The nutritional requirements and physiological mechanisms of avian molt and the relationship of molt to other ecological requirements in birds are poorly understood. Relative to other nutritionally costly events in the annual cycle (e.g., reproduction and migration), the efficiency of feather synthesis is extremely low (King 1981, Murphy and King 1984a). Gavrilov and Dolnik (1974) suggested that this inefficiency was caused by an regulation of food intake which allows acquisition of sufficient cysteine and cystine for construction of feather keratins. Recent investigations failed to confirm this aminostatic hypothesis, however, and instead suggested that overall nitrogen retention (of the correct amino acid spectrum), not specific sulfur amino acid (SAA) concentrations, may be a more important constraint on feather synthesis, and that both protein and SAA requirements can be met through dietary intake without depleting tissue proteins (Murphy and King 1984a, 1984b, 1984c, 1985). Also, studies of wild Eurasian Bullfinches (Pyrrhula pyrrhula) (Newton 1968), the Canada Goose (Branta canadensis) (Raveling 1979, Mainguy and Thomas 1985), the Lesser Snow Goose (Chen caerulescens) (Ankney 1979), Brant (Branta bernicla) (Ankney 1984), and Mallard (Anas platyrhynchos) (Heitmeyer 1985) indicate that molting birds typically obtain protein and SAA required for feather synthesis from food. The actual protein intake needed to synthesize feathers is not known for any bird in the wild, and only White-crowned Sparrows (Zonotrichia leucophrys) have been intensively studied in the laboratory in an attempt to calculate protein costs (Murphy and King 1982, 1984a, 1984b). Studying molt with captive birds has been hampered, however, because captive birds often do not undergo a typical molt if (1) photoperiod, temperature, food quantity and quality, and social settings are artificial, (2) birds are unnaturally constrained, or (3) locations are distant from the site where molt would occur naturally (West 1968, Blackmore 1969, King 1974, Chilgren 1978). In contrast to laboratory investigations, studying the cost of molt in the wild is hampered because variables affecting the bird and its environment are not controlled, and the intake and output of nutrients are not measured. Despite these problems bioenergetic costs can be accurately estimated from birds collected in the wild if sufficient data exist on the pattern, timing, and duration of synthesis, and composition of the synthesized product (e.g., estimates of bioenergetic costs of reproduction, Ricklefs 1974, Drobney 1980). Herein, I estimate the protein cost of the prebasic molt of adult female Mallards in late winter using birds collected in the wild.
Read full abstract