Etiology Of DNA Damage Research Articles

DNA Damage and Repair in Human Reproductive Cells.

The fundamental underlying paradigm of sexual reproduction is the production of male and female gametes of sufficient genetic difference and quality that, following syngamy, they result in embryos with genomic potential to allow for future adaptive change and the ability to respond to selective pressure. The fusion of dissimilar gametes resulting in the formation of a normal and viable embryo is known as anisogamy, and is concomitant with precise structural, physiological, and molecular control of gamete function for species survival. However, along the reproductive life cycle of all organisms, both male and female gametes can be exposed to an array of “stressors” that may adversely affect the composition and biological integrity of their proteins, lipids and nucleic acids, that may consequently compromise their capacity to produce normal embryos. The aim of this review is to highlight gamete genome organization, differences in the chronology of gamete production between the male and female, the inherent DNA protective mechanisms in these reproductive cells, the aetiology of DNA damage in germ cells, and the remarkable DNA repair mechanisms, pre- and post-syngamy, that function to maintain genome integrity.

DNA fragmentation in spermatozoa: a historical review.

SummarySperm DNA Fragmentation has been extensively studied for more than a decade. In the 1940s the uniqueness of the spermatozoa protein complex which stabilizes the DNA was discovered. In the fifties and sixties, the association between unstable chromatin structure and subfertility was investigated. In the seventies, the impact of induced DNA damage was investigated. In the 1980s the concept of sperm DNA fragmentation as related to infertility was introduced as well as the first DNA fragmentation test: the Sperm Chromatin Structure Assay (SCSA). The terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase nick end labelling (TUNEL) test followed by others was introduced in the nineties. The association between DNA fragmentation in spermatozoa and pregnancy loss has been extensively investigated spurring the need for a therapeutic tool for these patients. This gave rise to an increased interest in the aetiology of DNA damage. The present decade continues within this research area. Some of the more novel methods recently submerging are sorting of cells with increased DNA fragmentation and hyaluronic acid (HA) binding techniques. The clinical value of these tests remains to be elucidated. In spite of half a century of research within the area, this analysis is not routinely implemented into the fertility clinics. The underlying causes are multiple. The abundance of methods has impeded the need for a clinical significant threshold. One of the most promising methods was commercialized in 2005 and has been reserved for larger licensed laboratories. Myriads of reviews and meta‐analyses on studies using different assays for analysis of DNA fragmentation, different clinical Artificial Reproductive Treatments (ART), different definitions of successful ART outcome and small patient cohorts have been published. Although the area of DNA fragmentation in spermatozoa is highly relevant in the fertility clinics, the need for further studies focusing on standardization of the methods and clinical implementation persists.

Genome integrity and disease prevention in the nervous system.

Multiple DNA repair pathways maintain genome stability and ensure that DNA remains essentially unchanged over the life of a cell. Various human diseases occur if DNA repair is compromised, and most of these impact the nervous system, in some cases exclusively. However, it is often unclear what specific endogenous damage underpins disease pathology. Generally, the types of causative DNA damage are associated with replication, transcription, or oxidative metabolism; other direct sources of endogenous lesions may arise from aberrant topoisomerase activity or ribonucleotide incorporation into DNA. This review focuses on the etiology of DNA damage in the nervous system and the genome stability pathways that prevent human neurologic disease.

Apoptosis and DNA damage in human spermatozoa.

DNA damage is frequently encountered in spermatozoa of subfertile males and is correlated with a range of adverse clinical outcomes including impaired fertilization, disrupted preimplantation embryonic development, increased rates of miscarriage and an enhanced risk of disease in the progeny. The etiology of DNA fragmentation in human spermatozoa is closely correlated with the appearance of oxidative base adducts and evidence of impaired spermiogenesis. We hypothesize that oxidative stress impedes spermiogenesis, resulting in the generation of spermatozoa with poorly remodelled chromatin. These defective cells have a tendency to default to an apoptotic pathway associated with motility loss, caspase activation, phosphatidylserine exteriorization and the activation of free radical generation by the mitochondria. The latter induces lipid peroxidation and oxidative DNA damage, which then leads to DNA fragmentation and cell death. The physical architecture of spermatozoa prevents any nucleases activated as a result of this apoptotic process from gaining access to the nuclear DNA and inducing its fragmentation. It is for this reason that a majority of the DNA damage encountered in human spermatozoa seems to be oxidative. Given the important role that oxidative stress seems to have in the etiology of DNA damage, there should be an important role for antioxidants in the treatment of this condition. If oxidative DNA damage in spermatozoa is providing a sensitive readout of systemic oxidative stress, the implications of these findings could stretch beyond our immediate goal of trying to minimize DNA damage in spermatozoa as a prelude to assisted conception therapy.

Analysis of the relationships between oxidative stress, DNA damage and sperm vitality in a patient population: development of diagnostic criteria

DNA damage in human spermatozoa is known to be associated with a variety of adverse clinical outcomes affecting both reproductive efficiency and the health and wellbeing of the offspring. However, the origin of this damage, its biochemical nature and strategies for its amelioration, still await resolution. Using novel methods to simultaneously assess DNA fragmentation (modified TUNEL assay), DNA-base adduct formation (8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine [8OHdG]) and cell vitality, spermatozoa from a cohort of 50 assisted conception patients were examined and compared with a group of donors. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was then used to examine the frequency distribution of the data and to determine optimized thresholds for identifying patients exhibiting abnormally high levels of DNA damage. 8OHdG formation and DNA fragmentation were highly correlated with each other and frequently associated with cell death. Percoll centrifugation improved sperm quality but, unexpectedly, increased 8OHdG formation in live cells, as did sperm fractionation using Puresperm gradients. ROC analysis indicated that the frequency distribution of 8OHdG and DNA fragmentation data were significantly different between patients and donors (P < 0.001), permitting the development of thresholds that would allow the accurate diagnosis of DNA damage in the male germ line. The aetiology of DNA damage in spermatozoa involves a cascade of changes that progress from the induction of oxidative stress and oxidized DNA base adduct formation to DNA fragmentation and cell death. Preparation of spermatozoa on discontinuous density gradients aggravates the problem by stimulating the formation of 8OHdG in live cells. However, the development of novel methods and optimized thresholds for diagnosing oxidative DNA damage in human spermatozoa should assist in the clinical management of this pathology.

001. ORIGINS OF DNA DAMAGE IN SPERMATOZOA

DNA damage is frequently encountered in the spermatozoa of sub-fertile male mammals and is correlated with a range of adverse clinical outcomes including impaired fertilization, disrupted embryonic development, increased rates of miscarriage and an enhanced risk of disease in the progeny. The etiology of DNA fragmentation in human spermatozoa is closely correlated with the appearance of oxidative base adducts and evidence of impaired chromatin remodelling during spermiogenesis. In light of these associations we propose a two step hypothesis for the origins of DNA damage in spermatozoa. In Step 1, a variety of intrinsic (diabetes, varicocele, testicular torsion, obesity) and extrinsic (radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation, heat, cigarette smoke, diet, environmental toxicants) factors collude to generate a state of oxidative stress in the testes. This stress impedes spermiogenesis resulting in the generation of spermatozoa with poorly remodelled chromatin. These defective cells readily default to an apoptotic pathway comprising motility loss, caspase activation, phosphatidylserine exteriorization and the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) by the mitochondria. In Step 2, these mitochondrial ROS attack the spermatozoa inducing lipid peroxidation and oxidative DNA damage, which then leads to DNA strand breakage and cell death. Nucleases activated and released during the apoptotic process are denied access to the sperm nucleus because the unique physical architecture of this cell prevents it. For this reason, a majority of the DNA damage encountered in human spermatozoa is oxidative. Given the importance of oxidative stress in the etiology of DNA damage, there should be a significant therapeutic role for antioxidants in the treatment of this condition. Furthermore, if oxidative DNA damage in spermatozoa is providing a sensitive readout of systemic oxidative stress, the implications of these findings could stretch beyond our immediate goal of trying to minimize DNA damage in spermatozoa as a prelude to assisted conception therapy.

Sperm DNA damage: importance in the era of assisted reproduction

With the proliferation of assisted reproductive technologies, there is an increasing awareness of the importance of sperm DNA damage. With the recent advent of in-vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection, we are bypassing the normal natural selection barriers and potentially introducing sperm with damaged DNA. To date, these consequences are still largely unknown. Infertile men possess substantially more DNA-damaged sperm than fertile men, and this DNA damage may adversely affect reproductive outcomes. There may be a threshold level of DNA damage beyond which embryo development and subsequent pregnancy are impaired. Protamine deficiency and the effect of reactive oxygen species have been implicated in the etiology of sperm DNA damage. Assays of DNA damage are being used clinically to quantify objectively the degree of DNA damage in the sperm of infertile men in the hope of identifying more accurate ways of gauging fertility potential. There now exists clinical evidence to show that sperm DNA damage is detrimental to reproductive outcomes. Tests for DNA damage may provide better prognostic information and may allow for better decision-making than standard semen parameters when evaluating the infertile couple. The etiology of the DNA damage and the full extent of the damage on reproductive outcomes need further study.

Oxidative stress, DNA damage and the Y chromosome

Recent advances in understanding of male infertility have implicated two major causative factors, oxidative stress and Y chromosome deletions. A major cause of oxidative stress appears to be the high rate of reactive oxygen species generation associated with the retention of excess residual cytoplasm in the sperm midpiece. Other possible causes include the redox cycling of xenobiotics, and antioxidant depletion or apoptosis. Oxidative stress induces peroxidative damage in the sperm plasma membrane and DNA damage in both the mitochondrial and nuclear genomes. Nuclear DNA damage in the germ line of the father may be associated with pathology in the offspring, including childhood cancer and infertility. Gene deletions on the non-recombining region of the Y chromosome account for the infertility observed in about 15% of patients with azoospermia and 5-10% of subjects with severe oligozoospermia. The Y chromosome is particularly susceptible to gene deletions because of the inability of the haploid genome to deploy recombination repair in retrieving lost genetic information. Aberrant recombination, defective chromatin packaging, abortive apoptosis and oxidative stress may all be involved in the aetiology of DNA damage in the germ line. The factors responsible for Y chromosome deletions in spermatozoa remain unresolved but may be one facet of a central reproductive problem: controlling the amount of oxidative stress experienced by germ cells during their differentiation and maturation in the male reproductive tract.

Oxidative stress, DNA damage and the Y chromosome.

Recent advances in understanding of male infertility have implicated two major causative factors, oxidative stress and Y chromosome deletions. A major cause of oxidative stress appears to be the high rate of reactive oxygen species generation associated with the retention of excess residual cytoplasm in the sperm midpiece. Other possible causes include the redox cycling of xenobiotics, and antioxidant depletion or apoptosis. Oxidative stress induces peroxidative damage in the sperm plasma membrane and DNA damage in both the mitochondrial and nuclear genomes. Nuclear DNA damage in the germ line of the father may be associated with pathology in the offspring, including childhood cancer and infertility. Gene deletions on the non-recombining region of the Y chromosome account for the infertility observed in about 15% of patients with azoospermia and 5-10% of subjects with severe oligozoospermia. The Y chromosome is particularly susceptible to gene deletions because of the inability of the haploid genome to deploy recombination repair in retrieving lost genetic information. Aberrant recombination, defective chromatin packaging, abortive apoptosis and oxidative stress may all be involved in the aetiology of DNA damage in the germ line. The factors responsible for Y chromosome deletions in spermatozoa remain unresolved but may be one facet of a central reproductive problem: controlling the amount of oxidative stress experienced by germ cells during their differentiation and maturation in the male reproductive tract.