Ethics Consultation Service Research Articles

When Do Pediatricians Call the Ethics Consultation Service? Impact of Clinical Experience and Formal Ethics Training

Background: Previous research shows that pediatricians inconsistently utilize the ethics consultation service (ECS). Methods: Pediatricians in two suburban, Midwestern academic hospitals were asked to reflect on their ethics training and utilization of ECS via an anonymous, electronic survey distributed in 2017 and 2018, and analyzed in 2018. Participants reported their clinical experience, exposure to formal and informal ethics training, use of formal and informal ethics consultations, and potential barriers to formal consultation. Results: Less experienced pediatricians were more likely to utilize formal ethics consultation and more likely to have formal ethics training. The most commonly reported reasons not to pursue formal ECS consultation were inconvenience and self-reported expertise in pediatric ethics. Conclusions: These results inform ongoing discussions about ethics consultation among pediatricians and the role of formal ethics training in both undergraduate and graduate medical education.

Development and Retrospective Review of a Pediatric Ethics Consultation Service at a Large Academic Center.

The primary objective was to review pediatric ethics consultations (PECs) at a large academic health center over a nine year period, assessing demographics, ethical issues, and consultant intervention. The secondary objective was to describe the evolution of PECs at our institution. This was a retrospective review of Consultation Summary Sheets compiled for PECs at our Academic Health Center between January 2008 and April 2017. There were 165 PECs reviewed during the study period. Most consult requests came from the inpatient setting, with the Pediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care Units being the highest utilizers. Consultation utilization increased over the study period. The most common patient age was less than oneyear. Physicians were most likely to request consultation. Patient Best Interest, Withholding/Withdrawing of Life Sustaining Therapy, and Provider Moral Distress were ethical issues most commonly identified by the consultants. Making recommendations was the most common consultant intervention. The ethics consultation process evolved over time from informal provider discussions, to a hospital infant care review committee, to a pediatric only consultation service, to a combined adult/pediatric consultation service, with variable levels of salary support for consultants. Ethics consultation requests are growing at our institution. Similarities in identified ethical issues exist between our findings and existing literature, however meaningful comparisons remains elusive secondary to variability in approaches to investigation and reporting. A combined paid/volunteer/trainee ethics consultation service model appears sustainable and real time ethics consultation is feasible using this approach.

Clinical ethics consultation among Italian ethics committee: Amixed method study.

The general purpose for ethics consultations is to deliberate on issues on medical and scientific research and act towards the safeguard of the patient's rights and dignity. With the implementation of European Union (EU) Regulation 536/2014 on clinical trials and cost and time-optimization, the nature of consultations and the bodies they are carried out might be to some extent affected. Accordingly, we sought to gain an updated perspective on the current role and current practices of ethics consultations nationwide in both clinical and research settings. The study was carried forth by a three-step mixed-method approach: i) review of policies/regulations for ethics committee (EC) nationwide; ii) a structured survey on ethics consultation activity completed by each EC during 2016; iii) incorporated into the third part, a qualitative assessment with a selected sample of 8 key-informants for a semi-structured interview, discussing EC history, the ethics consultation function, and the professional experience of consultants. Review of the policies/regulations promoted by ECs showed that 72,6% (n = 69) of all the ECs (N = 95) being actually capable of providing ethics consultation service by policy. 71 ECs (74.7%) responded to the survey on ethics consultation requests; among them, 48 (67.6%) provided ethics consultations of which 23 (23/48) actually received requests for this service in the year 2016. Many ECs did not have a structured database in place to provide precise figures of requests received in the last year nor of their contents. To date, ethics consultation in clinical and research practice is largely underappreciated and not well understood by users. The consultants themselves lack a comprehensive vision of work carried out in their field, and bioethics training programs to keep them updated. Despite clinical ethics consultation services should not necessarily be mandatory, following the recent EU Regulation on clinical trials, institutional ethics consultation bodies should be re-evaluated.

La consulenza bioetica al letto del malato: l’esperienza del Servizio di Etica clinica presso la Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “Agostino Gemelli” IRCCS – Roma

L’articolo espone l’esperienza del Servizio di Consulenza di Etica Clinica (Servizio CEC) dell’Istituto di Bioetica e Medical Humanities dell’Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore per la Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “Agostino Gemelli” IRCCS (FPG) di Roma, dal 1992 ad oggi. Dopo una introduzione generale sul significato e gli scopi della consulenza di etica clinica, l’articolo prende in esame la casistica del Servizio. A tal fine è stata realizzata un’indagine retrospettiva di tutte le consulenze di etica clinica (CEC) richieste ed eseguite dal Servizio CEC dalla sua istituzione ad agosto 2019. È stato analizzato l’andamento del Servizio e confrontato il numero di CEC eseguite nei primi 20 anni, quando il Servizio utilizzava una modalità prevalentemente cartacea, con il numero di CEC eseguite da quando il Servizio è stato inserito sul Sistema Informativo interno del Policlinico il 1 gennaio 2016 dove le CEC sono tracciate elettronicamente. In particolare, sono stati individuati e fatti oggetto di discussione critica i dati relativi a: numero delle richieste di CEC, numero delle CEC elaborate, aree cliniche che hanno richiesto le CEC, forme assunte dalla consulenza (consulenza classica o documento condiviso di orientamento etico-assistenziale), quesiti etici – e non solo etici – maggiormente emersi.

Challenges and Opportunities in Clinical Ethics with the Implementation of Korea’s End-of-Life Act

This paper examines the possible impacts of the Act on Decisions on Life-Sustaining Treatment for Patients in Hospice and Palliative Care or at the End of Life in Korea (Korea’s end-of-life act), legislated in 2016, on the development of hospital ethics committees and clinical ethics consultation services in South Korea. Clinical ethics in Korea has not made much progress in comparison to other subdisciplines of biomedical ethics. While the enactment of this law may give rise to beneficial clinical ethics services, it is possible that customary practices and traditional authorities in Korean society will come into conflict with the norms of clinical ethics. This paper examines how the three main agents of Korean society—family, government, and medical professionals—may clash with end-of-life stage norms in clinical ethics, thus posing obstacles to the development of hospital committees and consultation services. A brief outline of what lies ahead for the progress of clinical ethics practice is explored.

Clinical Ethics Needs Assessment: Adapting Clinical Ethics to a Population Health Program.

The clinical encounter between providers and patients is insufficient: most factors influencing health outcomes occur outside the clinic. Community Health Needs Assessments address this insufficiency via collaboration between hospitals and the communities they serve to address systemic sociological-economic variables impacting health outcomes. Considering this, why are Health Care Ethics Consultation (HCEC) services limited to the clinical setting? We can cultivate better ethics outcomes by addressing systemic sociological-economic factors that cause recurring ethics issues in the hospital. In this article, I argue for the need for a Community Ethics Needs Assessment (CENA). CENA is a novel concept; thus, this article is exploratory. I argue for the necessity of a CENA and, more importantly, outline what methodology a CENA would use to both identify and address an ethics need.

Introducing clinical ethics consultation service in Malaysia: A SWOT analysis

Clinical ethics consultation service remains undeveloped in developing countries. It is recognised that its introduction poses challenges. Malaysia, a multicultural society with diverse religions, values and perceptions further complicate the introduction of formal clinical ethics consultation service. Clinicians attending a national congress workshop completed a Strengths–Weaknesses–Opportunities–Threats analysis. The aim was to gain insight into clinician’s expectations and promote initiatives leading to the introduction of clinical ethics consultation service. Clinicians agree that clinical ethics consultation service can improve quality of care, reduce healthcare costs and advocate for patients and providers. The analysis highlighted constraints in sufficient critical mass of relevant expertise and restricted opportunities for training. The opportunities lie in education, curriculum development and availability of dedicated proponents. Cultural barriers, limited resources, lack of awareness, differences in opinions, fear of litigation and destructive influence of social media are seen as threats to the introduction of clinical ethics consultation service. This study illustrates the value of involving stakeholders when introducing clinical ethics consultation service formally. The issues identified will inform the strategic directions for the delivery of clinical ethics consultation service at a national level.

Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: Ethical considerations

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) continues to be a leading cause of mortality worldwide. In Canada over 40,000 cardiac arrests that occur each year, a majority occur unexpectedly outside of the hospital setting. However, the reality is that without rapid and appropriate treatment within minutes, most victims will die before reaching the hospital. In the late 1980s case reports identifying favorable outcomes with the use of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (eCPR) in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) began to be reported. Since then case reports, observational studies, propensity analysis, and a systematic review of international practices continues to suggest eCPR as a feasible intervention for refractory ventricular fibrillation (VF) and pulseless ventricular tachycardia (VT) in select adult patients. However, in spite of this mounting base of evidence, clinicians continue to report concerns over a paucity of robust data showing definitive eCPR effectiveness compared with conventional resuscitation. This review will explore the ethical issues related to the impact eCPR might have on the orthodoxy pertaining to current resuscitation strategies, the impact of shifting decision-making on families particularly in dealing with a "bridge to nowhere" scenario, a call to accounting for greater data integrity and improved outcome reporting to assess eCPR effectiveness, and addressing the "Should we just do it" question. A recommendation is proposed for the creation of an ethics consultation service to assist families and staff in dealing with the invariable value conflicts and stresses likely to arise.

Technical Considerations for Implementation of Tele-Ethics Consultation in the Intensive Care Unit

Robust ethics consultation services cannot be sustained by all hospitals; consultative service from a high-volume center via teleconferencing is an attractive alternative. This pilot study was conceived to explore the feasibility and understand the practical implications of offering such a service. High-definition videoconferencing was used to provide real-time interaction between the rounding clinicians and a remote clinical ethicist. Data collection included: (1) evaluation of the hardware and software required for teleconferencing, and (2) comparison of ethics trigger counts between the remote and on-site ethicist during rounds. Issues with audio represented the majority of technical problems. Once technical difficulties were addressed, the on-site ethicist's count of "triggers" was not statistically different from the count of the remote ethicist. Remote clinical ethics rounding is feasible when the equipment is optimized. Remote ethicists can identify similar numbers of "triggers" for possible ethical issues when compared to on-site ethicist numbers.

Characteristics and Outcomes of Ethics Consultations on a Comprehensive Cancer Center's Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology Service.

The goal of this paper is to review and describe the characteristics and outcomes of ethics consultations on a gastrointestinal oncology service and to identify areas for systems improvement and staff education. This is a retrospective case series derived from a prospectively-maintained database (which includes categorization of the primary issues, contextual ethical issues, and other case characteristics) of the ethics consultation service at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. The study analyzed all ethics consultations requested for patients on the gastrointestinal medical oncology service from September 2007 to January 2016. A total of 64 patients were identified. The most common primary ethical issue was the DNR order (39%), followed by medical futility (28%). The most common contextual issues were dispute/conflict between staff and family (48%), dispute/conflict intra-family (16%), and cultural/ethnic/religious issues (16%). The majority of ethical issues leading to consultation were resolved (84%); i.e., the patient, surrogate, and/or healthcare team followed the recommendation of the ethics consultant. 22% had a DNR order prior to the ethics consult and 69% had a DNR order after the consult. In this population of patients on a gastrointestinal oncology service, ethics consultations are most often called regarding patients with advanced cancers and the most common ethical conflicts arose between families and the health care team over goals of care at the end of life, specifically related to the DNR order and perceived futility of continued/escalation of treatment. Ethics consultations assisted with conflict resolution. Conflicts might be reduced with improved communication about prognosis and earlier end of life care planning.

Relational autonomy in action: Rethinking dementia and sexuality in care facilities.

Caregivers and administrators in long-term facilities have fragile moral work in caring for residents with dementia. Residents are susceptible to barriers and vulnerabilities associated with the most intimate aspects of their lives, including how they express themselves sexually. The conditions for sexual agency are directly affected by caregivers' perceptions and attitudes, as well as facility policies. This article aims to clarify how to approach capacity determinations as it relates to sexual activity, propose how to theorize about patient autonomy in this context, and suggest some considerations for finding an ethically responsible and practically feasible way to respect the sexual rights of this population. The focus is on residents with early to moderate dementia in states of daily dependency on professional caregivers. The article critically examines existing empirical research on sexuality among persons with dementia, caregivers' attitudes, and institutional roadblocks to enabling residents' sexuality. A relational lens and insights from disability studies are used in the philosophical analysis. No research participants were part of this analysis. This article offers a conceptual analysis and normative framework only. The analysis highlights the delicate balance that capacity assessments for sexual activity have to strike; while caregivers should protect those who cannot give adequate consent, the denial of sexuality among residents can cause deep, long-ranging harms. Sexual agency features into an ongoing sense of self for many individuals with dementia, and the imposition of inappropriate standards and expectations for sexual autonomy can lead to unwarranted obstacles to sexual activity. Recommendations include developing clear and inclusive institutional policies and practices of care, providing education for caregivers on how to discuss and document residents' sexual preferences over time, and taking advantage of ethics consultation services. This analysis establishes the need for more research and discussion on this sensitive topic. Future research should investigate the specific responsibilities of caregivers in furthering the sexual interests of residents, how exactly to modify existing capacity instruments, and how best to support historically marginalized patients in their sexual identities.

Were the “Pioneer” Clinical Ethics Consultants “Outsiders”? For Them, Was “Critical Distance” That Critical?

“Clinical ethics consultants” have been practicing in the United States for about 50 years. Most of the earliest consultants—the “pioneers”—were “outsiders” when they first appeared at patients' bedsides and in the clinic. However, if they were outsiders initially, they acclimated to the clinical setting and became “insiders” very quickly. Moreover, there was some tension between traditional academics and those doing applied ethics about whether there was sufficient “critical distance” for appropriate reflection about the complex medical ethics dilemmas of the day if one were involved in the decision making. Again, the pioneers deflected concerns by identifying and instituting safeguards to assure professional objectivity in clinical ethics consultation services. One might suggest that in moving inside and establishing normative practices, the pioneer clinical ethics consultants anticipated adoption of their routines and professionalization of the field.

Outcomes of Ethics Consultations in Adult ICUs: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Clinical ethics consultation as a mechanism for supporting patients, family, and staff during ethically challenging situations has become standard of care. Despite this, there is a lack of consensus about the effectiveness of clinical ethics consultation consultation in the ICU. We performed a systematic review of outcomes associated with clinical ethics consultation within adult ICUs. We searched MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, Embase, PsycINFO, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature from 1984 to May 2017. Two reviewers independently screened articles, assessed eligibility, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias tool and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Pooled estimates of effect were calculated where possible. We screened 3,970 abstracts and reviewed 325 full-text articles of which 16 met all eligibility criteria. We examined changes in processes and outcomes as a result of clinical ethics consultation in the ICU. Categories of outcomes included user perception, clinical decision, or conflict resolution and resource utilization. The use of clinical ethics consultation in the ICU was associated with positive user experience (383/435 found clinical ethics consultation helpful), although stress and disagreement with clinical ethics consultation recommendations was greater in a subset (113/431 surrogates and providers). Consensus for a clinical decision was more frequently achieved with clinical ethics consultation (odds ratio, 4.09; 95% CI, 1.01-16.55; p = 0.05). Clinical ethics consultation was associated with lower resource utilization including significantly decreased ICU length of stay (mean difference, -4.65 d; 95% CI, -8.86 to -0.44; p = 0.03). Our review identified outcome-based assessment as the predominant measure used to report effectiveness of clinical ethics consultation consultations. In particular, clinical ethics consultation decreased ICU length of stay and increased family and healthcare provider satisfaction. However, using outcome measures as the primary endpoint may not reflect the original intent of the clinical ethics consultation service. Based on our review, we propose a list of process measures that may better capture the key domains of a quality clinical ethics consultation.

Certification ISO 9001 in clinical ethics consultation for improving quality and safety in healthcare.

This paper refers to the quality management process of the Laboratory of Clinical Bioethics (LCB) of the University of Padua (Italy), which has obtained the quality certification to ISO 9001:2008, as a Clinical Ethics Support Service. Its activities consist mainly in clinical ethics consultations and training services, addressed to those who are called to decisions with ethical implications in the clinical setting, proposing a structured approach to identify and analyze the ethical issues that may loom in the relationships between health professionals and patients, and participating in their solution. The expected benefits of the application of ISO 9001 were mainly the following: to formalize the procedure adopted for clinical ethics consultation and training, to obtain a controlled management of documents, information and data, to ensure and demonstrate the quality of the provided activities and to make methods and organization publicly available. The main results which have been achieved with the 'quality management project' are summarized as follows: the enunciation of LCB Mission and Quality Policy; the drafting of the procedure by which clinical ethics consultation is provided; the formalization of members' skills and the adoption of relevant process and outcome indicators. Our experience may be useful in promoting accountability for the quality of ethics consultation services. We consider the certification process as a tool for transparent and reliable management of one of the most critical tasks in the current context of healthcare, motivating similar facilities to undertake similar pathways, with the aim to provide quality control on their activities.

Evaluating the Inpatient Pediatric Ethical Consultation Service.

Pediatric ethical consultation services (ECSs) have been proliferating at medical centers, with little data available on evaluating their implementation. The objective of this study was to evaluate the pediatric ECS and understand the ethical issues occurring within a single quaternary-level pediatric hospital. A retrospective chart review of documented ethics consultations at a large pediatric hospital from November 2010 to November 2013 was performed and data was abstracted per the US Department of Veterans Affairs' Domains of Ethics in Health Care. An anonymous, prospective survey regarding ethical issues encountered was distributed electronically to ∼3500 inpatient staff from November 2013 through January 2014. Ethical domains, demographics, feelings of distress by staff, and location of occurrence data were collected. These data were compared with formally documented ethics consults from the retrospective chart review and ECS activity during the same period. A total of 47 ethics consults were documented between 2010 and 2013, primarily in the domains of end-of-life care (19; 40%) and shared decision-making (17; 36%). Sixty-three staff members (92% female; 42% nurses; 20% attending physicians) logged an encountered ethical issue between November 2013 and January 2014, corresponding to only 5 documented ethics consults in the same time period. Domains included end-of-life care (18; 28.5%), shared decision-making (13; 20.6%), everyday workplace (11; 17.4%), professionalism (8; 12.6%), and resource allocation (7; 11%). Eighty-one percent of subjects reported personal or professional distress. On the basis of this single-center study in which we reviewed formal documentation, we determined that formal pediatric ECSs are underused, particularly for ethical domains that cause staff members moral distress.

Need for ethics support in clinical practice and suggestion for an Ethics Consultation Service: views of Nurses and Physicians working in Italian Healthcare Institutions.

Ethics Consultation Services (ECS) and Ethical Committees manage several aspects of clinical ethical issues. In Italy there are only Ethical Committees, and, although they should also perform ethical consultations, their activity is limited to approving clinical trial protocols. To analyse the opinions of a sample of Nurses and Physicians about their motivations to ask for an ethical consultation. A cross-sectional study was conducted on a sample of Italian Nurses and Physicians. Respondents would request ethical consultations mainly for end-of-life issues and, secondarily, for conflicts with patients' families. Respondents identified the provision of suggestions for hospital policy, the development of ethical guidelines, and the counselling for individual cases requested by clinicians, patients or families as the most important functions of ECS. ECS activities should focus on counselling and support to decisions in complex ethical situations according to institutional policies and guidelines self-developed.

A RETROSPECTIVE REVIEW OF CLINICAL ETHICS CONSULTATIONS REQUESTED BY NURSES FOR ONCOLOGY PATIENTS

<div>Background: With growing importance of clinical ethics in daily nursing practice, and the increasing occurrence and utilization of ethics consultation nationwide, awareness about the motives behind consults is vital to enhancing patient care.</div><div>Aim: to determine the predominant requests for ethics consultation from nurses in a cancer setting. </div><div>Design: This is a retrospective data review of the ethics consultations recorded in the clinical ethics consultation database. The data reviewed consist of the ethics consults requested by nurses from records in the database of consultations conducted from January 1, 2008 through July 31, 2013. </div><div>Findings: The predominant reason for requesting an ethics consult was the level of appropriate care with a total of 27 consults (28%). Within this topic, there were ten consults about the shift from curative care to palliative care, 13 about code status, 2 about general appropriate level of care and 2 regarding hospice.</div><div>Discussion: The data show that the nurses at this hospital had similar concerns as other nurses in the literature in that there were several requests for concerns regarding code status, informed consent, and appropriate treatment, including the decision to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining therapies.</div><div>Conclusion: Improving access to ethics consultation services access and the ethics education for nursing staff are necessary steps to improve confidence among them to engage more often with clinical ethics consultation. </div><div> </div>

The Emergence of Clinical Research Ethics Consultation: Insights From a National Collaborative

The increasing complexity of human subjects research and its oversight has prompted researchers, as well as institutional review boards (IRBs), to have a forum in which to discuss challenging or novel ethical issues not fully addressed by regulations. Research ethics consultation (REC) services provide such a forum. In this article, we rely on the experiences of a national Research Ethics Consultation Collaborative that collected more than 350 research ethics consultations in a repository and published 18 challenging cases with accompanying ethical commentaries to highlight four contexts in which REC can be a valuable resource. REC assists: 1) investigators before and after the regulatory review; 2) investigators, IRBs, and other research administrators facing challenging and novel ethical issues; 3) IRBs and investigators with the increasing challenges of informed consent and risk/benefit analysis; and 4) in providing flexible and collaborative assistance to overcome study hurdles, mediate conflicts within a team, or directly engage with research participants. Institutions that have established, or plan to establish, REC services should work to raise the visibility of their service and engage in open communication with existing clinical ethics consult services as well as the IRB. While the IRB system remains the foundation for the ethical review of research, REC can be a valuable service for investigators, regulators, and research participants aligned with the goal of supporting ethical research.

Examining Quality and Value in Ethics Consultation Services

Examining Quality and Value in Ethics Consultation Services

A Practical Guide to Developing and Sustaining a Clinical Ethics Consultation Service

A Practical Guide to Developing and Sustaining a Clinical Ethics Consultation Service