Estrogen Receptor-positive Metastatic Breast Cancer Research Articles

Abstract PS17-07: Interim analysis of giredestrant + inavolisib in MORPHEUS Breast Cancer: a Phase Ib/II study of giredestrant treatment combinations in estrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative, locally advanced/metastatic breast cancer

Abstract BACKGROUND Patients with estrogen receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer (ER+ mBC) almost always progress on first-line endocrine therapy (ET), which is usually combined with a cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i). Finding effective ET combinations after progression following CDK4/6is remains a challenge. Giredestrant (GIR) is a highly potent, nonsteroidal, oral, selective ER antagonist and degrader. Inavolisib (INAVO) is a highly potent PI3Kα-selective inhibitor that promotes degradation of mutated p110α. After first-line treatment (tx) with a CDK4/6i, PIK3CA mutations (mut), which are common, persist and remain a sensitive oncogenic target in these patients. We present a 16-week interim analysis of GIR vs GIR + INAVO in MORPHEUS BC (NCT04802759). METHODS Patients whose tumors harbored a PIK3CAmut and who had disease progression on up to two lines of endocrine-based therapy (including at least one prior line of CDK4/6i) for locally advanced (LA)/mBC were randomized 1:6 to receive GIR (30 mg orally daily [PO QD]) or GIR + INAVO (9 mg PO QD) tx until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Given the small numbers, the GIR arm is presented for overall safety. Primary endpoints are safety and objective response rate (ORR). Other endpoints include progression-free survival (PFS), disease control rate (DCR), and pharmacokinetics. Genetic alterations were identified centrally in baseline circulating tumor DNA using the FoundationOne Liquid CDx assay. In cases where PIK3CAmut could not be determined centrally, local blood or tissue results are used. RESULTS As of April 18, 2023, seven and 15 patients were enrolled in the GIR and GIR + INAVO arms, respectively; 71% (n = 5) and 67% (n = 10) received one prior line of therapy in the LA/mBC setting; 14% (n = 1) and 33% (n = 5) received two prior lines; and one GIR-arm patient received four prior lines. Prior fulvestrant (FUL) was received by 53% of patients in the GIR + INAVO arm (n = 8). For GIR + INAVO, the ORR was 47% (n = 7); the complete response rate was 7% (n = 1); and the partial response (PR) rate was 40% (n = 6). The DCR at 12 weeks was 80% (12/15 patients). The median PFS was 10.3 months (95% confidence interval = 6.5, not evaluable) with 47% of patients (n = 7) having events. In the GIR + INAVO arm, 5/6 patients with an ESR1mut had a PR (83%) and one (17%) had stable disease. No clinically relevant drug–drug interaction was observed. Safety data are presented in the table. Two patients experienced grade 3 hyperglycemia, one of whom had baseline elevated HbA1c and has been on insulin therapy since the event. The other patient received a single day of insulin treatment. In the GIR + INAVO arm, the incidence of rash and stomatitis (all grade 1) was 13% each. CONCLUSIONS An encouraging efficacy signal was observed with GIR + INAVO when compared cross-trial with BYLieve arm A (PMID: 33794206). ORRs were 47% in MORPHEUS BC vs 21% in BYLieve for patients with measurable disease (although no prior FUL was allowed in BYLieve). Safety of GIR + INAVO was aligned to the individual safety profiles of each of the drugs, with no new safety signals identified and a favorable tolerability profile for a PI3Kα inhibitor-based combination. Table. Safety summary Data are % of patients. AE, adverse event; GIR, giredestrant; INAVO, inavolisib; TRAE, treatment-related adverse event; tx, treatment. Citation Format: Hope Rugo, Maria Gion, Cristina Hernando, Kyung Hae Jung, Mafalda Oliveira, Melinda Telli, Gregory Vidal, Sina Vatandoust, Jing Zhu, Richard Schwab, Huy Ngo, Erika Ferreira, Ann Collier, Vanessa Breton, Einav Gal-Yam. Interim analysis of giredestrant + inavolisib in MORPHEUS Breast Cancer: a Phase Ib/II study of giredestrant treatment combinations in estrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative, locally advanced/metastatic breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PS17-07.

Abstract PO5-04-13: Liquid Biopsy Testing in a Greek Cohort of ER-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer patients

Abstract AIM Endocrine therapy (ET) represents the first line treatment for patients with ER+, HER2- breast cancer, however disease progression is observed in many cases. PIK3CA and ESR1 are the most encountered mutated genes that have been associated with targeted molecular treatment, as well as with resistance to Endocrine Therapy. Liquid biopsy is a non-invasive procedure, that can provide “real-time” monitoring of disease progression and response to treatment. The aim of this study is to determine the mutation rate of ESR1 and PIK3CA genes in a selected cohort of 200 Greek breast cancer patients, using liquid biopsies and NGS technology. PATIENTS AND METHODS Liquid biopsies were collected from 200 ER-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer patients who have received at least one previous line of endocrine treatment. cfDNA was extracted using the QIAamp Circulating Nucleic Acid Kit (Qiagen). Library preparation was performed using Oncomine™ Breast cfDNA Research Assay (Thermofisher Scientific) and sequencing was carried out using Ion GeneStudio™ S5 System (Thermofisher Scientific). Ion Torrent Oncomine Knowledgebase Reporter was used in sequence analysis and interpretation of Copy number variations, SNPs, and indels. RESULTS Preliminary data of the first 49 examined samples demonstrated the prevalence of ESR1 and PIK3CA mutations in 20.4% (10/49) and 38.7% (19/49) of the cases respectively. The most frequently mutated codon in the ESR1 gene is the Y537, while in the PIK3CA gene, the H1047 codon is mainly altered. ESR1 and PIK3CA genes were co-mutated in 10.2% of the cases. Mutations in KRAS (6.1%) and TP53 (24%) were also detected. CONCLUSION More than 20% of the ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer patients with metastatic disease are eligible for targeted treatment with elacestrant. In addition, the high prevalence of mutations detected in our cohort indicates that liquid biopsy NGS panel testing can be used to monitor treatment response, track the development of resistance, and identify emerging genetic alterations that may guide treatment adjustments or the selection of alternative targeted therapies in breast cancer patients. REFERENCES Demir Cetinkaya B, Biray Avci C. Molecular perspective on targeted therapy in breast cancer: a review of current status. Med Oncol. 2022 Jul 14;39(10):149. doi: 10.1007/s12032-022-01749-1. PMID: 35834030; PMCID: PMC9281252. Liao H, Huang W, Pei W, Li H. Detection of ESR1 Mutations Based on Liquid Biopsy in Estrogen Receptor-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer: Clinical Impacts and Prospects. Front Oncol. 2020 Dec 15;10:587671. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.587671. PMID: 33384956; PMCID: PMC7770162. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/resources-information-approved-drugs/fda-approves-elacestrant-er-positive-her2-negative-esr1-mutated-advanced-or-metastatic-breast-cancer Citation Format: Nikolaos Tsoulos, Angeliki Meintani, Georgios Kapetsis, Chrysiis Chatzigiannidou-Florou, Aikaterini Tsantikidi, Stella Maxouri, Eleni Thanou, Kalliopi Aggelaina, Vasiliki Metaxa-Mariatou, Georgios Tsaousis, Ioannis Natsiopoulos, Vasileios Venizelos, Christos Markopoulos, Flora Zagouri, Eleftherios Kampletsas, Eirini Karyda, Dimitrios Tryfonopoulos, Konstantinos Papazisis, Dimitrios Ziogas, Ilias Athanasiadis, Eirini Papadopoulou, Georgios Nasioulas. Liquid Biopsy Testing in a Greek Cohort of ER-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO5-04-13.

Abstract PS15-06: Results of the window-of-opportunity PIONEER trial evaluating addition of the progesterone receptor (PR) agonist megestrol to letrozole for early stage estrogen receptor (ER) positive breast cancer: exploiting ER-PR interaction

Abstract Background: Pre-clinical data suggest that combining anti-estrogen treatment with a progesterone receptor agonist leads to greater inhibition of tumor proliferation, due to molecular interactions between ER and PR [1]. A high dose of the PR agonist megestrol (160mg daily) is approved as monotherapy for the treatment of ER positive metastatic breast cancer. A lower dose of megestrol (20-40mg daily) can be an effective treatment for severe hot flashes associated with endocrine therapy [2] but whether this dose has anti-tumor activity is unknown. The PIONEER trial evaluated the potential anti-proliferative effect of low and high dose megestrol in combination with letrozole, relative to letrozole alone, using a short-term preoperative ‘window’ trial design assessing the direct effects of the trial treatment on tumor tissue before and after treatment. Methods: Eligible patients were post-menopausal women with histologically confirmed ER+ (Allred ≥ 3) HER2 negative breast cancer at least 10mm in size, with an ECOG performance status ≤ 2, planned for primary surgery or endocrine therapy. Enrolled patients were randomised 2:3:3 to Arm A: letrozole alone, Arm B: letrozole + lower-dose megestrol (40mg) or Arm C: letrozole + higher-dose megestrol (160mg). Treatment was given for 15 (13-19) days prior to surgery or end of treatment (EOT) core biopsy. The primary endpoint was change in tumor proliferation between baseline and EOT in Arm A vs (Arms B+C combined), measured by Ki67 immunohistochemistry (IHC). Secondary endpoints were comparison of Ki67 change in high versus low dose megestrol arms, absolute Ki67 at EOT, and change in tumor apoptosis (cleaved caspase 3 IHC), proliferation (Aurora Kinase A IHC), PR and androgen receptor expression. Exploratory analysis of ER chromatin binding (ChIP-Seq) was conducted on paired fresh-frozen samples from a subset of patients. Results: A total of 243 patients were randomised from July 2017 to October 2022 with recruitment paused for 3 months at onset of the COVID pandemic. 198 patients completed treatment and had evaluable tissue samples at baseline and EOT (Arm A: n = 51, Arm B: n = 74, Arm C: n = 73). Baseline mean Ki67 values were well balanced. Therapy was well tolerated and adverse events ≥ grade 3 were similarly rare across arms (A: 3.3%, B+C: 3.5%). The mean % reduction in Ki67 for each arm was: Arm A (letrozole): 71%, Arm B (letrozole + 40mg megestrol): 79%, Arm C (letrozole + 160mg megestrol): 80%. There was a statistically significantly greater reduction in Ki67 with megestrol combinations (B+C) versus letrozole alone (A) (P = 0.013). Analyses of secondary IHC endpoints and ER ChIP-Seq are ongoing and will be presented. Conclusion: Addition of the PR agonist megestrol enhanced the anti-proliferative effect of letrozole in this window-of opportunity trial. Megestrol combinations were well tolerated, and the anti-proliferative effect was observed in both low and high dose arms. These data support the potential use of low-dose megestrol as an inexpensive and well-tolerated means of improving aromatase inhibitor efficacy. Low dose megestrol can also ameliorate hot flashes and therefore might be a strategy to improve both treatment adherence and clinical outcomes for patients taking adjuvant endocrine therapy.

Abstract PO1-18-12: Trial in progress: Open-label, randomized, multicenter, phase 3, ELAINE 3 study of the efficacy and safety of lasofoxifene plus abemaciclib for treating locally advanced or ER+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer with an ESR1 mutation

Abstract Background: Patients with estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) metastatic breast cancer (BC) may develop resistance to endocrine therapy (ET), particularly following treatment with a cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i), potentially driven by a mutation in the ERa-coding gene, ESR1. Lasofoxifene, an oral, next-generation ET and ER breast antagonist, had potent activity in mBC xenograft models expressing ESR1 mutations, either as a single agent or combined with a CDK4/6i. Subsequently, two phase 2 studies evaluated lasofoxifene in women with ER+/HER2- metastatic BC and an ESR1 mutation who had disease progression on previous ET and CDK4/6i. The ELAINE 1 trial showed numerically greater progression-free survival (PFS, median ~6 vs 4 months; P=0.138), objective response rate (ORR, 13% vs 3%; P=0.124), and clinical benefit rate (CBR, 37% vs 22%; P=0.117) with lasofoxifene monotherapy versus the ER degrader fulvestrant, with a favorable safety profile (Goetz MP, et al. Ann Oncol. 2022;33:S1387). The single-arm, ELAINE 2 trial demonstrated that lasofoxifene combined with abemaciclib was well tolerated with a median PFS of ~13 months, ORR of 56%, and CBR of 66% (Damodaran S, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2023;41:suppl 16; abstr 1057). Based on these data, the phase 3, registrational, ELAINE 3 trial was initiated. Methods: ELAINE 3 (NCT05696626) is an open-label, phase 3, multicenter study evaluating the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of lasofoxifene plus abemaciclib versus fulvestrant plus abemaciclib. Key inclusion criteria are pre- and postmenopausal women and men aged ≥18 years; ER+/HER2-, locally advanced and/or metastatic BC (measurable and/or non-measurable disease); ≥1 acquired ESR1 mutation; progression on an aromatase inhibitor plus palbociclib or ribociclib as their first hormonal treatment for advanced/metastatic BC; and ≤1 line of chemotherapy in the advanced/metastatic setting. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive lasofoxifene 5 mg/day plus abemaciclib 150 mg BID, or fulvestrant 500 mg IM on days 1, 15, and 29, then 4 weekly plus abemaciclib 150 mg BID. Treatment will continue until progression, death, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal from the study. The primary endpoint is PFS; key secondary endpoints are ORR, overall survival, CBR, duration of response, and time to response. Time to cytotoxic chemotherapy, quality of life, and safety will also be evaluated. Blood samples for circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) will be collected at screening, at weeks 4 and 8 and every 8 weeks thereafter, and at the final visit for genomic analyses. Outcomes with lasofoxifene/abemaciclib and fulvestrant/abemaciclib will be compared using a stratified Cox proportional hazards model and stratified logrank test. Expected PFS is ≥10.3 months for lasofoxifene/abemaciclib and 7 months for fulvestrant/abemaciclib (PFS hazard ratio of 0.68 at final analysis). The target sample size is 400, to achieve 90% power with a one-sided type I error rate of 0.025 after 285 PFS events. Full recruitment is expected to occur over 18 months at 125 global sites. Citation Format: Matthew Goetz, Seth Wander, Thomas Bachelot, Gerald Batist, Javier Cortés, Massimo Cristofanilli, Giuseppe Curigliano, Alexandre de Nonneville, Einav Nili-Gal Yam, Komal Jhaveri, Cynthia Ma, Heather Parsons, Hope Rugo, Sarah Sammons, Daniel Stover, Chris Twelves, Aditya Bardia, Paul V. Plourde, David J Portman, Senthil Damodaran. Trial in progress: Open-label, randomized, multicenter, phase 3, ELAINE 3 study of the efficacy and safety of lasofoxifene plus abemaciclib for treating locally advanced or ER+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer with an ESR1 mutation [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO1-18-12.

CDK4/6 Inhibitor Efficacy in ESR1-Mutant Metastatic Breast Cancer

BackgroundIn estrogen receptor–positive metastatic breast cancer, ESR1 mutations (ESR1m) are a common mechanism of acquired resistance to aromatase inhibitors (ArIh). However, the impact ESR1 alterations have on CDK4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) sensitivity has not been established. Analyses of CDK4/6i trials suggest that the endocrine therapy partner and specific ESR1 allele may affect susceptibility. We analyzed a real-world data set to investigate CDK4/6i efficacy in ESR1m metastatic breast cancer and associated clinical factors.MethodsESR1m were identified by analysis of circulating-tumor deoxyribonucleic acid. The GuardantINFORM database contains genomic information from tumors linked with claims data. Patients who started a CDK4/6i within 30 days of sequencing were categorized as having ESR1m or non-ESR1–mutant (non-ESR1m) breast cancer. Data were analyzed to determine the real-world time-to-next-treatment, defined as the start of a breast cancer treatment to initiation of the subsequent treatment.ResultsOne hundred forty-five patients with ESR1m and 612 with non-ESR1m metastatic breast cancer were analyzed. ESR1m and non-ESR1m tumors had similar real-world time-to-next-treatment on CDK4/6i regimens (hazard ratio, 1.02; 95% confidence interval, 0.82 to 1.23). Duration on therapy in the first-line and second-line plus treatment settings were comparable regardless of ESR1 status. We stratified treatment duration by concurrent endocrine therapy, and patients with ESR1m had worse outcomes on ArIh but comparable real-world time-to-next-treatment on fulvestrant.ConclusionsThese data suggest ESR1 variants are not associated with pan-CDK4/6i resistance and are consistent with the hypothesis that CDK4/6 blockade combined with a selective estrogen receptor degrader is potentially an effective option for ESR1m metastatic breast cancer.

Estrogen Receptor Mutations as Novel Targets for Immunotherapy in Metastatic Estrogen Receptor-positive Breast Cancer.

Estrogen receptor (ESR1) mutations have emerged as a key factor in endocrine therapy resistance. We identified and validated five novel, immunogenic ESR1-derived peptides that could be targeted through vaccine-based immunotherapy.

Open-label, phase II, multicenter study of lasofoxifene plus abemaciclib for treating women with metastatic ER+/HER2− breast cancer and an ESR1 mutation after disease progression on prior therapies: ELAINE 2

Acquired ESR1 mutations in estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) metastatic breast cancer (mBC) drive treatment resistance and tumor progression; new treatment strategies are needed. Lasofoxifene, a next-generation, oral, endocrine therapy and tissue-specific ER antagonist, provided preclinical antitumor activity, alone or combined with a cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) in ESR1-mutated mBC. In the open-label, phase II, ELAINE 2 trial (NCT04432454), women with ESR1-mutated, ER+/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) mBC who progressed on prior therapies (including CDK4/6i) received lasofoxifene 5 mg/day and abemaciclib 150 mg b.i.d until disease progression/toxicity. The primary endpoint was safety/tolerability. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), clinical benefit rate (CBR), and objective response rate (ORR). Twenty-nine women (median age 60 years) participated; all but one were previously treated with a CDK4/6i (median duration 2 years). The lasofoxifene-abemaciclib combination was well tolerated with primarily grade 1/2 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), most commonly diarrhea, nausea, fatigue, and vomiting. One patient (with no prior CDK4/6i) discontinued treatment due to grade 2 diarrhea. No deaths occurred during the study. Median PFS was 56.0 weeks [95% confidence interval (CI) 31.9 weeks-not estimable; ∼13 months]; PFS rates at 6, 12, and 18 months were 76.1%, 56.1%, and 38.8%, respectively. CBR at 24 weeks was 65.5% (95% CI 47.3% to 80.1%). In 18 patients with measurable lesions, ORR was 55.6% (95% CI 33.7% to 75.4%). ESR1-mutant circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) allele fraction decreased from baseline to week 4 in 21/26 (80.8%) patients. Lasofoxifene plus abemaciclib had an acceptable safety profile, was well tolerated, and exhibited meaningful antitumor activity in women with ESR1-mutated, ER+/HER2- mBC after disease progression on prior CDK4/6i. Observed decreases in ESR1-mutant ctDNA with lasofoxifene concordant with clinical response suggest target engagement. If the ELAINE 2 findings are confirmed in the initiated, phase III, ELAINE 3 trial, these data could be practice-changing and help address a critical unmet need.

Experiences of patients with metastatic breast cancer: A qualitative study.

346 Background: More than 150,000 women live with incurable metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in the U.S. today. Survival for patients with MBC has greatly improved over recent decades, but studies exploring aspects of breast cancer survivorship (quality of life, health outcomes, coping, etc.) disproportionately focus on patients with non-metastatic disease. In an effort to better serve patients with MBC at our large tertiary cancer center, we launched a project to understand the preferences, perceived barriers, and unmet needs of this unique population. Methods: We employed focus groups to qualitatively examine patients living with metastatic breast cancer at all points in their journey with advanced cancer. Two experienced patient advocates provided feedback on the protocol. We invited 37 patients with metastatic breast cancer to participate in focus groups of 2-4 subjects. A researcher moderated these recorded conversations, asking subjects to discuss their memories of being diagnosed with MBC, their everyday experience of living with MBC, and their hopes and fears as they look forward. Written transcripts of the studies are coded using the Atlas.ti qualitative research software with intercoder reliability calculated among three coders. Recurrent themes are identified and described. Results: 32 patients participated in 13 focus groups. The majority of patients were white (88%), with an average age of 59 (median 61). Median time since diagnosis with metastatic disease was 57 months (4.75 years). 84% of patients had estrogen-receptor positive MBC, 28% had HER2-positive MBC, and none had triple negative disease. Initial themes identified include a desire for more information about treatments (new drugs, clinical trials, symptom management), and about planning in the face of uncertainty (especially financial, but also regarding end-of-life challenges, relationship changes). Patients also commonly expressed a need for more connection to fellow patients who can provide guidance and support. Analysis of data and formulation of findings are still ongoing, and will be completed by the end of 2023. Publication is planned for early 2024. Conclusions: Metastatic breast cancer cancer survivors continue to have unmet physical, practical, emotional, and spiritual needs. These needs change throughout a patient’s journey. The knowledge gained from exploring these needs will inform projects and management changes designed to better serve our patients by adapting existing services and creating new ones.

Clinician's guide to targeted estrogen receptor degradation using PROTAC in patients with estrogen receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer.

Metastatic breast cancer (MBC) remains a major clinical challenge, necessitating the development of innovative therapeutic strategies. Estrogen receptor (ER) degradation using proteolysis-targeting chimeras (PROTAC) has emerged as a promising approach for overcoming acquired resistance to endocrine therapy. This review will summarize recent findings, highlighting the role of ER degradation by PROTAC in patients with MBC. The application of PROTAC technology for ER degradation has demonstrated initial success in preclinical and early clinical studies. PROTACs, consisting of an ER-targeting moiety, an E3 ubiquitin ligase-recruiting moiety, and a linker, facilitate ER ubiquitination and subsequent proteasomal degradation. Yet, significant challenges persist in the clinical translation of ER degradation by PROTAC. These include the optimization of PROTAC design, elucidation of mechanisms underlying resistance to PROTAC-induced ER degradation, and identification of predictive biomarkers for patient stratification. Additionally, addressing potential off-target effects and toxicity profiles remains a critical aspect of developing PROTAC-based therapies. Recent data demonstrate the potential of ER degradation by PROTAC as a therapeutic strategy for patients with MBC. Continued research efforts and development of synergistic combinations are crucial for further advancing PROTAC-based therapies and improving outcomes in patients with MBC.

Pak1 pathway hyper-activation mediates resistance to endocrine therapy and CDK4/6 inhibitors in ER+ breast cancer

Cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) have been approved in combination with endocrine therapy (ET) to treat estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) metastatic breast cancer (BC). However, drug resistance represents the leading cause of breast cancer patients mortality. This study aimed to identify novel resistance mechanisms to ER antagonists in combination with CDK4/6 inhibitors. We generated two ER+ BC cell lines, T47D and MCF7, resistant to the combination of the ER antagonist fulvestrant and CDK4/6i abemaciclib, named T47D-FAR and MCF7-FAR. Transcriptomic analysis revealed common up-regulation of genes involved in MAPK and epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) pathways in FAR cells, sustaining their hyper-invasive phenotype and increased anchorage-independent growth, compared to sensitive cells. FAR cells showed higher p21-activated kinase 1 (Pak1) expression and phosphorylation levels than parental cells. PAK1 knockdown by siRNAs hampered cell proliferation, reduced anchorage-independent growth and invasive properties of T47D-FAR and MCF7-FAR, re-sensitizing them to fulvestrant and abemaciclib. Conversely, over-expression of PAK1 in MCF7 and T47D cells increased tumor spheroids’ growth and invasion and reduced sensitivity to fulvestrant and abemaciclib, confirming its role in inducing drug resistance. Finally, treatment with Pak1 inhibitors, PF-3758309 (PF309) and NVS-PAK1-1, restored cell sensitivity to fulvestrant and abemaciclib of MCF7-FAR and T47D-FAR cells, both in vitro and in vivo. In conclusion, our data suggested a pivotal role for Pak1 in resistance to ET and CDK4/6i in ER+ breast cancers. These data might promote the rationale for the development of novel Pak1 inhibitors for treatment of patients with ER+ BC progressing on ET plus CDK4/6i.

Abstract 3934: PRMT5 is an actionable target in CDK4/6 inhibitor-resistant ER+/Rb-deficient breast cancer

Abstract RB1 loss-of-function genomic alterations confer resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) and are enriched post treatment of CDK4/6i in estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) metastatic breast cancer. ER+/Rb-deficient breast cancer is a rising patient population in need of novel therapeutic strategies. Herein, we used a genome-wide CRISPR screen and identified protein arginine methyltransferase 5 (PRMT5) as a molecular vulnerability in this refractory breast cancer subtype. sgRNA-induced depletion of PRMT5 arrested growth of MCF-7 and T47D RB1 knockout (RBKO) cells. PRMT5 catalyzes symmetric dimethylation of arginine (SDMA). In RBKO cells carrying doxycycline-inducible shRNA targeting the 3’UTR of PRMT5, rescue with wild-type but not an enzymatically dead mutant of PRMT5 restored cell growth, supporting that PRMT5 methyltrasferase activity is essential for growth of these cells. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) of RNA-seq data revealed significant downregulation of cell cycle-related Hallmark gene signatures in RBKO cells treated with PRMT5 siRNA versus control siRNA. Both gene silencing and pharmacological blockade of PRMT5 with the small molecule inhibitor pemrametostat impeded G1-to-S cell cycle progression in MCF-7 and T47D RBKO cells and in lung, prostate, and triple-negative breast cancer cells with natural RB1 mutations or deletions, suggesting that PRMT5 inhibition can block the G1-to-S transition even in the absence of Rb. To identify the protein interactome of PRMT5 and the mechanism by which it promotes cell cycle progression in Rb-deficient cells, we performed proteomics analysis of Co-IP mass spectrometry and an SDMA post-translational modification scan and pinpointed FUS (fused in sarcoma) as a putative downstream effector of PRMT5. FUS is known to regulate RNA polymerase II (Pol II)-mediated transcription. Inhibition of PRMT5 with pemrametostat significantly reduced SDMA levels on FUS and dissociated FUS from Pol II as evidenced by FUS Co-IP and immunoblot analysis. ChIP-seq analysis revealed that treatment of RBKO cells with pemrametostat derepressed phosphorylation of Ser2 in the C-terminus of Pol II at transcription start sites (TSS) of genes involved in cell cycle progression. In accordance with the abnormal accumulation of pSer2 Pol II at TSS, pemrametostat treatment also resulted in an increased Pol II pausing index and an enrichment of intron retention splicing variants. Finally, therapeutic inhibition of PRMT5 with pemrametostat synergized with fulvestrant (a selective ER degrader) against growth of ER+/Rb-deficient breast cancer cell line- and patient-derived xenografts in mice, suggesting this combination as a novel therapeutic strategy for ER+/Rb-deficient metastatic breast cancers. Citation Format: Chang-Ching Lin, Tsung-Cheng Chang, Yunguan Wang, Yanfeng Zhang, Andrew Lemoff, Yisheng V. Fang, He Zhang, Dan Ye, Isabel Soria-Bretones, Alberto Servetto, Kyung-min Lee, Xuemei Luo, Joseph J. Otto, Hiroaki Akamatsu, David W. Cescon, Lin Xu, Yang Xie, Joshua T. Mendell, Ariella B. Hanker, Carlos L. Arteaga. PRMT5 is an actionable target in CDK4/6 inhibitor-resistant ER+/Rb-deficient breast cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 3934.

Abstract P3-01-10: Going beyond the median: Estimating survival times for patients with hormone receptor positive, metastatic breast cancer commencing endocrine therapy

Abstract Background: Oncologists are often asked to provide information about expected survival times for patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). We have previously demonstrated that using estimates of best-case, typical and worst-case scenarios for survival to explain life expectancy conveys more meaning and hope than simply providing single point estimates of the median overall survival (OS). Our aim was to assess whether using simple multiples of the median could accurately assess scenarios for survival for patients with estrogen receptor (ER) positive, MBC starting endocrine therapy (ET) using simple multiples of the median. Methods: We systematically searched for randomised trials of ET for ER positive MBC. We then recorded the following percentiles (representative scenarios) from the OS curve of each trial using UN-SCAN-IT® graph digitising software: 90th (worst-case), 75th (lower-typical), 50th (median) 25th (upper-typical), and 10th (best-case). We assessed the accuracy of estimating these percentiles for each OS curve by multiplying the median OS by four simple multiples: 0.25 (to estimate the 90th percentile), 0.5 (75th), 2 (25th) and 3 (10th). Estimates were deemed accurate if within 0.75 -1.33 times the actual value. Results: We identified 24 trials with 10,068 patients. The median OS (interquartile range [IQR]) was: 61.3 months (53.4-64.8) for first-line ET with cyclin-dependant kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) (4 treatment groups); 42.6 months (40.9-50.4) for first-line ET alone (23 treatment groups) and 29.2 months (24.8-33.4) for subsequent line ET (21 treatment groups). The median OS (IQR) for each scenario for first-line ET with CDK4/6i was: worst-case 17.4 months (13.8-20.7); lower-typical 32.5 months (29.3-34.9); upper-typical and best-case percentiles were not available. Simple multiples of the median OS accurately estimated the 90th percentile in 79%; 75th percentile in 93%; and 25th percentile in 76% of curves. The 10th percentile was only available for four OS curves and could not be accurately assessed. Conclusion: Using simple multiples of the median OS to estimate and explain survival times to patients with MBC starting ET, is accurate and meaningful. Longer follow-up of trials is required to help clinician’s estimate the best-case scenario for these patients. Citation Format: Andrew O. Parsonson, Sunit Sarkar, Lauren Brown, Belinda Kiely, Anuradha Vasista. Going beyond the median: Estimating survival times for patients with hormone receptor positive, metastatic breast cancer commencing endocrine therapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-01-10.

Molecular testing opportunities on cytology effusion specimens: the pre-analytic effects of various body fluid cytology preparation methods on RNA extraction quality and targeted sequencing.

RNA sequencing (RNAseq) analysis is emerging as a clinical research or diagnostic approach for cytologic samples, but there is need for formal comparison of different sample preparation methods in the cytology laboratory to identify which pre-analytic methods could provide alternatives to formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) sections. We prepared 13 malignant effusions (metastatic estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer) in the cytology laboratory using 6 routine cytologic methods: FFPE cell block, Carnoy's solution, 95% ethanol (EtOH), air-dried and Diff-Quik, ThinPrep, and SurePath preparations. Measurements of RNA quality, expression of 2 multigene expression signatures, molecular subtype, and 4 common activating mutation sites in each preparation were compared with fresh frozen (FF) cell pellet in RNA preservative using distribution of fragment length and concordance correlation coefficient (CCC). The fraction of RNA fragments measuring 200 bases or more (DV200) were 24% higher from cytospins fixed in Carnoy's solution or 95% EtOH than DV200 from FFPE cell blocks. SurePath samples failed RNAseq quality control. There was high concordance of gene expression measurements with FF samples using cytospins fixed in Carnoy's solution, 95% EtOH, Diff-Quik (CCC = 0.829, 0.812, 0.760, respectively), or ThinPrep (CCC = 0.736), but lower using FFPE cell block (CCC = 0.564). The proportion of mutant transcripts was concordant between FF and any cytologic preparation methods. Cytospin preparations fixed with Carnoy's or 95% ETOH then Papanicolaou stained produced RNAseq results that were equivalent to FF samples and superior to FFPE cell block sections.

S6K1 amplification confers innate resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors through activating c-Myc pathway in patients with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer

BackgroundCDK4/6 inhibitors combined with endocrine therapy has become the preferred treatment approach for patients with estrogen receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer. However, the predictive biomarkers and mechanisms of innate resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors remain largely unknown. We sought to elucidate the molecular hallmarks and therapeutically actionable features of patients with resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors.MethodsA total of 36 patients received palbociclib and endocrine therapy were included in this study as the discovery cohort. Next-generation sequencing of circulating tumour DNA in these patients was performed to evaluate somatic alterations associated with innate resistance to palbociclib. Then the candidate biomarker was validated in another independent cohort of 104 patients and publicly available datasets. The resistance was verified in parental MCF-7 and T47D cells, as well as their derivatives with small interfering RNA transfection and lentivirus infection. The relevant mechanism was examined by RNA sequencing, chromatin immunoprecipitation and luciferase assay. Patient-derived organoid and patient-derived xenografts studies were utilized to evaluated the antitumor activity of rational combinations.ResultsIn the discovery cohort, S6K1 amplification (3/35, 9%) was identified as an important reason for innate resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors. In the independent cohort, S6K1 was overexpressed in 15/104 (14%) patients. In those who had received palbociclib treatment, patients with high-expressed S6K1 had significantly worse progression free survival than those with low S6K1 expression (hazard ratio = 3.0, P = 0.0072). Meta-analysis of public data revealed that patients with S6K1 amplification accounted for 12% of breast cancers. Breast cancer patients with high S6K1 expression had significantly worse relapse-free survival (hazard ratio = 1.31, P < 0.0001). In breast cancer cells, S6K1 overexpression, caused by gene amplification, was sufficient to promote resistance to palbociclib. Mechanistically, S6K1 overexpression increased the expression levels of G1/S transition-related proteins and the phosphorylation of Rb, mainly through the activation of c-Myc pathway. Notably, this resistance could be abrogated by the addition of mTOR inhibitor, which blocked the upstream of S6K1, in vitro and in vivo.ConclusionsS6K1 amplification is an important mechanism of innate resistance to palbociclib in breast cancers. Breast cancers with S6K1 amplification could be considered for combinations of CDK4/6 and S6K1 antagonists.

Treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with palbociclib-based therapies: real-world data in the Han population.

Background:This study aimed to reveal the treatment patterns and clinical outcomes of diverse palbociclib-based regimens in Han patients with estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) metastatic breast cancer in routine clinical practice.Methods:The clinical data of patients with ER+ metastatic breast cancer treated with palbociclib were collected from the National Cancer Center database. The efficacy profile of palbociclib in this Han population was evaluated, especially for various combination regimens. The efficacy of palbociclib-based therapy in patients with prior everolimus treatment was also assessed.Results:A total of 186 patients from 89 cities in 18 provinces in China were enrolled. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was similar among different palbociclib-combined groups (P = 0.566): 10.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.8–16.1) in the +exemestane group, 9.7 months (95% CI 6.3–13.1) in the +letrozole group, 7.8 months (95% CI 5.5–10.2) in the +fulvestrant group, 7.2 months (95% CI 3.2–11.3) in the +toremifene group, and 6.1 months (95% CI 1.2–11.0) in the +anastrozole group. Thirty-four patients (18.3%) had received everolimus for their metastatic disease before the prescription of palbociclib. The disease control rate was significantly lower in patients who had received previous everolimus than in the everolimus-naïve group (50.0% vs. 82.2%, P < 0.001). Patients pre-treated with everolimus had significantly worse PFS than those in the everolimus-naïve group (3.4 months vs. 8.8 months, P = 0.001). After propensity score matching, patients pre-treated with everolimus had similar PFS (4.4 months, 95% CI 0.5–8.2) compared with everolimus-naïve patients (6.1 months, 95% CI 4.7–7.5, P = 0.439).Conclusions:Various palbociclib-based regimens have promising efficacy in ER+ metastatic breast cancer in real-world settings, even in patients who had been pre-treated with everolimus.

Abstract 1772: EGFR signaling as a mechanism of resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors in Palbociclib-resistant ER+ breast cancer cells

Abstract Breast cancer driven by estrogen receptor (ER) is responsible for approximately 60-70% of cases among women. Selective inhibition of cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) and ER signaling is now standard-of-care therapy for ER positive (ER+) metastatic breast cancer. CDK4/6 inhibitors, including palbociclib (PD), used in combination with endocrine therapy have shown improvement in progression-free survival compared to endocrine therapy alone in the metastatic setting. However, the inevitable development of acquired resistance significantly limits the efficacy of this targeted therapy. In ER+ breast cancer resistant cells, rewired signaling driven by different oncogenes, including the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), overcomes the inhibition of CDK4/6 by PD, which, in turn, allows cell cycle progression contributing to PD-resistance. We investigated the dependency of ER+ breast cancer cell lines sensitive and resistant to PD on EGFR signaling in vitro. We evaluated the expression and activity of EGFR in two different matching pairs of ER+ palbociclib-sensitive (pS) and palbociclib-resistant (pR) breast cancer cell lines (MCF7 and T47D) and observed elevated EGFR expression in MCF7/pR cells. Increased EGFR expression in MCF7/pR cells correlated with elevated ER alpha phosphorylation at S118 and S167 sites, suggesting a direct cross-talk between EGFR and ER signaling in PD-resistant cells. Serum starvation significantly decreased EGFR activity, cdk2 and cyclin D1 expression in both MCF7 and T47D PD-resistant cells compared to the parental cell lines, confirming their dependency on the presence of growth factors. Notably, stimulation with EGF promoted ER phosphorylation and expression of cell cycle related targets: cdk2, cyclin E and wee1 in both MCF7 and T47D cell lines sensitive and resistant to PD. Furthermore, stimulation with estrogen promoted EGFR activation in MCF7/pS and MCF7/pR cells, indicating a direct cross-regulation between these molecular targets. Further, exposure to the EGFR inhibitor erlotinib dramatically inhibited the proliferation of MCF7/pR cells compared to the parental cells, suggesting that EGFR could be an important bypass signaling regulator contributing to resistance to PD. We found that dual treatment with erlotinib and PD significantly inhibited Rb phosphorylation in MCF7/pR cells improving the effect of PD on cell cycle arrest. Moreover, dual treatment of MCF7/pR cells attenuated ER expression suggesting the higher dependency of ER signaling on EGFR activity in resistant cells. Taken together, our findings suggest that EGFR signaling is a mechanism of resistance in ER+ cell lines with acquired resistance to PD in vitro and that EGFR targeting can be a promising approach to improve palbociclib efficacy in breast cancer patients. Citation Format: Nadiia Lypova, Lilibeth Lanceta, Susan M. Dougherty, Jason A. Chesney, Yoannis Imbert-Fernandez. EGFR signaling as a mechanism of resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors in Palbociclib-resistant ER+ breast cancer cells [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 1772.

Elacestrant Improves Progression-Free Survival After Endocrine Therapy for Estrogen Receptor-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer.

In the phase III EMERALD trial, treatment with elacestrant significantly improved progression-free survival compared with investigator’s choice in patients with estrogen receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer that progressed on prior endocrine therapies.

Early Switch to Fulvestrant Plus Palbociclib Improves Outcomes in ESR1-Mutated, Estrogen Receptor-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer.

For patients with estrogen receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer who are treated with palbociclib plus an aromatase inhibitor, the strategy of switching to palbociclib plus fulvestrant upon detection of a resistance mutation more than doubled progression-free survival, according to results from the phase III PADA-1 trial.

PALVEN: phase Ib trial of palbociclib, letrozole and venetoclax in estrogen receptor- and BCL2-positive advanced breast cancer.

The addition of a CDK4/6 inhibitor to endocrine therapy improves progression-free and overall survival in women with metastatic estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. In that setting, CDK4/6 inhibitors induce a potent cell-cycle arrest (which may be accompanied by tumor senescence) but fail to induce apoptotic cell death. Venetoclax is a potent inhibitor of BCL2, a pro-survival protein overexpressed in the majority of estrogen receptor-positive cancers. Pre-clinical findings indicate that venetoclax augments tumor response to the CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib by triggering apoptosis, including in senescent cells. The PALVEN phase Ib trial will further examine this finding. The primary objective is to identify the maximum tolerated dose and determine the recommended phase II dose for palbociclib, letrozole and venetoclax combination therapy. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT03900884 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Abstract P2-07-04: Analysis of host inflammatory and estrogen biomarkers in JAKEE: A phase II trial of the JAK inhibitor ruxolitinib in combination with exemestane for estrogen receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer

Abstract Background: Circulating IL-6, an activator of JAK/STAT signaling, is associated with poor outcomes and aromatase inhibitor (AI) resistance in hormone-receptor positive (HR+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC). We previously presented clinical outcomes of JAKEE, a single arm, phase II, Simon two-stage clinical trial that tested Ruxolitinib (Rux), an oral selective inhibitor of JAK1/2, and exemestane (EXE) in 25 participants (pts) with HR+ MBC that relapsed/progressed on non-steroidal AI (NSAI); specifically, the primary endpoint of safety was met, but there were no complete or partial responses and 6/25 (24%) achieved stable disease (SD) for ≥6 cycles. We investigated whether host circulating inflammatory markers, IL-6 genotypes, and estrogen levels were associated with differential response to therapy.Methods: Responders (R) were defined as having achieved SD≥6 cycles. Flow cytometry was performed on baseline and on-treatment peripheral blood samples to assess downstream CD3+ T-cell phosphoSTAT3 inhibition by Rux. Serum concentrations of C-reactive protein (CRP), IL-6, serum amyloid A (SAA), Estrone (E1) and Estradiol (E2) were measured at baseline and serially on treatment. Sanger sequencing was performed to assess for three functional variants of the IL-6 promoter: −572G&amp;gt;C (rs1800796), −597G&amp;gt;A (rs1800797), and −174G&amp;gt;C (rs1800795), with high-risk polymorphisms being -597G/G and/or -174G/G. Non-parametric median testing was employed to test for differences in circulating markers by response groups given non-normal distribution, with a two-sided alpha of 0.05.Results: The cohort was heavily pre-treated: 28% received ≥2 lines of chemotherapy for MBC and 20% had CNS disease at enrollment. Among 17/25 pts with samples for pharmacodynamic assessment, Rux exhibited a 25% median inhibition (range 0-77%) of phosphoSTAT3. There was no differential effect in R vs non-responders (NR) (median inhibition 20% vs 29%, p=0.15). Frequency of high-risk IL-6 genotypes and distribution of baseline serum CRP, IL-6, SAA, E1 and E2 are depicted in the table. 15/25 (60%) harbored a high-risk IL-6 promoter polymorphism, with no significant difference in frequency between R and NR (50% vs 63%, p=0.65). 19 pts had samples for inflammatory biomarker analysis. 16/19 had baseline CRP≥10mg/L. While median levels of baseline CRP, SAA, and IL-6 were above upper limit of normal, there was no difference between R and NR (table). The proportion of pts with baseline undetectable E1 and E2 were similar between R and NR (E1: 36.9% vs 33.3%, p=1.0, E2: 52.6% vs 50%, p=1.0); notably, a significantly lower proportion with high-risk IL-6 genotype had undetectable baseline E1 (20% vs 60%, p=0.041), while no difference was noted for baseline E2, nor in the % change in E1 or E2 levels from baseline to cycle 4 by responder status.Conclusions: The JAKEE cohort represents an inflamed population with elevated circulating inflammatory markers and a high proportion with high-risk IL-6 genotypes. Examination of host inflammatory markers, IL-6 genotypes and estrogen levels did not reveal a differential response to the combination of Rux and EXE in patients with HR+ MBC that had progressed on prior NSAI. At tolerable dosing, Rux exhibited only a modest inhibition of phosphoSTAT3. Further work is needed to optimize strategies for targeting inflammation and JAK/STAT signaling in HR+ MBC. IL-6 GenotypeFrequencyFrequency by ResponderSignificanceHigh-Risk -174G/G and/or -597G/G15/25 (60%)Non-responder12/19 (63.2%)Responder3/6 (50%)p-value0.56Pretreatment Inflammatory Biomarkers [Upper limit of normal]Median (Range)Median Level by Responder GroupSignificanceCRP [8mg/L]SAA [10mg/L]IL-6 [2pg/mL]24.0 (0.2-146.8)12.8 (2.8-162.5)4.2 (1.8-11.5)Non-responder23.219.84.5Responder24.7 12.42.7p-value0.510.150.15Baseline Estrogen BiomarkersMedian (Range)Non-responderResponderp-valueEstrone (E1) (pg/mL)Estradiol (E2) (pg/mL)79.5.0 (0.2-1039.0)0.2 (0.2-44.1)79.8 0.247.8 4.20.410.91 Citation Format: Igor Makhlin, Nicholas McAndrew, E. Paul Wileyto, Amy Clark, Robin Holmes, Lisa N Bottalico, Grace R Jeschke, Kevin R Fox, Susan M Domcheck, Jennifer M Matro, Angela R Bradbury, Natalie Shih, Michael D Feldman, Elizabeth O Hexner, Jacqueline F Bromberg, Angela DeMichele. Analysis of host inflammatory and estrogen biomarkers in JAKEE: A phase II trial of the JAK inhibitor ruxolitinib in combination with exemestane for estrogen receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-07-04.