Evidence Synthesis Research Articles

Examining attitudes to uptake and sustainment of technology among care aides in the delivery of care: a scoping review protocol

IntroductionCare aides are health workers who deliver hands-on care to patients across the healthcare continuum. The use of technology in healthcare delivery is increasing, and evidence regarding how care aides’...

Nursing staff's attitudes towards the prevention of adverse events among hospitalized people with dementia: Protocol of qualitative systematic review and evidence synthesis.

People with dementia are more likely than people without dementia to be hospitalized and to experience in-hospital preventable adverse events, such as falls, skin injury, and infection, compared to other hospitalized groups. Negative attitudes towards people with dementia are common among acute healthcare workers and have been linked to a cascade of negative adverse events in this population. However, no qualitative systematic review has ever been conducted to synthesize the existing evidence in this area, which hampers the development of preventative measures. This is a protocol for a qualitative systematic review aimed at exploring and synthesizing existing qualitative evidence regarding the attitudes of nursing staff towards the prevention of adverse events among hospitalized people with dementia. Literature searches will be performed in PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Biblioteca Virtual de Salud, Scopus, The Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar. The references of eligible studies will be checked for eligibility. All primary qualitative or mixed-methods studies with a qualitative component published in peer-reviewed academic journals in English, Portuguese, or Spanish will be eligible. There will be no limitations to the date of publication. The selection process will be conducted independently by two researchers using the software Rayyan and then compared and discussed. Any disagreements regarding eligibility will be discussed among the entire research team and resolved via consensus. Methodological quality will be assessed using Cochrane's guidance. A meta-aggregative approach will be employed to extract and synthesize the evidence using the software package QARI from the JBI. The confidence in the findings will be graded using ConQual. This review will help identify and better understand specific attitudinal and psychosocial aspects that influence nursing care delivery for people with dementia in hospital settings. Such data can be used to generate novel explanatory models of nursing behaviors in dementia care, as well as capacity building and training to enhance hospital care for people with dementia globally.

Scoping Review on the Use of Music for Emotion Regulation.

With increasing interest in the emotional responses to music, some studies are specifically looking into music's regulatory function on emotion, known as "music emotion regulation (MER)". The purpose of this study was to examine the concepts on the regulatory impact of music on emotion using a scoping review procedure. Through an electronic database and manual searches based on the guidelines suggested by the JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis, a total of 47 studies were identified and included for analysis. The results showed that there were some definitional challenges in each component of music emotion regulation. Most studies treated music as a single variable without exploring the regulatory mechanism of the intra-musical elements that constitute music. When examining the regulatory impact of music on emotion, emotion was inclusive of other terms ranging from feeling to mood. Most of the MER studies employed the terms used in the emotion regulation strategies; however, there were some regulatory processes that pertained solely to music's cathartic effect. Overall, the results showed that music emotion regulation (MER) was not clearly distinguished from music emotion (ME) studies. Future research should allocate more attention to the theoretical mechanism behind music's intrinsic regulatory effect in emotion regulation (MER) studies.

Experiences of breastfeeding among mothers of preterm infants during their infants' hospital stays: a qualitative systematic review protocol.

The objective of this review is to synthesize the existing qualitative evidence on the breastfeeding experiences of mothers with hospitalized preterm infants. Breastfeeding is crucial for the well-being and development of preterm infants born before 37 weeks' gestation. Mothers of preterm infants often face challenges that make breastfeeding particularly complex. Understanding their breastfeeding experience is important for health care professionals as it enables them to provide appropriate support and assistance. The qualitative evidence synthesis regarding the breastfeeding experiences of mothers with preterm infants in hospital settings is a valuable area of research that has not been documented. This review will consider all qualitative studies that explore the experiences of mothers with preterm infants with breastfeeding and mother's own milk management for their hospitalized infants. All mothers of preterm infants who provide their own milk to their infants will be considered, regardless of their health and social status. This review will follow the JBI approach for qualitative systematic review. The search strategy aims to find both published and unpublished studies with no date limit. A search of PubMed, CINAHL (EBSCOhost), and Embase (EBSCOhost) will be undertaken to identify articles on the topic. Studies published in English will be considered for inclusion in this review. Two independent reviewers will evaluate the methodological validity of the selected papers before incorporating them into the review. Data synthesis will be conducted using the meta-aggregation approach, and synthesized findings will be assessed using the ConQual approach. PROSPERO CRD42024501454.

The Use of Stem Cells in Bone Regeneration of Cleft Lip and Palate Patients: A Systematic Review.

Background and Objectives: Cleft lip alone or a combination of cleft lip and palate (CLP) is a common developmental abnormality in the craniofacial region. This umbrella review aims to identify promising avenues for treatment using stem cell therapy. Materials and Methods: Systematic reviews from 2014 to 2024 were searched among databases like PubMed, Medline, and Google Scholar. PRISMA guidelines were employed to ensure the thoroughness of the search. A quality assessment (ROBIS) of the included reviews was conducted to ensure the reliability and validity of the synthesized evidence. Results: Five systematic reviews were selected for this umbrella review. Results show that stem cell therapy, specifically using mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and adipocyte stem cells (ADSCs), promotes bone regeneration in CLP deformities. Although multiple studies have established the effectiveness of diverse types of stem cells in treating CLP, important considerations including safety concerns, methodological variability, and the need for standardization have been identified. The fact that the number of relevant systematic reviews that matched our inclusion criteria was limited could affect this research's robustness and may limit the breadth and depth of evidence synthesis. Definitive conclusions could not be reached due to variation among treatments and outcomes. Conclusions: The examined studies highlight the potential of stem cell therapy as a complementary approach to existing treatments for CLP. However, there are challenges that need to be addressed, including concerns regarding safety, variations in methodologies, and the need for standardization. Exploring the potential of other stem cell types may further enhance treatment outcomes for CLP patients.

Mental health and academic performance in university students: Systematic review

Introduction: Mental health is an important part of public health, as its lack leads to a variety of mental disorders that are health problems in societies around the world. Mental health can be affected by biological, psychological, social and economic factors. In the university environment, these factors constitute an aspect that requires special attention, given the negative influence they could exert on the academic performance of students.Objective: Analyze the relationship between mental health and academic performance in university students.Methods: The systematic review of available scientific literature was carried out, using a systematic procedure based on the search, selection, review, interpretation and synthesis of the proven evidence from the years 2006 – 2023. The search was based on the study of the variables: mental health and academic performance.Results: After the analysis of the different articles, three main themes were identified: mental health: generalities; importance of mental health in academic performance and professional support: guarantee of good academic performance in university students.Conclusions: It is concluded that mental health in the university environment affects the student's academic performance. Work must be done on the development of skills to manage emotions and address imbalances that affect the mental health of students, otherwise it will be reflected in the learning process, in the family environment and the social environment, resulting in possible dropouts and the occurrence of psychosomatic diseases in the medium and long term.

Integrating evidence synthesis services in Zimbabwean state university libraries

This article explores how Zimbabwean state university libraries incorporate evidence synthesis services in their traditional research support services as the evidence synthesis methodology begins to gain popularity among researchers beyond the health sciences. The literature indicates that academic libraries around the world are responding to the need for evidence synthesis services. However, there is a lack of evidence concerning how libraries in Zimbabwean state university libraries have adapted to this trend. Exploratory research that involved sub-librarians and faculty librarians as participants was conducted. Purposive and self-selection sampling techniques were utilised in addition to the use of questionnaires and interviews for data gathering. The results reveal that some libraries have started offering evidence synthesis services, particularly in the disciplines of agriculture and applied sciences. The results also show that systematic and scoping reviews are evidence synthesis types commonly conducted by researchers. While the study shows that some librarians demonstrated a good understanding of evidence synthesis, most lacked practical experience and relied on self-teaching and peer-to-peer learning for skill acquisition.

Improving Pain mAnagement for childreN and young people attendeD by Ambulance (PANDA): protocol for a realist review.

Background Each year in England, 450,000 children and young people (CYP) under 18 years of age are transported by ambulance to emergency departments. Approximately 20% of these suffer acute pain caused by illness or injury. Pain is a highly complex sensory and emotional experience. The intersection between acute pain, unwell CYP and the unpredictable pre-hospital environment is convoluted. Studies have shown that prehospital pain management in CYP is poor, with 61% of those suffering acute pain not achieving effective pain relief (abolition or reduction of pain score by 2 or more out of 10) when attended by ambulance. Consequences of poor acute pain management include altered pain perception, post-traumatic stress disorder and the development of chronic pain. This realist review will aim to understand how ambulance clinicians can provide improved prehospital acute pain management for CYP. Methods A realist review will be conducted in accordance with the Realist And Meta-narrative Evidence Syntheses: Evolving Standards (RAMESES) guidance. A five-stage approach will be adopted; 1) Developing an Initial Programme Theory (IPT): develop an IPT with key stakeholder input and evidence from informal searching; 2) Searching and screening: conduct a thorough search of relevant research databases and other literature sources and perform screening in duplicate; 3) Relevance and rigour assessment: assess documents for relevance and rigour in duplicate; 4) Extracting and organising data: code relevant data into conceptual “buckets” using qualitative data analysis software; and 5) Synthesis and Programme Theory (PT) refinement: utilise a realist logic of analysis to generate context-mechanism-outcome configurations (CMOCs) within and across conceptual “buckets”, test and refine the IPT into a realist PT. Conclusion The realist PT will enhance our understanding of what works best to improve acute prehospital pain management in CYP, which will then be tested and refined within a realist evaluation. Registration PROSPERO Registration: CRD42024505978

Diagnostic Performance of MRI and FDG PET/CT for Preoperative Locoregional Staging of Colon Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: CT is the standard-of-care test for colon cancer (CC) preoperative locoregional staging, but has limited diagnostic performance. More accurate preoperative staging would guide selection among expanding patient-tailored treatment options. Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of MRI for T and N staging and of FDG PET/CT for N staging in CC locoregional staging through systematic review. Evidence Acquisition: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched through December 31, 2023 for studies reporting diagnostic performance of MRI or FDG PET/CT for primary (nonrectal) CC before resection without neoadjuvant therapy using histopathology as reference. Study quality was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. Publication bias was assessed with Deeks' funnel plot. Primary outcomes were estimated pooled predictive values, stratified by T and N categories for MRI and N categories for PET/CT. Secondary outcomes were pooled sensitivity and specificity. Evidence Synthesis: The systematic review included 11 MRI studies (686 patients) and five PET/CT studies (408 patients). Thirteen studies had at least one risk of bias or concern of applicability. Deeks' funnel plot asymmetry indicated possible publication bias in MRI studies for differentiation of T3cd-4 from T1-3ab disease and N- from N+ disease. For MRI, for discriminating T1-2 from T3-4 disease, PPV was 64.8% (95% CI [52.9-75.5%]), and NPV was 88.9% (95% CI [82.7-93.7%]); for discriminating T1-3ab from T3cd-4 disease, PPV was 83.4% (95% CI [75.0-90.3%]), and NPV was 74.6% (95% CI [58.2-86.7%]); for discriminating T1-3 from T4 disease, PPV was 94.0% (95% CI [89.4-97.3%]), and NPV was 39.9% (95% CI [24.9-56.6%]); for discriminating N- from N+ disease, PPV was 74.9% (95% CI [69.3-80.0%]), and NPV was 53.9% (95% CI [45.3-62.0%]). For PET/CT, for discriminating N- from N+ disease, PPV was 76.4% (95% CI [67.9-85.1%]), and NPV was 68.2% (95% CI [56.8-78.6%]). Across outcomes, MRI and PET/CT exhibited pooled sensitivity of 55.1-81.4% and pooled specificity of 70.3-88.1%. Conclusion: MRI had strongest predictive performance for T1-2 and T4 disease. MRI and PET/CT had otherwise limited predictive values, sensitivity, and specificity for evaluated outcomes related T and N staging. Clinical Impact: MRI and FDG PET/CT had overall limited utility for preoperative locoregional staging in colon cancer.

Initial assessment and management of adults with suspected acute respiratory infection: a rapid evidence synthesis of reviews and cost-effectiveness studies.

This work was undertaken to inform a National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guideline on the initial assessment of adults with suspected acute respiratory infection. To undertake a rapid evidence synthesis of systematic reviews and cost-effectiveness studies of signs, symptoms and early warning scores for the initial assessment of adults with suspected acute respiratory infection. MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched for systematic reviews and MEDLINE, EMBASE, EconLit and National Health Service Economic Evaluation Database were searched for cost-effectiveness studies in May 2023. References of relevant studies were checked. Clinical outcomes of interest included escalation of care, antibiotic/antiviral use, time to resolution of symptoms, mortality and health-related quality of life. Risk of bias was assessed using the Risk of Bias in Systematic Reviews tool or the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence economic evaluations checklist. Results were summarised using narrative synthesis. Nine systematic reviews and one cost-effectiveness study met eligibility criteria. Seven reviews assessed several early warning scores for patients with community- acquired pneumonia, one assessed early warning scores for nursing home-acquired pneumonia and one assessed individual signs/symptoms and the Centor score for patients with sore throat symptoms; all in face-to-face settings. Two good-quality reviews concluded that further research is needed to validate the CRB-65 in primary care/community settings. One also concluded that further research is needed on the Pneumonia Severity Index in community settings; however, the Pneumonia Severity Index requires data from tests not routinely conducted in community settings. One good-quality review concluded that National Early Warning Score appears to be useful in an emergency department/acute medical setting. One review (unclear quality) concluded that the Pneumonia Severity Index and CURB-65 appear useful in an emergency department setting. Two poor-quality reviews concluded that early warning scores can support clinical judgement and one poor-quality review found numerous problems with using early warning scores in a nursing home setting. A good-quality review concluded that individual signs and symptoms have a modest ability to diagnose streptococcal pharyngitis, and that the Centor score can enhance appropriate prescribing of antibiotics. The cost-effectiveness study assessed clinical scores and rapid antigen detection tests for sore throat, compared to delayed antibiotic prescribing. The study concluded that the clinical score is a cost-effective approach when compared to delayed prescribing and rapid antigen testing. Several early warning scores have been evaluated in adults with suspected acute respiratory infection, mainly the CRB-65, CURB-65 and Pneumonia Severity Index in patients with community-acquired pneumonia. The evidence was insufficient to determine what triage strategies avoid serious illness. Some early warning scores (CURB-65, Pneumonia Severity Index and National Early Warning Score) appear to be useful in an emergency department/acute medical setting; however, further research is required to validate the CRB-65 and Pneumonia Severity Index in primary care/community settings. The economic evidence indicated that clinical scores may be a cost-effective approach to triage patients compared with delayed prescribing. Only systematic reviews were eligible for inclusion in the synthesis of clinical evidence. There was a great deal of overlap in the primary studies included in the reviews, many of which had significant limitations. No studies were undertaken in remote settings (e.g. NHS 111). Only one cost-effectiveness study was identified, with limited applicability to the review question. This article presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme as award number NIHR159945.

Addressing equity, diversity, and inclusion in JBI qualitative systematic reviews: a methodological scoping review.

The objective of this methodological scoping review was to investigate ways in which qualitative review teams are addressing equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) in the process of conducting and reporting qualitative systematic reviews that use JBI guidelines. To promote health equity, there is a need for evidence synthesis processes and practices to develop approaches that incorporate EDI. Some guidance is available to guide equity-focused review methods and reporting, but this is primarily oriented to quantitative systematic reviews. There is currently limited knowledge about how review teams are addressing EDI within qualitative evidence syntheses. This review included English-language qualitative systematic reviews, published in 2022, that used all the steps outlined in JBI guidance for qualitative reviews. A 1-year sample of published reviews was identified from a search undertaken on March 17, 2023, of 2 health care databases: MEDLINE (Ovid) and CINAHL (EBSCOhost). Data extraction followed a framework approach, using an adapted preexisting equity template. This included attention to i) the reporting of a range of characteristics associated with EDI, ii) search approaches, and iii) analytical approaches (including reflexivity, intersectionality, and knowledge user engagement). Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and narrative summary. Forty-three reviews met the inclusion criteria. The majority of reviews (n=30) framed their questions and aims in a generic/universal (rather than EDI-focused) way. Six reviews justified their population focus in terms of an EDI-related issue. Only one review included a knowledge user. The sociodemographic and other key characteristics of the samples in underpinning studies were poorly reported, making it hard to discern EDI-related issues or to undertake EDI-related analyses. Thirteen of the reviews included non-English-language evidence sources, and 31 reviews included gray literature sources. Ten reviews demonstrated an element of intersectional or otherwise critical approaches within their analyses of categories and synthesized findings (whereby issues of power and/or representation were explicitly considered). Only 8 reviews included discussions of review team composition and reflexivity within the review process. This EDI-focused methodological enquiry has highlighted some limitations within current qualitative evidence synthesis practice. Without closer attention to EDI, there is a danger that systematic reviews may simply serve to amplify, rather than illuminate, existing gaps, silences, and inequitable knowledge claims based on dominant representations. This review sets out a range of suggestions to help qualitative evidence synthesis teams to more systematically embed EDI within their methods and practices. Open Science Framework https://osf.io/wy5kv/.

Bleeding Risk in Patients with Cancer.

The hemostatic system and cancer display a tight interconnection, and hemostatic imbalance frequently occurs in patients with cancer. While extensive knowledge about thrombotic risk has been generated, less is known about bleeding risk and associated risk factors. However, bleeding risk is of high significance as patients with cancer frequently receive therapeutic anticoagulation for various indications and/or are candidates for primary thromboprophylaxis. The risk of bleeding in patients with cancer is variable and difficult to assess in clinical practice. Certain clinical settings such as hospitalization, specific underlying risk factors (e.g., tumor type), and medications (e.g., anticoagulation) can contribute to the individual bleeding risk of a patient with cancer. In addition, some dynamic factors such as platelet count or kidney function have an impact. Particularly, data on baseline risk of bleeding are lacking to allow for risk assessment in cancer patients without anticoagulation. In contrast, risk assessment models for the prediction of bleeding events in cancer patients receiving anticoagulation have been developed; however, these have yet to be validated. The recognition of the importance of bleeding risk in cancer patients is growing, leading to an increasing number of studies investigating and reporting bleeding complications. As study designs and reporting of bleeding events vary, it is challenging to offer a clear synthesis of evidence. In this narrative review, we provide an overview of currently available data about incidence, risk factors, and clinical impact of bleeding events in patients with cancer, and critically review risk assessment models for bleeding in cancer patients during anticoagulant therapy.

Tobacco retail availability and smoking-A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Health policy makers worldwide have adopted evidence-based legislation, largely directed at consumers, to reduce tobacco-related harm. It is suggested that limiting supply by decreasing retail availability can also reduce cigarette smoking. To inform policy makers this systematic literature review assesses whether reducing availability is associated with smoking behaviours. Systematic literature searches of five databases were carried out up to January 2023. Included studies had at least one exposure (tobacco retail density, proximity or mixed measures thereof) and outcomes of smoking behaviour. Meta-analysis of effect estimates were undertaken if there were at least three studies with similar population, exposure and outcome measures. Sixty-two studies were included, and positive associations were found between tobacco outlet density and cigarette smoking in pregnancy, youth, adults and cessation. Meta-analyses were undertaken for retail density and ever smoking (odds ratio [OR] 1.20; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04, 1.37; I2 = 87.3%), and current youth smoking (OR 1.23; 95% CI 1.08, 1.40; I2 = 0.0%), adult smoking (OR 1.11; 95% CI 1.01, 1.22; I2 = 74.8%); and mixed measures of retail availability near schools and current youth smoking (OR 1.03; 95% CI 1.01, 1.05; I2 = 0.0%). There is evidence higher tobacco retail density is consistently associated with cigarette smoking in pregnant women, young people and adults when ecological studies are included in meta-analysis. Meanwhile, evidence synthesis reveals restrictive tobacco retail laws based on proximity or mixed measures near home or very near school may not reduce smoking except in men who smoke heavily. Mechanisms to reduce retailer density should be thus considered part of tobacco control strategies.

Summary of the 2023 international evidence-based guideline for the assessment and management of polycystic ovary syndrome: an Australian perspective.

The Australian-led 2023 International evidence-based guideline for the assessment and management of polycystic ovary syndrome was based on best available evidence, clinical expertise and consumer preference. It followed best practice, involved extensive evidence synthesis and applied relevant frameworks across evidence quality, feasibility, acceptability, cost and implementation. Thirty-nine societies and organisations covering 71 countries were engaged. The evidence in the assessment and management of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) has generally improved in the past five years, but remains of low to moderate quality. The technical evidence report, 52 systematic reviews and analyses (approximately 6000 pages) underpin 77 evidence-based and 54 consensus recommendations, with 123 practice points. Changes include: refinement of individual diagnostic criteria, a simplified diagnostic algorithm and inclusion of anti-Müllerian hormone levels as an alternative to ultrasound in adults only, and differentiation of adolescent and adult criteria; strengthening the recognition of broad features of PCOS including metabolic effects, cardiovascular disease, dermatological symptoms, sleep apnoea, a high prevalence of psychological features and a high risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes; emphasising the poorly recognised, diverse burden of disease, the vital need for greater health professional education, evidence-based patient information, improved models of care, shared decision making and research efforts to improve patient experience; maintained emphasis on healthy lifestyle, emotional wellbeing and quality of life, with awareness and consideration of weight stigma; and emphasising evidence-based medical therapy and cheaper and safer fertility management. The 2023 guideline is approved by the National Health and Medical Research Council and provides clinicians and patients with clear advice on best practice in a common and neglected condition, based on the best available evidence, expert multidisciplinary input and consumer preferences. It provides vital, extensive patient and provider resources to enhance evidence-based care. The full guideline is available at www.monash.edu/medicine/mchri/pcos/guideline.

The effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and policy processes of regulatory, voluntary and partnership policies to improve food environments: an evidence synthesis.

Dietary factors are among the largest and costliest drivers of chronic diseases in England. As a response, the government implements a range of population interventions to promote healthy diets by targeting food environments. This study aimed to conduct a systematic review of the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and policy process of real-world evaluations of national and state policies on improving food environments, with a focus on whether they were regulatory, voluntary or partnership approaches. Fourteen relevant English-language databases were searched in November 2020 for studies published between 2010 and 2020. Six separate evidence reviews were conducted to assess the evidence of effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and policy processes of policies to improve food environments. A total of 483 primary research evaluations and 14 evidence syntheses were included. The study reveals considerable geographic, methodological and other imbalances across the literature, with, for example, 81% of publications focusing only on 12 countries. The systematic reviews also reveal the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of reviewed regulatory approaches designed to improve health, consumer behaviour and food environment outcomes while public-private partnerships and voluntary approaches to improve diets via reformulation, advertising and promotion restrictions or other changes to the environment were limited in their effectiveness and cost-effectiveness. The study also revealed key enabling and impeding factors across regulatory, voluntary and public-private partnership approaches. From the available evidence reviewed, this study finds that regulatory approaches appear most effective at improving the food environment, and voluntary agreements and partnerships have limited effectiveness. These findings should be carefully considered in future public health policy development, as should the findings of geographic imbalance in the evidence and inadequate representation of equity dimensions across the policy evaluations. We find that food policies are at times driven by factors other than the evidence and shaped by compromise and pragmatism. Food policy should be first and foremost designed and driven by the evidence of greatest effectiveness to improve food environments for healthier diets. This was a complex evidence synthesis due to its scope and some policy evaluations may have been missed as the literature searches did not include specific policy names. The literature was limited to studies published in English from 2010 to 2020, potentially missing studies of interest. Priorities include the need for guidance for appraising risk of bias and quality of non-clinical studies, for reporting policy characteristics in evaluations, for supporting evaluations of real-world policies equitably across geographic regions, for capturing equity dimensions in policy evaluations, and for guideline development for quality and risk of bias of policy evaluations. This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42020170963. This awardproject was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Public Health Research programme (NIHR award ref: NIHR128607)and is published in full in Public Health Research; Vol. 12, No. 8. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further awardinformation.

Practical Recommendations on Laboratory Monitoring in Patients with Atopic Dermatitis on Oral JAK Inhibitors.

Oral Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi), a class of advanced targeted systemic therapy, have demonstrated efficacy and safety in the treatment of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD). Like other small molecules, oral JAKi have the potential for off-target effects including laboratory-related adverse events (AEs). Product labels for oral JAKi recommend an initial laboratory assessment and follow-up 4-12weeks later to monitor for potential changes, based on evidence from clinical trials across therapeutic indications for oral JAKi, which may not reflect a population of moderate-to-severe AD patients typically seen in routine clinical practice. To address this gap, a panel of eight dermatologists with clinical and research experience with oral JAKi for the management of AD conducted a targeted review of the literature focused on key laboratory-related AEs associated with oral JAKi in the moderate-to-severe AD population. Based on the synthesis of evidence and informed opinion, a set of best practice statements related to fundamental standards of care and consensus recommendations on laboratory monitoring were suggested, and level of agreement was ascertained using a Likert scale from 0 to 100. There was a high level of agreement on three of the four suggested recommendations related to assessment and monitoring of key laboratory parameters and to dose reduction or switching in response to laboratory changes; there was a lower level of agreement related to the frequency of ongoing laboratory monitoring. Appropriate patient selection and laboratory assessment is an important strategy to mitigate the potential risks associated with oral JAKi when treating AD.

Developing the Society of Obstetric Medicine Australia and New Zealand (SOMANZ) Hypertension in Pregnancy Guideline 2023: Guideline development approaches, challenges and contextual considerations

AbstractThe Society of Obstetric Medicine Australia and New Zealand (SOMANZ) Hypertension in Pregnancy Guideline 2023 is the first evidence‐based guideline for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy that has been developed to the standards of the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC). This article describes the methodology, challenges and considerations in developing the guideline and includes details on group composition, literature search, evidence synthesis and development of recommendations. We also discuss several practical considerations and challenges related to contextual issues, topics of interest and resources available for guideline developers working with similar jurisdictions or topics.

Impact of climate change on water-related physical events, consequent human migration, and burden of drowning in India: An evidence synthesis.

Disrupted weather patterns are associated with climate change. Between 2001 and 2018, nearly 74% of disasters were water-related, including floods and cyclones. Such water-related cataclysmic events increase the risk of drowning. We aimed to map evidence on the impact of climate change on water-related physical events, associated human migration, and drowning burden in India. We searched electronic databases, government reports, and relevant websites to map evidence on water-related physical events (including but not limited to sea-level rise, glacier bursts, lake bursts, floods, rainfall, cyclones, and droughts) and consequent human migration using narrative review approach, while drowning burden through scoping review approach. We summarized the results narratively. Evidence from 48 studies and seven reports suggest that India will witness the greatest sea-level rise, significantly impacting poor coastal communities. An increase in droughts, cyclonic rainfall, storms, and floods, with increasing surface rainwater and streamflow water, due to melting glaciers is expected. Climate change-triggered migration is expected notably in northeast and south India, making farmers, drivers, street vendors, women, and youth most vulnerable. No direct evidence was identified on the impact of climate change, water-related disasters, meteorological events, or seasonal variations on drowning from India. Our study highlights a significant gap in the availability of context-specific and localized data to improve disaster response and strengthen public health systems, especially for areas most vulnerable to climate change. There is an urgent need to generate new knowledge and understanding of climate change, water-related or meteorological events, and seasonal variations' impact on drowning burden as the level of risk remains unknown.

Encuesta nacional y elaboración de un documento de consenso sobre estrategias de dosificación de antibióticos beta-lactámicos frente a bacterias gramnegativas multirresistentes (BGN-MDR) en pacientes críticos sometidos a técnicas de soporte vital extracorpóreas: protocolo de estudio DOSEBL

IntroductionInfections caused by multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacilli (MDR-GNB) in critically ill patients present a challenge for timely and appropriate antibiotic treatment. This is particularly important in patients undergoing extracorporeal life support techniques such as renal replacement therapy and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. These techniques can introduce additional pharmacokinetic alterations, potentially leading to suboptimal exposure to antibiotics. This study aims to outline dosing strategies and therapeutic drug monitoring protocols for new β-lactam antibiotics effective against MDR-GNB in critically ill patients undergoing extracorporeal life support techniques at a national level. Additionally, the study seeks to develop a consensus document, based on available evidence. MethodsThe project will comprise two main phases: I) A national survey, and II) the development of a consensus document. This consensus document, undertaken according to ACCORD guidelines, will encompass: a) establishment of a multidisciplinary panel of experts, b) prospective registration of the consensus, c) evidence synthesis, d) modified Delphi rounds. The antimicrobials to be included will be: meropenem, ceftazidime/avibactam, ceftolozane/tazobactam, cefiderocol, meropenem/vaborbactam, imipenem/relebactam, and aztreonam. Extracorporeal life support techniques will include continuous renal replacement therapy, conventional intermittent hemodialysis, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. DiscussionThe availability of extracorporeal life support techniques has expanded significantly in recent years, alongside a rise in the prevalence of infections caused by multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacilli (MDR-GNB). There is a need to develop evidence-based tools of high quality to standardize dosing and monitoring strategies for new β-lactam antibiotics.

The cost-effectiveness of preventing, diagnosing, and treating postpartum haemorrhage: A systematic review of economic evaluations.

Postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) is an obstetric emergency. While PPH-related deaths are relatively rare in high-resource settings, PPH continues to be the leading cause of maternal mortality in limited-resource settings. We undertook a systematic review to identify, assess, and synthesise cost-effectiveness evidence on postpartum interventions to prevent, diagnose, or treat PPH. This systematic review was prospectively registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023438424). We searched Medline, Embase, NHS Economic Evaluation Database (NHS EED), EconLit, CINAHL, Emcare, Web of Science, and Global Index Medicus between 22 June 2023 and 11 July 2024 with no date or language limitations. Full economic evaluations of any postpartum intervention for prevention, detection, or management of PPH were eligible. Study screening, data extraction, and quality assessments (using the CHEC-E tool) were undertaken independently by at least 2 reviewers. We developed narrative syntheses of available evidence for each intervention. From 3,993 citations, 56 studies were included: 33 studies of preventative interventions, 1 study assessed a diagnostic method, 17 studies of treatment interventions, 1 study comparing prevention and treatment, and 4 studies assessed care bundles. Twenty-four studies were conducted in high-income countries, 22 in upper or lower middle-income countries, 3 in low-income countries, and 7 studies involved countries of multiple income levels. Study settings, methods, and findings varied considerably. Interventions with the most consistent findings were the use of tranexamic acid for PPH treatment and using care bundles. In both cases, multiple studies predicted these interventions would either result in better health outcomes and cost savings, or better health outcomes at acceptable costs. Limitations for this review include that no ideal setting was chosen, and therefore, a transferability assessment was not undertaken. In addition, some sources of study uncertainty, such as effectiveness parameters, were interrogated to a greater degree than other sources of uncertainty. In this systematic review, we extracted, critically appraised, and summarised the cost-effectiveness evidence from 56 studies across 16 different interventions for the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of PPH. Both the use of tranexamic acid as part of PPH treatment, and the use of comprehensive PPH bundles for prevention, diagnosis, and treatment have supportive cost-effectiveness evidence across a range of settings. More studies utilizing best practice principles are required to make stronger conclusions on which interventions provide the best value. Several high-priority interventions recommended by World Health Organization (WHO) such as administering additional uterotonics, non-pneumatic anti-shock garment, or uterine balloon tamponade (UBT) for PPH management require robust economic evaluations across high-, middle-, and low-resource settings.