Evaluation Of Shear Bond Strength Research Articles

Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Glass Ionomer Cement, Composite and Compomer in Primary Teeth: An In Vitro Study

Background: Because the main dislodging pressures at the tooth restoration interface have a shearing effect, shear bond strength is crucial for the restorative material clinically. Therefore, greater shear bond strength suggests improved material to tooth bonding. Glass ionomer cement and composite is the most popularly used restorative material. Composite resins have better mechanical properties and esthetics than many other types of cement, but they need bonding agents as they are hydrophobic and hence fail to adhere to the teeth. Compomers are polyacid modified resin composites. Compomer and composite resin have similar physical properties, as they are thought to bond to dentin by micromechanical bonding. As resin composites are used in this, the polymerized acid monomer shows acidity when it comes in contact with the saliva and there is a reaction of fluoride-containing basic glass resulting in the cariostatic effect. Aim: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the shear bond strength of Glass Ionomer Cement (Fuji IX GP), Composite Resin (Filtek Z-250) and Compomer, (Compoglass, Ivoclar). Material and Method: An in-vitro, experimental study was conducted on 30 freshly extracted over-retained deciduous molars. Samples were randomly divided into three groups depending on the material to be used. Flat dentinal surface on tooth was prepared over which restorative materials were placed. The prepared specimen was subjected to shear test and the value obtained was compared. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed to calculate the mean shear bond strength of each group. Result: It was observed from the study that the composite resin had the highest shear bond strength value (17.13 ± 1.54), followed by compomer (11.32 ± 1.05) whereas GIC showed the least shear bond strength (6.56 ± 0.87). Conclusion: It was concluded that composite restorative materials show higher shear bond strength than glass ionomer cement and compomer in primary molars, but shear bond strength of compomer was higher than that of glass ionomer cement.

Comparative Evaluation of Micro Shear bond Strength of Self-Adhesive Resin Cement to Two Commercially Available Zirconia-Reinforced Lithium Silicate Ceramics

Comparative Evaluation of Micro Shear bond Strength of Self-Adhesive Resin Cement to Two Commercially Available Zirconia-Reinforced Lithium Silicate Ceramics

A comparative evaluation of micro shear bond strength and microleakage between the resin-modified glass ionomer cement and residual dentin following excavation of carious dentin using Carie CareTMand conventional caries removal in primary teeth: an in vitro study.

52 primary teeth with dentinal caries were randomly grouped into group I, where caries removal was done using the conventional method, and group II which used Carie Care TM. All the teeth were restored using RMGIC. Micro shear bond strength between the residual dentin and the cement was tested using universal testing machine and the dye penetration method was used for microleakage testing. Independent t-test was performed for intergroup comparison. Pearson chi-square test was carried out to evaluate the microleakage patterns in the enamel and dentin. The mean micro-shear bond strength of group I was 6.03±1.6 and that of group II was 8.54±2.92; this difference was statistically significant with a p-value of 0.012. Microleakage was higher in the test group (1.38±0.51) than the control group (0.77±0.6) and was significant with a p -value of .036. Papain-based chemomechanical agent Carie Care TMcan be used as an alternative method to conventional caries removal. However, further studies need to explore methods to improve the marginal sealing capacity of RMGIC to the residual dentin after chemomechanical caries removal.

A Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Embrace WetbondTM Pit and Fissure Sealant with or without the Use of a Universal Dental Adhesive System [ScotchbondTM Universal Adhesive] Using Different Bonding Protocols: A Multiparametric In Vitro Study.

To evaluate and compare the shear bond strength (SBS) of Embrace WetBondTM (EWS) Pit and Fissure Sealant (PF sealants) with or without the use of a universal dental adhesive system ScotchbondTM Universal Adhesive (SBU) using different bonding and curing protocols and to assess and compare the mode of failure as determined by visualization of the fractured surfaces of the test specimens after shear testing under an optical microscope at a magnification of 20×. A total of 85 samples were prepared for testing SBS on enamel on caries-free, extracted permanent human molars. The specimens were randomly divided into five groups based on different bonding and curing protocols. A knife-edge blade in a universal testing machine was used to perform the SBS test with a crosshead speed of 1 mm/minute. Then the mode of failure was assessed. Results were analyzed using a one-way analysis of variance with Tukey's post hoc test and Chi-squared test. A probability value 0.05 (p ≤ 0.01) was regarded as significant. ScotchbondTM Universal Adhesive (SBU) in total-etch (TE) mode/etch-and-rinse (ER) mode with individual light curing of the sealant and adhesive showed the highest SBS to enamel (5.40 ± 2.51 MPa). A predominance of cohesive mode of failure was observed for all the test groups. Embrace WetBondTM (EWS) PF sealants with SBU in the ER mode of application, with either curing mode, can be used as an alternative to a conventional technique for sealant placement for improving interfacial bond strength to enhance sealant retention and efficacy. Embrace WetBondTM (EWS) PF sealants with SBU in the ER mode of application can be used as an alternative to a conventional technique for sealant placement for improving interfacial bond strength. Swathy SR, Naidu J. A Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Embrace WetbondTM Pit and Fissure Sealant with or without the Use of a Universal Dental Adhesive System [ScotchbondTM Universal Adhesive] Using Different Bonding Protocols: A Multiparametric In Vitro Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2023;16(1):48-53.

Evaluation and comparison of shear bond strength and adhesive remnant index score in brackets bonded with probiotics impregnated orthodontic adhesive and commercially available orthodontic adhesive - An in vitro study

Background: White spot lesions are one of the main drawbacks of fixed orthodontic mechanotherapy. Probiotic bacteria have been included in mouthwashes and lozenges to check the activity of S.mutans on surface enamel. Aim: Aim of the present study was to evaluate and compare shear bond strength and adhesive remnant index scores of orthodontic brackets bonded with probiotic impregnated (Lactobacillus rhamnous) orthodontic adhesive and conventional light cure orthodontic adhesive. Materials and methods: In this in-vitro study, two groups were tested in one group brackets were bonded to extracted maxillary premolars using probiotic impregnated composite and in the other with conventional light cure composite resin. Shear bond strength was assessed using universal testing machine. Adhesive remnant index scores were assessed on the same samples. Results: Shear bond strength of the new composite resin was significantly decreased when compared to conventional light cure composite (p=0.001). There was no significant difference in ARI scores (p=0.51) between the groups. Conclusions: The shear bond strength of the novel probiotic impregnated composite was significantly reduced. Though there was no significant variation in ARI scores when compared to control, avenues to improve the shear bond strength should be assessed.

Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Cention N and Glass Ionomer Cement - An In Vitro Study

Aim: This study compared the shear bond strengths of glass-ionomer cement (GIC) Type IX and Cention N. Materials and Methods: To assess the shear bond strength, 40 samples each of GIC Type IX and Cention N were evaluated. Sample cylinders with dimensions of 4 mm in diameter and 4 mm in height were bonded to the buccal surface of teeth to evaluate the shear bond strength in a universal testing machine with a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. Results: The shear bond strength of Cention N in comparison to GIC Type IX was statistically highly significant (P < 0.01). Conclusion: The results reached to a conclusion that shear bond strength of Cention N as compared to GIC Type IX was superior.

Evaluation of shear bond strength of orthodontic adhesives with integrated primer: A comparative study

Objectives: The study aimed to compare the shear bond strength (SBS) of three orthodontic adhesives with integrated primer, with those of self-etching and conventional bonding adhesives. Material and Methods: One hundred extracted premolars were randomly allocated to five groups. Brackets were bonded using three adhesives with integrated primer (GC Ortho Connect™, Biofix, and Orthocem). A group of brackets was bonded with the conventional bonding procedure (Transbond XT) and one group was bonded with a self-etching primer (Transbond™ Plus). All samples were subjected to thermal aging (5000 cycles: At 5°C and 55°C media). The compressive strength test was performed and the maximum load when the bracket detached was recorded. The amount of residual adhesive (ARI) remaining on the tooth surface was assessed visually. Results: Significantly higher SBS values were recorded with the conventional technique (14.01 ± 5.79 megapascals [MPa]), compared to other groups except for GC Ortho Connect™ (11.86 ± 3.83 MPa). There was no significant difference between the self-etching group and the groups containing integrated primer samples. However, one of the adhesives with integrated primer presented SBS values near-slightly below the limit considered clinically successful (7.65 ± 3.71 MPa). The ARI scores varied between adhesive groups; GC Ortho Connect™ and the self-etching primer samples showed statistically significantly higher scores compared to the three other groups. Conclusion: Clinically successful bonding values were achieved with two out of three different adhesives with integrated primer. One of the adhesives with integrated primer provided a similar SBS value to the tri-step conventional bonding procedure. ARI scores varied independently from SBS values.

In-vitro evaluation of shear bond strength of different veneering materials to CAD/CAM zirconia ceramics

In-vitro evaluation of shear bond strength of different veneering materials to CAD/CAM zirconia ceramics

Evaluation of Shear Bond Strengths of Three Adhesive Materials Used to Retain Fiber Post in the Severely Damaged Primary Anterior Teeth

Background and Objective: Tooth decay and periodontal problems are among the most common human diseases which are considered unsolved health problems in most countries of the world. This study aimed to investigate and compare the shear bond strength of the fiber post with three different types of cement, including Glass ionomer, as well as Universal and Flowable composites. Materials and Methods: This in-vitro study was conducted on 30 extracted anterior deciduous teeth with at least two-thirds of healthy roots. The teeth were randomly divided into three groups of 10. The teeth were mounted from the root part inside the self-curing acryl. Group 1 includes G-Premio Bond and Universal Composite, group 2 includes G-Premio Bond and flowable composite, and group 3 includes Glass ionomer without bond. Immediately, the fiber post was placed in the cemented material in the canal and was light-cured according to the manufacturer's instructions. Shear bond strength was performed by an electromechanical universal testing machine at a speed of 1 mm/min. Results: The shear bond strength mean values in the Universal composite, Glass ionomer, and Flowable composite groups were 15.29±4.82, 9.74±2.82, and 13.71±4.91 MPa, respectively, and the difference among them was significant (P=0.022). The shear bond strength mean value of the Universal composite was significantly higher than that of the Glass ionomer (P=0.020); however, this difference was not significant for comparing other groups (P<0.05). Conclusion: The highest and lowest amount of shear bond strength values for cementing fiber post in the repair of anterior deciduous teeth were related to the Universal composite and Glass ionomer cement groups, respectively, which showed a significant difference but did not differ significantly from the Flowable composite group

Evaluation of shear bond strength and enamel remineralizing effect of experimental orthodontic composite containing nano-hydroxyapatite: An in vitro study

The purpose of this study was to prepare an orthodontic composite containing hydroxyapatite nanoparticles to prevent demineralization and create a suitable environment for mineral deposition around orthodontic brackets, and to investigate the mechanical and remineralizing properties of the experimental adhesive composite. Experimental orthodontic composite were formulated using varying percentages of nano-hydroxyapatite particles. Assessments were based on four groups: a control group (3M™ Transbond™ XT) and experimental composites containing 2% (HA2), 5% (HA5) and 10% (HA10) hydroxyapatite. Vickers Microhardness test was performed to investigate the remineralizing effect in 3 stages: initial stage, after demineralization and after 4 weeks of exposure to artificial saliva. Scanning electron microscopy with energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy analyser (SEM/EDAX) was used to evaluate hydroxyapatite precipitation and elemental composition of enamel surface. Shear Bond Strength tests were carried out using a universal testing machine and the debonding pattern was assessed using Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI). All groups showed clinically acceptable SBS values. The highest SBS was achieved in the HA2 group, followed by Transbond™ XT, HA5 and HA10. There was no significant difference in the ARI scores. In terms of microhardness properties, HA5 and HA10 demonstrated a significant increase after 4 weeks. The results of SEM analysis showed the precipitation of hydroxyapatite crystals and EDAX analysis indicated the increase of calcium and phosphate ion peaks compared to the demineralized sample. The data were analysed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey's Post-hoc test. Addition of hydroxyapatite nanoparticles to orthodontic composite can increase the mineral content and microhardness of the adjacent enamel. However, increasing the amount of nanoparticles reduces shear bond strength in a decreasing trend. The above-mentioned findings showed that incremental increase of nanoparticles of HA can be incorporated in composite to a certain extent and limitations are determined by mechanical properties (SBS) required for bracket bonding.

Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to three-dimensionally-printed and milled materials after surface treatment and artificial aging.

This study aimed to evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS) of orthodontic brackets bonded to three-dimensionally (3D)-printed materials after various surface treatments and artificial aging compared with that bonded to computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA)-milled materials. Eighty cylindrical specimens were 3D printed and divided into the following four subgroups (n = 20 each) according to the surface treatment and artificial aging procedure. Group A, sandblasted with 50 μm aluminum oxide particles (SA) and aging; group B, sandblasted with 30 μm silica-coated alumina particles (CO) and aging; group C, SA without aging; and group D, CO without aging. For the control group, 20 CAD-CAM PMMA-milled cylindrical specimens were sandblasted with SA and aged. The SBS was measured using a universal testing machine (0.25 mm/min), examined at ×2.5 magnification for failure mode classification, and statistically analyzed (p = 0.05). The retention obtained with the 3D-printed materials (groups A-D) was higher than that obtained with the PMMA-milled materials (control group). However, no significant difference was found between the study and control groups, except for group C (SA without aging), which showed significantly higher retention than the control group (PMMA-SA and thermocycling) (p = 0.037). Study groups A-D predominantly exhibited a cohesive specimen mode, indicating specimen fracture. Orthodontic brackets bonded to 3D-printed materials exhibit acceptable bonding strengths. However, 3D-printed materials are prone to cohesive failure, which may result in crown fractures.

Evaluation of shear bond strength of TheraCal PT and Biodentine in primary molars: In vitro study

Evaluation of shear bond strength of TheraCal PT and Biodentine in primary molars: In vitro study

Evaluation of shear bond strength and translucency of zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate and lithium disilicate: An in vitro study.

To analyze the effect of various surface treatment protocols on shear bond strength between the ceramic and resin cement (RC) and influence of zirconia on the translucency of LD as compared to zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate (ZLS). In-Vitro Study. Specimens (14 mm × 12 mm × 2 mm) (n = 135) and (14 mm × 12 mm × 1 mm) (n = 45) of ZLS computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing glass ceramic block and LD were fabricated, respectively. All the ZLS specimens were crystallized and were tested for the translucency parameter and ceramic-resin shear bond strength. Two different types of surface treatment were used on the ZLS and LD samples. The specimens were treated using the hydrofluoric acid (HF) etching or air abrasion with diamond particles (DPs). The specimens were then bonded using self-adhesive RC to a composite disc of 10 mm and thermocycling was performed. A universal testing machine was used to evaluate ceramic-resin shear bond strength after 24 h. The translucency of the specimens was evaluated using the spectrophotometer by calculating the difference in color between the readings over a black background and a white background. Data were statistically analyzed using the independent sample t-test and analysis of variance with Bonferroni's correction and comparison was made between the specimens. Independent sample t-test demonstrated statistically significantly higher translucency for group ZLS (61.44 ± 22) as compared to group LD (20.16 ± 8.39) (P < 0.001). Group ZLS showed statistically significant higher shear bond strength when surface treatment using HF or air abrasion with synthetic DPs was performed as compared to untreated group (3.58 ± 0.45) (P < 0.001). Moreover, air abrasion group (16.79 ± 2.11 megapascal [MPa]) demonstrated statistically significant higher shear bond strength as compared to HF etched group (8.25 ± 0.30 MPa) (P < 0.001). Furthermore, statistically significant higher shear bond strength was noted when air abrasion was done for group ZLS (16.79 ± 2.11 MPa) as compared to group LD (10.82 ± 1.92 MPa) (P < 0.001). However, on surface treatment with HF, a statistically significantly lower shear bond strength was noted for group ZLS (8.25 ± 0.30 MPa) as compared to group LD (11.29 ± 0.58 MPa) (P = 0.001). ZLS demonstrated higher translucency compared to LD restorations. DP abrasion of ZLS is recommended to achieve higher shear bond strength between the ceramic and RC.

Comparison of shear bond strength of composite resin, compomer, and resin-modified glass-ionomer cements in primary teeth: An in-vitro study.

The contemporary esthetic restorative materials such as composite resin and glass-ionomer cements and their modifications have all been developed keeping in mind the requirements of permanent teeth. There have been plenty of studies that have focused on the characteristics of these materials in relation to permanent teeth with a relative dearth of such studies as regard to the primary teeth. The present study was undertaken to compare and evaluate the shear bond strength of composite resin, compomer, and resin-modified glass-ionomer cements in primary teeth. Thirty non-carious primary molars that were indicated for extraction because of physiological resorption or, for orthodontic reasons, were selected. The selected teeth were randomly allocated to three groups of 10 each for composite, compomer, and resin-modified glass-ionomer cements. The enamel from the occlusal surface of all teeth was removed to expose the superficial dentin and was wet polished with 400 grit sand paper. Composite, compomer, and resin-modified glass-ionomer stubs were bonded on to the occlusal surfaces using a plastic tube as a template. All samples were, then, subjected to thermocycling and evaluation of shear bond strength using the universal testing machine at a cross-head speed of 0.5 mm/min, whereas the results obtained were subjected to statistical analysis. Statistical analysis was performed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 17.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), whereas one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's multiple post-hoc procedures were used for statistical analysis. A P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The mean shear bond strength values for Groups I, II, and III were found to be 11.7 ± 3.07 MPa, 7.74 ± 4.16 Mpa, and 4.43 ± 2.08 Mpa, respectively, whereas one-way ANOVA and Tukey's multiple post-hoc procedures indicated that there were remarkable differences among the three groups with the results being statistically significant (P < 0.05). Composite resin showed the highest shear bond strength in relation to primary dentin when compared to compomer and resin-modified glass-ionomer cements.

Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength at the interface of monolithic zirconia with two distinct core build-up materials: An in vitro study.

The study aimed to evaluate and compare the shear bond strength (SBS) at the interface of monolithic zirconia with zirconomer (Zr) core build-up, a new type of glass ionomer cement to monolithic zirconia with composite resin core build-up material. In vitro a comparative study. A total of 32 disk-shaped samples of monolithic zirconia and two distinct core build-up materials: Zr (n = 16) and composite resin (n = 16) were used. The two components, monolithic zirconia with Zr core build-up and monolithic zirconia with composite resin core build-up, were bonded using zirconia primer and self-adhesive, dual-cure cement. The samples were subsequently thermocycled, and the SBS was tested at their interfaces. The failure modes were determined using a stereomicroscope. Data were evaluated using the descriptive analysis for mean, standard deviation, confidence interval, and independent t-test for intergroup comparison. Descriptive analysis, independent t-test, Chi-square test. The mean SBS (megapascals) of monolithic zirconia to Zr core build-up (0.74) was statistically significant when compared to monolithic zirconia with composite resin core build-up material (7.25) (P ≤ 0.001). Zirconomer core build-up showed 100% adhesive failure; composite resin core build-up had 43.8% cohesive, 31.2% mixed, and 25.0% adhesive failures. When evaluating the two core build-up materials' bindings to monolithic zirconia, Zr and composite resin core build-up showed statistically significant differences. Although Zr has been demonstrated to be the optimal core build-up material; however, additional investigation is required to determine how it bonds to monolithic zirconia more effectively.

A Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Type IX GIC to Demineralized Dentin in Primary Teeth with and without Application of SDF: An In Vitro Study

A Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Type IX GIC to Demineralized Dentin in Primary Teeth with and without Application of SDF: An In Vitro Study

Evaluation of shear bond strength of high molecular chitosan nanoparticle incorporated heat polymerized polymethyl methacrylate denture base resin with acrylic resin teeth: An in-vitro study

The present study is conducted to evaluate the shear bond strength of acrylic resin denture teeth to high molecular chitosan nanoparticle incorporated heat polymerized polymethylmethacrylate denture base resin. This comparative study is performed at the Department of Prosthodontics and Crown & Bridge, JSSDCH, Mysuru. 45 samples of acrylic resin blocks of size 8 × 10 × 20 mm were fabricated using mold such that the long axis of crosslinked acrylic resin maxillary central incisor teeth is aligned at 45° to the long side of the specimen to which the ridge lap surface is attached. Among these, 15 samples belong to the control group, 15 samples to the 0.5 % chitosan gel incorporated group, and the remaining 15 samples to the 1 % chitosan gel incorporated group. The test specimens were then subjected to a failure load test using the universal testing machine. The readings were tabulated and statistically analyzed using Mean, Standard deviation, Independent t-test, - way and two-way ANOVA, and Scheffes’ Post hoc test. The statistical analysis reveals that the mean bond strength of acrylic denture teeth to conventional heat cure PMMA denture base material increased from 4.6627 ± 0.54198 MPa to 7.5186 ± 0.57461 MPa and 8.9356 ± 0.63675 MPa upon addition of chitosan at 0.5 % and 1 % concentration, respectively. It can be concluded that The mean shear bond strength of acrylic denture teeth to conventional heat cure PMMA denture base material increased with the addition of chitosan at 0.5 and 1 % concentration. The best shear bond strength was observed with the addition of 1 % chitosan as per the evidence.

Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength of calcium silicate-based liners to resin-modified glass ionomer cement in resin composite restorations - a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Purpose The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the difference in shear bond strength between calcium silicate-based liners to resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) in resin composite restorations.Materials and methods The protocol was registered in PROSPERO following which primary research was carried out on Medline, Scopus and Cochrane library. To assess the risk of bias, a customised tool was used. Among the 194 records retrieved from the databases, only ten articles qualified for qualitative and quantitative synthesis after meeting all the requirements of the eligibility criteria. Covidence software was used to record the decisions. Studies published until 31 March 2021 were taken up for the review. The articles showed a low-to-moderate risk of bias. I2 test was used to check the percentage variation due to heterogeneity.Results RMGIC showed a higher shear bond strength value compared to the three calcium silicate liners MTA, Biodentine and TheraCal LC. However, TheraCal LC and MTA showed better bond strength than Biodentine. Cohesive failure was seen predominantly in liners followed by adhesive failure. RMGIC shows mixed mode of failure in some studies.Conclusions RMGIC is preferred over calcium silicate-based materials as the liner to be used under resin composite restorations. Among calcium silicate-based materials, TheraCal LC showed a better bond strength value. The mode of failure was predominantly cohesive in all the liner groups in majority.

Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength of two different GICs in pediatric dentistry

Background: New restorative materials and techniques continue to appear in the market, the knowledge of which is required, to make an informed decision on the most suitable successful and cost effective treatment strategy. Aim: To compare and evaluate the Shear bond strength of different glass ionomer cements used in Pediatric dentistry. Materials and Methods: 60 Premolars were taken which were extracted due to orthodontic reasons. The extracted teeth were cleaned with a disinfectant and stored in distilled water at room temperature until further use. The teeth were divided into five groups: Group A: Anhydrous GIC, Group B: Giomer. All the samples were then subjected to shear bond strength test using universal testing machine. The data collected was tabulated and statistically analyzed using Anova one way test followed by tukey post Hoc HSD test using SPSS 16.0 software. Results: The Mean Shear bond strength was found to be maximum for Group B (Giomer) i.e. 2.90±0.55. Conclusion: Research and technology has revolutionized dental procedures. This revolution has occurred at such a rapid pace that it has become almost over whelming to the clinician who must take decision based on combination of experience and current trends.

Evaluation of shear bond strength and adhesive remnant index of metal APC™ Flash-Free adhesive system: A comparative in vitro study with APC™ II and uncoated metal brackets

The aim of this in vitro study was to compare the shear bond strength (SBS) and the adhesive remnant index (ARI) of the metal APC™ Flash-Free adhesive system, the APC™ pre-coated adhesive system and a conventional uncoated system. One hundred eighty-six freshly extracted human premolars were randomly divided into 3 groups and bonded by a single operator. Group A/Control Group (60 teeth): the manual bonding group treated with Transbond™ XT Light Cure Adhesive Paste (3M™ Unitek). Group B (60 teeth): treated with APC™II metal maxillary premolar precoated brackets. Group C (66 teeth): treated with metal maxillary premolar APC Flash-Free brackets. The teeth were then stored in distilled water at 37̊C for 24hours, and five hundred cycles of thermocycling were performed. The Shear Bond Strength (SBS) test was performed using an Instron Universal Testing Machine, and the adhesive remnant index (ARI) was determined using a dental optical microscope at ×25 magnification. The mean shear bond strength values showed differences between the three types of brackets (P=0.016; Anova). It was significantly higher with APC™II and lower with APC Flash-Free brackets; however, no significant differences were found between conventional and APC Flash-Free brackets (P-value=0.574). The distribution of the dichotomized ARI score was significantly different between the three brackets (P-value=0.049). The ARI score for APC Flash-Free brackets was higher with no significant difference between the conventional system and APC brackets (P-value=0.361). The mean SBS values were not significantly different between APC Flash-Free metal brackets and uncoated metal brackets. The APC Flash-Free metal system's bond failure occurred at the bracket-adhesive interface, with the highest percentage of teeth having more than 50% of the residual composite on the enamel after debonding.