The family Onagraceae is such a homogenous one that the interrelationships of the constituent genera should not be difficult to determine. Moreover, as is well known, changes in number of chromosomes play an unusually conspicuous r61le in experimental phylogenetic studies in this family. There is no basic number of chromosomes common to all genera in the family, which indicates that the family probably originated from parents of dissimilar chromosomal constitution.' Postulating a ancestry renders it possible to consider at least five distinct sets of haploid chromosome numbers upon which to base a phylogenetic scheme. If the structure were based upon a single ancestor whose parents each had essentially the identical chromosomal complements, only one haploid set is available; in other words, the possible mechanical combinations are strictly limited and hardly any flexibility is possible unless polyploidy of some form intervenes, or it is assumed that the ancestor showed marked variations in the number of chromosomes.2 If we visualize one parent as an aquatic form possessing four haploid chromosomes, and the other as a probably terrestrial form with seven haploid elements, the cross between the two would therefore possess eleven haploid chromosomes. We may call the first parent A, the second B, and the hybrid C. We may assume that A and B are self-fertile and that C is capable of being back-crossed to either parent. Therefore, A + C = 15, and B + C = 18n chromosomes. All numbers so far found for any onagrad, with a few improbable exceptions,3 can be fitted nicely into this scheme. Before proceeding further, it will be necessary to mention that the chromosomal complement of any species in the following genera has not yet been ascertained: Hauya, Gayophytum, Meriolix, Diplandra, Riesenbachia, Semeiandra, Ludwigia, Heterogaura, Gongylocarpus, Burragea. Some of these have been fitted into the scheme on the basis of vegetative and morphological resemblances. Jussieua (Jussiaea), with 8n chromosomes, may be assumed to have arisen directly from A as a tetraploid genus. Parent A probably had many of the characters of Ludwigia, and there is a strong likelihood that Jussieua may have been derived from this genus. The back-cross of A with C would account for the parentage of Zauschneria. On the basis of its
Read full abstract