Kean Gibson. The Cycle of Racial Oppression in Guyana, Maryland, University Press of America, 2003, 97 pages, ISBN 0-7618-2469-3 Kean Gibson's book The Cycle of Racial Oppression in is fairly short and so it can be read in a single afternoon. But make no mistake, the contents of the book are thought provoking to say the least. The crux of the book is that Africans in have been oppressed by East Indians particularly after 1992 under Guyana's East Indian People's Progressive Party (PPP) government. Gibson claims that this attitude was brought from India under the racial rubric of Hinduism, which has a resemblance to European racism. In Guyana, has been a similarity between European and East Indian as practiced since 1992... and that Hinduism - a religion that sanctifies racism is responsible for this neo-ethno-supremacists behavior (1-2).The rest of the opening chapter of the book sketches the definition of race and tries to connect race and politics to the Guyana's political history. The argument, however, is strained. The author also gives us a history of international oppression in regard to the of language beginning with colonialism in Third World and ending with contemporary international terrorism. Name calling, it was argued, is a technique of those in the position of power to dehumanize the other. While these views are welcoming they add nothing new to the literature of world oppression in terms of theory. The author just reiterates a list of world problems. But the chapter set the tone as to what will follow. Gibson writes African-dominated People's National Congress (PNC) was only the political party with an economic development plan and a vision for Guyana in the 2003 general election. There is something sinister about this statement. Mind you, much the same was said when achieved its independence from Britain 1966. The PNC embraced the policy of cooperative socialism, but the record shows that was transformed from a bread basket to a begging bowl of the region. The second chapter examines the history of Guyanese people in regards to labor. Gibson correctly states that European attempts to enslave the Amerindians were not successful and so the Europeans not only traded with the Amerindians but they shifted their colonial enterprise from the interior region to coastal lands. Then the Europeans - Dutch and British - engaged in plantation agriculture. African slaves were subsequently brought to provide the bulk of the labor. In this process, the Amerindians and Africans were enslaved in which their languages, among other things, experienced enormous pidignization and creolization or what Gibson calls linguistic dehumanization (9). Gibson also summarizes Guyana's post-emancipation experience. After the gradual withdrawal of Africans from plantation labor there was a labor shortage which the planters supplanted with immigrants from Europe, Portugal, Africa and Asia. Like everywhere else in the Caribbean that brought in indentured laborers soon after emancipation, was also subsequently transformed into a multi-ethnic or plural society. Each group developed or settled in its own enclave and interacted with each other when necessary. The planters played one ethnic group against the other to secure their safety. The end result was that various stereotypes emerged, which the author highlights (17-21), that hampered race relations in forever. One common theme that emerged, in layman term, was that light skin was good and dark skin was bad. This view was the jurisprudence of not only Guyana's post-emancipation society but the entire New World experience following European exploration and expansion in the fifteenth century. This section adds nothing new to the scholarship on Guyana's post-emancipation experience. It is essentially a review of previous works, mainly that of Professors Alvin Thompson and Brian Moore. Gibson informs us in the third chapter about the formation of the PPP in the late 1940s and the subsequent political- ideological split between Cheddie Jagan and Forbes Burnham. …