27 Field Trip Jessamyn R. Abel and Leo Coleman Violence and Hope: The Aesthetic Force of Infrastructures The essays of this Field Trip use new approaches to infrastructure, especially arguments about the political force of aesthetics and the relation between infrastructures and political violence, to consider the ways that the mapping, projection, and design of infrastructures shape the distribution of power and intervene in political processes. They emerge from a roundtable titled “Imaging Infrastructure,” which we organized for the Global Asias 5 conference held at Penn State in April 2019. Together, they suggest that the forces conveyed and exerted by infrastructures, as either concept or material reality, direct human action, form identities and expectations, and delimit political possibilities. However, these effects , our authors demonstrate, often extend far beyond the intended function of any particular construction. The three essays here address both intangible and concrete infrastructures . Corey Byrnes and Lisa Hofmann-Kuroda examine representations of potential infrastructures in order to understand the particular political force of maps, propaganda images, and architectural designs. In Byrnes’s study of China’s aspirational mapping of expanded maritime borders and ongoing island construction in the South China Sea, infrastructures that have been “made up” and then “made real” help bolster the Chinese government ’s case in international territorial disputes by lending its claims conceptual, then actual, solidity. In contrast, the imagined infrastructure in Hofmann-Kuroda’s study was never realized. In the case of Isamu Noguchi’s plans for a recreational space within a World War II Japanese American internment camp, the aesthetic and practical elements of the infrastructure envisioned in his blueprints aimed to change the meaning of the space for its involuntary inhabitants, literally watering down 28 Field Trip its militarized organization and softening the hard grid of its barracks. Finally, Mubbashir Rizvi examines the role that long-term colonial interventions , legal and physical, in the pattern of agricultural land holding and irrigation, can play in explaining the patterns of violence after the partition of India and Pakistan in 1947. His essay shows that categorizations of identity (and rights) and lines on a map give form to even the most sudden and devastating episodes of communal violence. Importantly, these essays collectively highlight the presence of military power and state violence within legal routines of classification or as a framework shaping efforts to imagine and build infrastructures for play and recreation. They thus question the commonsense idea that infrastructures are built to improve people’s lives. Byrnes draws attention to the damage done to ocean ecologies through construction over coral reefs to provide space for airfields and soccer fields alike. Hofmann-Kuroda notes that Noguchi’s playground was a small and ultimately unsuccessful effort to mitigate the negative effects of a different kind of infrastructure: the regimented barracks that symbolized and enacted the U.S. government ’s effort to control Japanese American bodies. And Rizvi suggests that both legal and infrastructural attempts to provide better lives and increased productivity for rural Punjabi farmers ended up contributing to a climate of violence that erupted with exceptional force during the period of partition in 1947. Political societies build infrastructures to facilitate the mundane activities of daily life: schools and government buildings allow residents of a newly built island to live as they would in any small city; a playground offers a space for relaxation and pleasure; canals help farmers increase their yield. But attention to the aesthetics and effects of infrastructure shows that, intentionally or not, and for better or worse, they often do much more. Jessamyn Abel is associate professor in the Asian Studies department at Pennsylvania State University. She is the author of The International Minimum : Creativity and Contradiction in Japan’s Global Engagement, 1933–64. Leo Coleman is associate professor of anthropology at Hunter College and the Graduate Center, City University of New York. He is the author of A Moral Technology: Electrification as Political Ritual in New Delhi and editor of Food: Ethnographic Encounters. ...