During the past several years a number of reports have attested to the value of the ultra-fine focal spot in diagnostic radiology. The technics are difficult, however, and still not in general use (1-5). In the course of four years experience with 0.3-mm. focal spot tubes we have had occasion to analyze the factors involved and adapt technics for everyday clinical use. Theoretical and Experimental Evaluation The size of the focal spot affects radiographic sharpness in so far as it directly affects penumbra size. Blurring due to this factor is determined by the relative sizes of the penumbra and the radiographic image. With decrease of the focal spot-object distance and/or increase of the object-film distance, both radiographic image and penumbra are magnified, but not in the same degree. The size of the penumbra is determined only by the relative distances involved and the focal spot size, and is independent of the size of object. With magnification, the penumbra size increases more rapidly than the image size. The practical limit to useful magnification is a little over three times, beyond which finer bony detail is lost. Figure 1 shows the relative sizes of images and penumbrae with 0.3-mm. and 1.0-mm. focal spots, with magnifications up to three times. It is evident in this example that relative penumbra sizes with the ultra-fine focal spot are smaller with magnification than with the larger focal spot without magnification. Magnification is obviously impractical with a 1.0-mm. focal spot or larger. It is also clear that, regardless of focal spot size, the relative penumbra size is minimum with the least possible degree of magnification. In our experience, however, the maximum radiographic detail is obtained with magnifications of about head of the radius picked up with magnification of 1 1/4 but not seen on multiple non-magnified films. The thickness of the upper portion of the fracture line suggests that its size without magnification was less than the defining power of the film. Of far more importance than the overall degree of magnification is the relative magnification that can be obtained. Figure 3 shows films of three strips of wire screening at levels 1, 2 and 3, at distances of 2 1/4, 4 1/2, and 6 3/4 inches, respectively, from the table top. The three exposures were made with focal spot-table top distances of 40, 20, and 20 inches, and with table top-film distances of 0, 20 and 30 inches, respectively. In the first film, where the strips overlap, it is almost impossible to differentiate the three levels. In the second film, the three levels can be distinguished, and in the last film the differential magnification or perspective of the three levels is readily appreciated. With the increased magnification, the screening at level 3 is magnified 34 per cent more than that at level 1.