The construction of "co-creation space" in colleges and universities has created a comprehensive support platform for their students to start their own businesses, and plays an important role in implementing the innovation-driven development strategy of the country. However, china's " co-creation space " in colleges and universities started relatively late, the law of business incubation has not yet been clarified, the entrepreneurship incubation mechanism, performance evaluation and other research is relatively weak, indirectly affecting the practice of innovation and entrepreneurship guidance. The purpose of this paper is, through the study of the incubation mechanism and performance evaluation of the university's co-creation space, to provide some reference for better use of the superior resources of colleges and universities to improve the incubation efficiency and improve the quality of the incubation of the “co-creation space”. This paper analyzes the meaning of " co-creation space " and the function of incubation service in colleges and universities, and expounds the mechanism of the incubation capacity of the university's creation space, that is, the cultivation mechanism of the spirit of creation, the nesting mechanism of the entrepreneurial network, the mechanism of heterogeneous synergy of entrepreneurship, the mechanism of upgrading the incubation capacity and the interrelated role between them. Based on the meaning of the incubation mechanism of "university co-creation space", the influence factors of incubation performance are extracted, and the evaluation index system of incubation performance of "creation space" in colleges and universities is constructed on this basis. And designed a set of operational evaluation procedures. Data sources are obtained by means of questionnaires and interviews, respectively. using the scoring method of Licht's five-point scale, the incubation performance of selected case universities was tested and evaluated, the evaluation scores were obtained, and the corresponding evaluation results were determined by reference to other evaluation criteria. Reasonable suggestions are put forward for the problems found in the evaluation.
Read full abstract