Abstract Background Women are at higher risk of mortality from ST-elevation myocardial infarction (1) when compared to men. There is a lack of consensus among studies examining the effect of sex on outcomes from cardiogenic shock due to acute myocardial infarction (AMI-CS) (2-5). In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we sought to assess the relationship between outcomes of AMI-CS and sex. Purpose To examine sex-related differences in mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock secondary to acute myocardial infarction (AMI-CS). Methods Cochrane Central, PubMed, MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched in February 2023 for studies reporting in-hospital or 30-day sex-specific mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock. Inclusion criteria consisted of observational or randomised controlled trials of adult patients with cardiogenic shock that reported unadjusted or adjusted (by odds or risk ratio) mortality rates by sex. In-hospital or 30-day mortality were treated as equivalent. Data were extracted for study size, number of men and women, unadjusted and adjusted mortality rates, and factors used in multivariable analysis. Studies were assessed for risk of bias and publication bias. Meta-analysis was performed using DerSimonian-Laird random effects model with inverse variant weighting, due to predicted high heterogeneity of included studies. Data are reported as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence interval (CI). P values were adjusted for multiple comparison using Holm-Bonferonni correction. The primary outcomes were unadjusted and adjusted sex-specific mortality rates due to AMI-cardiogenic shock. Results 4,286 studies were identified and 37 met inclusion criteria, pooling a total of 630,890 patients. Raw 30-day/in-hospital mortality of females with AMI-cardiogenic shock was 41.2% compared to 32.3% in males. Unadjusted OR for mortality in females was 1.42 (95% CI 1.31–1.55, p <0.001, t2 = 0.02, I2 = 70.3%), and the adjusted OR was 1.11 (95% CI 1.04–1.20, p <0.001, t2 = 0.01, I2 = 76.8%). Eight studies included data on use of mechanical circulatory support (MCS), which was used in 31.2% of females compared to 39.9% of males. OR for use of MCS in females compared to males was 0.71 (95% CI 0.66–0.77, p < 0.001, t2 = 0.003, I2 = 35.2%). Conclusions Women with AMI-related cardiogenic shock are at greater risk of death compared to male patients and are less often treated with MCS. Potential explanations include residual confounding factors, differences in AMI-cardiogenic shock pathophysiology between men and women, and sex-related differences in healthcare behaviours, but we cannot exclude the effect of systemic bias on outcomes. Further research is required to address the causes of sex disparities in outcomes and ensure equitable management of AMI-cardiogenic shock in women.Unadjusted sex outcomes from AMI-CSAdjusted sex outcomes from AMI-CS