001) and hand width (0.9 (0.29), p=0.003) were significantly associated with number of marbles that fit in the hand, representing palmar workspace capacity. Although hand strength and size characteristics were tested, only age (-0.02 (0.01), p=0.001) was significantly associated with the HANDFULs score of time per marble. The Intraclass Correlation Coefficient was 0.94 demonstrating excellent test-retest reliability. Conclusions This study developed a new pediatric hand outcome measure to address hand function to address a gap related to burn and trauma recovery. The measure was tested on able-bodied, noninjured children to establish validity and reliability, provide reference values for patients with injuries by age groups, and is clinically feasible to administer. Applicability of Research to Practice Outcome test for burn injured hands.

Physical performance tests have excellent reliability in frail and non-frail patients with prostate cancer

Purpose Our aim was to investigate the test-retest reliability of the 2-min walk test (2MWT), timed up and go test (TUG), and five times sit-to-stand test (FTSST) in prostate cancer (PC) patients. Methods This study was conducted with 73 patients who were classified into two groups as frail and non-frail determined by the Geriatric-8 questionnaire. Patients performed the 2MWT, TUG, and FTSST tests for two times. The test-retest reliability of the 2MWT, TUG, and FTSST was assessed by calculating the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The standard error of measurement (SEM95) and minimal detectable change (MDC95) values were calculated. Results All tests showed excellent test-retest reliability for both groups (ICC(2.1) > 0.90). The SEM95 and MDC95 values of 2MWT were 3.09, 8.57, and 3.15 m, 8.73 m for frail and non-frail groups. The SEM95 and MDC95 values of TUG for the frail group were 0.6 and 1.66 and 0.43 and 1.19 for the non-frail group, respectively. The SEM95 and MDC95 values of FTST for the frail group were 0.68 and 1.88 and for the non-frail group 0.86 and 2.38. Conclusions The 2MWT, TUG, and FTSST showed excellent reliability in frail and non-frail older adults with PC which can be used to assess physical performance.

A portable system to measure knee extensor spasticity after spinal cord injury

BackgroundThe pendulum test is a quantitative method used to assess knee extensor spasticity in humans with spinal cord injury (SCI). Yet, the clinical implementation of this method remains limited. The goal of our study was to develop an objective and portable system to assess knee extensor spasticity during the pendulum test using inertial measurement units (IMU).MethodsSpasticity was quantified by measuring the first swing angle (FSA) using a 3-dimensional optical tracking system (with external markers over the iliotibial band, lateral knee epicondyle, and lateral malleolus) and two wireless IMUs (positioned over the iliotibial band and mid-part of the lower leg) as well as a clinical exam (Modified Ashworth Scale, MAS).ResultsMeasurements were taken on separate days to assess test–retest reliability and device agreement in humans with and without SCI. We found no differences between FSA values obtained with the optical tracking system and the IMU-based system in control subjects and individuals with SCI. FSA values from the IMU-based system showed excellent agreement with the optical tracking system in individuals with SCI (ICC > 0.98) and good agreement in controls (ICC > 0.82), excellent test–retest reliability across days in SCI (ICC = 0.93) and good in controls (ICC = 0.87). Notably, FSA values measured by both systems showed a strong association with MAS scores (ρ\\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \\usepackage{amsmath} \\usepackage{wasysym} \\usepackage{amsfonts} \\usepackage{amssymb} \\usepackage{amsbsy} \\usepackage{mathrsfs} \\usepackage{upgreek} \\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \\begin{document}$$\\uprho$$\\end{document} ~ −0.8) being decreased in individuals with SCI with higher MAS scores, reflecting the presence of spasticity.ConclusionsThese findings suggest that our new portable IMU-based system provides a robust and flexible alternative to a camera-based optical tracking system to quantify knee extensor spasticity following SCI.

Psychometric evaluation of the near activity visual questionnaire presbyopia (NAVQ-P) and additional patient-reported outcome items.

The Near Visual Acuity Questionnaire Presbyopia (NAVQ-P) is a patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure that was developed in a phakic presbyopia population to assess near vision function impacts. The study refined and explored the psychometric properties and score interpretability of the NAVQ-P and additional PRO items assessing near vision correction independence (NVCI), near vision satisfaction (NVS), and near vision correction preference (NVCP). This was a psychometric validation study conducted using PRO data collected as part of a Phase IIb clinical trial (CUN8R44 A2202) consisting of 235 randomized adults with presbyopia from the US, Japan, Australia, and Canada. Data collected at baseline, week 2, and months 1, 2, and 3 during the 3-month trial treatment period were included in the analyses to assess item (question) properties, NAVQ-P dimensionality and scoring, reliability, validity, and score interpretation. Item responses were distributed across the full response scale for most NAVQ-P and additional PRO items. Confirmatory factor analysis supported the pre-defined unidimensional structure and calculation of a NAVQ-P total score as a measure of near vision function. Item deletion informed by item response distributions, dimensionality analyses, item response theory, and previous qualitative findings, including clinical input, supported retention of 14 NAVQ-P items. The 14-item NAVQ-P total score had excellent internal consistency (α = 0.979) and high test-retest reliability (Intraclass Correlation Coefficients > = 0.898). There was good evidence of construct-related validity for all PROs supported by strong correlations with concurrent measures. Excellent results for known-groups validity and ability to detect change analyses were also demonstrated. Anchor-based and distribution-based methods supported interpretation of scores through generation of group-level and within-individual estimates of meaningful change thresholds. A meaningful within-patient change in the range of 8-15-point improvement on the NAVQ-P total score (score range 0-42) was recommended, including a more specific responder definition of 10-point improvement. The NAVQ-P, NVCI, and NVS are valid and reliable instruments which have the ability to detect change over time. Findings strongly support the use of these measures as outcome assessments in clinical/research studies and in clinical practice in the presbyopia population.

Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of a smartphone-based manikin to support pain self-reporting.

Many people worldwide suffer from chronic pain. Improving our knowledge on chronic pain prevalence and management requires methods to collect pain self-reports in large populations. Smartphone-based tools could aid data collection by allowing people to use their own device, but the measurement properties of such tools are largely unknown. To assess the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of a smartphone-based manikin to support pain self-reporting. We recruited people with fibromyalgia, rheumatoid arthritis, and/or osteoarthritis and access to a smartphone and the internet. Data collection included the Global Pain Scale at baseline and follow-up, and 30 daily pain drawings completed on a 2-dimensional, gender-neutral manikin. After deriving participants' pain extent from their manikin drawings, we evaluated convergent and discriminative validity, test-retest reliability, and responsiveness and assessed findings against internationally agreed criteria for good measurement properties. We recruited 131 people; 104 were included in the full sample, submitting 2185 unique pain drawings. Manikin-derived pain extent had excellent test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.94), moderate convergent validity (ρ, 0.46), and an ability to distinguish fibromyalgia and osteoarthritis from rheumatoid arthritis (F statistics, 30.41 and 14.36, respectively; P < 0.001). Responsiveness was poor (ρ, 0.2; P, 0.06) and did not meet the respective criterion for good measurement properties. Our findings suggest that smartphone-based manikins can be a reliable and valid method for pain self-reporting, but that further research is warranted to explore, enhance, and confirm the ability of such manikins to detect a change in pain over time.

Translating and establishing the psychometric properties of the Jenkins Sleep Scale for Arabic-speaking individuals

BackgroundThe Jenkins Sleep Scale is a widely used self-report questionnaire that assesses sleep quality and disturbances. This study aimed to translate the scale into Arabic and evaluate its psychometric properties in an Arabic-speaking population.MethodsThe Jenkins Sleep Scale was translated into Arabic using forward and backward translation procedures. The Arabic version was administered to a convenience sample of 420 adults along with the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and Athens Insomnia Scale (AIS) for validation purposes. Reliability was examined using Cronbach’s alpha and McDonald’s omega coefficients. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was also conducted to test the unidimensional factor structure. Convergent validity was assessed using correlations with PSQI and AIS scores.ResultsThe Cronbach’s alpha and McDonald’s omega values for the Arabic Jenkins Sleep Scale were 0.74 and 0.75, respectively, indicating good internal consistency. The 2-week and 4-week test-retest intraclass correlation coefficients were both 0.94 (p < 0.001), indicating excellent test-retest reliability. The CFA results confirmed the unidimensional factor structure (CFI = 0.99, TLI = 0.96, RMSEA = 0.08). The measurement model had an equivalent factor structure, loadings, intercepts, and residuals across sex, age, and marital status. Significant positive correlations were found between the Arabic Jenkins scale score and the PSQI (r = 0.80, p < 0.001) and AIS (r = 0.74, p < 0.001), supporting convergent validity.ConclusionThe Arabic version of the Jenkins Sleep Scale demonstrated good psychometric properties. The findings support its use as a valid and reliable measure for evaluating sleep quality and disturbances among Arabic-speaking populations.

The Gothenburg Trismus Questionnaire in China: Cross-cultural adaptation and measurement invariance.

The Gothenburg Trismus Questionnaire (GTQ) is a comprehensive scale for screening and assessing trismus in head and neck (H&N) cancer and temporomandibular joint disorders (TMD) patients. This study aimed to translate and cross-culturally adapt the GTQ in China, and to test its measurement invariance. This study comprised 278 H&N cancer, 245 TMD, and 507 control patients. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were tested to assess the GTQ's reliability. The validity was evaluated through composite reliability (CR), average variance extracted (AVE), and correlation tests. Multi-group confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to investigate the GTQ's measurement invariance across clinical status and gender. T tests were employed to compare score differences across clinical status and gender. The Chinese version of GTQ scale shows excellent internal consistency and test-retest reliability. The CR, AVE, and correlation values demonstrate the good validity of GTQ. The multi-group CFA supported configural invariance across clinical status but not metric invariance, while it supported strict invariance across gender. Additionally, t tests revealed that patients with H&N cancer and TMD scored higher than the control group, while males scored higher than females. The Chinese version of GTQ serves as an effective tool for screening and assessing trismus.

Development, validation, and reliability of the Chrononutrition Profile Questionnaire-Pregnancy (CPQ-P)

BackgroundDuring pregnancy, physiological changes can affect eating and sleeping habits, which may eventually have negative consequences for maternal and foetal health. To better understand these changes, it is essential to develop a reliable questionnaire that addresses lifestyle habits such as snacking and daytime napping. This study aimed to determine the validity and reliability of the Chrononutrition Profile Questionnaire-Pregnancy (CPQ-P).MethodsA total of 399 women in their second and third trimester of pregnancy were recruited from government maternal and child health clinics in Kuala Lumpur and Putrajaya and completed a self-administered online questionnaire. Content validity was conducted with an expert panel consisting of 4 members. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) using maximum likelihood was conducted to determine the construct validity. Internal consistency was determined by Cronbach’s alpha coefficient (CAC), while the test-retest reliability was conducted using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).ResultsThe questionnaire had an appropriate content validity index of 0.91. The CPQ-P consists of 22 items, measuring 5 constructs, including morning chrono-habits, sleeping habits, evening eating, temporal eating, and pregnancy symptoms. The factor model showed good fit with χ2/df = 2.486, GFI = 0.893, CFI = 0.912, and RMSEA = 0.065. The 22 items in CPQ-P showed fair to excellent test-retest reliability (ICC: 0.42 to 0.98). The 5 constructs in CPQ-P were found to have a good to excellent internal consistency (α = 0.612–0.963).ConclusionsThe CPQ-P is a valid and reliable tool for assessing lifestyle habits during pregnancy. The questionnaire can be used to identify areas where pregnant women may need additional support or intervention to adopt healthy behaviours and reduce the risk of adverse maternal and foetal outcomes.Trial registrationNCT05700136 (clinicaltrials.gov). Trial registration date: 26/01/2023.