Evolution Of Function-valued Traits Research Articles

Variation and Evolution of Function-Valued Traits

Function-valued traits—phenotypes whose expression depends on a continuous index (such as age, temperature, or space)—occur throughout biology and, like any trait, it is important to understand how they vary and evolve. Although methods for analyzing variation and evolution of function-valued traits are well developed, they have been underutilized by evolutionists, especially those who study natural populations. We seek to summarize advances in the study of function-valued traits and to make their analyses more approachable and accessible to biologists who could benefit greatly from their use. To that end, we explain how curve thinking benefits conceptual understanding and statistical analysis of functional data. We provide a detailed guide to the most flexible and statistically powerful methods and include worked examples (with R code) as supplemental material. We review ways to characterize variation in function-valued traits and analyze consequences for evolution, including constraint. We also discuss how selection on function-valued traits can be estimated and combined with estimates of heritable variation to project evolutionary dynamics.

Measures of mate choice: a comment on Dougherty & Shuker

Arnqvist G, Rowe L. 2015. The shape of preference functions and what shapes them: a comment on Edward. Behav Ecol. 26:325. Blows MW, Chenoweth SF, Hine E. 2004. Orientation of the genetic variance-covariance matrix and the fitness surface for multiple male sexually selected traits. Am Nat. 163:E329–E340. Chenoweth SF, McGuigan K. 2010. The genetic basis of sexually selected variation. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 41:81–101. Delcourt M, Blows MW, Rundle HD. 2010. Quantitative genetics of female mate preferences in an ancestral and a novel environment. Evolution. 64:2758–2766. Edward DA. 2015. The description of mate choice. Behav Ecol. 26:301–310 Hereford J, Hansen TF, Houle D. 2004. Comparing strengths of directional selection: how strong is strong? Evolution. 58:2133–2143. Izem R, Kingsolver JG. 2005. Variation in continuous reaction norms: quantifying directions of biological interest. Am Nat. 166:277–289. Kingsolver JG, Hoekstra HE, Hoekstra JM, Berrigan D, Vignieri SN, Hill CE, Hoang A, Gibert P, Beerli P. 2001. The strength of phenotypic selection in natural populations. Am Nat. 157:245–261. Kirkpatrick M, Heckman N. 1989. A quantitative genetic model for growth, shape, reaction norms, and other infinite-dimensional characters. J Math Biol. 27:429–450. Lande R, Arnold SJ. 1983. The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution. 37:1210–1226. McGuigan K, Van Homrigh A, Blows MW. 2008. Genetic analysis of female preference functions as function-valued traits. Am Nat. 172:194–202. Stinchcombe JR, Kirkpatrick M; Function-valued Traits Working Group. 2012. Genetics and evolution of function-valued traits: understanding environmentally responsive phenotypes. Trends Ecol Evol. 27:637–647. Wagner WE. 1998. Measuring female mating preferences. Anim Behav. 55:1029–1042.