Previous article FreeErratumOriginal articleCatch Shares and Shoreside Processors: A Costs and Earnings Exploration into the Downstream SectorPDFPDF PLUSFull Text Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmailQR Code SectionsMoreMarine Resource Economics 33(3):289–307 (2018)An error was identified in the Abstract of the following article, which appeared in MRE 33(3). This statement serves to outline the error and provide a correction, which was submitted by the lead author, Marie Guldin in June 2019.PerspectivesGuldin, M., and C. M. Anderson. 2018. “Catch Shares and Shoreside Processors: A Costs and Earnings Exploration into the Downstream Sector.” Marine Resource Economics 33(3):289–307.Please see the error, in bold, in the following original abstract.ABSTRACTAlthough processors can be a significant source of fishery-based employment and rent generation, land-based processors are often not included in analyses of fishery management impacts, generally because no data are available. This article utilizes facility-level, cost-earnings data on shoreside processors in the Pacific whiting fishery to describe behavior before and after rationalization in 2011, where 20% of the harvesting quota was allocated to processors. Predicted effects on processors centered on the potential for season lengthening to lead to increased ex-vessel prices and efficiency gains in the use of processing inputs, like labor and utilities.Data show longer seasons following rationalization, with processors paying higher ex-vessel prices as the ratio of ex-vessel to export prices fell. Estimated changes in efficiency match predictions directionally, but are not statistically significant, which may be due, in part, to the limited number of facilities and the range of other factors from which the impacts of rationalization must be disentangled.Please see the correction, in bold, in the following revised abstract.ABSTRACTAlthough processors can be a significant source of fishery-based employment and rent generation, land-based processors are often not included in analyses of fishery management impacts, generally because no data are available. This article utilizes facility-level, cost-earnings data on shoreside processors in the Pacific whiting fishery to describe behavior before and after rationalization in 2011, where 20% of the harvesting quota was allocated to processors. Predicted effects on processors centered on the potential for season lengthening to lead to increased ex-vessel prices and efficiency gains in the use of processing inputs, like labor and utilities. Data show longer seasons following rationalization with higher average ex-vessel prices, which comprise a larger share of the export price. Estimated changes in efficiency match predictions directionally, but are not statistically significant, which may be due, in part, to the limited number of facilities and the range of other factors from which the impacts of rationalization must be disentangled.The error has been corrected in the online version of this article. Previous article DetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Marine Resource Economics Volume 34, Number 3July 2019 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/705120 Views: 187Total views on this site HistoryReceived June 22, 2019Accepted June 22, 2019Published online July 17, 2019 © 2019 MRE Foundation, Inc. All rights reserved.PDF download Crossref reports no articles citing this article.Related articlesCatch Shares and Shoreside Processors: A Costs and Earnings Exploration into the Downstream Sector23 Apr 2018Marine Resource Economics
Read full abstract