Exacerbation Rate Research Articles

A study to assess the relationship between vitamin D3 levels and the risk of acute exacerbation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is one of the top three causes of mortality worldwide. Vitamin D deficiency in COPD has been associated with poor lung function and decreased muscle power, which further increases the risk of exacerbations. The role of vitamin D in preventing acute exacerbations of COPD has conflicting results in the literature. Hence, we planned this study to assess the relationship between vitamin D3 levels and the risk of acute exacerbations among COPD patients in a tertiary care center in north India. This was a prospective randomized control trial that was performed on 100 consecutive stable COPD patients attending the Department of Respiratory Medicine at Maharishi Markandeshwar Medical College and Hospital, Solan, India. The patients with subnormal vitamin D3 levels (i.e., less than 30 ng/mL) were divided into the intervention and control groups. Baseline demographic profiles, lung function, COPD assessment test (CAT) score, modified Medical Research Council grade and chest radiology were performed and repeated after 12 months in all these patients. All these parameters were recorded and compared with the baseline values obtained at the beginning of the study. Out of 100 subjects, 96 had vitamin D deficiency, of which 48 were assigned to the intervention group and 48 to the control group. Among the 100 subjects, 74 (74%) were males and 26 (26%) were females, with a mean age of 66.9±9.4 years. The mean vitamin D level was 14.71±6.69 in these 96 patients. The vitamin D level improved after 3 months of supplementation to the mean level of 45.56±16.18 in the intervention group. Vitamin D supplementation was positively correlated with a decrease in the rate of acute exacerbations in the intervention group in terms of reduction in mean CAT score (4.17 in intervention and 1.43 in non-interventional group, p<0.001), number of acute exacerbations (1.7 in intervention and -1.05 in non-interventional group, p<0.001), and number of emergency visits (p=0.0121) during the 9-month period after attainment of a normal vitamin D level. Vitamin D supplementation plays a key role in COPD patients with D3 hypovitaminosis in decreasing COPD acute exacerbations, improving the CAT score, and reducing the number of emergency visits.

Tezepelumab for Severe Asthma: One Drug Targeting Multiple Disease Pathways and Patient Types.

Asthma is a heterogeneous inflammatory disease of the airways, affecting many children, adolescents, and adults worldwide. Up to 10% of people with asthma have severe disease, associated with a higher risk of hospitalizations, greater healthcare costs, and poorer outcomes. Patients with severe asthma generally require high-dose inhaled corticosteroids and additional controller medications to achieve disease control; however, many patients remain uncontrolled despite this intensive treatment. The treatment of severe uncontrolled asthma has improved with greater understanding of asthma pathways and phenotypes as well as the advent of targeted biologic therapies. Tezepelumab, a monoclonal antibody, blocks thymic stromal lymphopoietin, an epithelial cytokine that has multifaceted effects on the initiation and persistence of asthma inflammation and pathophysiology. Unlike other biologic treatments, tezepelumab has demonstrated efficacy across severe asthma phenotypes, with the magnitude of effects varying by phenotype. Here we describe the anti-inflammatory effects and efficacy of tezepelumab across the most relevant phenotypes of severe asthma. Across clinical studies, tezepelumab reduced annualized asthma exacerbation rates versus placebo by 63-71% in eosinophilic severe asthma, by 58-68% in allergic severe asthma, by 67-71% in allergic and eosinophilic severe asthma, by 34-49% in type 2-low asthma, and by 31-41% in oral corticosteroid-dependent asthma. Furthermore, in all these asthma phenotypes, tezepelumab demonstrated higher efficacy in reducing exacerbations requiring hospitalizations or emergency department visits versus placebo. In patients with severe uncontrolled asthma, who commonly have multiple drivers of inflammation and disease, tezepelumab may modulate airway inflammation more extensively, as other available biologics block only specific downstream components of the inflammatory cascade.

Sustained Effectiveness of Benralizumab in Naïve and Biologics-Experienced Severe Eosinophilic Asthma Patients: Results from the ANANKE Study.

Severe eosinophilic asthma (SEA) patients often present overlapping inflammatory features rendering them eligible for multiple biologic therapies; switching biologic treatment is a strategy adopted to optimize asthma control when patients show partial or no response to previous biologics. ANANKE is a retrospective, multicenter Italian study (NCT04272463). Here, we outline the characteristics and long-term clinical outcomes in naïve-to-biologics and biologics-experienced patients treated with benralizumab for up to 96 weeks. Bio-experienced patients were split into omalizumab and mepolizumab subsets according to the type of biologic previously used. A total of 124 (76.5%) naïve and 38 (23.5%) bio-experienced patients were evaluated at index date; 13 patients (34.2%) switched from mepolizumab, 21 patients (55.3%) switched from omalizumab, and four patients (10.5%) received both biologics. The mepolizumab subset was characterized by the longest SEA duration (median of 4.6 years), the highest prevalence of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP) (76.5%), and the greatest oral corticosteroid (OCS) daily dosage (median of 25 mg prednisone equivalent). The omalizumab group showed the highest severe annual exacerbation rate (AER) (1.70). At 96 weeks, treatment with benralizumab reduced any and severe AER by more than 87% and 94%, respectively, across all groups. Lung function was overall preserved, with major improvements observed in the mepolizumab group, which also revealed a 100% drop of the median OCS dose. Asthma Control Test (ACT) score improved in the naïve group while its increment was more variable in bio-experienced patients; among these, a marked difference was noticed between omalizumab and mepolizumab subsets (median ACT score of 23.5 and 18, respectively). Benralizumab promotes durable and profound clinical benefits in naïve and bio-experienced groups, indicating that a nearly complete depletion of eosinophils is highly beneficial in the control of SEA, independently of previous biologic use.

Clinical Features and Outcomes of Patients with Idiopathic Inflammatory Myositis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease in Rural Appalachia: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs) are a group of autoimmune disorders often complicated by interstitial lung disease (ILD). The clinical characteristics and outcomes of IIM-associated ILD have been reported variably, but the literature on rural populations is scarce. A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted at a rural tertiary academic medical center. Twenty-nine patients met the final inclusion criteria. The primary outcome was to assess the disease state and immunological and radiographic features of IIM-associated ILD. Secondary outcomes included disease progression, ILD exacerbation, mortality rate, and factors associated with poor outcome. Dermatomyositis (n = 15, 51.72%) followed by polymyositis (n = 8, 27.58%) were predominant myopathies. The most common autoantibodies were anti-Jo1 antibodies (n = 11, 37.93%). Indeterminate usual interstitial pneumonitis (41.30%, n = 12) was the most common radiographic pattern followed by non-specific interstitial pneumonia (n = 5, 17.24%). ILD exacerbation (n = 14, 66.66%) and mortality rate (n = 6, 20.69%) were high. Albumin levels were significantly lower in patients who died. The clinical characteristics of patients with IIM-associated ILD in rural Appalachia exhibit notable distinctions, and outcomes are worse compared to other populations. Larger studies are needed to investigate other prognostics factors and longitudinal trends of clinical characteristics and outcomes of IIM-associated ILD in rural populations.

Precision care in the treatment of pediatric asthma.

Precision medicine in pediatric asthma involves identification of asthma phenotypes, genetic markers, biomarkers, and biologics that target specific pathways. This review includes a discussion of the efficacy of currently approved biologics for pediatric asthma and most recent advances in biomarker/phenotype identification and genetic associations that affect asthma care. Biologics targeting type-2 mediated pathways have shown success in the treatment of moderate to severe asthma in pediatric and adult patients. In comparative studies, dupilumab, an interleukin-4 (IL-4) alpha receptor inhibitor, and mepolizumab, an IL-5 inhibitor, have shown more improvement in asthma exacerbation rates and lung function compared to other biologics such as tezepelumab, omalizumab and benralizumab. Other methods used to categorize asthma treatment response have been investigated and include use of biomarkers such as fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO). Genomic studies are also emerging in precision care for pediatric asthma. An understanding of underlying immunologic and genetic mechanisms affecting the development of asthma in pediatric patients has resulted in the production of numerous targeted therapies that have led to improvement in lung function and reduced exacerbation burden.

International Variation in Severe Exacerbation Rates in Patients With Severe Asthma

BackgroundExacerbation frequency strongly influences treatment choices in patients with severe asthma. Research QuestionWhat is the extent of the variability of exacerbations rate across countries and its implications in disease management? Study Design and MethodsWe retrieved data from the International Severe Asthma Registry, an international observational cohort of patients with a clinical diagnosis of severe asthma. We identified patients aged ≥18 years who did not initiate any biologics prior to baseline visit. A severe exacerbation was defined as the use of oral corticosteroids for ≥3 days or asthma-related hospitalization/emergency room visit. A series of negative binomial models were applied to estimate country-specific severe exacerbation rates during 365 days of follow-up, starting from a naïve model with country as the only variable, to an adjusted model with country as a random-effect term and patient and disease characteristics as independent variables. ResultsThe final sample included 7,510 patients from 17 countries (56% from the United States), contributing to 1,939 severe exacerbations (0.27/person-year). There was large between-country variation in observed severe exacerbation rate (min: 0.04 [Argentina], max:0.88 [Saudi Arabia], interquartile range [IQR]: 0.13–0.54), which remained substantial after adjusting for patient characteristics and sampling variability (IQR: 0.16–0.39). InterpretationIndividuals with similar patient characteristics but coming from different jurisdictions have varied severe exacerbation risks, even after controlling for patient and disease characteristics. This suggests unknown patient factors or system-level variations at play. Disease management guidelines should recognize such between-country variability. Risk prediction models that are calibrated for each jurisdiction will be needed to optimize treatment strategies. Clinical Trial Registration NumberN/A

Transcriptomic evaluation of skin tape-strips in children with allergic asthma uncovers epidermal barrier dysfunction and asthma-associated biomarkers abnormalities.

Tape-strips, a minimally invasive method validated for the evaluation of several skin diseases, may help identify asthma-specific biomarkers in the skin of children with allergic asthma. Skin tape-strips were obtained and analyzed with RNA-Seq from children with moderate allergic asthma (MAA) (n = 11, mean age 7.00; SD = 1.67), severe allergic asthma (SAA) (n = 9, mean age 9.11; SD = 2.37), and healthy controls (HCs) (n = 12, mean age 7.36; SD = 2.03). Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified by fold change ≥2 with a false discovery rate <0.05. Transcriptomic biomarkers were analyzed for their accuracy in distinguishing asthma from HCs, their relationships with asthma-related outcomes (exacerbation rate, lung function-FEV1, IOS-R5-20, and lung inflammation-FeNO), and their links to skin (barrier and immune response) and lung (remodeling, metabolism, aging) pathogenetic pathways. RNA-Seq captured 1113 in MAA and 2117 DEGs in SAA. Epidermal transcriptomic biomarkers for terminal differentiation (FLG/filaggrin), cell adhesion (CDH19, JAM2), lipid biosynthesis/metabolism (ACOT2, LOXL2) were significantly downregulated. Gene set variation analysis revealed enrichment of Th1/IFNγ pathways (p < .01). MAA and SAA shared downregulation of G-protein-coupled receptor (OR4A16, TAS1R3), upregulation of TGF-β/ErbB signaling-related (ACVR1B, EGFR, ID1/2), and upregulation of mitochondrial-related (HIGD2A, VDAC3, NDUFB9) genes. Skin transcriptomic biomarkers correlated with the annualized exacerbation rate and with lung function parameters. A two-gene classifier (TSSC4-FAM212B) was able to differentiate asthma from HCs with 100% accuracy. Tape-strips detected epithelial barrier and asthma-associated signatures in normal-appearing skin from children with allergic asthma and may serve as an alternative to invasive approaches for evaluating asthma endotypes.

Positioning of Tezepelumab in Severe Asthma.

Asthma is one of the most common chronic diseases and is estimated to be severe in 3%-10% of affected patients. There is a need for additional biologic treatments that are highly efficacious across the spectrum of severe uncontrolled asthma. Currently available drugs inhibit 1 or 2 specific cytokines or IgE antibodies and thus only partially suppress the complex type 2 (T2) inflammatory cascade. Biologics targeting more upstream molecules in the pathophysiological pathway of asthma could treat asthma more effectively. Tezepelumab is a human monoclonal immunoglobulin G2λ antibody that targets the cytokine thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP). It is the first marketed biologic against an epithelial cell-derived cytokine, preventing binding of TSLP to its receptor and reducing the immune stimuli that TSLP can trigger in different asthma endotypes. Tezepelumab reduces downstream biomarkers of inflammation, such as blood and airway eosinophils, FeNO, IgE, IL-5, and IL-13. Tezepelumab provides a clinical benefit in severe asthma, reducing the annualized asthma exacerbation rate in patients with either high or low levels of biomarkers of T2 inflammation, although the effect is greater among those with high levels. The drug has been shown to improve asthma control, quality of life, and lung function and reduce airway hyperresponsiveness. Therefore, tezepelumab can be used across the spectrum of patients with severe uncontrolled asthma, especially in T2-high patients. This review includes a positioning statement by the authors, all of whom are members of the SEAIC Asthma Committee.

Lebrikizumab in Uncontrolled Asthma: Reanalysis in a Well-Defined Type 2 Population

LAVOLTA (L)I, LII, and ACOUSTICS were randomized, placebo-controlled, Phase 3 trials of lebrikizumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting IL-13 in patients with uncontrolled asthma. Failure to demonstrate efficacy may have been related to patient selection in those trials. To assess the efficacy in a well-defined subpopulation of patients with elevated blood eosinophil counts and a minimum number of prior asthma exacerbations. We performed an additional analysis in a subpopulation of patients with elevated FeNO and prior exacerbations. Adult (LI and LII) and adolescent patients (aged 12-17 years weighing ≥40 kg, ACOUSTICS) with uncontrolled asthma received lebrikizumab (125 mg, n= 832; or 37.5 mg, n= 829) or placebo (n= 833) subcutaneously every 4 weeks. Post hoc analysis of the annualized adjusted exacerbation rate (AER) was performed in a subpopulation of patients with baseline blood eosinophils of 300 cells/μL or greater and history of one or more exacerbations. In this subpopulation, there were 227 patients in the placebo group, 222 in the lebrikizumab 37.5-mg group, and 217 in the lebrikizumab 125-mg group. We summarized safety in patients who received at least one dose of lebrikizumab using adverse events. Lebrikizumab significantly reduced AER compared with placebo in adults (AER reduction: 125 mg [38%]; and 37.5 mg [41%]) and adolescents (AER reduction:125 mg [59%]; 37.5 mg [64%]) with baseline blood eosinophils of 300 cells/μL or greater and one or more exacerbations. Most adverse events were mild or moderate in severity and did not lead to treatment discontinuation. Lebrikizumab significantly reduced asthma exacerbations in a subpopulation of patients with elevated blood eosinophils, elevated FeNO, and a history of asthma exacerbation.

Epidemiology and outcomes of multidrug-resistant bacterial infection in non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis

PurposeMultidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria impose a considerable health-care burden and are associated with bronchiectasis exacerbation. This study investigated the clinical outcomes of adult patients with bronchiectasis following MDR bacterial infection.MethodsFrom the Chang Gung Research Database, we identified patients with bronchiectasis and MDR bacterial infection from 2008 to 2017. The control group comprised patients with bronchiectasis who did not have MDR bacterial infection and were propensity-score matched at a 1:2 ratio. The main outcomes were in-hospital and 3-year mortality.ResultsIn total, 554 patients with both bronchiectasis and MDR bacterial infection were identified. The types of MDR bacteria that most commonly affected the patients were MDR- Acinetobacter baumannii (38.6%) and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (18.4%), Extended-spectrum-beta-lactamases (ESBL)- Klebsiella pneumoniae (17.8%), MDR-Pseudomonas (14.8%), and ESBL-E. coli (7.5%). Compared with the control group, the MDR group exhibited lower body mass index scores, higher rate of chronic bacterial colonization, a higher rate of previous exacerbations, and an increased use of antibiotics. Furthermore, the MDR group exhibited a higher rate of respiratory failure during hospitalization (MDR vs. control, 41.3% vs. 12.4%; p < 0.001). The MDR and control groups exhibited in-hospital mortality rates of 26.7% and 7.6%, respectively (p < 0.001); 3-year respiratory failure rates of 33.5% and 13.5%, respectively (p < 0.001); and 3-year mortality rates of 73.3% and 41.5%, respectively (p < 0.001). After adjustments were made for confounding factors, the infection with MDR and MDR bacteria species were determined to be independent risk factors affecting in-hospital and 3-year mortality.ConclusionsMDR bacteria were discovered in patients with more severe bronchiectasis and were independently associated with an increased risk of in-hospital and 3-year mortality. Given our findings, we recommend that clinicians identify patients at risk of MDR bacterial infection and follow the principle of antimicrobial stewardship to prevent the emergence of resistant bacteria among patients with bronchiectasis.

Dupilumab Efficacy on Asthma Functional, Inflammatory, and Patient-Reported Outcomes across Different Disease Phenotypes and Severity: A Real-Life Perspective.

Dupilumab is currently approved for the treatment of Type 2 severe asthma and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). Few studies have specifically reported on dupilumab efficacy on asthma outcomes as a primary objective in a real-life setting, in patients with and without CRSwNP. Our study aimed to explore the efficacy of dupilumab on functional, inflammatory, and patient-reported outcomes in asthma patients across different disease phenotypes and severity, including mild-to-moderate asthma coexisting with CRSwNP. Data from 3, 6, and 12 months follow-up were analyzed. Asthma (FEV1%, Tiffeneau%, ACT, FeNO, oral steroid use, exacerbation rate, and blood eosinophilia) and polyposis (SNOT22, VAS, NPS) outcomes showed a rapid (3 months) and sustained (6 and 12 months) significant change from baseline, despite most of the patients achieving oral steroid withdrawal. According to the sensitivity analysis, the improvement was not conditioned by either the presence of polyposis or severity of asthma at baseline. Of note, even in the case of milder asthma forms, a significant further improvement was recorded during dupilumab treatment course. Our report provides short-, medium-, and long-term follow-up data on asthma outcomes across different diseases phenotypes and severity, contributing to the real-world evidence related to dupilumab efficacy on upper and lower airways T2 inflammation.

Preference for hotline versus mobile application/countdown-based mobile overdose response services: a qualitative study.

In response to the exacerbated rates of morbidity and mortality associated with the overlapping overdose and COVID-19 epidemics, novel strategies have been developed, implemented, operationalized and scaled to reduce the harms resulting from this crisis. Since the emergence of mobile overdose response services (MORS), two strategies have aimed to help reduce the mortality associated with acute overdose including staffed hotline-based services and unstaffed timer-based services. In this article, we aim to gather the perspectives of various key interest groups on these technologies to determine which might best support service users. Forty-seven participants from various interested groups including people who use substances who have and have not used MORS, healthcare workers, family members, harm reduction employees and MORS operators participated in semi-structured interviews. Transcripts were coded and analyzed using a thematic analysis approach. Four major themes emerged regarding participant perspectives on the differences between services, namely differences in connection, perceived safety, privacy and accessibility, alongside features that are recommended for MORS in the future. Overall, participants noted that individuals who use substances vary in their desire for connection during a substance use session offered by hotline and timer-based service modalities. Participants perceived hotline-based approaches to be more reliable and thus potentiallysafer than their timer-based counterparts but noted that access to technology is a limitation of both approaches.

Outcomes of Patients with COPD Treated with ICS/LABA Before and After Initiation of Single-Inhaler Triple Therapy with Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium/Vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI).

Triple therapy (fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol; FF/UMEC/VI) has been shown to improve symptoms and reduce exacerbations in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and a history of exacerbations. This real-world study compared exacerbation rates and healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) before and after initiation of FF/UMEC/VI in patients with COPD previously treated with inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)/long-acting β2-agonist (LABA). This retrospective cohort study included commercial and Medicare Advantage with PartD administrative claims data from September01, 2016, to March31, 2020, of patients diagnosed with COPD. The index date was the date of the first FF/UMEC/VI claim (September 2017-March 2019). The 12months prior to index (baseline) were used to assess patient characteristics and outcomes; the 12months following index (follow-up) were used to assess study outcomes. All patients had ≥ 30 consecutive days' supply of any ICS/LABA dual therapy during the 12months prior to FF/UMEC/VI initiation. Subgroup analyses included patients with ≥ 30 consecutive days' supply of budesonide/formoterol (BUD/FORM) during baseline. Analyses of patients with ≥ 1 COPD exacerbation during baseline were reported as well. The overall population included 1449 patients (mean age 70.75years; 54.18% female), of whom 540 were patients in the BUD/FORM subgroup. Significantly fewer patients experienced any exacerbation during follow-up versus baseline (overall population 53.49% vs 62.59%; p < 0.001; BUD/FORM subgroup 55.00% vs 62.41%; p = 0.004). Effects on exacerbation reduction were more pronounced among patients with ≥ 1 exacerbation during baseline. Lower COPD-related HCRU was observed during the follow-up compared with baseline for both the overall population and the BUD/FORM subgroup. Patients with COPD treated with ICS/LABA during baseline, including patients specifically treated with BUD/FORM and those with a history of ≥ 1 exacerbation, had fewer COPD exacerbations and lower COPD-related HCRU after initiating FF/UMEC/VI.

Impact of Lung Function on Asthma Exacerbation Rates in Children Treated with Dupilumab: The VOYAGE Study.

Severe, uncontrolled asthma and asthma exacerbations in children are associated with abnormal lung function and airway development, and increased risk of chronic obstructive lung disease in adulthood. The rationale for this post hoc analysis was to explore the relationship between changes in asthma exacerbation rates and lung function in children treated with dupilumab. This post hoc analysis included children aged 6 to 11 years with uncontrolled, moderate-to-severe type 2 asthma (blood eosinophils ≥150 cells/μL or fractional exhaled nitric oxide ≥20 ppb) who received dupilumab or placebo in the phase 3 LIBERTY ASTHMA VOYAGE study (NCT02948959). Endpoints were the proportion of patients achieving clinically meaningful improvements (≥5% or ≥10%) in pre-bronchodilator percent-predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second (ppFEV1) by Week 12, annualized severe asthma exacerbation rates from Week 12-52, and mean change from baseline in ppFEV1 to Week 12. At Week 12 of VOYAGE, 141/236 (60%) of children treated with dupilumab and 57/114 (50%) of children receiving placebo showed improvements of ≥5% in ppFEV1; 106/236 (45%) children receiving dupilumab and 36/114 (32%) receiving placebo achieved improvements in ppFEV1 ≥10%. During the Week 12-52 treatment period, dupilumab vs placebo significantly reduced severe exacerbation rates in all subgroups by 52-60% (all P<0.05). Dupilumab treatment resulted in rapid and sustained improvements in ppFEV1 (Week 12 least squares mean difference [95% CI] vs placebo: 3.54 [0.30, 6.78] percentage points; P=0.03) in children who achieved improvements of ≥5%. Dupilumab vs placebo significantly improved pre-bronchodilator ppFEV1, with a higher proportion of patients achieving a clinically meaningful response at Week 12. Dupilumab also significantly reduced severe exacerbation rates, independent of pre-bronchodilator ppFEV1 response at Week 12. NCT02948959.

Trigeminal neuralgia pain outcomes following microsurgical resection versus stereotactic radiosurgery for petroclival meningiomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Petroclival meningiomas (PCMs) are challenging lesions to treat because of their deep location and proximity to critical neurovascular structures. Patients with these lesions commonly present because of local mass effect. A symptom that proves challenging to definitively manage is trigeminal neuralgia (TN), which occurs in approximately 5% of PCM cases. To date, there is no consensus on whether microsurgical resection or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) leads to better outcomes in the treatment of TN secondary to PCM. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, the authors aimed to evaluate the available literature on the efficacy of microsurgical resection versus SRS for controlling TN secondary to PCM. The Embase, MEDLINE, Scopus, and Cochrane databases were queried from database inception to May 17, 2022, using the search terms "(petroclival AND meningioma) AND (trigeminal AND neuralgia)." Study inclusion criteria were as follows: 1) reports on patients aged ≥ 18 years and diagnosed with TN secondary to PCM, 2) cases treated with microsurgical resection or SRS, 3) cases with at least one posttreatment follow-up report of TN pain, 4) cases with at least one outcome of tumor control, and 5) publications describing randomized controlled trials, comparative or single-arm observational studies, case reports, or case series. Exclusion criteria were 1) literature reviews, technical notes, conference abstracts, or autopsy reports; 2) publications that did not clearly differentiate data on patients with PCMs from data on patients with different tumors or with meningiomas in different locations (other intracranial or spinal meningiomas); 3) publications that contained insufficient data on treatments and outcomes; and 4) publications not written in the English language. References of eligible studies were screened to retrieve additional relevant studies. Data on pain and tumor outcomes were compared between the microsurgical resection and SRS treatment groups. The DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model with Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman variance correction was used to pool estimates from the included studies. Two comparative observational studies and 6 single-arm observational studies describing outcomes after primary intervention were included in the analyses (138 patients). Fifty-seven patients underwent microsurgical resection and 81 underwent SRS for the management of TN secondary to PCM. By the last follow-up (mean 71 months, range 24-149 months), the resection group had significantly higher rates of pain resolution than the SRS group (82%, 95% CI 50%-100% vs 31%, 95% CI 18%-45%, respectively; p = 0.004). There was also a significantly longer median time to tumor recurrence following resection (43.75 vs 16.7 months, p < 0.01). The resection group showed lower rates of pain persistence (0%, 95% CI 0%-6% vs 25%, 95% CI 13%-39%, p = 0.001) and pain exacerbation (0% vs 12%, 95% CI 3%-23%, p = 0.001). The most common postintervention Barrow Neurological Institute pain score in the surgical group was I (66.7%) compared with III (27.2%) in the SRS group. Surgical reintervention was less frequently required following primary resection (1.8%, 95% CI 0%-37% vs 19%, 95% CI 1%-48%, p < 0.01). Microsurgical resection is associated with higher rates of TN pain resolution and lower rates of pain persistence and exacerbation than SRS in the treatment of PCM. SRS with further TN management is a viable alternative in patients who are not good candidates for microsurgical resection.

Respiratory symptoms, exacerbations and sleep disturbances are more common among participants with asthma and chronic airflow limitation: an epidemiological study in Estonia, Iceland and Sweden

BackgroundChronic airflow limitation (CAL) is a hallmark of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease but is also present in some patients with asthma. We investigated respiratory symptoms, sleep and health status of...

Real-world users of triple therapy for asthma in the US.

For patients with asthma who remain symptomatic on a medium-dose inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting β2 agonist, addition of a long-acting muscarinic antagonist as a supplementary controller is a recommended option. However, real-world data on the characteristics and treatment patterns of these patients are limited. This study described the demographics and clinical characteristics of new users of single- or multiple-inhaler triple therapy and treatment patterns preceding triple-therapy initiation. This retrospective cohort study used medical and pharmacy claims data from the IQVIA PharMetrics Plus database. The study population comprised adults with asthma with or without chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) initiating triple therapy with single-inhaler fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI; 100/62.5/25 μg) or multiple-inhaler triple therapy (MITT) between September 18, 2017, and September 30, 2019. Demographics, clinical characteristics, and treatment patterns in the 12 months preceding triple-therapy initiation were described (baseline period). A total of 12,395 patients were included. Among FF/UMEC/VI initiators with asthma (n = 1301), the mean age was 49.0 years and 59.3% were women. During the baseline period, 81.5% of patients used controller therapy, 94.7% used rescue medications, and 42.0% reported at least 1asthma-related exacerbation; the annual mean exacerbation rate was 0.96. Similar trends were observed among patients with asthma initiating MITT and patients with comorbid asthma-COPD initiating FF/UMEC/VI or MITT. In real-world practice, triple therapy is often utilized following other asthma controller medication use. High disease burden, as evidenced by substantial use of rescue medications and continued asthma-related exacerbations, suggests that patients may not have achieved adequate asthma control prior to triple-therapy initiation.

P553 The safety and efficacy of adalimumab 80mg weekly as maintenance therapy in pediatric Crohn’s Disease

Abstract Background Intensification of adalimumab (ADL) dosing to weekly 40 mg injections, in response to low drug levels, has been shown to provide beneficial outcomes in pediatric patients with Crohn’s disease (CD). Our study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of weekly 80 mg ADL administration in children with CD. Methods In this retrospective cohort study conducted across five Israeli centers, we reviewed the medical records of pediatric CD patients who received a high dose of ADL 80 mg weekly injections between 2016 and 2023. Collected data included demographic characteristics, disease features, laboratory studies, and treatment outcomes. Results Thirty-two children with CD were included: mean age 15.8 (±1.7) years at intensification, 21 male (66%), 18 (56%) with L3 phenotype. The median time to ADL 80 mg intensification from ADL induction was 48.4 weeks (IQR 23.1-122.5). The mean weighted Pediatric Crohn's Disease Activity Index (wPCDAI) was 28.5 (±16.9) at the time of intensification and the median calprotectin and C-reactive protein levels were 937 μg/g (IQR 540-1410) and 1.3 mg/dL (IQR 0.6-5.2), respectively. Clinically active disease was the main reason for ADL intensification (30, 94%). Baseline ADL levels were available in 30 patients (94%) with a median of 3.8 μg/mL (IQR 2.4-7.2). Among these, 23 children (77%) failed to achieve a target of ≥ 7.5 μg/mL. The median follow-up duration from the intensification dose was 91.2 weeks (IQR 53.6-149.1). Corticosteroids were required in 5/32 (15.6%) children, with a median time of 32.3 weeks (IQR 10.7-51.3) from intensification. There was no statistically significant difference in steroid utilization rates between children who achieved a target baseline drug level of ≥ 7.5 μg/mL and those who did not (p=0.934). Thirteen individuals (41%) discontinued ADL treatment, within a median of 24.7 weeks (IQR 11.7-57.1) from intensification. CD-related exacerbation, hospitalization, and surgery rates were 9 (28%), 4 (13%), and 2 (6%), respectively. No statistically significant differences were found in exacerbation (p=0.406), hospitalization (p=0.322), or surgery rates (p=0.427) between children who achieved a baseline ADL trough concentration level of ≥ 7.5 μg/mL and those who did not. Overall, ADL intensification was safe, but 3 (9%) patients developed new-onset psoriasis. Conclusion Our findings support the safety and efficacy of administering ADL at a weekly dosage of 80 mg as maintenance therapy in pediatric patients with moderate to severe CD.

DOP29 Capsule endoscopy-guided proactive treatment versus standard treatment of patients with quiescent Crohn’s Disease: The CURE-CD randomized controlled trial

Abstract Background Optimal strategies for treat-to-target in Crohn’s disease (CD) are still being sought. We aimed to examine the value of capsule endoscopy (CE) to guide proactive treatment optimization in patients with CD Methods A prospective randomized controlled clinical trial with temporally-restricted blinding. Patients with CD involving the small bowel who were in clinical remission (CDAI&amp;lt;150) for over three months were enrolled. Baseline clinical, biomarker, imaging, patency capsule and CE assessments were performed. ‘High risk’ patients, defined as CE Lewis score ≥350 were randomized to either proactive treatment optimization or continued standard care for 24 months. ‘Low risk’ patients with Lewis score&amp;lt;350 continued their standard care. All patients repeated CE every six months for 24 months. Primary outcome was the rate of clinical exacerbation (CDAI increase&amp;gt;70 points and CDAI&amp;gt;150 or hospitalization/surgery) in the standard-care versus the proactive-care sub-groups of high-risk patients, at 24 months. Secondary outcomes included risk of flare in the low-risk versus the standard-care high-risk arms, and predictive profiles for flare of calprotectin, MRI, intestinal ultrasound and Lewis score. Results Out of 118 screened patients, 60 were enrolled (20 in each of the three arms). Treatment intensification in CE-determined high-risk group, who were allocated to proactive treatment, comprised biologic dose-escalation (n=11/20), starting a biologic (8/20) or swapping a biologic (1/20) at study entry. Notably, 9/20 proactive-group patients underwent a second optimization following detected inflammation on subsequent semi-annual CE studies. Clinical exacerbation by 24 months (primary outcome) occurred in 5/20 (25%) of the high-risk proactive-treatment group versus 14/20 (70%) of the high-risk standard-care group (OR=0.14, 95%CI 0.04-0.57, p=0.006). For secondary outcomes, the rate of clinical flare in the standard-care low-risk group was numerically but not significantly lower than in standard-care high-risk group (9/20 versus 14/20, respectively, OR 0.3, 0.1-1.3, P=0.11). Among all patients continuing standard care, baseline CE Lewis score was higher among relapsers versus non-relapsers (median 450, IQR [225-900] versus 225, [135-600], respectively, p=0.03). Of 251 CE ingested, there was a single (0.4%) temporarily-retained CE, which resolved spontaneously. Conclusion In a randomized strategy-finding controlled trial, proactive treatment optimization based on CE findings in patients with CD in remission, proved safe and superior for prevention of disease exacerbation compared with continued standard care. NCT03555058

P550 Short and long-term outcomes after acute severe ulcerative colitis in adults: A 12 year Canadian experience in the post biologic era

Abstract Background Patients with acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) are at increased risk of colectomy following an episode of acute severe exacerbation. Medical rescue therapy in steroid non-responders has reduced the need for emergency colectomy. However, impact of biologics on longer-term colectomy risk is unclear. Methods A retrospective cohort study of adult patients aged ≥18 years hospitalized with acute exacerbation of UC requiring hospitalization and managed with intravenous corticosteroids between 2010 and 2022 at two regional hospitals in London, Ontario, Canada. Steroid non-response was defined as requirement of medical rescue therapy or colectomy. Results A total of 264 adults hospitalized with ASUC were included in the analysis (male: 51.1% [n=136], mean age at admission: 40.8±17.8 years). The majority had extensive colitis (71.3% [n=169]) at the time of diagnosis. 46.3% (n=118/255) presented within one year of disease onset and 23% (n=61) had ASUC as their first presentation with UC. 25.7% (n=66/257) of patients had prior purine analogues and 23.3% (60/257) had previous biologics prior to ASUC presentation. After admission, 55.7% (n=147) responded to intravenous corticosteroids. Of the steroid non-responders, 37.5% (n=99) patients were managed with infliximab rescue therapy and only one patient received tofacitinib rescue therapy. Median CRP, stool frequency and Lindgren index score were statistically significant between steroid responders and non-responders (Table 1). A higher proportion of steroid non-responders had prior exposure to biologics or tofacitinib compared to steroid responders (31.9% vs 16.3%, p&amp;lt;0.01). On multivariate analysis for various factors predicting steroid non-response, assessment by Oxford criteria on day 3 was the only factor that was statistically significant (odds ratio 4.70 (95% CI 1.06-20.8), p = 0.04). Oxford criteria on day 3 had a sensitivity, specificity of 58.6% and70.8%, respectively for predicting steroid non-response. 8% (n=21) required colectomy during index admission. An additional 13% (n = 32) underwent colectomy within 12 months of discharge, for which there was no difference between steroid responders and non-responders (12.2% vs 14.7%). The short term (3 months following discharge) and long-term (3-12 months following discharge) colectomy rates following discharge were 8% (20/245) and 5.4% (12/223) respectively. Hospitalization with UC exacerbation rate following discharge was 17% (38/223). Conclusion 8% of patients admitted for ASUC require colectomy during the same admission and additional 13% required colectomy within 12 months of discharge. Despite a high initial response to corticosteroids, long term colectomy rates and re-hospitalization rates remain high.