Evaluation Of Chemotherapy-induced Peripheral Neuropathy Research Articles

Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Assessing Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: Systematic Review

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a common side effect of many anticancer drugs that may cause various symptoms altering the quality of life. We conducted a systematic review to evaluate the peripheral and central nervous system changes associated with CIPN and detected by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Medical literature databases (PubMed, Scopus, Thomson Reuters - Web of Science and Embase) were searched for original studies reporting the use of MRI in the evaluation of CIPN. A total of 31 studies were identified and 9 were eligible for analysis. Results indicate few changes of the peripheral nervous system, most CIPN-associated nervous alterations involving pain processing areas and circuits inside the central nervous system. Distinct patterns of pain processing, changes in cerebral perfusion and gray matter density together with chronic activation of somatosensory areas have been observed in patients with CIPN compared to healthy subjects or cancer patients who did not develop CIPN. Identification of vulnerable brain areas and circuits may indicate future targets for novel therapies directed to prevent or treat CIPN. A preexisting vulnerability suggested by a unique pattern of brain activation following nociceptive stimulation prior to chemotherapy could help identify high-risk individuals, candidates to close monitoring and preventive strategies.

Association Between Nurses’ Knowledge and Practice Regarding Chemotherapy Induced Peripheral Neuropathy and Its Development in Cancer Patients

The adverse effects of peripheral neuropathy caused by chemotherapy include numbness, tingling, irritation, burning, difficulty keeping balance, and a chilling sensation. CIPN is one of the symptoms that has the potential to negatively impact the patient's quality of life (QoL), the treatment plan, and their overall safety. Objectives: To determine oncology nurses’ knowledge and practice regarding chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) and its development in cancer patient. Methods: In a descriptive cross-sectional study, 172 registered nurses from two public hospitals were chosen with convenient sampling to see if there was an association between their knowledge and practice about chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy in regard with its development in cancer patients. Three revised questioners were used to get information about nurses’ knowledge, practice and 1 questioner from patient about neuropathy development. (Knowledge, practice and neuropathy devolvement). Results: Knowledge showed that 56.4 % of participants had fair knowledge and Practice showed that 49.4 % of participants had fair practice, while 47.1% of patient had developed mild neuropathy. Chi square test was performed to see the association which showed a significant association between neuropathy development with nurses’ knowledge and practice as results were 0.000 (p-value is <0.005 taken as significant). Conclusions: There is a critical need to enhance oncology nurses' abilities in neurological assessment, and a reliable method of CIPN evaluation is essential. Guidelines for the treatment and evaluation of CIPN, as well as further studies in different health institutions to generalize the results across Pakistan, are urgently needed.

Quantitative evaluation of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy by using intraepidermal electrical stimulation.

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a frequently observed treatment-related adverse effect, particularly associated with taxane-based chemotherapy, which affects the quality of life of the patients. To date, CIPN has been subjectively evaluated by patients or physicians. Intraepidermal electrical stimulation (IES) may be applied to evaluate the function of small fibers by measuring pain threshold, and assess the degree of diabetic peripheral neuropathy. The aim of the present study was to evaluate CIPN objectively by using IES. The pain threshold measured by IES in patients with gynecological cancer who underwent taxane-based chemotherapy was compared with the clinical grading scale of peripheral neuropathy (National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0). A total of 57 patients were evaluated (151 measurements). The median age of the patients was 63 years. The number of measurements with clinical grades of 0, 1 and ≥2 was 49, 57 and 45, respectively. The mean pain threshold was 0.1, 0.14 and 0.18 mA for grades 0, 1 and ≥2, respectively. Therefore, the mean pain threshold significantly increased with the progression of the clinical grade. The measurement of pain threshold by using IES may be a reliable indicator for quantitative evaluation of CIPN.

The Relationship Between Evaluation Methods for Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy

Numbness and pain are currently evaluated using subjective methods such as the visual analogue scale (VAS). PainVision (PV) is an analytical instrument that was designed to quantitatively assess sense perception and nociception in patients. Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is one of the most important adverse events that renders prolonged chemotherapy difficult. To assess the features of CIPN, we aimed to compare PV methods with existing methods. A total of 73 patients received oxaliplatin for metastatic colorectal cancer. Registered patients included 37 men and 36 women in the range of 37 to 89 years (median 70). CIPN was evaluated a total of 483 times (median per patient six times). Our study examined the correlation between evaluation methods of CIPN using VAS and PV, respectively. The average VAS (hand), VAS (foot) and PV scores of CIPN were 18.4 (range: 0–100), 23.8 (range: 0–100), and 24.7 (range: 0–496), respectively. VAS (hand), VAS (foot), and FACT/GOG-NTX (NTX2, NTX4 and NTX8) were significantly correlated with PV. PV showed no correlation with a Disk-Criminator or the monofilament test used as a quantitative evaluation. The evaluation of CIPN is complex, and further improvement is required for evaluation with PV.

Development and validation of the comprehensive assessment scale for chemotherapy\u2013induced peripheral neuropathy in survivors of cancer

BackgroundAppropriate assessment is essential for the management of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN), an intractable symptom that cannot yet be palliated, which is high on the list of causes of distress for cancer patients. However, objective assessment by medical staff makes it easy to underestimate the symptoms and effects of CIPN in cancer survivors. As a result, divergence from subjective evaluation of cancer survivors is a significant problem. Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop a subjective scale with high accuracy and applicability that reflects the experiences of cancer patients. We developed a comprehensive assessment scale for CIPN in cancer survivors, named the Comprehensive Assessment Scale for Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy in Survivors of Cancer (CAS-CIPN), and demonstrated its reliability and validity.MethodsWe developed a questionnaire based on qualitative studies of peripheral neuropathy in Japanese cancer patients and literature review. Twelve cancer experts confirmed the content validity of the questionnaire. A draft version comprising 40 items was finalized by a pilot test on 100 subjects. The participants in the present study were 327 Japanese cancer survivors. Construct validity was determined by factor analysis, and internal validity by confirmation factor analysis and Cronbach’s α.ResultsFactor analysis showed that the structure consisted of 15 items in four dimensions: “Threatened interference in daily life by negative feelings”, “Impaired hand fine motor skills”, “Confidence in choice of treatment/management,” and “Dysesthesia of the palms and soles.” The CAS-CIPN internal consistency reliability was 0.826, and the reliability coefficient calculated using the Spearman-Brown formula [q = 2r/(1 + r)] was 0.713, confirming high internal consistency and stability. Scores on this scale were strongly correlated with Gynecologic Oncology Group-Neurotoxicity scores (r = 0.714, p < 0.01), confirming its criterion-related validity.ConclusionsThe CAS-CIPN is an assessment tool with high reliability and validity for the comprehensive evaluation of CIPN in cancer survivors. The CAS-CIPN is simple to use, and can be used by medical professionals for appropriate situational assessment and intervention.

Objective evaluation of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy using quantitative pain measurement system (Pain Vision\xae), a pilot study

BackgroundIn an evaluation of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN), objectivity may be poor because the evaluation is determined by the patient’s subjective assessment. In such cases, management of neuropathy may be delayed and CIPN symptoms may become severe. In this pilot study, we attempted an objective evaluation of CIPN using a quantitative pain measurement system (Pain Vision®).MethodsThe subjects were patients with gynecologic cancer who underwent chemotherapy using taxane and platinum drugs. The grade of the peripheral sensory nerve disorder was based on the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTC-AE) ver. 4.0 and was evaluated before the initiation of therapy and up to six chemotherapy cycles. A symptom scale assessed by the patients using a peripheral neuropathy questionnaire (PNQ) was also evaluated. Simultaneously during these evaluations, graded electric current was applied from the probe to a fingertip and measured both the lowest perceptible current and lowest current perceived as pain by Pain Vision®. From these values, the pain degree was calculated from the following formula: (pain perception current value - lowest perceptible current value) ÷ lowest perceptible current value × 100. We compared the pain degrees by Pain Vision® during CIPN development with the value obtained before chemotherapy initiation.ResultsForty-one patients were enrolled. In the evaluation by a medical professional, 28 (64.3%) patients developed CIPN during 2.5 ± 1.1 chemotherapy cycles (mean ± standard deviation). The pain degree by Pain Vision® at grade 1 and 2 CIPN development according to the evaluation (CTC-AE) was significantly decreased compared to that before chemotherapy initiation (126.0 ± 114.5 vs. 69.8 ± 46.8, p = 0.001, and 126.0 ± 114.5 vs. 32.8 ± 32.6, p = 0.004). Changes in the pain degree by Pain Vision® were also found during scale B and C, D CIPN development in the patient evaluation (PNQ) (115.9 ± 112.4 vs. 70.6 ± 56.5, p = 0.005, and 115.9 ± 112.4 vs. 46.3 ± 42.9, p = 0.004). In the 13 patients in whom CIPN did not occur, no significant decrease in the pain degree by Pain Vision® was detected (p = 0.764). There was no discontinuation of the measurements because of adverse events such as discomfort from the electric current.ConclusionThe decrease in the pain degree measured by Pain Vision® was associated with the onset of CIPN symptoms. Particularly, detection of CIPN by Pain Vision® was possible, though most of the CIPN that occurred was low grade or mild symptom. Pain Vision® might become a noninvasive and convenient objective CIPN detection tool to supplement subjective CIPN evaluation.Trial registrationThe study approval number in the institution; H25–140. Registered December 17, 2013.

Evaluation of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy using current perception threshold and clinical evaluations

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is increasing with introduction of new and combination cancer pharmacotherapies. This study evaluated associations between clinical and self-report measurements and current perception threshold (CPT), a neuroselective measure of sensory nerve function that may detect asymptomatic CIPN damage. Data for this secondary analysis were from a prospective, observational study using CPT to evaluate CIPN. Bivariate mixed models, accounting for the intraclass correlation between repeated patient assessments, were used to assess the relationship between CPT at each frequency (5, 250, and 2,000 Hz) and each subjective measure (Neuropathic Pain Scale, FACT-GOGntx) and objective measurement (quantitative sensory testing, deep tendon reflexes, and grip strength). A total of 29 chemotherapy-naïve subjects with various cancer types had a mean age of 56.7 (SD 10.4); nine subjects developed CIPN grade >1 using NCI CTC-AE criteria. Cold detection thresholds were inversely associated with CPT 5 [b(95 % CI) = -2.5(-4.5, -0.5)] and CPT 2,000 [-7.5(-11.8, -3.3)] frequencies. FACT GOG-ntx quality of life (QoL) scale and neurotoxicity and function subscales were inversely associated with CPT 2,000 [-1.8 (-3.5, -0.05), -2.2 (-4.2, -0.2), and -5.4 (-9.8, -0.9), respectively], indicating worsening QoL, impairment, and function as hypoesthesia increases. CPT 2,000 may identify impending worsening of patient-reported outcomes such as QoL.

Precise evaluation of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy using the visual analogue scale: a quantitative and comparative analysis of neuropathy occurring with paclitaxel–carboplatin and docetaxel–carboplatin therapy

Some regimens of chemotherapy cause peripheral neuropathy such as pain in muscles and joints and numbness in the limbs. It is often difficult to estimate the neuropathy accurately and analyze it in detail. The aim of this study was to investigate whether chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy could be appropriately estimated by using the visual analogue scale (VAS). Ninety-three patients who received paclitaxel and carboplatin treatment (TC) or paclitaxel and docetaxel treatment (DC) participated in answering a questionnaire about peripheral neuropathy using the VAS. As a result, 134 cycles of TC and 79 cycles of DC were evaluated. The average of VAS scores at every 10 days after each cycle of chemotherapy began was calculated. The daily change in VAS scores was also analyzed, and average VAS scores compared between TC and DC. Daily changes in peripheral neuropathy for each treatment could be demonstrated in detail. Pain and numbness had separate patterns of appearance. For both pain and numbness, a greater VAS score was observed in patients receiving TC than in those receiving DC. As the number of cycles grew, peripheral neuropathy became more serious in TC. The VAS could appropriately recognize the difference in peripheral neuropathy between TC and DC. Moreover, the VAS could also catch the change in peripheral neuropathy. This result suggests that the VAS system is a useful tool for managing peripheral neuropathy.

Diagnosis, Management, and Evaluation of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy

Peripheral neuropathy induced by cancer chemotherapy represents a large unmet need for patients due to the absence of treatment that can prevent or mitigate this common clinical problem. Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) diagnosis and management is further compounded by the lack of reliable and standardized means to diagnose and monitor patients who are at risk for, or who are symptomatic from, this complication of treatment. The pathogenesis and pathophysiology of CIPN are not fully elucidated, but there is increasing evidence of damage or interference with tubulin function. The diagnosis of CIPN may present a diagnostic dilemma due to the large number of potential toxic etiologies and conditions, which may mimic some of the clinical features; the diagnosis must be approached with care in such patients. The incidence and severity of CIPN is commonly under-reported by physicians as compared with patients. The development of new and reliable methods for the assessment of CIPN as well as safe and effective treatments to prevent this complication of treatment would represent important medical advancements for cancer patients.