Evidence Summary Research Articles

Preventing functional decline in hospitalized older adults in medical ward: a best practice implementation project.

Functional decline frequently occurs in older adults in hospitals. The aim of this project was to promote evidence-based strategies for physical activity to prevent functional decline in hospitalized older adults in a medical center in southern Taiwan. This project was guided by the JBI Evidence Implementation Framework. Seven audit criteria were derived from a JBI evidence summary and a baseline audit involving 25 nurses and 30 hospitalized older adults was conducted to compare current practice with best practice recommendations. The JBI Getting Research into Practice (GRiP) approach was used to identify barriers to implementation, and strategies were developed to overcome those barriers. A follow-up audit was conducted to measure any changes in compliance. After implementing the strategies, the pass rate of nursing staff improved in the physical activity knowledge test, rising from 56% to 88%. Compliance of nursing staff with providing physical activity instructions using evidence-based guidelines to hospitalized older adults reached 80%. The incidence of functional decline among hospitalized older adults decreased from 36.7% to 20%. The results of this best practice implementation project suggest that initiating physical activity as early as possible for hospitalized older adults once their medical condition has stabilized can help prevent functional decline. http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A171.

Summary of the best evidence for the management of dysphagia in elderly patients.

To search for and summarize the best evidence for themanagement of elderly patients with dysphagia. Clinical decisions, recommended practices, evidence summaries, clinical practice guidelines, expert consensus, and systematic reviews on the management of dysphagia among elderly patients were systematically reviewed from domestic and foreign guideline websites, association websites, and Chinese and English databases according to the 6S model of evidence-based resources. The search period was between January 1, 2010 and November 1, 2023. Two researchers evaluated the quality of the included literature respectively and extracted evidence. A total of 14 literatures were identified, including 2 guidelines, 2 clinical decisions, 5 evidence summaries, 3 expert consensus statements, and 2 systematic reviews. Twenty-four pieces of evidence from 7 aspects were summarized, including assessment, treatment and rehabilitation, medication care, nutrition management, oral care, complication management, and psychological care. The best evidence-based recommendations for the management of dysphagia in elderly patients is summarized, it is suggested that the best evidence should be selected according to the actual situation of patients, and a personalized management plan should be formulated to improve the quality of life of patients and achieve high-quality nursing.

An Evidence-Based Medical Review on Promoting Gastrointestinal Function Recovery After Colorectal Cancer Surgery.

The objective of this study was to search for, evaluate, and summarize data related to a faster postoperative recovery in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) based on literature from China as well as internationally. This will serve as an evidence-based foundation for the clinical implementation of enhanced postoperative recovery of gastrointestinal function in patients with CRC. Based on the hierarchical "6S" evidence model, we conducted a systematic search of computerized decision-support systems, guideline websites, as well as domestic and international databases for evidence, guidelines, expert consensus statements, clinical decision-making, best practices, evidence summaries, and systematic reviews of interventions focusing on accelerating gastrointestinal function rehabilitation after CRC surgery. The time limit for the search was from the date of creation of the database to January 2023. Two researchers evaluated the quality of the literature that was included, and we extracted data and summarized the evidence from those publications that fulfilled the quality criteria. The review included a total of 21 publications, comprising 6 guidelines, 6 systematic reviews, 3 expert consensus statements, 4 randomized controlled trials, and 2 evidence summaries. We summarized 51 best evidence findings across five areas: organizational management, preoperative risk assessment, education, intraoperative monitoring, and postoperative management. There is a wide variety and wealth of information available on interventions to promote enhanced postoperative recovery of gastrointestinal function in patients with CRC. The use of evidence is discussed, keeping in mind the practical situation in China.

WHAM evidence summary: fish skin for treating burns

WHAM evidence summary: fish skin for treating burns

Electrical stimulation therapy for wound-related pain: a WHAM evidence summary

Electrical stimulation therapy for wound-related pain: a WHAM evidence summary

Characteristics and Quality of Traditional Chinese Therapies and Integrative Medicine Clinical Practice Guidelines for Musculoskeletal Disorders Published in Mainland China

Background: Musculoskeletal disorders are prevalent in adults. Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) and integrative medicine (IM) are commonly used treatments which have clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). This study aimed to determine the characteristics and quality of these CPGs.Methods: CPGs which recommended TCM/IM therapies in musculoskeletal conditions/diseases published in Chinese or English between January 2018 to December 2022 in mainland China were retrieved and analyzed for guideline classification, funding source, conflict of interest, and methodology. Appraisal of Guideline for Research and Evaluation Ⅱ including 6 domains, was applied to assess CPG quality.Results: Of the 50 CPGs included, there were 19 TCM, 5 IM, and 26 western conventional medicine (WCM) guidelines of which osteoporosis (13, 26%), osteoarthritis (11, 22%) and rheumatoid arthritis (6, 12%) were the most frequent diseases. The TCM therapies recommended by the CPGs successively were acupuncture and moxibustion, Chinese patent medicine, and TCM decoction based on syndrome differentiation. Nearly half of the CPGs reported funding source (52%) and conflict of interest (48%). Thirty-six CPGs used the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations method to present summaries of evidence, the remaining did not report the method. Based on Appraisal of Guideline for Research and Evaluation Ⅱ scores, “clarity of presentation” scored the highest (55%), while “applicability” was the lowest (6%). No CPG was recommended without change, and 23 CPGs were not recommended.Conclusion: The quality of CPGs for musculoskeletal conditions/diseases in China is generally low. Future CPGs should pay more attention to standardized developing procedures.

Evidence-based systematic review of removal of peripheral arterial catheter in critically ill adult patients

ObjectiveTo evaluate and summarize literature pertaining to evidence of peripheral arterial catheterization in adults, and to provide a reference for clinical practice.MethodsWe undertook a systematic review of literature on the removal of peripheral arterial manometric catheters in adult patients from various sources such as UpToDate, BMJ, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), Medlive, Cochrane Library, Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Evidence-based Health Care Center Database, CINAHL, PubMed, Wanfang Data, VIP, and other databases. The retrieval time was set as from the establishment of the database till August 30, 2021. We screened the studies that fulfilled the inclusion criteria, evaluated their quality, and retrieved and summarized such articles.ResultsThe review included 8 articles: 1 clinical decision, 3 guidelines, 2 evidence summaries, 1 systematic review, and 1 expert consensus. In all, 17 pieces of strong evidence were collected and extracted based on the following 5 dimensions: assessment of removal timing, preparation before removal, removal procedure, compression time, and key points after removal.ConclusionsThe removal of a peripheral arterial manometry catheter requires careful consideration by medical professionals. In order to increase the removal standardization rate and decrease the incidence of clinical complications, standardized procedures and training need to be developed.

The impacts of housing conditions on physical and mental health - A mini-review informed by a rapid conversion of evidence from Alidoust and Huang (2021).

This article provides a summary and critical appraisal of the systematic review conducted by Alidoust et al. (1) regarding the various effects of housing on both physical and psychological well-being. We aim to discuss the review's findings against existing published evidence to draw out policy and practical implications. Our mini-review illuminates a wide range of housing-related factors which impact on health around which we draw evidence-based policy initiatives and implications, and outline avenues for future research. This mini-review is part of the wider Rapid Conversion of Evidence Summaries (RaCES) program which aims to critically appraise systematic reviews and highlight evidence-based policy and practice implications.

Nursing management of cognitive dysfunction in adults with brain injury: Summary of best evidence-practiced strategies.

To summarize the best evidence-based strategies for the management of cognitive dysfunction in patients with brain injury and to provide a reference for clinical nursing practice. Review. The review was presented using PRISMA guidelines. A systematic search of evidence on the management of cognitive dysfunction in patients with brain injury was conducted in computerized decision systems, guideline websites, professional association websites and comprehensive databases from the date of creation to 21 June 2023. The types of evidence included were clinical decision making, guidelines, evidence summaries, best practices, recommended practices, expert consensus, systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Two researchers trained in evidence-based methodological systems independently evaluated the quality of the literature and extracted, integrated and graded the evidence for inclusion. A total of 20 articles were selected, including nine guidelines, three expert consensus articles, one clinical practice article and seven systematic reviews, and the overall quality of the literature was high. Thirty pieces of evidence were summarized in seven areas: assessment, multidisciplinary team, rehabilitation program, cognitive intervention, exercise intervention, music intervention and medication management. This study summarizes the latest evidence on the management of cognitive dysfunction in the care of adults with brain injury and provides a reference for clinical nursing practice. The best evidence should be selected for localized and individualized application in clinical work, and the best evidence should be continuously updated to standardize nursing practice. Patients with cognitive impairment after brain injury often suffer from memory loss, attention deficit and disorientation and are unable to have a normal life and experience much enjoyment, which seriously affects their physical and mental health and creates a great burden of care for their families and society. Best evidence-based strategies for the nursing management of cognitive impairment in brain injury are essential for standardizing clinical nursing practice and providing timely, professional, systematic and comprehensive nursing interventions for patients. This review is reported following the PRISMA 2020 statement guidelines, as applicable, to enhance transparency in reporting the evidence synthesis. This study has been registered with the Fudan University Centre for Evidence-based Nursing, a JBI Centre of Excellence under registration number ES20232566, http://ebn.nursing.fudan.edu.cn/myRegisterList. No patient or public contribution.

Summary of best evidence for prevention and management of frailty.

Frailty in older people can seriously affect their quality of life and increase the demand for long-term care and health care expenses. Aims of this study are to provide an evidence-based basis for clinical practice of frailty in older people by systematically searching for the best current evidence on interventions for the prevention and management of frailty. According to the '6S' evidence resource model, evidence retrieval is searched from the top-down and collected relevant guidelines, best practices, evidence summaries, systematic reviews and expert consensus. The retrieval time limit was from the database establishment to 20 March 2023. Two reviewers independently screened and evaluated the literature, and then extracted and summarised the evidence according to the JBI grading of evidence and recommendation system. A total of 44 publications were finally included, including 12 guidelines, 5 best practices, 4 expert consensus, 5 evidence summaries and 18 systematic reviews. Through the induction and integration of the evidence, the evidence was finally summarised from eight aspects: frailty screening, frailty assessment, exercise intervention, nutrition intervention, multi-domain intervention, drug administration, social support and health education, and 43 best evidences were formed. This study summarised the best evidence for the prevention and management of frailty from eight aspects, which can provide guidance for clinical or community medical staff to develop and apply frailty intervention and practice programmes for older people and improved the clinical outcome and quality of life of older people.

Summary of the best evidence for the prevention of nasal injury in preterm infants with nasal noninvasive ventilation.

Due to immaturity, the nose of preterm infants can easily be injured, by even a short application of a nasal device. However, 20% to 60% of preterm infants suffer nasal damage while using nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) due to weak skin tissue, prolonged use of nasal device, and improper nursing practices, leading to increased risk of infection and decreased compliance and tolerance. In this study, we retrieved, obtained and integrated the related evidences of prevention of nasal injury in premature infants with nasal noninvasive ventilation to provide reference for clinical practice. We searched the relevant guidelines, expert consensus, evidence summaries and systematic reviews in the databases and guideline websites of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN), the Agency for Health care Research and Quality (AHRQ), Guidelines International Network (GIN), the World Health Organization (WHO) guideline websites, Registered Nurses' Association of Ontario (RANO), Association of Women's Health, Obstetric and Neonatal Nurses (AWHONN), European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (EPUAP), Yi Maitong, British Medical Journal best-practice, Cochrane Library, UpToDate, Embase, PubMed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang. The search was limited to the time of library establishment to February 2023. In total, 16 articles were included, including six guidelines, three expert consensuses, two evidence summaries and five systematic reviews. Twenty-eight pieces of evidence were summarized from six aspects: risk assessment, ventilation and connection, skin protection, skin assessment, training and support, and continuous quality improvement. This study summarized the best evidence for the prevention of nasal injury in premature infants through nasal noninvasive ventilation. It is suggested that nurses should consider the actual clinical situation when applying the suggestions from the evidence, formulate corresponding nursing measures, and reduce the occurrence of nasal injury in premature infants.

Methods for conducting a living evidence profile on mpox: An evidence map of the literature

AbstractBackgroundIn May of 2022, several cases of mpox were identified in multiple nonendemic countries and on July 23, 2022 the World Health Organization declared mpox a Public Health Emergency of International Concern. During the first six months of the outbreak there was an urgent need to have up‐to‐date synthesized evidence on mpox to inform public health decision‐making. At this point, evidence is changing too quickly for traditional evidence synthesis methods, as systematic reviews were out‐of‐date before publication. This paper describes the framework developed to manage and maintain a living evidence profile (LEP) to systematically identify, classify and synthesize evidence on a broad range of mpox topics at a rapid pace as the outbreak unfolded.MethodsThe LEP framework was based on principles of evidence synthesis, risk assessment, priority epidemiological parameters for infectious disease modeling and consultation with experts. The framework consisted of a systematic search conducted twice weekly; study selection; categorization into pre‐determined foci and data extraction; integration and synthesis of evidence; internal peer‐review and dissemination to stakeholders.ResultsBetween April 14 and December 15, 2022, 2287 citations were identified, 687 were primary research studies or surveillance reports on the 2022 mpox outbreak and 496 were included in the final LEP. Each study was mapped to one of 32 foci and evidence was narratively synthesized. From June to December 2022, 23 LEPs were produced (approximately weekly) along with a searchable database of extracted data of the mpox literature. They were disseminated globally to public health researchers and decision‐makers to inform public health response efforts.ConclusionsThe LEP framework is applicable to other public health emergencies when a rapid synthesis cycle is required because the evidence is evolving quickly. This efficient methodology for creating up‐to‐date summaries of the current evidence during the first few months of an outbreak or emergency supports public health decision‐making and response activities.

Vaccinations in patients diagnosed with an autoimmune disorder receiving an immunosuppressive agent: a best practice implementation project.

Immunosuppressed patients face increased health risks due to infections such as influenza or COVID-19. Scientific evidence supports improved health-related outcomes in this patient population, such as reduced hospitalizations, with up-to-date vaccinations. The project setting, a community-based rheumatology clinic, did not have a vaccination record specific to the needs of immunosuppressed patients, which may lead to a suboptimal immunization status in these patients. This project aimed to promote evidence-based practices regarding the use of vaccinations in patients diagnosed with autoimmune disorders receiving immunosuppressive agents. This project used the JBI evidence implementation framework to promote best practices regarding vaccination. Two audit criteria were identified using a JBI Evidence Summary. Baseline audits identified gaps between the evidence and current practice. Barriers to best practice were then identified, and strategies implemented. Post-implementation audits measured changes in compliance. Baseline audits revealed 67% compliance with the two best practices. Barriers included a lack of provider awareness of the current vaccination recommendations for immunosuppressed patients and a lack of customizable vaccine records. Strategies to address these barriers included educating providers about current national vaccination recommendations and implementing a new patient vaccination history intake form. Post-implementation audits revealed 83% compliance, with a 16% increase from baseline. This evidence-based implementation project enhanced best practices by educating providers and implementing an updated patient vaccination history form. Recommendations include the improved compliance with the use of the new form and to assess the effectiveness and usability of a customizable electronic form that interfaces with the clinic's electronic medical records.

Uncovering gaps in GRADE reporting of Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma (EAST) guidelines

ObjectivesTo formally evaluate the uptake and reporting of the Grading of Recommendation Assessments, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach in clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) developed by the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma (EAST). Study Design and SettingBased on an a priori, written protocol, we developed a dedicated data abstraction form that included the six suggested criteria for using and applying GRADE. By searching the EAST website, we identified all EAST guidelines that referenced the use of GRADE. All steps of the data abstraction process were completed independently and in duplicate by two members of the research team. ResultsWe identified a total of 48 CPGs that used GRADE. Trauma and violence prevention (n = 11; 23.9%) was the most common topic. The median number of patient/population, intervention, comparison, and outcomes (PICO) questions addressed was 3 (interquartile range: 2; 4) with a median of 2.5 (interquartile range: 1; 4) critical outcomes. A conditional/weak recommendation was provided for n = 79 (51.4%) PICOs, whereas a strong recommendation was provided for 33 PICOs (23.9%). For 22 PICOs (15.9%), no recommendation was made. Nearly all guideline documents provided search dates (n = 44; 95.7%) and a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses flow diagram (n = 44; 95.7%). Most described categories for rating down (n = 35; 76.1%). GRADE decision-making domains related to the ratio of benefits to harms, values and preferences, and resource utilization were referenced by 43.5% (n = 20), 43.5% (n = 20), and 30.4% (n = 14) of CPGs, respectively. For nearly half of PICO questions (n = 59; 44.2%) authors did not provide an evidence profile or summary of findings table. Comparing time periods from 2014–2018 to 2019–2022, the proportion of recommendations with an overall certainty of evidence increased (52.4% vs 83.9%; P < 0.001). ConclusionEAST has successfully adopted GRADE to develop many trauma-related guidelines, each addressing a finite number of focused clinical questions based on systematic reviews conducted in-house. Overall reporting improved over time. There is for improvement when it comes to consistent provision of an overall certainty of evidence, the reporting of the evidence to decision-making process, and the justification of strong recommendations based on low/very low certainty evidence.

Judging the relative trustworthiness of research results: How to do it and why it matters

AbstractThis paper describes, and lays out an argument for, the use of a procedure to help groups of reviewers to judge the quality of prior research reports. It argues why such a procedure is needed, and how other existing approaches are only relevant to some kinds of research, meaning that a review or synthesis cannot successfully combine quality judgements of different types of research. The proposed procedure is based on four main factors: the fit between the research question(s) for any study and its design(s); the size of the smallest group of cases used in the headline analyses; the amount and skewness of missing data; and the quality of the data collected. This simple procedure is now relatively widely used, and has been found to lead to widespread agreement between reviewers. It can fundamentally change the findings of a review of evidence, compared to the conclusions that would emerge from a more traditional review that did not include genuine quality rating of prior evidence. And powerfully, because it is not technical, it permits users to help judge research findings. This is important as there is a growing demand for evidence‐led approaches in areas of social science such as education, wherein summaries of evidence must be as trustworthy as possible.

Evaluating ClinGen variant curation expert panels' application of PVS1 code

BackgroundThe 2015 American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) and Association for Molecular Pathology (AMP) guidelines articulates that the effects of certain types of variants on gene function can often be seen as a complete absence of the gene product by leading to a lack of transcription or nonsense-mediated decay(NMD). However, detailed information considering different types of loss of function(LOF) variants, refined steps assimilating details concerning location of variant, changes in strength levels, NMD boundary, or any additional information pointing to a true null effect, were all left to expert judgement. As part of its Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen) initiative, Variant Curation Expert Panels (VCEPs) are designated to make gene/disease-centric specifications in accordance with the ACMG/AMP guidelines, including a more detailed definition of what constitutes an appropriate LOF evidence. Our goal was to evaluate the current LOF guidelines developed by the VCEPs and analyse the prior curated variants concerning the PVS1 criteria, bringing people occupied in genetic data analysis a comprehensive understanding of this code. MethodsOur study evaluated 7 VCEPs for their LOF criteria (PVS1). Subsequently, we assessed the predictive criteria by considering the underlying disease mechanism, protein transcript, and variant types delineated. Then, we meticulously curated the LOF evidence referenced by each VCEP in their preliminary variant classification, thereby scrutinizing the recommendations put forth by VCEPs and their application in the interpretation of the aforementioned predictive criteria. Based on these, an extensive curation of evidence summary considering PVS1 applied by VCEPs according to their classification of pilot variants for the purpose of analyzing VCEP criteria specifications and their use in the understanding of LOF was conducted. ResultsWe observed in this article that the VCEPs discussed followed the majority of Sequence Variant Interpretation (SVI) recommendations concerning the application of this LOF criteria, except for some disease/gene specific considerations. We highlighted the wide range of PVS1 strength levels approved by VCEP, reflecting the diversity of evidence for each variants type. In addition, we observed substantial differences in the approach used to determine relative strengths for different types of null variants and in the attitude towards these principles concerning variant location, NMD and influence to protein function between VCEPs. ConclusionsIt is difficult to understand the intricacies of the predictive data(PVS1), which often requires expert-level knowledge of disease/gene. The VCEP criteria specifications for the predictive evidence play an important role in making it more accessible for the curators to apply the predictive data by providing details concerning this complex criteria. Despite this, we believe there is a need for more guidance on standardizing this process and ensuring consistency in the application of this predictive evidence.

Policing schools in the USA: An evidence summary and future research agenda

Policing schools in the USA: An evidence summary and future research agenda

Prescribing Portraits to Optimize Prescribing of Proton Pump Inhibitors in Long-Term Care: PPI-T STOP Study.

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are among the most commonly prescribed medications in Canada, particularly for older adults (at least 65 years of age). Overprescribing of long-term PPIs leads to health care system waste and is associated with adverse effects, including infections and fractures. The high prevalence of PPI prescribing in long-term care (LTC) facilities prompted an evaluation of systematic approaches to PPI deprescribing. To assess the impact of individualized prescribing portraits, a type of audit-and-feedback quality improvement intervention, on PPI deprescribing in the LTC setting. This prospective, nonblinded, uncontrolled, pre-post quality improvement study was conducted from December 2021 to April 2022 at a 126-bed LTC facility in Vancouver, British Columbia. A PPI prescribing portrait was developed for each prescriber (n = 5) at the LTC facility, containing the prescriber's personal PPI prescribing metrics as compared with those of their peers across all LTC facilities within the same health authority; an evidence summary for PPI deprescribing; and a personalized list of the prescriber's PPI-treated residents, along with their respective PPI indications and strategies for PPI deprescribing. Three months after the prescribers received their PPI prescribing portraits, the number and types of PPI deprescribing orders were recorded. The implementation of prescribing portraits resulted in 17 (61%) of 28 PPI-treated residents receiving a deprescribing order by the end of the study period. Of the 28 PPI-treated residents, 20 were determined to be eligible for PPI deprescribing according to the evidence summary presented in the prescribing portrait; of these 20 residents, 16 (80%) appropriately received PPI deprescribing. Individualized prescribing portraits had the potential to increase evidence-based PPI deprescribing among LTC residents, beyond the extent of deprescribing previously achieved through standard of care.

The value and challenges of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in surgical research

ABSTRACT Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are essential tools in evidence-based medicine, providing unbiased summaries of current evidence to guide clinical decision-making. While widely utilized in various medical specialties, surgical research presents unique challenges to conducting high-quality systematic reviews. This comprehensive review explores the value of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in surgery, discussing recent trends, key components, benefits, limitations, and challenges specific to surgical interventions. It examines issues such as blinding, surgical heterogeneity, learning curves, patient and clinician preference, industry involvement, and emergency interventions. By addressing these challenges and highlighting the importance of rigorous methodology, this review emphasizes the critical role of systematic reviews in advancing surgical practice and shaping evidence-based guidelines.

The Saudi urological association guidelines on urolithiasis.

The Saudi Urolithiasis Guidelines are a set of recommendations for diagnosing, evaluating, and treating urolithiasis in the Saudi population. These guidelines are based on the latest evidence and expert consensus to improve patient outcomes and optimize care delivery. They cover the various aspects of urolithiasis, including risk factors, diagnosis, medical and surgical treatments, and prevention strategies. By following these guidelines, health-care professionals can improve care quality for individuals with urolithiasis in Saudi Arabia. The Saudi Urolithiasis Guidelines Panel consists of urologists specialized in endourology with expertise in urolithiasis and consultation with a guideline methodologist. All panelists involved in this document have submitted statements disclosing any potential conflicts of interest. The Saudi Guidelines on Urolithiasis were developed by relying primarily on established international guidelines to adopt or adapt the most appropriate guidance for the Saudi context. When necessary, the panel modified the phrasing of recommendations from different sources to ensure consistency within the document. To address areas less well covered in existing guidelines, the panel conducted a directed literature search for high quality evidence published in English, including meta analyses, randomized controlled trials, and prospective nonrandomized comparative studies. The panel also searched for locally relevant studies containing information unique to the Saudi Arabian population. The recommendations are formulated with a direction and strength of recommendation based on GRADE terminology and interpretation while relying on existing summaries of evidence from the existing guidelines.