Eurasian Economic Union Member Research Articles

Current State and Prospects for Developing Carbon Integration in the Eurasian Space

The processes of decarbonisation of the world economy, expressed among other things in the increasing use by states of carbon pricing mechanisms and the strengthening of the role of green protectionism in international trade, create certain challenges for the competitiveness of the economies of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) countries, setting them the task of harmonizing national approaches within the framework of the climate agenda and subsequent carbon integration. This article, based on a comprehensive analysis of the economic and legal aspects of national and supranational climate regulation, examines factors that can contribute to the development of such integration in the Eurasian space, and identifies existing and potential challenges that could have an impact on it. We propose a definition of carbon integration as one of the areas of climate integration, analyzed the current conditions for its development, and identified potential measures for its further improvement and regulation in the EAEU. The authors come to the conclusion that, despite such factors as the initial stage of climate integration in the Eurasian space, the existing differences in the climate regulation regimes of the countries of the association (manifested among other things in the heterogeneity of the development of institutional and legal frameworks for the application of carbon pricing mechanisms), the scale of the consequences of introducing the European CBAM (Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism) for the national economies of the countries under consideration, opportunities and conditions for investing in green projects and greening of production, carbon integration remains one of the necessary conditions for the successful development of trade and economic relations of the EAEU member states at both regional and global levels.

Concept for improving customs and tariff mechanisms for regulating international trade

The purpose of the study is to develop main provisions of the concept of improving customs tariff mechanisms for regulating international trade. As the subject of the study, the fundamental elements of the customs mechanisms development concept have been defined: principles, tasks, tools, etc. In order to develop competitiveness in the world economy and international trade, it is relevant to adapt to the changing conditions of international business and identify the area where it is necessary to take measures to support it. The necessity of improving customs mechanisms for regulating international trade has been substantiated. The research methodology is based on the scientific literature analysis, comparative analysis, statistical data systematization and analysis. The main study result is the presentation of the concept of the processes of improving customs-tariff mechanisms of international trade and its elements regulation, aimed at increasing the effectiveness of customs-tariff measures for developing international trade in the Eurasian Economic Union member states. The concept proposes directions for systematization and improvement of supranational level customs regulation tools, which remains an important task for the near future, especially in view of changes in the foreign trade of Russian enterprises as a result of the trade conflicts aggravation caused by political and economic relations deterioration between the US, the European Union member states, and Russia. The study results application scope can be determined by a wide range of users, such as government executive authorities and customs service, logistics and commercial companies, as well as the scientific community. In the future, the proposed concept application in practical activities will ensure a business-friendly environment creation in accordance with the requirements of the general trade and customs policy and investments promotion related to the international trade development.

РОССИЙСКАЯ ФЕДЕРАЦИЯ КАК ЦЕНТР НАУЧНО-ТЕХНИЧЕСКОЙ КООПЕРАЦИИ СТРАН-ЧЛЕНОВ ЕАЭС: АНАЛИЗ ПУБЛИКАЦИОННОЙ АКТИВНОСТИ И ПЕРСПЕКТИВЫ РАЗВИТИЯ

The study examines the representation of scientific research outcomes from member countries of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) within the Russian scientific database eLIBRARY.RU in the field of economics and economic sciences. Methods of scientometric and bibliometric analysis were employed to analyze metadata from over 12 publications available in the scientific databases eLIBRARY.RU, Scopus, and Crossref. Recommendations have been formulated for the overall development of the Russian Federation and, specifically, for the eLIBRARY.RU platform as a center for scientific and technical cooperation among EAEU member countries. The results show that among the authors registered on the platform from the EAEU countries (other than the Russian Federation), the share of authors-economists from Belarus is higher than from Kyrgyzstan, Kazakhstan and Armenia, however, it is generally small. The authors from Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan and Armenia have a similar distribution of average values in terms of published materials, however, unlike Belarus, there are almost no registered economic authors with a significant number of publications in these countries. A significant absence of previously published works, archival data and an extremely small number of indexed economic scientific peer-reviewed publications from the EAEU member states were also revealed on the platform. None of the journals of Russia’s EAEU counterpart countries presented on the eLIBRARY.RU, is not included in the list of the Higher Attestation Commission, the core of the RSCI, Web of Science or Scopus. In addition, it was determined that in the EAEU countries there is a wide range of thematic areas of economic and interdisciplinary research covering education, digital technologies, agriculture and other areas. Among them there are general thematic areas that unite science in the EAEU countries, including globalization, digital transformation, agriculture, sustainable development, innovation, education and others. Based on the results obtained, the team of authors formed recommendations for the development of the Russian Federation as a whole, and the eLIBRARY. RU, in particular, as a center for scientific and technical cooperation of the EAEU member states.

Economic crime in the new Kazakhstan – a comparative analysis of the criminal legislation of EAEU member states

Relevance. Economic criminal offences are a factor in slowing a country's development. The number of such crimes is growing rapidly around the world, and the methods of committing them are becoming increasingly sophisticated, which determines the relevance of establishing new methods of countering economic crime and reforming legislation in this area, including in the member states of the Eurasian Economic Union. Purpose. The purpose of this article is to explore the essence, characteristics and features of economic crime, as well as the grounds for criminal liability for economic crimes in the Eurasian Economic Union countries. Methodology. The methodological basis of the study was dialectical and comparative methods, case study, abstraction, methods of system-structural and logical analysis, methods of registration and ranking, method of generalisation, which allowed to clarify the concepts and characteristics of economic crime; to consider available definitions of economic crime and individual provisions of the regulatory framework of Eurasian Economic Union member states on the regulation of economic crime; to characterise the legal nature of economic crime; to analyse the main scientific and methodological developments in this area. Results. The types of economic crimes in the member states of the Eurasian Economic Union were compared; to compare types of economic crime in the Eurasian Economic Union member states; to identify current trends in economic crime within the Eurasian Economic Union; to find out the main advantages of each Eurasian Economic Union member state's national legislation to combat economic crime; to classify possible economic crimes; and to determine the number of economic crimes committed and record their rates in each Eurasian Economic Union state; to characterise the specifics of countering economic crime in the Eurasian Economic Union. Conclusions. The significance of the research results is to provide practical recommendations for improving the legal regulation of relations in the sphere of economic crime, as well as in the process of implementing policies and taking public management decisions in the field of countering economic crime in the Eurasian Economic Union states.

Digital Economy as a Driver of Regional Integration to Achieve Esg Principles: the Case of the Eurasian Economic Union

Objective: Analyzing digitalization as an innovation in the government policy of Eurasian Economic Union member states, the authors attempt to establish its further impact on the supranational level of management of the integration association. The researchers also point out the effect of e-government development on the digitalization of integration processes. The purpose of the study is to investigate the effect of digitalization in the EAEU and its contribution to achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. Methods: The study employs a comprehensive review of EAEU policies, digitalization projects, and the national strategies of member states related to digital transformation. It also examines data on the economic and social effects of these initiatives. Results: The article reveals that the EAEU's digitalization efforts have significantly enhanced economic integration, trade efficiency, and the quality of public services. These digital initiatives have also shown promise in addressing environmental challenges and promoting sustainable economic growth. The results underscore the importance of digital infrastructure and cross-sectoral cooperation in achieving these outcomes. Conclusion: In conclusion, digitalization within the EAEU is proving to be a transformative force, shaping the region's economic landscape and contributing to sustainable development. By embracing digital technologies and fostering collaboration among member states, the EAEU is well-positioned to harness the full potential of the digital economy while addressing critical sustainability issues. To maximize the benefits and mitigate challenges, continued coordination and investment in digital skills and infrastructure are essential for the EAEU's long-term success in the digital era.

The Strategy of Russia in the Trans-Eurasian Connectivity

It was observed in the recent period that strategic initiatives enhancing connectivity in the Eurasian continent. Since 2014, the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) has been promoted by China, and some CIS countries, including Russia, established the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) in 2015. Several East–West routes exist, in contrast to which the INSTC is the only one meridional transcontinental corridor in the EAEU. The rapidly growing economy of India, on the other hand, for which the INSTC could be the land-based corridor of choice for efficient trade with Russia and Central Asia. Ongoing challenges, bureaucratic delays, and inter-regional disputes are the challenges likely to be faced by the project as competition for influence across Eurasia continues to heat up. INSTC may become a major game-changer in global trade as well as in the broader region provided it tackles all the obstacles in its way. The northwestern part of Europe and the Nordic countries, along with Central Asia and the Persian Gulf, are connected through this multimodal INSTC. Passing through the Suez Canal and Gibraltar, multimodal routes are to be facilitated for the shift of freight that flows from these sea routes. The INSTC has not gained as much traction as the existing Eurasian corridors and TRACECA, given sanctions imposed on Iran and bottlenecks in the transport infrastructure. The active interaction of the EAEU member states with India and Iran, over the last several years, as well as a better regulatory environment around the Caspian Sea, drove its development. To form the framework for a strong connectivity network from the Indian Ocean to the Baltic States and Scandinavia, for which the INSTC has much potential. Besides its significance economically and its capacity to improve the bilateral relations of member states, INSTC also has the potential to act as a major counterbalance to Chinese influence in the region of Central Asia where the interests of Russia, Iran, and India, the leading INSTC states, also align. Ongoing challenges, bureaucratic delays, and inter-regional disputes are the challenges likely to be faced by the project as competition for influence across Eurasia continues to heat up. INSTC may become a major game-changer in global trade as well as in the broader region provided it tackles all the obstacles in its way.

Non-recognizing the Other? Discursive deligitimation of the EAEU by the EU

ABSTRACT The Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU), despite being regarded as the most developed integration project in the post-Soviet area, has faced different hurdles in acquiring international recognition. Especially, the EU, the EAEU’s Significant Other, has been reluctant to formally recognize it, in spite of close ties with EAEU member states as well as of its own self-image as a supporter of regional integrations. This paper focuses on this puzzle and examines how the EU has been discursively explaining its non-recognition of the EAEU at the institutional level. Based on the analysis of EU-articulated narratives since 2010, the paper reveals three dominant representations of the EAEU in the EU discourse: (1) Russia’s geopolitical project; (2) a protectionist union; and (3) a dysfunctional union. These narratives have been used by Brussels to create the EAEU’s image as a threatening Other, thus justifying why the EU cannot formally recognize the EAEU and officially engage with it. The paper also identifies five different stages of the EU’s discursive representation of the EAEU since 2010, when its tone and content varied. The paper concludes that such non-recognition from the Significant Other still limits the EAEU’s international agency despite its increasing interest in cooperation with non-Western actors.

EAEU and China: Partnership in the Self-sufficiency Interests

This study is aimed at understanding the current state of trade and economic cooperation between the Eurasian Economic Union member states and China and developing a progressive course towards its further intensification through integration advantages of the EAEU.Aim. Offer a new format for deeper economic cooperation between the EAEU and the PRK in accordance with the current global and regional development situation.Tasks. Assess the current state of cooperation between the EAEU member states and the PRC, with an emphasis on the trade and economic sphere, and highlight its strengths and weaknesses. Analyze practical examples of the implementation of bilateral and multilateral projects. Formulate the most promising areas for deepening partnership between the EAEU and China, structure and summarize them. Offer an effective way of comprehensive legal regulation of ãhe new format of cooperation.Methods. Various general scientific and special methods are used, among which are analysis, synthesis, deduction, induction, analogy, as well as descriptive research, system-functional and institutional methods. The comparative legal method was of particular importance.Results. Based on the analysis, a comprehensive understanding of the existing directions of cooperation between the EAEU member states and the PRC is submitted. Conclusions are drawn regarding the current model of conjugation of the Eurasian integration and the “One Belt — One Road” initiative. The most promising areas for joint efforts of the parties have been identified: investment partnership, cooperation in the financial and transport and logistics spheres, cooperation projects in the field of high tech. A mechanism of legal regulation (two-level conjugation model) for transferring cooperation between the EAEU and China to a new institutional level is presented.Conclusions. Transformation of the model of conjugation of the Eurasian integration and the “One Belt — One Road” initiative from the «5+1» format to the «1+1» format will contribute to the formation of a new dimension of cooperation between the EAEU and the PRC: Partnership in the Self-sufficiency Interests.

INVESTMENT COOPERATION OF THE EAEU COUNTRIES IN CONDITIONS OF ECONOMIC INSTABILITY

In the conditions of modern international political contradictions, the main task for any state is to strengthen trade, economic and investment cooperation with neighboring countries. On January 1, 2015, the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU), which unites the states of Russia, Kazakhstan, Belarus, Armenia and Kyrgyzstan, began its work. The purpose of this regional integration organization is the freedom of movement of goods, services, capital and labor, as well as ensuring the implementation of a coordinated, coordinated and unified policy in the sectors of the economy.Despite numerous studies devoted to the consideration of the foundations of mutual investment cooperation of the EAEU countries, the peculiarities of the modern world economy require studying the structure of mutual investment cooperation within the framework of the main geopolitical and macroeconomic partnership. The article analyzes the main trends in the investment activity of the EAEU member states based on mathematical statistics methods, analyzes the features of the structure of mutual direct investment, the volume of investments in the fixed capital of the Union countries by type of economic activity. In the course of the study, the problems facing the Union states on the way to effective investment cooperation were identified, the investment intensity index was evaluated and the prospects for economic and financial integration of mutual cooperation were determined.

Transport Week 2022

The journal publishes a selection of materials based on the news reports of the press centre of the Ministry of Transport of the Russian Federation and dedicated to the events held during 16th Transport of Russia International Forum and Exhibition.The Forum, which opened on November 15, 2022, during its first day hosted the Session of the Committee of the State Council of the Russian Federation, the panel discussion «Container Flow during the Era of Global Shocks. Current Trajectories for Market Development», the roundtable discussion «Life-Cycle-Long Maintenance of Motor Transport» and the industrial conference «Efficiency of State Support for Air Transport During Unprecedented Sanctions Pressure».On the second day of the Forum, the participants discussed the role of science in providing technological stability of transport, water transport and assessment of compliance in the new conditions, the formula for cooperation in transport engineering, new digital tools, information services and technologies, transport safety and security and digital management ecosystems. Besides, were held the Session of the Council of Heads of Transport Authorities of the Eurasian Economic Union Member Countries and the presentation of the RZD Transport Accelerator.The final day was devoted to international cooperation. It was opened by the plenary discussion «International Transport Cooperation in 2022. New Directions, Trends, Results», which focused on the actions of countries on the issues of building transport communications under sanctions, the law enforcement, and the coordination of work aimed at creating more competitive transport products within the EAEU. Then, the session «Sunrise on the East: Significance of Trade with Asian Countries for the Russian Economics and the Ability of Transport to Support the Trade» demonstrated the achieved results in rerouting of external trade communications to the East.The business program was concluded with the plenary discussion. In the opinion of a Deputy Minister of Transport of the Russian Federation, Valentin Ivanov, «activity of the Forum was organised in a very productive manner. Many issues were discussed and many meeting points and solutions were found».Winners of the «Formula of Movement» premium were awarded. The premium is designed to promote development of transport infrastructure, improve the quality of transport services, as well as stimulate government and commercial structures to solve significant problems in the transport sector. Only implemented projects or services that have received practical application in the field of transport were eligible to participate.The topic of «Transport Week» is also highlighted on the second cover and on the pages of the central insert of the issue.

Industrial Policy in the EAEU Countries: Challenges and Solutions for Kazakhstan in the Competition and Intellectual Property Law

The paper describes and examines the industrial policies of the Eurasian Economic Union member states. It shows the need to adjust the traditional type of industrial policy of the Eurasian Economic Union countries, which relies on leading industries. The purpose of this article is to identify the main challenges for the industrial policy in Kazakhstan, taking into account its participation in the EAEU and the risks associated with distortion of competition as a result of hostile mergers and acquisitions, and to propose solutions intended to ensure a balance between competition protection and industrial policy. The paper’s objectives are to review the problems arising at the intersection of trade, innovation, and intellectual property in the EAEU countries and to develop recommendations for industrial and innovation policy. The article considers two main issues in accordance with the purpose: the industrial policy problems in the EAEU countries; the use of intellectual property and competition law for the development and protection of innovations. It is shown that the industrial policy of Kazakhstan and other EAEU countries remains insufficiently effective and has a contradictory nature. Since 2000, the economic complexity index decreased in most EAEU countries, the intensity of industrialization remained low, and the share of medium and high-tech manufacturing diminished. There is a need to adjust the traditional type of industrial policy, to exclude selective advantages to specific firms, to focus on industry-wide industrial policy, the insufficient experience of EAEU member states in counteracting hostile and murderous takeovers, the complexity of innovation development system, protection of competition within the integration.

Assessment of Impact of Trade and Economic Cooperation of Kazakhstan with Russia, EAEU Countries and Third Countries on Development of Integration Processes of EAEU

The countries of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) will strengthen cooperation despite external pressure. This is also confirmed by the issues discussed at the meeting of the Intergovernmental Council of the EAEU held in February 2022 in Nur-Sultan, where it was determined that the countries included in the Council will develop a common market for the freedom of movement of goods, services, capital and labor. All the EAEU member states continue to make necessary decisions for the development of trade, economic and humanitarian relations, improving the quality of life and wellbeing of citizens of their citizens. The article contains the results of scientific and applied research carried out using the methods of logical, systematic, comparative, economic and statistical analysis. The most important directions of trade and economic cooperation between Russia and Kazakhstan, the economies of the countries of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) and third countries are revealed, which have a significant impact on the development of integration processes of the EAEU, and to identify promising areas of cooperation in key sectors of the two largest economies. The dynamics of the openness of the economy of Kazakhstan over the past 20 years is considered. The contribution of Eurasian integration to the economic growth of Russia and Kazakhstan is assessed. The authors suggest possible promising areas of cooperation in key industries that contribute to strengthening economic relations between Russia and the Republic of Kazakhstan.

Direct budget subsidizing as a factor of sustainable development of agricultural production in the Republic of Belarus

Currently, most of the world’s countries are pursuing an active agrarian policy in order to support national agricultural producers. At the same time, the ongoing changes in the global and domestic food markets, due to rising prices, reduction in the product range, and social tension in society require optimization of costs of the country’s budgets and development of proposals for the most effective measures. The paper presents an analysis of methodological approaches to assessing the efficiency of direct budget support for agricultural production used in the member states of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) and in Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). Taking into account the identified advantages and disadvantages of applying these approaches in practice in the Republic of Belarus, as well as using the experience of the EAEU member states, methodological approaches have been developed to assess the efficiency of state support measures aimed at subsidizing of: 1) compensation for the cost of production resources; 2) price support; 3) losses of banks related to issuing preferential loans to rural producers; 4) stimulating the volume of output and the efficiency of related types of economic activity by increasing the amount of resources produced by the agriculture. Based on the presented developments, the most rational level of production costs was determined, when each additional ruble (as well as according to types) invested in the production allows to get the maximum increase in performance indicators. In addition, a positive effect of stimulating the growth of agricultural production on the performance of manufacturing (food) industry entities has been determined. These developments can be used to justify the sources and volumes of financing the priority areas for development of agriculture in the Republic of Belarus in the mid- and long-term outlook.

ENSURING FOOD SECURITY THROUGH TRADE AND ECONOMIC COOPERATION BETWEEN SIBERIA AND THE EURASIAN ECONOMIC UNION

The paper focuses on a critical issue of ensuring food security for countries that are members of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU), which is especially important given the transformation of the global food market in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. The research aims (1) to assess the possibility of creating a single food market of the EAEU and (2) to identify the difficulties faced by the Siberian agricultural sector in addressing food security issues and export development. The paper presents the results of the study concerning the development of trade and economic cooperation between the Siberian Federal District (SFD) of the Russian Federation and the EAEU countries with regard to the agricultural market. Based on the statistical analysis of national data, we examined the particular aspects of Siberian agricultural export development. We were able to identify the largest trading partners among the EAEU member states and study the particular aspects of their food imports based on the Russian database indicators. According to the analysis results, we concluded that exports are dominated by food products, namely intermediate and final products, which correspond to the objectives of the Russian Federation National Project International Cooperation and Exports. Market research on the breakdown of imports to the EAEU showed that it imported dairy products, fruits, vegetables, and processed foods. We identified the most promising areas of export development for the SFD based on a review of the scientific studies on economic integration and food security issues. The scientific novelty of this research lies in proving the need to develop exports of finished food products with a high level of processing, which requires the integrated development of the food processing industry in the SFD by means of regional strategic programs for introducing innovative biotechnologies in deep processing of agricultural raw materials. The research findings might be of great interest to members of the academic community and undergraduate and graduate students pursuing similar research agendas.

Analysis of the Energy Complex Member of the EАEU Countries and the Formation of Groups-Technologies of its Digitalization

Due to the increasing internationalization of the member countries of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU), it is planned to create a common energy market and an electric energy market. To ensure the reliable functioning of the energy systems of individual states of the Union and their common energy market, it is necessary to increase energy efficiency and reduce costs at each stage of production, transmission, distribution and sale of electricity by optimizing processes in the industry through the introduction of digital technologies. The purpose of this work is to analyze the electric power complexes of the EAEU member states and to consider groups of digitalization technologies of industries in the context of the electric power industry, to form an algorithm for creating a classification of digitalization technologies of the electric power industry and on the basis of the latter to create the classification itself. The article provides an overview of the dynamics of the main economic indicators of the Union countries and the main indicators of their electric power industries, examines the structure of electricity production, energy portfolio, average electricity prices, total electricity consumption by sector. The import-export potential and the level of electricity losses in the networks have been analyzed. The interpretation of digital technologies of the electric power complex in the context of existing groups-digitalization technologies was made, the components of the interconnection of digital technologies were identified; the classification of the above components by production stages has been developed. Recommendations on the further use of the classification for the formation of an indicative system for assessing the level of digitalization of the electric power complex are put forward. It is concluded that digitalization of the electric power system on the technical side increases the energy security of the state and the competitiveness of the energy system on the world market, and on the economic side it helps to reduce costs at all stages of the entire technological cycle.

Legal Framework for Regulating Customs Activity

Introduction . At the present stage of international economic relations, the issue of efficient legal regulation of customs activity is particularly acute. Over the past few years, Russia has faced the challenge of economic sanctions on behalf of a number of unfriendly countries. Transparency of the regulatory framework and thorough elaboration of the fundamental provisions of the customs law will allow building a clear and efficient interaction between the customs authorities of the Russian Federation and the participants of the international economic activity (hereinafter - IEA), the Russian companies and the customs authorities of the Eurasian Economic Union (hereinafter - EEU) member states. The aim of this study is to analyse the legal framework for regulating customs activity and to find out the challenging aspects. The working hypothesis relies on the system of theoretical and methodological provisions and scientific knowledge, indicating the need in further elaboration of the customs legal documentation to ensure the modern approaches regulating the relations between the customs clearance and control processes participants. Materials and Methods . In the course of the research, general scientific and specific scientific methods were used, in particular, the method of dialectical materialism, the system analysis, logical, statistical methods and the method of comparative jurisprudence. Results . The carried out analysis of the regulatory legal framework in the field of customs activity entitles to state the insufficient elaboration of the certain issues, both the ones falling within competence of the Federal Customs Service and the ones generally referring to cooperation with the EEU member states in the field of customs activity. Discussion and Conclusions . In the course of the study, the following problematic aspects were identified. Since insufficient attention is paid in scientific circles to studying the forms of interaction between the tax and the customs authorities of the Russian Federation, the attention is focused on their distinctive features and the recommendation is given to continue collaboration of the Federal Customs Service of Russia (hereinafter – FCS of Russia) and the Federal Tax Service of Russia (hereinafter – FTS of Russia) on creation of the unified data bank designated to testify performance of the export-import operations by the international economic activity participants. Due to the fact that under current conditions, the special attention is paid by the customs authorities to the post-control issues in the frame of the in-office audits, the need to bring the customs and tax legislation into compliance taking into account the results of the in-office audits has been identified. It is necessary to accomplish the regulatory framework enabling implementation of the customs procedure "temporary import (admission)" for individuals with dual citizenship, and to refine the legal basis for the international economic activity participants to provide the documents additionally requested during the customs control. The issue of efficient interaction between the customs authorities and the standardisation and certification authorities during the preliminary customs declaring procedure should be elaborated. It is expedient to continue formation of the EEU digital space and digital infrastructures along with implementation of the advanced information technologies.

EURASIAN ECONOMIC UNION SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT VECTOR: RETROSPECTIVE AND OUTLOOK

The continuous transformation of the global market poses challenges for national economies, requiring the formation and strengthening of integration processes. To analyze the development of socio-economic relations within the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU), the authors conducted a retrospective analysis, statistical and structural analysis of key indicators, and assessed prospects for further cooperation. The study confirmed the hypothesis of insufficient competitiveness of national economies, weak foreign trade relations, and an inconsistent regulatory environment that limits export opportunities. The authors recommend shifting the focus of cooperation towards mutual support, ensuring socio-economic and demographic security, and maintaining living standards. The article identifies the main problems of interaction between EAEU member countries and suggests directions for expanding integration ties to increase the effectiveness of cooperation. The authors propose transitioning to a new level of socio-economic development for the EAEU.

The Chronology of Economic Instabilities of the EAEU Countries

As economic history has shown, economic instabilities that originate in one country can be transmitted through various mechanisms and affect not only individual countries but also integration associations and their integration processes and economic developments. Moreover, if in the initial period this impact is noticeable only for the economic prospects of the trading partners, later it gains a global character and affects other partner countries after a certain time lag. Considering recent economic developments, the same pattern is applied in the case of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU). Being former members of the USSR, EAEU member countries have faced systemic crises since their independence until these days. This article summarizes the chronology of the economic crises that took place in the EAEU member states, elaborates, clarifies, and classifies their characteristics. Based on this, the author aims to explore the differences and similarities of the economic development cycles of the EAEU countries.

Evaluating the role of salt intake in achieving WHO NCD targets in the Eurasian Economic Union: A PRIME modeling study.

The World Health Organization has set clear global targets in reducing non-communicable disease mortality by 2030 in its sustainable development goals. This study models the number of deaths that could be averted if Eurasian Economic Union (EEU) member states met the target of reducing their population's current mean salt intake by 30% to achieve mortality reduction targets. Using the WHO Preventable Risk Integrated ModEl (PRIME), we modelled the mortality impact of reducing salt consumption by 30%, as well as according to WHO recommended levels (5 g/person/day), for the five member states of the EEU. PRIME models the number of averted deaths from reducing salt intake by applying established risk ratios to a given population. The baseline demographic and mortality data that are required to generate these estimates were obtained from the relevant government statistical bodies, and salt intake data were referenced from surveillance studies. Uncertainty intervals were generated using Monte Carlo simulation. If salt consumption was reduced by 30%, we estimate that there would have been 94,150 (95%UI: 47,329 to 137,131) fewer deaths due to cardiovascular disease in the EEU in the baseline year, with males and the elderly being more affected. If the WHO-recommended maximum salt intake of 5 g/day was achieved, a total of 193,155 (95%UI: 98,548 to 272,536) deaths would have been prevented. These findings underline the importance of incorporating effective policy changes to meet targets in reducing NCD mortality by one-third by 2030.

Цифровое измерение социально-экономической интеграции ЕАЭС

The article analyzes the priorities of socio-economic development of the digital strategies of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) member states in the context of implementing the digital agenda. The author concludes that the formation of disparate national public administration platforms limits the possibilities for integration. Along with technological limitations, the main obstacle to the creation of a single digital space of the EAEU is the difference in approaches to socio-economic policy, which prevents one of the key goals of the Union – to develop a common labor market. The purpose of this article is to identify possible “assembly points” of digital tools for the development of the EAEU labor market as the basis for their socio-economic integration.