Everolimus In Patients Research Articles

Phase 1 trial of vorolanib (CM082) in combination with everolimus in patients with advanced clear-cell renal cell carcinoma

BackgroundVorolanib (X-82, CM082) is a multi-target tyrosine kinase inhibitor. This study aimed to evaluate the tolerability, safety, pharmacokinetics and antitumor activities of vorolanib plus everolimus (an inhibitor of mammalian target of rapamycin). MethodsPatients had histologically or cytologically confirmed advanced RCC and failed with standard therapy were eligible for this study. Dose-escalated combinations of vorolanib (100, 150 or 200 mg once daily) with everolimus (5 mg once daily) were administered on 28-day cycles until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity using a conventional 3 + 3 dose-escalation design. Findings22 patients (100 mg n = 4, 150 mg n = 3, 200 mg n = 15) were enrolled. Only one patient experienced dose-limiting toxicity (DLT, grade 4 thrombocytopenia) in the vorolanib 200 mg combination cohort, and the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was not reached. The most common treatment-related adverse events were proteinuria (100%), leukopenia (77%), hypercholesterolaemia (77%), increased low-density lipoprotein (68%), hypertriglyceridaemia (64%), hyperglycaemia (59%), and fatigue (55%). Most treatment-related adverse events were grade 1 to 2, with grade 3 or higher toxicities mostly seen in the 200 mg cohort. Single dosing of vorolanib demonstrated dose-proportional increases in the Cmax and AUC, and observed short t1/2z ranging from 4.74±1.44 to 12.89±7.49 h. The pharmacokinetic parameters for everolimus were similar among all cohorts. Of 19 evaluable patients, the ORR and DCR was 32% (n = 6, 95% CI, 13–57%) and 100% (95% CI, 82–100%), respectively. InterpretationCombination therapy of vorolanib 200 mg plus everolimus 5 mg once daily is potentially effective with potential activity. Further evaluation of the combination in advanced RCC patients is ongoing (NCT03095040). FundingBetta Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Hangzhou, China.

Clinical Outcomes by Nephrectomy Status In METEOR, A Randomized Phase 3 Trial of Cabozantinib Versus Everolimus in Patients with Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma

Background: We investigated outcomes with cabozantinib versus everolimus in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with or without prior nephrectomy in the phase 3 METEOR trial (NCT01865747). Methods: Patients (N = 658) with advanced clear cell RCC and prior treatment with≥1 VEGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) were randomized to cabozantinib 60 mg/day or everolimus 10 mg/day. Pre-specified subgroup analyses of progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and objective response rate (ORR) were conducted by prior nephrectomy status. Response was assessed by independent radiology committee. Results: Most enrolled patients (85%) had prior nephrectomy. Baseline prognostic factors (e.g. MSKCC risk group) were less favorable for patients without prior nephrectomy. Cabozantinib improved outcomes versus everolimus in the subgroups with and without nephrectomy—hazard ratios (95% CIs) of 0.51 (0.41–0.64) and 0.51 (0.30–0.86), respectively, for PFS, and 0.66 (0.52–0.84) and 0.75 (0.44–1.27), respectively, for OS. Median OS was numerically longer in patients with versus those without prior nephrectomy in both treatment arms. ORR for cabozantinib versus everolimus was 17% versus 4% for the prior nephrectomy subgroup and 21% versus 2% for the subgroup without prior nephrectomy. Among evaluable patients without prior nephrectomy, reductions of renal target lesions occurred in 94% (16/17) of patients in the cabozantinib arm versus 44% (8/18) in the everolimus arm. The safety profiles of both subgroups were generally consistent with that of the overall study population. Conclusion: Cabozantinib improved PFS, ORR, and OS compared with everolimus in patients with advanced RCC irrespective of nephrectomy status.

A phase II study of lenvatinib plus everolimus in patients with advanced non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC).

685 Background: Non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC) is an umbrella term that encompasses multiple RCC histological subtypes, including papillary, chromophobe, and undetermined RCC. Both increased expression of the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and dysregulation of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway occur in nccRCC. Lenvatinib (LEN) is a multitarget tyrosine kinase inhibitor that inhibits the VEGF receptor and other targets; everolimus (EVE) is a mTOR inhibitor. LEN + EVE is approved for the treatment of patients with advanced RCC following 1 prior antiangiogenic therapy. This phase 2 study examined the efficacy and tolerability of LEN + EVE in patients with nccRCC. Methods: This single-arm, multicenter, phase 2 trial assessed the safety and efficacy of LEN (18 mg once daily) + EVE (5 mg once daily) in patients with unresectable advanced or metastatic nccRCC who had not received any chemotherapy for advanced disease. The primary objective was objective response rate (ORR) as assessed by investigators using RECIST v1.1. Secondary objectives included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety assessments. Results: At the time of data cutoff (July 17, 2019), 31 patients with nccRCC (papillary, n = 20; chromophobe, n = 9; unclassified, n = 2) were enrolled and treated. The ORR was 25.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 11.9–44.6%); 8 patients achieved a partial response (PR; papillary, n = 3; chromophobe, n = 4; unclassified, n = 1) and no patients had a complete response (CR). The median duration of response was not reached. Additionally, 18 patients (58.1%) had stable disease (SD) and the clinical benefit rate (CR + PR + durable SD [duration ≥ 23 weeks]) was 61.3% (95% CI: 42.2–78.2%). The median PFS was 9.23 months (95% CI: 5.49- not estimable [NE]) and median OS was 15.64 months (95% CI: 9.23–NE). The safety profile observed in this study was similar to the established profile of the study drug combination (LEN + EVE). Conclusions: The combination of LEN + EVE showed promising antitumor activity as first-line therapy in patients with advanced nccRCC. The ORR was 25.8%, which compares favorably to historical reports with EVE monotherapy. Clinical trial information: NCT02915783.

A Phase II Trial of Everolimus in Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Carcinoma Refractory or Intolerant to Platinum-Containing Chemotherapy (NECTOR Trial)

Background: Platinum-containing regimens are widely used as first-line chemotherapy for unresectable pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC), but second-line chemotherapies have yet to be established. Objectives: We evaluated the safety and efficacy of everolimus in patients with pancreatic NEC refractory or intolerant to platinum-containing chemotherapy. Methods: This study was a prospective, multicenter, phase II trial in patients with pancreatic NEC after platinum-containing chemotherapy. Everolimus treatment was continued until disease progression or intolerable toxicity was observed. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Results: Participants comprised 25 patients. Median age was 63 years, median PFS was 1.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.9–3.1 months), median overall survival was 7.5 months (95% CI 3.1–13.5 months), overall response rate was 0%, and disease control rate was 39.1%. Common grade 3/4 adverse events were hyperglycemia (20%), thrombocytopenia (16%), and anemia (16%). Conclusion: The efficacy of everolimus was limited in patients with unresectable pancreatic NEC.

Outcomes based on age in the phase III METEOR trial of cabozantinib versus everolimus in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma

BackgroundCabozantinib improved progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and objective response rate (ORR) compared with everolimus in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) after prior antiangiogenic therapy in the phase III METEOR trial (NCT01865747). Limited data are available on the use of targeted therapies in older patients with advanced RCC. MethodsEfficacy and safety in METEOR were retrospectively analysed for three age subgroups: <65 (n = 394), 65–74 (n = 201) and ≥75 years (n = 63). ResultsPFS, OS and ORR were improved with cabozantinib compared with everolimus in all age subgroups. The PFS hazard ratios (HRs) were 0.53 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.41–0.68), 0.53 (95% CI: 0.37–0.77) and 0.38 (95% CI: 0.18–0.79) for <65, 65–74 and ≥75 years, respectively, and the OS HRs were 0.72 (95% CI: 0.54–0.95), 0.66 (95% CI: 0.44–0.99) and 0.57 (95% CI: 0.28–1.14). The ORR for cabozantinib versus everolimus was 15% vs 5%, 21% vs 2% and 19% vs 0%, respectively. No significant differences were observed in PFS or OS with age as a categorical or continuous variable. Grade III/IV adverse events (AEs) were generally consistent across subgroups, although fatigue, hypertension and hyponatraemia occurred more frequently in older patients treated with cabozantinib. Dose reductions to manage AEs were more frequent in patients receiving cabozantinib than in those receiving everolimus. Dose reductions and treatment discontinuation due to AEs were more frequent in older patients in both treatment groups. ConclusionsCabozantinib improved PFS, OS and ORR compared with everolimus in previously treated patients with advanced RCC, irrespective of age group, supporting use in all age categories. Proactive dose modification and supportive care may help to mitigate AEs in older patients while maintaining efficacy.

A Phase 4 Study of Everolimus to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety in Patients with Metastatic Renal-Cell Carcinoma after Failure of First-Line Sunitinib or Pazopanib (SUNPAZ)

Introduction: Sunitinib and pazopanib are both standard first-line therapies for clear-cell metastatic renal-cell carcinoma (mRCC). Everolimus is a well-established second-line treatment. Objective: To estimate the efficacy and safety of second-line everolimus following pazopanib or sunitinib. Methods: SUNPAZ was an open-label, phase 4 clinical trial of everolimus in patients with clear-cell mRCC progressing after first-line sunitinib or pazopanib. The primary end point was the number of patients without progression 6 months after starting everolimus. Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and overall response rate. Enrollment was terminated early due to slow recruitment; all analyses are descriptive. Results: Patients who received prior sunitinib (n = 16) or pazopanib (n = 13) were enrolled. One of 12 patients in the sunitinib group and 6/13 patients in the pazopanib group were progression-free by month 6 in the full analysis set. Median PFS in the sunitinib and pazopanib groups was 2.8 and 8.0 months, and median OS was 14.8 months and 20.4 months, respectively. Fifteen patients in the sunitinib group and 13 in the pazopanib group experienced adverse events. Conclusions: Safety and efficacy results confirm the second-line everolimus profile. However, baseline differences in patient populations should be taken into consideration.

ACTR-09. A PHASE 0 PHARMACODYNAMIC AND PHARMACOKINETIC STUDY OF EVEROLIMUS IN VESTIBULAR SCHWANNOMA (VS) AND MENINGIOMA PATIENTS

Abstract BACKGROUND Inhibition of mTORC1 signaling has been shown to diminish growth of NF2 deficient tumors in preclinical studies, and clinical data suggest that everolimus, an orally administered mTORC1 inhibitor, may slow tumor progression in a subset of adult and pediatric NF2 patients with VS. To assess the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and potential mechanisms of treatment resistance, we performed a pre-surgical (“phase 0”) clinical trial of everolimus in patients undergoing surgery for VS or meningiomas. METHODS Eligible patients with meningioma or VS requiring tumor resection received everolimus 10 mg daily for 10 days immediately prior to surgery. Everolimus blood levels were determined immediately prior to and after surgery. Tumor samples were collected intraoperatively. RESULTS Ten patients completed protocol therapy, including 5 patients with NF2-related meningioma, 3 patients with sporadic meningioma, and 2 patients with NF2-related VS. Median pre- and post-operative plasma levels of everolimus were found to be in a high therapeutic range (17.4 ng/ml and 9.4 ng/ml, respectively). Median tumor tissue drug concentration determined by mass spectrometry was 24.3 ng/g (range 9.2–169.2), and median tumor tissue to post-operative plasma drug concentration ratio was 0.39. We observed only partial inhibition of phospho-S6 in the treated tumors, indicating incomplete target inhibition compared to matched control tissues from untreated patients (p = 0.005). Consistent with prior observations that inhibition of mTORC1 may lead to MAPK pathway activation through a PI3K-dependent feedback loop, we observed a statistically significant increase of phospho-ERK (p &lt; 0.03) versus untreated controls. CONCLUSIONS In patients with meningioma or VS, treatment with everolimus leads to incomplete inhibition of mTORC1 signaling and upregulation phospho-ERK. These data may explain the limited anti-tumor effect of everolimus observed in clinical studies for NF2 patients and identify upregulation of phospho-ERK as a likely resistance mechanism that could be addressed with combination therapies.

Phase I clinical trial of the combination of eribulin and everolimus in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer

BackgroundAlteration of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway is a common genomic abnormality detected in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Everolimus acts synergistically with eribulin in TNBC cell lines and xenograft models. This phase I trial was designed to test the safety and tolerability of combining eribulin and everolimus in patients with metastatic TNBC.MethodsThe primary objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and toxicities of the combination. Patients with metastatic TNBC who had up to four lines of prior chemotherapies were enrolled. The combination of eribulin and everolimus was tested using three dosing levels: A1 (everolimus 5 mg daily; eribulin 1.4 mg/m2 days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks), A2 (everolimus 7.5 mg daily; eribulin 1.4 mg/m2, days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks), and B1 (everolimus 5 mg daily; eribulin 1.1 mg/m2 days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks).ResultsTwenty-seven patients with median age 55 years were enrolled. Among 8 evaluable patients who received dose level A1, 4 had dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). Among 3 evaluable patients treated with dose level A2, 2 had DLTs. Among 12 evaluable patients who received dose level B1, 4 had DLTs. The DLTs were neutropenia, stomatitis, and hyperglycemia. Over the study period, 59% had a ≥ grade 3 toxicity, 44% had ≥ grade 3 hematologic toxicities, and 22% had grade 4 hematologic toxicities. The most common hematological toxicities were neutropenia, leukopenia, and lymphopenia. Thirty-three percent had grade 3 non-hematologic toxicities. The most common non-hematological toxicities were stomatitis, hyperglycemia, and fatigue. The median number of cycles completed was 4 (range 0–8). Among 25 eligible patients, 9 patients (36%) achieved the best response as partial response, 9 (36%) had stable disease, and 7 (28%) had progression. The median time to progression was 2.6 months (95% CI [2.1, 4.0]), and median overall survival (OS) was 8.3 months (95% CI [5.5, undefined]).ConclusionEribulin 1.1 mg/m2 days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks with everolimus 5 mg daily was defined as the highest dose with acceptable toxicity (RP2D). The combination is safe, and efficacy is modest. A post hoc analysis showed that participants that used dexamethasone mouthwash stayed on treatment for one additional cycle.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02120469. Registered 18 April 2014

Phase 2 clinical trial of TORC1 inhibition with everolimus in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer

BackgroundActivation of the PI3K-Akt-mTOR signaling pathway is common in advanced castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), typically through PTEN loss. Preclinical studies suggest that Akt-driven CaP cells are genetically susceptible to mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR, or TORC1) inhibition. Everolimus is a Food and Drug Administration-approved inhibitor of TORC1. Materials and MethodsWe performed a phase II study of everolimus in patients with mCRPC, who were refractory to standard of care hormonal and chemotherapeutic agents. Patients received everolimus 10 mg daily until unacceptable adverse events or disease progression. The primary efficacy outcome was confirmed 50% or greater prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response, using a 2 stage design with futility rules. Paired biopsies were utilized to assess for treatment effect on downstream TORC1 targets as well as tumor cell proliferation and apoptosis. ResultsOut of 35 men enrolled with heavily pretreated mCRPC, 32 were evaluable for clinical efficacy. No PSA responses were observed, the median progression-free survival time was 3.6 months (95% confidence interval = 2.9–4.8) and the median overall survival time was 10.4 months (95% confidence interval = 5.8–15.8). Several patients had declines in serum PSA upon cessation of everolimus. Thus, the study was closed due to clinical futility. The most common toxicities were mucositis, fatigue, anorexia, hypertriglyceridemia, and thrombocytopenia and were largely low grade. Pathologic evaluation of paired metastatic biopsies demonstrated consistent inhibition of pS6, a downstream mTOR pharmacodynamics biomarker, but the tumor proliferation marker Ki-67 increased with therapy. ConclusionsEverolimus demonstrated predictable toxicity in advanced and heavily pretreated patients with mCRPC. No clinical or clear pathologic effects despite downstream TORC1 target inhibition, suggesting that single agent everolimus has no clinical utility in men with mCRPC.

Post-marketing observational study of everolimus in patients with unresectable or metastatic renal cell carcinoma in Japan.

To confirm the safety and efficacy of everolimus in patients with unresectable or metastatic RCC. Patients with unresectable or metastatic RCC were included and were followed for up to 1 year from the start of everolimus. The study was conducted at 618 investigational sites in Japan from March 2010 through January 2018. Safety endpoints include adverse events (AEs), and efficacy endpoints were presence/absence of tumor response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) rate. Of 1694 patients, majority were male (76.33%). Overall, 97.64% of patients experienced AEs and 49% reported serious AEs. The most common serious AEs (incidence of ≥ 5%) include malignant neoplasm progression (21.13%) and interstitial lung disease (10.86%). The incidences of adverse reactions of priority investigation items are as follows: interstitial lung disease (27.74%), infections (11.57%), stomatitis (45.45%), increased in serum creatinine (5.61%), hyperglycemia (14.23%), exacerbation of renal impairment (26.14%), and exacerbation of hepatic impairment (1.15%). The overall tumor response rate was 6.81% with 0.08% CR, and 6.73% PR. The SD was reported in 68.74% of patients. The median PFS was 196 days (95% CI: 181-216 days). The 365-day cumulative OS rate was 82.42%. The acceptable safety and efficacy findings in patients with unresectable or metastatic RCC were confirmed in this study, and are similar to those of pivotal study, which led to the approval, and no new issues were detected. There were no safety or efficacy issues in special populations including elderly and patients with renal/hepatic impairment.

P359 - Phase III randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial evaluating the use of adjuvant endocrine therapy±everolimusin patients with high-risk, hormone receptor (HR) positive, HER2-negative breast cancer (BC): SWOG/NRG/Alliance S1207 (NCT01674140)

P359 - Phase III randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial evaluating the use of adjuvant endocrine therapy±everolimusin patients with high-risk, hormone receptor (HR) positive, HER2-negative breast cancer (BC): SWOG/NRG/Alliance S1207 (NCT01674140)

Abstract P6-18-18: Phase I trial of eribulin and everolimus in patients with metastatic triple negative breast cancer

Abstract Background: Alteration of PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway is the most common genomic abnormality detected in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). Everolimus acts synergistically with eribulin in inducing apoptosis in TNBC cell lines and xenografts in our preclinical study. This phase I trial was designed to test the safety and tolerability of combining eribulin and everolimus in patients (pts) with metastatic TNBC. Methods: The overall objective of this study was to describe the safety and toxicities of the combination. The secondary objective was to assess activity based on response rate (RR) and progression free survival (PFS). Eligibility criteria included pts with metastatic TNBC, ECOG 0-2, 0-3 lines of prior chemotherapy in metastatic setting, and prior treatment with anthracycline and/or taxane therapy. The study utilized the toxicity equivalence range (TEQR) design with a target equivalence range for dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of 0.20-0.35. The recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) will be the dose closest to the target of 0.25 below 0.51 based on isotonic regression.Three dosing levels of the combinations were tested: level A1 (everolimus 5mg daily; eribulin 1.4 mg/m2 days 1, 8 every 3 weeks), level A2 (everolimus 7.5mg daily; eribulin 1.4 mg/m2, days 1, 8 every 3 weeks), level B1(everolimus 5mg daily; eribulin 1.1 mg/m2 days 1, 8 every 3 weeks). Nanostring RNA analysis and genomic mutation analysis were conducted in 16 pts with available tumor tissue. Results: A total of 27 pts were enrolled. Median age was 55 years (range 36-76). Two pts were ineligible due to HER2+ on repeat biopsy and were only included in the toxicity analysis. Dose level B1 (everolimus 5mg daily and eribulin 1.1 mg/m2 days 1, 8 every 3 weeks) was determined to be the RP2D doses. The DLTs were neutropenia, stomatitis and hyperglycemia. Across all cycles, 59% (16/27) had a ≥ Gr3 toxicity attributed to treatment at the possible or above level. 44% (12/27) had Gr3 heme-toxicities. The most common toxicities were ≥ Gr3 neutropenia (10 pts), Gr3 lymphopenia (6 pts) and ≥ Gr3 leukopenia (7 pts). 33% (9/27) had Gr3 non-heme toxicities. The most common were Gr3 stomatitis (3 pts), Gr3 hyperglycemia (3 pts) and Gr3 fatigue (5 pts). The median number of cycles completed was 4 (0-8). 68% (17/25) had a dose modification or hold, 14 of 25 (56%) were for eribulin and 15 of 25 (60%) were for everolimus. Of 25 eligible pts, 8 (32%) achieved a best response as partial response, 11 (44%) had stable disease and 6 (24%) had progression. 80% (20/25) experienced progression by RECIST or showed clinical progression, and the median time to progression was 2.7 mo (95% CI (2.2, 4.6)). At the time of this analysis, 16 participants had died, median OS was 6.3 mo (95% CI (5.3, undefined)). Two pts are still being followed on treatment. PI3K-Akt-mTOR pathway genes and mutations profiles were studied. Conclusion: Eribulin 1.1 mg/m2 days 1, 8 and everolimus 5mg daily was defined as the RP2D. Genomic analysis is currently underway to understand the molecular mechanisms of resistance. Citation Format: Yuan Y, Yost S, Blanchard S, Yin H, Li M, Robinson K, Tang A, Martinez N, Leong L, Somlo G, Tank Patel N, Waisman J, Portnow J, Hurria A, Luu T-H, Mortimer J. Phase I trial of eribulin and everolimus in patients with metastatic triple negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-18-18.

Abstract P4-13-06: Real-world experience using exemestane and everolimus in patients with hormone receptor positive/HER2 negative breast cancer with and without prior CDK4/6 inhibitor exposure

Abstract Background: For patients with metastatic hormone receptor (HR)-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer who progress on a non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor (NSAI), exemestane plus everolimus (EE) has been shown to prolong progression-free survival in comparison to exemestane alone. In the current era, many patients are now receiving a CDK4/6 inhibitor with first-line NSAI therapy. There is limited data describing the utilization and effectiveness of treatments following hormonal therapy - CDK4/6 inhibitor combinations, including EE. The aim of this study was to describe the real-world clinical experience and outcomes associated with EE amongst patients with and without prior CDK4/6 inhibitor exposure treated in our provincial jurisdiction. Methods: All patients prescribed EE from January 1, 2016 through May 10, 2018 were obtained from the Alberta Health Services CancerControl Breast Data Mart (BDM). Patients with HER2+ disease, had received &amp;lt;1 cycle of EE or who had been on a placebo controlled trial of hormonal therapy +/- CDK4/6 inhibitor prior to EE were excluded. Review of the electronic medical record was undertaken to obtain detailed information on lines of treatment prior to EE, EE dosing and reason for EE discontinuation. The cohort was described and analyzed in total and by prior CDK4/6 inhibitor exposure. Time on treatment (TOT) was defined as start of EE to last dose or June 11, 2018 (censoring for data extraction) and was calculated using the Kaplan Meier method. The log rank test was used to compare TOT. Results: There were 110 patients extracted and 88 eligible for analysis (3 excluded for HER2+ disease, 14 for receipt of &amp;lt;1 cycle EE and 5 for participation on a placebo controlled trial of hormonal therapy +/- CDK4/6 inhibitor prior to EE. Median age 62.4 years (range 32.1-86.6 years). EE was administered first line in 12.5%, second line in 46.6% and third or greater line in 40.9%. Median time from start of first line therapy to start of EE was 19.3 months (range 0.3-72.1 months). Visceral metastases at start of EE in 62.5%. EE mean starting dose 7.3 mg (SD 2.5 mg) and mean last dose recorded 7.0 mg (SD 2.7 mg). At time of data extraction, 69 patients had stopped EE, 68.1% for progression and 31.9% for toxicity or other reason. Twenty patients had hormonal therapy + CDK4/6 inhibitor prior to EE. In the first line setting, 10 patients had letrozole and palbociclib. In the second line setting or greater, 5 patients had letrozole + palbociclib, 1 patient had tamoxifen + palbociclib and 4 patients had fulvestrant + palbociclib. Median time on hormonal therapy + CDK4/6 inhibitor was 12.0 months (range 4.0-20.9 months). Those with hormonal therapy + CDK4/6 inhibitor were more likely to have visceral metastases (p=0.02). Median time on treatment for the CDK4/6 exposed vs naïve groups was similar (5.8 vs 5.3 months, p=0.952). Median overall survival not yet reached. Conclusion: In a cohort of patients who have progressed on hormonal therapy + CDK4/6 inhibitor within 2 years, subsequent EE is a clinically meaningful treatment option in the setting of HR-positive/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer. TOT was similar for CDK4/6 inhibitor exposed and naïve patients. Citation Format: Lupichuk SM, Recaldin B, Nixon NA, Mututino A, Joy AA. Real-world experience using exemestane and everolimus in patients with hormone receptor positive/HER2 negative breast cancer with and without prior CDK4/6 inhibitor exposure [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-13-06.

PTEN Expression, Not Mutation Status in TSC1, TSC2, or mTOR, Correlates with the Outcome on Everolimus in Patients with Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated on the Randomized RECORD-3 Trial.

Genomic alterations in key components of PI3K/mTOR pathway have been proposed as candidate predictive markers for rapalog therapy in renal cell carcinoma (RCC). We tested this hypothesis in patients from a randomized phase II trial of everolimus versus sunitinib. Archival specimens collected at baseline were analyzed with targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS). Focus of interest were alterations in key PI3K pathway components. PTEN expression was assessed by IHC. Association between molecular findings and treatment outcomes was investigated; same associations were tested for 2 everolimus-treated trial cohorts in gastric and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Among 184 everolimus-treated patients with RCC with NGS data, mutation rates in genes of interest were 6% (TSC1), 4.4% (TSC2), and 8.2% (mTOR); 44% harbored alterations in ≥1 PI3K pathway component. For subjects with presence versus absence of mutations in TSC1, TSC2, or mTOR progression-free survival (PFS) neither differed on univariate analysis (HR, 1.0; P = 0.895) nor on multivariate testing stratified by MSKCC risk group and other established prognostic factors (HR, 1.1; P = 0.806). Everolimus-treated patients with retained (n = 50) versus lost (n = 50) PTEN IHC expression had median PFS of 5.3 months versus 10.5 months (HR, 2.5; P < 0.001). Such differences were not seen with sunitinib (10.9 months vs. 10.3 months; HR, 0.8; P = 0.475). Molecular findings did not correlate with outcomes in gastric and HCC cohorts. Association between mutation status for TSC1/TSC2/mTOR and therapeutic outcome on everolimus was not confirmed. Clinically meaningful differences in PFS were seen based on PTEN expression by IHC, lost in >50% of patients.

Clinical Predictive Factors for the Efficacy of Everolimus in Patients With Hormone Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative Advanced Breast Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study in Japan.

Purpose:To investigate the clinical predictive factors for the efficacy of everolimus (EVE) for advanced/metastatic breast cancer (AMBC).Methods:Routine practice data of consecutive patients with AMBC who received EVE at 5 institutions in western Japan were retrospectively analyzed in this cohort study (study registration no.: UMIN 000032569). The correlation among time to treatment failure (TTF), overall survival (OS), and clinical background was investigated via univariate and multivariate analyses using Cox hazards model for the clinically important variables.Results:A total of 134 patients were included in the analysis. The median TTF and OS were 5.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.1-6.4) and 27.3 months (95% CI: 23.7-30.9), respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that dose reduction of EVE from any initial dose was associated with a longer TTF (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.52; 95% CI: 0.32-0.84, P = .007). Meanwhile, very low hormone sensitivity (ie, relapse within the first 2 years during adjuvant endocrine therapy or progression within 3 months of endocrine therapy immediately before EVE) was associated with a shorter TTF (HR: 2.48; 95% CI: 1.49-4.10, P < .001). In the analysis of stratified treatment outcomes, TTF was longer in the group with <3 liver metastases and in groups other than the very low hormone sensitivity group, regardless of the treatment line of EVE.Conclusions:Low hormone sensitivity and ⩾3 liver metastases were important prognostic factors for the efficacy of EVE. EVE may be less effective in patients with AMBC with these factors, and as such, chemotherapy should be administered instead.

O2 - Cabozantinib versus everolimus in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma from Europe and the rest of the world: subgroup analysis of the METEOR trial

O2 - Cabozantinib versus everolimus in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma from Europe and the rest of the world: subgroup analysis of the METEOR trial

1313PD - A phase II study of everolimus in patients with unresectable pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma refractory or intolerant to platinum-containing chemotherapy

Background: Pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) is rare tumor. If the tumors cannot be resected surgically, systemic chemotherapy is performed. Platinum-containing regimens are widely used as first-line chemotherapy, but there is no established second-line chemotherapy. Everolimus showed longer progressionfree survival (PFS) compared with placebo in the phase III RADIANT-3 trial in patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of everolimus in patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma refractory or intolerant to platinum-based chemotherapy. Methods: This study was prospective, multicenter phase II trial in patients with pancreatic NEC refractory or intolerant to platinum-contained chemotherapy. Everolimus treatment was initiated orally at a dose of 10mg once daily and continued until disease progression or intolerable toxicity were observed. Primary endpoint was PFS. Results: Twenty-five patients were enrolled from 12 institutions in Japan. The median age was 63 years, and 65% were male. All patients were Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 or 1. Patients with Ki-67<55% were 61%. The median PFS was 34.5 days [95% confidence interval (CI) 27.0-92.0], and median overall survival was 224 days (95%CI 92.0-406.0). The overall response rate was 0% and disease control rate was 39.1%. Common grade 3/4 adverse events were hyperglycemia (20%), thrombocytopenia (16%), anemia (16%), and hyponatremia (12%). Rhabdomyolysis occurred in one patient. Conclusions: Everolimus monotherapy was tolerable, but the efficacy was limited in patients with unresectable pancreatic NEC patients. It may be necessary to consider multi-drug regimens to improve outcome. Legal entity responsible for the study: NECTOR trial group. Funding: The National Cancer Center Research and Development Fund. Disclosure: M. Ikeda: Reserch funding: Bayer Yakuhin, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Yakult, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Eli Lilly Japan, Ono Pharmaceutical, Eisai, AstraZeneca, Zeria Pharmaceutical, Baxter, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Bristol Myers Sqiibb, Merck Serono, Kowa, Nano Carrier, ASLAN Pharmaceuticals; Honoraria: Novartis Pharma, Bayer Yakuhin, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Abbott Japan, Eisai, Eli Lilly Japan, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Daiichi-Sankyo, Yakult, Otsuka Pharmaceutical, Nobelpharma Membership on any entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees: Nano Carrier, Bayer Yakuhin, Eisai, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Novartis Pharma, Shire, MSD. T. Okusaka: Honoraria: Novartis Pharma, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Eli Lilly Japan, Dainippon Sumitomo Pharma, Bayer Yakuhin, Yakult Honsha, Nobelpharma, FUJIFILM RI Pharma, AstraZeneca, Ono Pharmaceutical, EA Pharma, Nippon Chemiphar, Celgene, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Bristol-Myers, Eisai, Pfizer Japan, Teijin Pharma, Daiichi Sankyo Consulting or Advisory Role: Dainippon Sumitomo Pharma, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Zeria Pharmaceutical, Daiichi Sankyo Research Funding: Eli Lilly Japan, Eisai, Novartis Pharma, Yakult Honsha, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Nippon Boehringer Inge lheim, Kowa Company, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Merck Serono, Ono Pharmaceutical, Bayer Yakuhin, Pfizer Japan, AstraZeneca, Dainippon Sumitomo Pharma, Nano Carrier, Baxter, Chugai Pharmaceutical. J. Furuse: Honoraria: Taiho, Chugai, Yakult, Sumitomo Dainippon, Eli Lilly Japan, Astellas, Ono, Pfizer, Bayer, Novartis, Merck Serono, Takeda, Eisai, MSD, Shionogi, J-Pharma, Daiichi Sankyo, Mochida, Nippon Kayaku, EA pharma, Sawai, Teijin pharma Consulting or Advisory Role: Taiho, Chugai, Yakult, Sumitomo Dainippon, Eli Lilly Japan, Astellas, Ono, Pfizer, Bayer, Novartis, Merck Serono, Takeda, Eisai, MSD, Shionogi, J-Pharma, Daiichi Sankyo, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Sanofy, Sandoz, Otsuka, Fujifilm, Astra Zeneca, Shire Research Funding: J-Pharma, Taiho, Sumitomo Dainippon, Janssen, Daiichi Sankyo, MSD, Yakult, Takeda, Chugai, Ono, Astellas, Zeria, Novartis, Nanocarrier, Shionogi, Onco Therapy Science, Eli Lilly Japan, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck Serono, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Eisai, NanoCarrier, Mochida, Baxalta, Sanofi. M. Furukawa: Grant: Taiho Pharma. S. Ohkawa: Honoraria: FUJIFILM RI Pharma, Yakult Honsha, Otsuka Pharmaceutical, MSD. A. Hosokawa: Honoraria: Taiho Pharmaceutical, Chugai Pharma, Takeda, Ono Pharmaceutical, Novartis, Eisai Research Funding: Taiho Pharmaceutical, Chugai Pharma, Ono Pharmaceutical, Eisai, Yakult Honsha. Y. Kojima: Honoraria: Sanofi. K. Yamaguchi: Grants, Personal fees: Eli Lilly. H. Ishii: Honoraria: Yakult Honsha, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Eisai, Towa Consulting, Advisory Role: Ono Pharmaceutical Research Funding: Taiho Pharmaceutical. N. Mizuno: Research funding: Taiho Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Merck Serono, AstraZeneca, Zeria Pharmaceutical, NanoCarrier, Eisai, MSD, Novartis, Dainippon Sumitomo Pharma, ASLAN. Pharmaceuticals, Pharma Valley Center, and Incyte Inc. Honoraria: Taiho Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Novartis, Ono Pharmaceutical, and Teijin Pharma Advisory Role: Teijin Pharma. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

LBA34 - PD-L1 status and clinical outcomes to cabozantinib, sunitinib and everolimus in patients with metastatic clear-cell RCC treated on CABOSUN and METEOR clinical trials

LBA34 - PD-L1 status and clinical outcomes to cabozantinib, sunitinib and everolimus in patients with metastatic clear-cell RCC treated on CABOSUN and METEOR clinical trials

Phase I Study of the BRAF Inhibitor Vemurafenib in Combination With the Mammalian Target of Rapamycin Inhibitor Everolimus in Patients With BRAF-Mutated Malignancies.

Parallel activation of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-mammalian target of rapamycin pathway represents a mechanism of primary and acquired resistance to BRAF-targeted therapy, but the two pathways have yet to be cotargeted in humans. We performed a phase I study to evaluate the safety and activity of the BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib in combination with the mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor everolimus in BRAF-mutated advanced solid tumors. We performed a 3+3 dose-escalation study with escalating doses of both oral (PO) vemurafenib administered twice a day and PO everolimus administered daily. Twenty patients with advanced cancers were enrolled. The median adult age was 64 years (range, 17 to 85 years); two pediatric patients were 10 and 13 years old. Patients were heavily pretreated with prior BRAF or MEK inhibitors (n = 11), phase I clinical trial therapy (n = 10), surgery (n = 18), radiation therapy (n = 11), and chemotherapy (n=13). One of the two pediatric patients initially experienced grade 3 rash, but after dermatologic intervention, the patient remains on trial with partial response and no dose reduction at time of analysis. Four dose-limiting toxicities (rash, n = 1; fatigue, n = 3) were observed at dose level 2. Therefore, dose level 1 (vemurafenib 720 mg PO twice a day and everolimus 5 mg PO daily) was the maximum-tolerated dose. Overall, four patients (22%) had a partial response and nine patients (50%) had stable disease as best response. One pediatric patient with pleomorphic xanthroastrocytoma remains on protocol with continued clinical response after 38 cycles. The combination of vemurafenib 720 mg PO twice a day and everolimus 5 mg PO daily is safe and well tolerated and has activity across histologies, with partial responses noted in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer, melanoma, optic nerve glioma, and xanthroastrocytoma, including patients who previously experienced progression on BRAF and/or MEK inhibitor therapy. Further investigation in a larger cohort of molecularly matched patients is warranted.

Angiomyolipoma rebound tumor growth after discontinuation of everolimus in patients with tuberous sclerosis complex or sporadic lymphangioleiomyomatosis

IntroductionThe EXIST-2 (NCT00790400) study demonstrated the superiority of everolimus over placebo for the treatment of renal angiomyolipomas associated with tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) or sporadic lymphangioleiomyomatosis (LAM). This post hoc analysis of EXIST-2 study aimed to assess angiomyolipoma tumor behavior among patients who submitted to continued radiographic examination following discontinuation of everolimus in the noninterventional follow-up phase.MethodsFor patients who discontinued everolimus at the completion of extension phase for reasons other than angiomyolipoma progression, a single CT/MRI scan of the kidney was collected after 1 year of treatment discontinuation. Changes from baseline and from the time of everolimus discontinuation in the sum of volumes of target angiomyolipoma lesions were assessed in the non-interventional follow-up phase (data cutoff date, November 6, 2015).ResultsOf the 112 patients who received ≥1 dose of everolimus and discontinued treatment by the end of extension phase, 34 (30.4%) were eligible for participation in the non-interventional follow-up phase. Sixteen of 34 patients were evaluable for angiomyolipoma tumor behavior as they had at least one valid efficacy assessment (i.e. kidney CT/MRI scan) after everolimus discontinuation. During the non-interventional follow-up phase, compared with baseline, two patients (12.5%) experienced angiomyolipoma progression (angiomyolipoma-related bleeding [n = 1], increased kidney volume [n = 1]). Five patients out of 16 (31.3%) experienced angiomyolipoma progression when compared with the angiomyolipoma tumor assessment at everolimus discontinuation. The median (range) percentage change in angiomyolipoma tumor volume (cm3) from baseline was −70.56 (−88.30; −49.64) at time of everolimus discontinuation (n = 11), and −50.55 (−79.40; −23.16) at week 48 (n = 7) after discontinuation of everolimus. One patient death was reported due to angiomyolipoma hemorrhage.ConclusionsAngiomyolipoma lesions displayed an increase in volume following discontinuation of everolimus in patients with renal angiomyolipoma or sporadic LAM associated with TSC, but there was no evidence of rapid regrowth.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT00790400