Evaluation Of Vascular Grafts Research Articles

Early Experience With Use of 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in Evaluation of Vascular Grafts and De Novo Infections

Early Experience With Use of 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in Evaluation of Vascular Grafts and De Novo Infections

CT Angiography of Lower Extremity Vascular Bypass Grafts

Over the past several years computed tomography (CT) technology has advanced to such a degree that CT angiography (CTA) has become the study of choice at our institution for imaging lower extremity vascular bypass grafts. CTA quickly provides anatomic information about the state of the graft and identifies virtually all forms of bypass graft failure and related complications. Furthermore, detailed vascular anatomy is seen beyond the graft and affords sufficient anatomic detail for surgical revision without the need for other angiographic studies. Although catheter angiography, duplex-ultrasound, magnetic resonance angiography, and nuclear medicine studies all continue to play some role in the evaluation of vascular grafts, they are more often used as problem solving modalities when CTA findings are equivocal. Whereas it was once essential to catheterize directly through a failing bypass graft or pass catheters into the graft from a distant arterial puncture to obtain an angiogram of a failing bypass graft, CTA produces arteriograms with only intravenous contrast administration, a brief visit to the CT scanner, and return to daily activities without catheterization, discomfort, or risk to the bypass conduit.

MR angiography of the head and neck: value of two-dimensional phase-contrast projection technique.

MR angiography is commonly performed by using two- and three-dimensional time-of-flight and three-dimensional phase-contrast techniques. These procedures require long examination times and processing of imaging data by computing maximum intensity projections. Two-dimensional phase-contrast projection angiography has neither of these disadvantages. We analyzed the value of this technique for head and neck MR angiography in 84 patients and 15 control subjects. Patients were examined to resolve specific clinical questions such as the presence of arteriovenous malformations (20 cases), patency of carotid and vertebral arteries (35 cases), patency of the superior sagittal sinus (14 cases), patency of saphenous vein bypass grafts (11 cases), and vascularity of masses (four cases). Conventional angiograms were available for correlation in 22 patients. Two-dimensional phase-contrast projection angiograms were generated by using a gradient-recalled-echo sequence sensitized to flow with the use of flow-encoding gradients. Projection MR angiograms were obtained in approximately 3.5 min by combining images obtained with flow-encoding gradients applied along the axes defining the image plane. MR angiograms were subjectively evaluated by three observers without reference to routine MR images or conventional angiograms. High-quality studies were obtained in 93% of control subjects and 90% of patients examined. The findings based on phase-contrast angiography were confirmed with conventional angiography in 21 of 22 patients for whom conventional angiograms were available. Evaluation of vascular grafts and of the patency of major cranial vessels was easily done with two-dimensional phase-contrast angiography and was useful in postoperative follow-up examinations. We also advocate its use for superior sagittal sinus thrombosis and follow-up examinations in patients with arteriovenous malformations.

Intravenous Digital Subtraction Arteriography in the Evaluation of Vascular Grafts

Between 1982 and 1986 intravenous digital subtraction arteriography was used to evaluate vascular grafts in 97 patients (54 males, 43 females). Indications included recurrent symptoms, absent or diminished pulses, a drop in Doppler pressure measurements, and clinical uncertainty with respect to graft patency. Problems identified included graft stenosis, stenosis of the anastomosis or its distal vessels, false aneurysm, arteriovenous fistula and emboli. Forty-eight operations were carried out following intravenous digital subtraction arteriography, and radiographic findings were verified surgically. Twice, intravenous digital subtraction arteriography did not show significant graft findings which were discovered at surgery. Thus intravenous digital subtraction arteriography showed a sensitivity of 95.8% and specificity of 100%. Complications following intravenous digital subtraction arteriography were: two patients developed urticaria, and one superficial thrombophlebitis. There were no cases of pulmonary edema or death. In conclusion intravenous digital subtraction arteriography is very useful in the diagnosis of graft-related problems if done on a selective basis looking at graft and anastomosis site only. Intravenous digital subtraction arteriography is done on an outpatient basis, has high sensitivity and specificity, good patient acceptance, is safe, fast and is less expensive than conventional arteriography.