Measures of mate choice: a comment on Dougherty & Shuker

Abstract

Arnqvist G, Rowe L. 2015. The shape of preference functions and what shapes them: a comment on Edward. Behav Ecol. 26:325. Blows MW, Chenoweth SF, Hine E. 2004. Orientation of the genetic variance-covariance matrix and the fitness surface for multiple male sexually selected traits. Am Nat. 163:E329–E340. Chenoweth SF, McGuigan K. 2010. The genetic basis of sexually selected variation. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 41:81–101. Delcourt M, Blows MW, Rundle HD. 2010. Quantitative genetics of female mate preferences in an ancestral and a novel environment. Evolution. 64:2758–2766. Edward DA. 2015. The description of mate choice. Behav Ecol. 26:301–310 Hereford J, Hansen TF, Houle D. 2004. Comparing strengths of directional selection: how strong is strong? Evolution. 58:2133–2143. Izem R, Kingsolver JG. 2005. Variation in continuous reaction norms: quantifying directions of biological interest. Am Nat. 166:277–289. Kingsolver JG, Hoekstra HE, Hoekstra JM, Berrigan D, Vignieri SN, Hill CE, Hoang A, Gibert P, Beerli P. 2001. The strength of phenotypic selection in natural populations. Am Nat. 157:245–261. Kirkpatrick M, Heckman N. 1989. A quantitative genetic model for growth, shape, reaction norms, and other infinite-dimensional characters. J Math Biol. 27:429–450. Lande R, Arnold SJ. 1983. The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution. 37:1210–1226. McGuigan K, Van Homrigh A, Blows MW. 2008. Genetic analysis of female preference functions as function-valued traits. Am Nat. 172:194–202. Stinchcombe JR, Kirkpatrick M; Function-valued Traits Working Group. 2012. Genetics and evolution of function-valued traits: understanding environmentally responsive phenotypes. Trends Ecol Evol. 27:637–647. Wagner WE. 1998. Measuring female mating preferences. Anim Behav. 55:1029–1042.