EU Clinical Trials Register Research Articles

Evaluating the effect of BCG vaccination for non-specific protection from infection in senior citizens during the COVID-19 pandemic: A randomised clinical trial

The Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccine may induce non-specific protection against unrelated infections. We tested the effect of BCG on the risk of infections among Danish senior citizens. Single-blinded randomised controlled trial including 1676 volunteers >65 years. Participants were randomised 1:1 to BCG or placebo and followed for 12 months. The primary outcome was acute infection leading to medical contact. Secondary outcomes were verified SARS-CoV-2 infection, self-reported respiratory symptoms, and all-cause hospitalisation. Data was analysed using Cox regression models, estimating hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). The incidence of acute infection was 52.1 and 58.2 per 100 person-years for BCG and placebo, respectively (HR=0.89, 95% CI=0.78-1.02). There was no effect of BCG on SARS-CoV-2 infections (0.97, 0.75-1.26) or all-cause hospitalisations (1.10, 0.80-1.50), but BCG was associated with more respiratory symptoms (1.21, 1.10-1.33). BCG reduced the incidence of acute infections among participants <75 years (0.82, 0.70-0.95) but not among those >75 years (1.14, 0.88-1.47). In participants, who were COVID-19 vaccinated before enrolment, BCG was associated with lower incidence of acute infections (0.65, 0.50-0.85). BCG did not reduce risk of acute infections among Danish seniors overall, but the effect was modified by age group and COVID-19 vaccination. ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04542330) and EU Clinical Trials Register (EudraCT number 2020-003904-15). Full trial protocol is available at ClinicalTrials.gov. In a randomised clinical trial among Danish senior citizens, BCG vaccination did not reduce the overall risk of acute infection, but BCG was associated with reduced risk in participants <75 years and participants who received COVID-19 vaccines prior to enrolment.

Efficacy and safety of a diffusion-based extended-release fluticasone propionate intra-articular injection (EP-104IAR) in knee osteoarthritis (SPRINGBOARD): a 24-week, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, vehicle-controlled, phase 2 trial.

Corticosteroids are among the few effective treatments for knee osteoarthritis, but short duration of action limits their utility. EP-104IAR, a long-acting formulation of fluticasone propionate for intra-articular injection, optimises the action of fluticasone propionate through novel diffusion-based extended-release technology. The SPRINGBOARD trial assessed the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of EP-104IAR in people with knee osteoarthritis. SPRINGBOARD was a randomised, vehicle-controlled, double-blind, phase 2 trial done at 12 research sites in Denmark, Poland, and Czech Republic. We recruited adults aged 40 years or older with primary knee osteoarthritis (Kellgren-Lawrence grade 2-3) who reported Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Arthritis Index (WOMAC) pain scores of at least 4 and no more than 9 out of 10. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive one intra-articular dose of 25 mg EP-104IAR or vehicle control. Randomisation was done via interactive web-based access to a central predefined computer-generated list with block size of six (allocated by clinical site). Participants and assessors were masked to treatment allocation. Participants were followed up for 24 weeks. The primary outcome was the difference between groups in change in WOMAC pain score from baseline to week 12, analysed in all participants who were randomly assigned and received treatment. Safety, including laboratory analyses, and pharmacokinetics from quantification of fluticasone propionate in peripheral blood were assessed in all participants who received a dose of randomly assigned treatment. A person with lived experience of knee osteoarthritis was involved in study interpretation and writing of the report. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04120402, and the EU Clinical Trials Register, EudraCT 2021-000859-39, and is complete. Between Sept 10, 2021, and Nov 16, 2022, 1294 people were screened for eligibility, and 319 were randomly assigned to EP-104IAR (n=164) or vehicle control (n=155). One participant in the EP-104IAR group was excluded from all analyses because treatment was not administered due to an adverse event. 318 participants (135 [42%] male and 183 [58%] female, 315 [99%] White) received randomly assigned treatment and were included in the primary analysis and safety analysis (EP-104IAR, n=163; vehicle control, n=155). At week 12, least squares mean change in WOMAC pain score from baseline was -2·89 (95% CI -3·22 to -2·56) in the EP-104IAR group and -2·23 (-2·56 to -1·89) in the vehicle control group, with a between-group difference of -0·66 (-1·11 to -0·21; p=0·0044); a significant between-group difference persisted to week 14. 106 (65%) of 163 participants in the EP-104IAR group had one or more treatment-emergent adverse event compared with 89 (57%) of 155 participants in the vehicle control group. Effects on serum glucose and cortisol concentrations were minimal and transient. There were no treatment-emergent deaths or treatment-related serious adverse events. Plasma concentrations of fluticasone propionate showed a blunted initial peak with terminal half-life of approximately 18-20 weeks. These phase 2 results suggest that EP-104IAR has the potential to offer clinically meaningful pain relief in knee osteoarthritis for an extended period of up to 14 weeks, longer than published data for currently marketed corticosteroids. There were minimal effects on glucose and cortisol, and stable fluticasone propionate concentrations in plasma. The safety and efficacy of EP-104IAR will be further evaluated in phase 3 trials, including the possibility of bilateral and repeat dosing with EP-104IAR. Eupraxia Pharmaceuticals. For the Danish translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

The effect of rituximab on patient reported outcomes in the preclinical phase of rheumatoid arthritis: 2 year data from the PRAIRI study

ObjectivesEarly treatment of individuals at risk of developing rheumatoid arthritis (RA-risk) in the preclinical phase has the potential to positively impact both patients and society by preventing disease onset and...

Ziftomenib in relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukaemia (KOMET-001): a multicentre, open-label, multi-cohort, phase 1 trial

Ziftomenib (KO-539) is an oral selective menin inhibitor with known preclinical activity in menin-dependent acute myeloid leukaemia models. The primary objective of this study was to determine the recommended phase 2 dose in patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukaemia based on safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and preliminary activity. KOMET-001 is a multicentre, open-label, multi-cohort, phase 1/2 clinical trial of ziftomenib in adults with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukaemia. Results of the phase 1 study, conducted at 22 hospitals in France, Italy, Spain, and the USA, are presented here and comprise the dose-escalation (phase 1a) and dose-validation and expansion (phase 1b) phases. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older, had relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukaemia, and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 or less. For phase 1a, patients (all molecular subtypes) received ziftomenib (50-1000 mg) orally once daily in 28-day cycles. For phase 1b, patients with NPM1 mutations or with KMT2A rearrangements were randomly assigned (1:1) using third-party interactive response technology to two parallel dose cohorts (200 mg and 600 mg ziftomenib). Primary endpoints were maximum tolerated dose or recommended phase 2 dose in phase 1a, and safety, remission rates, and pharmacokinetics supporting recommended phase 2 dose determination in phase 1b. Analyses were performed in all patients who received at least one dose of ziftomenib (modified intention-to-treat population). Phase 1a/1b is complete. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04067336, and the EU Clinical Trials register, EudraCT 2019-001545-41. From Sept 12, 2019, to Aug 19, 2022, 83 patients received 50-1000 mg ziftomenib (39 [47%] were male and 44 [53%] were female). Median follow-up was 22·3 months (IQR 15·4-30·2). Of 83 patients, the most common grade 3 or worse treatment-emergent adverse events were anaemia (20 [24%]), febrile neutropenia (18 [22%]), pneumonia (16 [19%]), differentiation syndrome (12 [15%]), thrombocytopenia (11 [13%]), and sepsis (ten [12%]). Overall, 68 of 83 patients had serious adverse events, with two reported treatment-related deaths (one differentiation syndrome and one cardiac arrest). Differentiation syndrome rate and severity influenced the decision to halt enrolment of patients with KMT2A rearrangements. In Phase 1b, no responses were reported in patients treated at the 200 mg dose level. At the recommended phase 2 dose of 600 mg, nine (25%) of 36 patients with KMT2A rearrangement or NPM1 mutation had complete remission or complete remission with partial haematologic recovery. Seven (35%) of 20 patients with NPM1 mutation treated at the recommended phase 2 dose had a complete remission. Ziftomenib showed promising clinical activity with manageable toxicity in heavily pretreated patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukaemia. Phase 2 assessment of ziftomenib combination therapy in the upfront and relapsed or refractory setting is ongoing. Kura Oncology.

Comparative effects of drug interventions for the acute management of migraine episodes in adults: systematic review and network meta-analysis

ObjectiveTo compare all licensed drug interventions as oral monotherapy for the acute treatment of migraine episodes in adults.DesignSystematic review and network meta-analysis.Data sourcesCochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Medline, Embase,...

Thromboprophylaxis in oesophageal cancer patients—a study protocol for a randomised, controlled trial (TOP-RCT)

BackgroundThe purpose of the study is to examine if prolonged thromboprophylaxis decreases the risk of thrombosis after intended curative surgery for oesophageal cancer.Study results are expected to inform a guideline for thromboprophylaxis after oesophageal cancer surgery. The perspective is to reduce morbidity and mortality in this critically ill patient group.Thrombosis is the second-most common cause of cancer death after the cancer itself. The risk of thrombosis depends on the cancer type, and upper gastrointestinal cancers are considered high risk. This risk is further increased when patients undergo surgery. However, only few studies have investigated the peri- and postoperative coagulation profile in oesophageal cancer patients. Due to this lack of knowledge, prophylaxis is currently restricted to 5000 IU (international units) low-molecular weight heparin daily from surgery until discharge from hospital (approximately 10 days), whereas patients with gastric cancer receive 30 days of treatment.The present study examines whether a 30-day treatment is superior and safe, compared with the current standard treatment.MethodsThe study is a randomised controlled trial. Inclusion is ongoing, and we aim to include 100 patients. Blood samples are drawn before and after surgery, and the coagulation is extensively examined. The primary endpoint is the difference in plasma levels of prothrombin fragment 1 + 2 (F1 + 2) 30 days after surgery between the intervention and the standard group. Furthermore, patients are examined with ultrasound to screen for asymptomatic venous thrombotic events (VTE).Secondary endpoints are incidence of bleeding, symptomatic and asymptomatic VTE and mortality 30 days 1 one year after surgery.DiscussionThe study will provide valuable information on the perioperative coagulation profile and VTE risk of oesophageal cancer patients. The study seeks to aid in optimising the postoperative thromboprophylaxis, and the perspective is to reduce morbidity and mortality in this at-risk patient population.Trials registrationThe trial was prospectively registered at the EU Clinical Trials Register with ID 2021–001335-24 on 30 June 2021 and at ClinicalTrials.gov with study identifier NCT05067153.

Clinical trial transparency and disclosure from the medical writing perspective

It’s been more than 6 years since our last Medical Writing edition dedicated to clinical trial transparency and disclosure. Since then, we have seen the full implementation of the long-awaited EU Clinical Trials Regulation (CTR), the pause and restart of EMA Policy 0070, and of course a global pandemic which resulted in a world-wide surge in freedom of information requests for Covid-19 vaccine clinical trial data. Although many of the regulations and policies governing public disclosure of clinical trial data and documents remain unchanged, we have seen significant changes in the way these are implemented. As those of us who work in this field know all too well, the landscape is ever changing, and it is essential to keep up to date with those changes. Resources such as the Drug Information Association Clinical Trial Disclosure Community, PHUSE Data Transparency Working Group, and Clarity and Openness in Reporting-E3 based (CORE) Reference provide invaluable updates and insights. This issue of Medical Writing touches on a number of different aspects of clinical trial transparency and disclosure, all of which involve medical writers as key stakeholders

Electroconvulsive Therapy Versus Aripiprazole Addition to Clozapine in Patients with Clozapine-Resistant Symptoms (EMECLO): A Protocol of a Single-Blind, Multicenter, Randomized-Controlled Feasibility Trial.

Currently, guidance on the most effective treatment for patients with clozapine-resistant schizophrenia-spectrum disorders (SSD) is lacking. While augmentation strategies to clozapine with aripiprazole and electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) have been demonstrated to be effective in patients with clozapine-resistant schizophrenia spectrum disorders (CRS), head-to-head comparisons between these addition strategies are unavailable. We therefore aim to examine the feasibility of a larger randomized, single-blind trial comparing the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and safety of aripiprazole addition vs. ECT addition in CRS. In this multi-center, randomized, single-blind feasibility study, the feasibility of recruiting 20 participants with CRS who will be randomized to either aripiprazole or bilateral ECT addition will be assessed. The main endpoint is the number of patients willing to be randomized. The number of screened individuals and reasons to decline participation will be recorded. Effects will be estimated for the benefit of the foreseen larger trial. To that end, differences between both arms in symptom severity will be assessed using blinded video assessments. In addition, tolerability (e. g., cognitive functioning), safety, quality of life, recovery, and all-cause discontinuation will be compared. The follow-up period is 16 weeks, after which non-responders will be given the option to switch to the other treatment. Strengths of this feasibility trial include maintaining blinding with video assessment, a possibility to switch groups in case of non-response, and a broad set of outcome measures. Identification of factors contributing to non-participation and drop-out will generate valuable information on trial feasibility and may enhance recruitment strategies in a follow-up RCT. The study has been approved by the Medical Research Ethics Committee of the Amsterdam University Medical Center, location AMC, and was registered on 1 May 2022 in the EU Clinical Trials Register (EudraCT) under the trial name 'EMECLO' (2021-006333-19).

Safety and immunogenicity of the live-attenuated hRVFV-4s vaccine against Rift Valley fever in healthy adults: a dose-escalation, placebo-controlled, first-in-human, phase 1 randomised clinical trial

Rift Valley fever virus, a pathogen to ruminants, camelids, and humans, is an emerging mosquito-borne bunyavirus currently endemic to Africa and the Arabian Peninsula. Although animals are primarily infected via mosquito bites, humans mainly become infected following contact with infected tissues or fluids of infected animals. There is an urgent need for adequate countermeasures, especially for humans, because effective therapeutics or vaccines are not yet available. Here we assessed the safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of a next-generation, four-segmented, live-attenuated vaccine candidate, referred to as hRVFV-4s, in humans. A first-in-human, single-centre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was done in Belgium in which a single dose of hRVFV-4s was administered to healthy volunteers aged 18-45 years. Participants were randomly assigned using an interactive web response system. The study population encompassed 75 participants naive to Rift Valley fever virus infection, divided over three dosage groups (cohorts) of 25 participants each. All participants were followed up until 6 months. Using a staggered dose escalating approach, 20 individuals of each cohort were injected in the deltoid muscle of the non-dominant arm with either 104 (low dose), 105 (medium dose), or 106 (high dose) of 50% tissue culture infectious dose of hRVFV-4s as based on animal data, and five individuals per cohort received formulation buffer as a placebo. Primary outcome measures in the intention-to-treat population were adverse events and tolerability. Secondary outcome measures were vaccine-induced viraemia, vaccine virus shedding, Rift Valley fever virus nucleocapsid antibody responses (with ELISA), and neutralising antibody titres. Furthermore, exploratory objectives included the assessment of cellular immune responses by ELISpot. The trial was registered with the EU Clinical Trials Register, 2022-501460-17-00. Between August and December, 2022, all 75 participants were vaccinated. No serious adverse events or vaccine-related severe adverse events were reported. Pain at the injection site (51 [85%] of 60 participants) was most frequently reported as solicited local adverse event, and headache (28 [47%] of 60) and fatigue (28 [47%] of 60) as solicited systemic adverse events in the active group. No vaccine virus RNA was detected in any of the blood, saliva, urine, or semen samples. Rift Valley fever virus nucleocapsid antibody responses were detected in most participants who were vaccinated with hRVFV-4s (43 [72%] of 60 on day 14) irrespective of the administered dose. In contrast, a clear dose-response relationship was observed for neutralising antibodies on day 28 with four (20%) of 20 participants responding in the low-dose group, 13 (65%) of 20 responding in the medium-dose group, and all participants (20 [100%] of 20) responding in the high-dose group. Consistent with the antibody responses, cellular immune responses against the nucleocapsid protein were detected in all dose groups, whereas a more dose-dependent response was observed for the Gn and Gc surface glycoproteins. Neutralising antibody titres declined over time, whereas nucleocapsid antibody responses remained relatively stable for at least 6 months. The hRVFV-4s vaccine showed a high safety profile and excellent tolerability across all tested dose regimens, eliciting robust immune responses, particularly with the high-dose administration. The findings strongly support further clinical development of this candidate vaccine for human use. The Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations with support from the EU Horizon 2020 programme.

Comparing cervical cerclage, pessary and vaginal progesterone for prevention of preterm birth in women with a short cervix (SuPPoRT): A multicentre randomised controlled trial.

Cervical cerclage, cervical pessary, and vaginal progesterone have each been shown to reduce preterm birth (PTB) in high-risk women, but to our knowledge, there has been no randomised comparison of the 3 interventions. The SuPPoRT "Stitch, Pessary, or Progesterone Randomised Trial" was designed to compare the rate of PTB <37 weeks between each intervention in women who develop a short cervix in pregnancy. SuPPoRT was a multicentre, open label 3-arm randomised controlled trial designed to demonstrate equivalence (equivalence margin 20%) conducted from 1 July 2015 to 1 July 2021 in 19 obstetric units in the United Kingdom. Asymptomatic women with singleton pregnancies with transvaginal ultrasound cervical lengths measuring <25 mm between 14+0 and 23+6 weeks' gestation were eligible for randomisation (1:1:1) to receive either vaginal cervical cerclage (n = 128), cervical pessary (n = 126), or vaginal progesterone (n = 132). Minimisation variables were gestation at recruitment, body mass index (BMI), and risk factor for PTB. The primary outcome was PTB <37 weeks' gestation. Secondary outcomes included PTB <34 weeks', <30 weeks', and adverse perinatal outcome. Analysis was by intention to treat. A total of 386 pregnant women between 14+0 and 23+6 weeks' gestation with a cervical length <25 mm were randomised to one of the 3 interventions. Of these women, 67% were of white ethnicity, 18% black ethnicity, and 7.5% Asian ethnicity. Mean BMI was 25.6. Over 85% of women had prior risk factors for PTB; 39.1% had experienced a spontaneous PTB or midtrimester loss (>14 weeks gestation); and 45.8% had prior cervical surgery. Data from 381 women were available for outcome analysis. Using binary regression, randomised therapies (cerclage versus pessary versus vaginal progesterone) were found to have similar effects on the primary outcome PTB <37 weeks (39/127 versus 38/122 versus 32/132, p = 0.4, cerclage versus pessary risk difference (RD) -0.7% [-12.1 to 10.7], cerclage versus progesterone RD 6.2% [-5.0 to 17.0], and progesterone versus pessary RD -6.9% [-17.9 to 4.1]). Similarly, no difference was seen for PTB <34 and 30 weeks, nor adverse perinatal outcome. There were some differences in the mild side effect profile between interventions (vaginal discharge and bleeding) and women randomised to progesterone reported more severe abdominal pain. A small proportion of women did not receive the intervention as per protocol; however, per-protocol and as-treated analyses showed similar results. The main study limitation was that the trial was underpowered for neonatal outcomes and was stopped early due to the COVID-19 pandemic. In this study, we found that for women who develop a short cervix, cerclage, pessary, and vaginal progesterone were equally efficacious at preventing PTB, as judged with a 20% equivalence margin. Commencing with any of the therapies would be reasonable clinical management. These results can be used as a counselling tool for clinicians when managing women with a short cervix. EU Clinical Trials register. EudraCT Number: 2015-000456-15, clinicaltrialsregister.eu., ISRCTN Registry: ISRCTN13364447, isrctn.com.

FIRE Stones: impact of forced diuresis on the residual fragment rate after flexible ureteroscopy for destruction of kidney stones with laser—protocol for a randomized controlled two-parallel group multicenter trial with blinding evaluation

BackgroundLithiasis is a common and recurrent disease. Flexible ureteroscopy (fURS) is the cornerstone of laser treatment of kidney stones. Kidney stones destruction requires its laser pulverization into small fragments in order to remove them through the ureter or improve their spontaneous expulsion along the urinary tract. However, most of the time, all the micro-fragments and dust created cannot be extracted using our surgical tools and may stay intra-renally at the end of the procedure. Adjuvant treatments (such as forced diuresis, inversion or mechanical pressure) were previously described to improve the expulsion of stone fragments after extra-corporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Nevertheless, the impact of adjuvant treatment after fURS remains unclear and mainly theoretical.ObjectiveThe primary objective is to show that the injection of 40 mg of furosemide in slow intravenous during 10 min, after the procedure, increases the stone-free rate 3 months after a fURS for destruction of kidney stones with laser.Methods/designThe study will be a two-parallel group randomized, controlled, multicentric trial with a blinding evaluation. Nine French departments of urology will participate. Patients will be randomized in 2 groups: the experimental group (injection of 40 mg of furosemide at the end of the surgery) and a control one (usual care). Patients will be followed up for 3 months (± 2 weeks) after the surgery. Then, we will perform a low dose abdomino-pelvic CT scan. The primary outcome is the stone-free rate at 3 months. A centralized review of the images will be performed by two specialized radiologists, in a blind and crossed way to allow a homogenization of the results. The secondary outcomes will include the rate of early post-operative urinary tract infection (UTI), the evaluation of post-operative pain, and the safety of the use of furosemide in patients treated by fURS for renal stone laser destruction. As secondary objectives, it is also planned to look at the effect of the prescription of an alpha-blocker as usual treatment on stone-free rate and to assess the agreement between the imaging analysis of the urologist and the specialized radiologist.DiscussionLithiasis is a public health problem. It affects about 10% of the general population. This prevalence is increasing (multiplied by 3 in 40 years), partly due to changes in the population’s eating habits over the years. The lithiasis patient is a patient with a chronic disease requiring annual follow-up and who may suffer from multiple recurrences, with a recurrence rate at 5 years of 50%.Recurrences are partly due to residual fragments left in the kidneys at the end of the operation. Other risk factors for recurrence include dietary hygiene and the presence of an associated metabolic disease. The metabolic blood and urine tests recommended by the Association Française d’Urologie (AFU) can be used to manage these last two problems.As far as residual fragments are concerned, their presence leads to an early recurrence of stones because they form the bed for a new aggregation of crystals in the kidneys. Being able to reduce the rate of residual fragments in patients with the use of furosemide at the end of the intervention therefore seems essential in the management of recurrences in our patients. This will also improve our patients’ quality of life.Indeed, lithiasis disease leads to chronic pain associated with acute pain that motivates consultations to the emergency for specialized management. This study is the first to evaluate the impact of forced diuresis with the use of furosemide on the stone-free rate after a fURS for destruction of kidney stone with laser.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05916963, first received: 22 June 2023.EU Clinical Trials Register EudraCT Number: 2022-502890-40-00.

O-022 Early tubal flushing with oil-based contrast during hysterosalpingography versus no tubal flushing in women with unexplained infertility – H2Oil-timing randomized controlled trial

Abstract Study question In women with unexplained infertility, does tubal flushing with oil-based contrast during HSG early in the fertility work-up reduce time to ongoing pregnancy? Summary answer In women with unexplained infertility, tubal flushing with oil-based contrast during HSG early in the fertility work-up does not reduce time to pregnancy. What is known already In couples with unexplained infertility, tubal flushing with oil-based contrast during HSG is known to increase live births and reduce time to pregnancy compared to HSG with water-based contrast. It is unknown whether tubal flushing with oil-based contrast incorporated early in the fertility work-up will have this effect as compared to 6 months later in the fertility work-up. Study design, size, duration Between August 2019 and May 2023, we performed a multicenter, randomized trial in 15 Dutch hospitals. After informed consent, participating women were randomized to immediate HSG (oil-based contrast) or HSG delayed by six months. This allowed us to assess the effect of tubal flushing versus no tubal flushing over a 6-month period, as well as time to conception after immediate versus delayed flushing over a period of 12 months. We aimed to recruit 554 participants. Participants/materials, setting, methods We included ovulatory infertile women (18-39 years), who were advised expectant management based on a favorable prognosis for natural conception (Hunault prediction-model). The study has two primary endpoints, time to conception leading to live births (I) within 6 months, and (II) over a 12-month period. Here we report on conception within 6 months leading to ongoing pregnancy. Live birth data will be available at the 2024 ESHRE meeting. Analyses were done according to intention-to-treat principle. Main results and the role of chance Between August 2019 and May 2023, we randomized 577 women (287 allocated to the immediate HSG and 290 allocated to the delayed HSG group). Mean (±sd) female age was 30.0±3.6 years and median duration of infertility was 17.0 months. In the immediate HSG group, 239 women had an HSG after a median duration of 0.7 months after randomization, while in the delayed group 83 women had an HSG within 6 months (median time to HSG: 5.2 months after randomization). Conception leading to ongoing pregnancy within 6 months occurred in 90 women (32.5%) in the immediate HSG group and 91 women (33.2%) in the delayed HSG group (HR: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.72-1.29). Conception leading to any pregnancy within 6 months occurred in 119 women (43.0%) in the immediate HSG group and 104 women (38%) in the delayed HSG group (HR: 1.16; 95% CI: 0.89-1.51). The median time to conception leading to ongoing pregnancy was 2.4 months in the immediate HSG group and also 2.4 months in in the delayed HSG group. Limitations, reasons for caution This study was limited to women with unexplained infertility with favorable natural conception chances (&amp;gt;30%). In this abstract, we only report time to ongoing pregnancy and not time to pregnancy leading to live birth. Data on conception leading to live births will be available at the 2024 ESHRE meeting. Wider implications of the findings In women with unexplained infertility and a favorable prognosis to conceive, early tubal flushing with oil-based contrast during HSG does not increase live birth rates nor reduce time to pregnancy within six months as compared to tubal flushing delayed by six months. Trial registration number EU clinical Trials Register, no: 2018-004153-25 AND Clinicaltrials.gov, ID: NCT05608590

Clinical Decision Support Systems in Adults with Chronic Respiratory Disease: A Systematic Review

Background: A sub-optimal uptake of clinical guidelines is reported across healthcare settings in many chronic respiratory disease populations. Clinical decision support systems (CDSS) are systems which analyse and present data so that users can make decisions more easily and are suggested as part of the solution to poor adoption of guidelines. Aims: The aim of this review was to describe the literature on CDSS in chronic respiratory disease management, their function and the features that may impact their effectiveness. Methods: The electronic databases PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, the trial registries Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EU Clinical Trial Register, ClinicalTrials.gov and World Health Organisation (WHO) trial registry were searched with the aid of a medical librarian. All searches began from September 2019 to March 2021. Data from relevant studies were extracted independently by 2 review authors using Covidence software and Microsoft Excel. Study quality was assessed. CDSS description and indication, function and the theory underpinning the CDSS (e.g., guidelines, expert opinion, etc.) were themed and summarised. The presence or absence of the important CDSS features were recorded i.e., (i) computer-based decision support, (ii) automatic provision of decision support as part of clinician workflow, (iiii) provision of decision support at the time and location of decisionmaking and (iv) provision of recommendations rather than just assessments. Results: Of the 2647 articles screened, 27 papers or abstracts (n = 22 full text and n = 5 abstracts) describing 26 studies met all inclusion and exclusion criteria. The 26 studies evaluated asthma care (n = 16), COPD care (n = 9) and both asthma and COPD care (n = )]. The highest level of evidence was generated by RCTs (n = 7). The 26 studies described 24 different CDSS. Most were based solely or in part on clinical and best practice guidelines. Whilst most CDSS had multiple functions, which were wide ranging, medicines management was the most prevalent function. Most systems had 3 out of 4 of the specific system features that have been correlated with improvements in clinical practice. Generally, in both controlled studies and in other study designs, patient and process outcome measures were commonly reported with performance outcomes measures less commonly reported. Fewer positive effects were reported in the higher quality studies (i.e. controlled studies). The success rate of the CDSS was higher in those studies that had 3 out of the 4 important CDSS features. Conclusion: Many CDSS in adults with asthma and COPD improve patient, process and performance outcomes.

Effects of Empagliflozin in Type 2 Diabetes With and Without Chronic Kidney Disease and Nondiabetic Chronic Kidney Disease: Protocol for 3 Crossover Randomized Controlled Trials (SiRENA Project).

Sodium-glucose-cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) have revolutionized the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2) and chronic kidney disease (CKD), reducing the risk of cardiovascular and renal end points by up to 40%. The underlying mechanisms are not fully understood. The study aims to examine the effects of empagliflozin versus placebo on renal hemodynamics, sodium balance, vascular function, and markers of the innate immune system in patients with DM2, DM2 and CKD, and nondiabetic CKD. We conducted 3 double-blind, crossover, randomized controlled trials, each with identical study protocols but different study populations. We included patients with DM2 and preserved kidney function (estimated glomerular filtration rate >60 mL/min/1.73 m2), DM2 and CKD, and nondiabetic CKD (both with estimated glomerular filtration rate 20-60 mL/min/1.73 m2). Each participant was randomly assigned to 4 weeks of treatment with either 10 mg of empagliflozin once daily or a matching placebo. After a wash-out period of at least 2 weeks, participants were crossed over to the opposite treatment. End points were measured at the end of each treatment period. The primary end point was renal blood flow measured with 82Rubidium positron emission tomography-computed tomography (82Rb-PET/CT). Secondary end points include glomerular filtration rate measured with 99mTechnetium-diethylene-triamine-pentaacetate (99mTc-DTPA) clearance, vascular function assessed by forearm venous occlusion strain gauge plethysmography, measurements of the nitric oxide (NO) system, water and sodium excretion, body composition measurements, and markers of the complement immune system. Recruitment began in April 2021 and was completed in September 2022. Examinations were completed by December 2022. In total, 49 participants completed the project: 16 participants in the DM2 and preserved kidney function study, 17 participants in the DM2 and CKD study, and 16 participants in the nondiabetic CKD study. Data analysis is ongoing. Results are yet to be published. This paper describes the rationale, design, and methods used in a project consisting of 3 double-blind, crossover, randomized controlled trials examining the effects of empagliflozin versus placebo in patients with DM2 with and without CKD and patients with nondiabetic CKD, respectively. EU Clinical Trials Register 2019-004303-12; https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/search?query=2019-004303-12, EU Clinical Trials Register 2019-004447-80; https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/search?query=2019-004447-80, EU Clinical Trials Register 2019-004467-50; https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/search?query=and+2019-004467-50. DERR1-10.2196/56067.

Ibrutinib followed by ofatumumab consolidation in previously untreated patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL): GELLC-7 trial from the Spanish group of CLL (GELLC)

BTK inhibitors have been concurrently administered with anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). However, the optimal regimen for combining these two drugs remains pending. This multi-center phase 2 study aimed to analyze whether consolidation with ofatumumab improved the response in patients with CLL receiving front-line treatment with ibrutinib. Patients received 12 cycles of ibrutinib monotherapy. Those who achieved CR after this induction were maintained on ibrutinib. Conversely, those who did not attain CR continued with ibrutinib in addition to a consolidation, which involved 7 doses of ofatumumab. The primary objective was the complete response (CR) rate at cycle 20. This study is registered within the EU Clinical Trials Register (EudraCT 2016-004937-26). Between September 8, 2017, and May 21, 2018, 84 patients (median age, 69 years) were included. After completion of 12 cycles of ibrutinib (n=80), 4 patients (5%) were in CR, 67 (84%) in partial response (PR), and 6 patients (7%) had a PR with lymphocytosis (PRL). After consolidation with ofatumumab, 20 patients improved the response from PR to CR and 6 patients with PRL obtained a PR. Seventy-one patients (85%) completed 20 cycles of treatment, with a CR rate of 24/71 (34%). According to the intention-to-treat analysis at cycle 20, the ORR was 69/84 (82.2%), with a CRR of 24/84 (28.6%). Progression-free survival and overall survival at 48-months were 89.9% (CI: 82.4-95.5) and 92.2% (CI: 85.3-97.1), respectively. These findings underscore the potential for a consolidation strategy in CLL, wherein the addition of a mAb in patients with low tumor burden might enhance the quality of the response. The study was funded by Janssen that also supplied ibrutinib, whereas ofatumumab was supplied by Novartis.

Dietary supplement intake in women with breast cancer before and after diagnosis: results from the SUCCESS C trial

BackgroundThere is little evidence that dietary supplements are beneficial for patients with breast cancer; therefore, they are usually not recommended by treatment guidelines. The aim of the present analysis was to assess the prevalence of dietary supplement (DS) intake among women before and after a breast cancer diagnosis.MethodsParticipants in the SUCCESS C lifestyle intervention study, a randomized controlled trial in women with newly diagnosed intermediate- to high-risk breast cancer, completed two questionnaires on dietary supplement intake 24 months (QS1) and 48 months (QS2) after beginning the lifestyle intervention. The study was registered on 12.17.2008 under the EU Clinical Trials Register https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/, trial registration number: 2008-005453-38. The questionnaires collected data on DS intake during the 5-year period prediagnosis (QS1) and in the period postdiagnosis (QS2). Multivariate logistic regression models were fitted to examine differences in DS intake between the two intervention groups. The groups were then pooled to examine differences in DS use between the prediagnostic and postdiagnostic period.ResultsA total of 320 questionnaires from 58.5% of intervention group completers and 416 questionnaires from 46.6% of low-level intervention group completers were included in the analysis. Overall, 20.2% of all respondents reported taking DS prior to their diagnosis. After a cancer diagnosis, the percentage of women taking DS significantly increased to 56.4% (p for time effect < 0.0001). No differences in DS intake between the intervention groups were observed. Single or combined preparations of vitamins and minerals/trace elements were the most frequently reported supplements. Notably, a 9-fold increase in vitamin D intake was reported postdiagnosis, where the proportion of women increased from 3.8 to 34.5%.ConclusionA 3-fold increase in the reported intake of dietary supplements was seen in women after a breast cancer diagnosis. These observations underscore the need to incorporate patient education surrounding the use of dietary supplements in a treatment care plan, particularly addressing the negligible benefits as well as the potential risks and treatment interactions.

Immunogenicity of third dose COVID-19 vaccine strategies in patients who are immunocompromised with suboptimal immunity following two doses (OCTAVE-DUO): an open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial

The humoral and T-cell responses to booster COVID-19 vaccine types in multidisease immunocompromised individuals who do not generate adequate antibody responses to two COVID-19 vaccine doses, is not fully understood. The OCTAVE DUO trial aimed to determine the value of third vaccinations in a wide range of patients with primary and secondary immunodeficiencies. OCTAVE-DUO was a prospective, open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial investigating humoral and T-cell responses in patients who are immunocompromised following a third vaccine dose with BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273, and of NVX-CoV2373 for those with lymphoid malignancies. We recruited patients who were immunocompromised from 11 UK hospitals, aged at least 18 years, with previous sub-optimal responses to two doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. Participants were randomly assigned 1:1 (1:1:1 for those with lymphoid malignancies), stratified by disease, previous vaccination type, and anti-spike antibody response following two doses. Individuals with lived experience of immune susceptibility were involved in the study design and implementation. The primary outcome was vaccine-specific immunity defined by anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike antibodies (Roche Diagnostics UK and Ireland, Burgess Hill, UK) and T-cell responses (Oxford Immunotec, Abingdon, UK) before and 21 days after the third vaccine dose analysed by a modified intention-to-treat analysis. The trial is registered with the ISRCTN registry, ISRCTN 15354495, and the EU Clinical Trials Register, EudraCT 2021-003632-87, and is complete. Between Aug 4, 2021 and Mar 31, 2022, 804 participants across nine disease cohorts were randomly assigned to receive BNT162b2 (n=377), mRNA-1273 (n=374), or NVX-CoV2373 (n=53). 356 (45%) of 789 participants were women, 433 (55%) were men, and 659 (85%) of 775 were White. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike antibodies measured 21 days after the third vaccine dose were significantly higher than baseline pre-third dose titres in the modified intention-to-treat analysis (median 1384 arbitrary units [AU]/mL [IQR 4·3-7990·0] compared with median 11·5 AU/mL [0·4-63·1]; p<0·001). Of participants who were baseline low responders, 380 (90%) of 423 increased their antibody concentrations to more than 400 AU/mL. Conversely, 166 (54%) of 308 baseline non-responders had no response after the third dose. Detectable T-cell responses following the third vaccine dose were seen in 494 (80%) of 616 participants. There were 24 serious adverse events (BNT612b2 eight [33%] of 24, mRNA-1273 12 [50%], NVX-CoV2373 four [17%]), two (8%) of which were categorised as vaccine-related. There were seven deaths (1%) during the trial, none of which were vaccine-related. A third vaccine dose improved the serological and T-cell response in the majority of patients who are immunocompromised. Individuals with chronic renal disease, lymphoid malignancy, on B-cell targeted therapies, or with no serological response after two vaccine doses are at higher risk of poor response to a third vaccine dose. Medical Research Council, Blood Cancer UK.

Daratumumab and antineoplastic therapy versus antineoplastic therapy only for adults with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma ineligible for transplant.

Daratumumab and antineoplastic therapy versus antineoplastic therapy only for adults with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma ineligible for transplant.

Adult and pediatric relapsing multiple sclerosis phase II and phase III trial design and their primary end points: Asystematic review.

No systematic review of trial designs in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS) was reported. This systematic review was conducted on the trial designs and primary end points (PEs) of phase II and III trials intended to modify the natural course of the disease in patients with RMS. The purpose of the study is to explore trends/topics and discussion points in clinical trial design and PE, comparing them to regulatory guidelines and expert recommendations. Three trial registration systems, ClinicalTrials.gov, the EU Clinical Trials Register, and the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials, were used and 60 trials were evaluated. The dominant clinical trial design was a randomized controlled parallel-arms trial and other details were as follows: in adult phase III confirmatory trials (n = 32), active-controlled double-blind trial (DBT) (53%) and active-controlled open-label assessor-masking trial (16%); in adult phase II dose-finding trials (n = 9), placebo- and active-controlled DBT (44%), placebo-controlled DBT (22%), and placebo-controlled add-on DBT (22%); and in pediatric phase III confirmatory trials (n = 8), active-controlled DBT (38%) and active-controlled open-label non-masking trial (25%). The most common PEs were as follows: in adult confirmatory trials, annual relapse rate (ARR) (56%) and no evidence of disease activity-3 (NEDA-3) (13%); in adult dose-finding trials, the cumulative number of T1 gadolinium-enhancing lesions (56%), combined unique active lesions (22%), and overall disability response score (22%); and in pediatric confirmatory trials, ARR (38%) and time to first relapse (25%). It was suggested that some parts of the regulatory guidelines and expert recommendations need to be revised.

A comparative ethical analysis of the Egyptian clinical research law

BackgroundIn this study, we examined the ethical implications of Egypt’s new clinical trial law, employing the ethical framework proposed by Emanuel et al. and comparing it to various national and supranational laws. This analysis is crucial as Egypt, considered a high-growth pharmaceutical market, has become an attractive location for clinical trials, offering insights into the ethical implementation of bioethical regulations in a large population country with a robust healthcare infrastructure and predominantly treatment-naïve patients.MethodsWe conducted a comparative analysis of Egyptian law with regulations from Sweden and France, including the EU Clinical Trials Regulation, considering ethical human subject research criteria, and used a directed approach to qualitative content analysis to examine the laws and regulations. This study involved extensive peer scrutiny, frequent debriefing sessions, and collaboration with legal experts with relevant international legal expertise to ensure rigorous analysis and interpretation of the laws.ResultsOn the rating of the seven different principles (social and scientific values, scientific validity, fair selection of participants, risk-benefit ratio, independent review, informed consent and respect for participants) Egypt, France, and EU regulations had comparable scores. Specific principles (Social Value, Scientific Value, and Fair selection of participants) were challenging to directly identify due to certain regulations embodying 'implicit' principles more than explicitly stated ones.ConclusionThe analysis underscores Egypt's alignment with internationally recognized ethical principles, as outlined by Emanuel et al., through its comparison with French, Swedish, and EU regulations, emphasizing the critical need for Egypt to continuously refine its ethical regulations to safeguard participant protection and research integrity. Key issues identified include the necessity to clarify and standardize the concept of social value in research, alongside concerns regarding the expertise and impartiality of ethical review boards, pointing towards a broader agenda for enhancing research ethics in Egypt and beyond.