3 90-year-old woman was admitted for a 2-week history of fever and persistent peristomal leakage. A percutaneous enoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) was placed a year earlier as a result of ultiple strokes resulting in dysphagia. During the ensuing year, he gastrostomy tube was replaced multiple times at the bedside as result of minor complications. The physical exam revealed a acerated peristomal site with surrounding erythema, induration, nd serosanguineous drainage. The abdominal exam was otherise normal without evidence of obstruction. An upper endoscopy as performed for placement of a new PEG; however, on examiation, absence of the pyloric opening was noted (Figure A).1 urthermore, the PEG tube was extending from the gastrocutaneus site to the opposite wall, with torsion of the distal stomach Figure B). A subsequent gastrostomy tube study revealed contrast xtrusion into the duodenum, suggesting the balloon was inflated n the small bowel. It was suspected that as a result of persistent anipulation of the PEG tube, torsion of the distal stomach and uodenum ensued, with a resultant anatomic gastric outlet obtruction. The wound dehiscence and cellulitis were believed to be result of leakage of gastric secretions around the peristomal site aused by the obstruction. Repeat esophagogastroduodenoscopy fter deflation of the balloon bumper revealed normal anatomy. ntubation of the duodenum noted a clean based ulcer attributed o pressure necrosis from the inflated balloon. A replacement PEG ube was inserted through the tract and anchored securely to the bdominal wall without any complication. The localized wound nfection has since healed. PEG tube placement is a low-risk procedure routinely erformed for patients who are unable to take food orally. ommon indications for placement include neurologic conitions with associated impaired swallowing, oropharyngeal, aryngeal, and esophageal neoplasms, facial trauma, and the eed for supplemental feedings in patients with miscellaeous catabolic conditions. Overall, the complication rate anges from 3%–14%, and mortality approaches 1%.1 Various ajor and minor complications have been described in the iterature. Commonly encountered problems include pain at he insertion site, leakage around PEG tube, tube displaceent by patient or health care personnel, tube obstruction, nd local ulceration or wound infection.2 This case is an example of an anatomically created gastric outlet bstruction, without the typical symptoms of nausea, vomiting, nd distention. Two theories have been postulated to explain the bove. As described by Lamont and Rode,3 passage of a gastrosomy tube past the pylorus into the small bowel with insufflation f the balloon can result in fixation within the small bowel. The econd theory implicates migration of the PEG tube through the ylorus as a result of improper anchoring to the abdominal wall. ortunately in this patient, absence of obstruction at the distal tip f the gastrostomy tube allowed for unimpeded feedings, and the toma provided an exit for air release and excess gastric secretions.