A proper choice of interest rate variables which represent opportunity costs of holding cash balances has been the subject of numerous empirical studies of the demand for money. The choice problem, of course, does not arise in theory because, in principle, the entire spectrum of interest rates affects the quantity of money demanded. The problem is thus an empirical one, caused by the multicollinearity among all theoretically plausible candidates. The common practice in the past has been to choose a set of two or three rates for the estimation. The chosen set varies mainly due to the emphasis on the motive of cash holding, that is, transactionsdemand approach versus portfolio-theoretic approach. A different approach has been taken in the study of Heller and Khan (1979), who attempted to incorporate the entire term structure into the specification of money In their approach the yield curve in each period is first approximated by a quadratic function, and then the estimates of the quadratic function parameters are used in the place of interest rates. Heller and Khan (HK hereafter) reported that the coefficients of the yield curve parameters were all significant and the estimated money demand function was stable over their sample period 1960.III-1976.IV. Allen and Hafer (1983) extended the sample period to 1960.III-1979.IV and also introduced the cubic function to approximate the yield curve. Allen and Hafer (AH hereafter), who used the Hatanaka (1974) estimation method, reported significant coefficients of the yield curve parameters, but the estimated money demand function was not stable over their sample period. 1 Both studies of HK and AH have used the stock adjustment model and have imposed on their estimation equation the conventional restrictions of the unitary long-run price elasticity and the real adjustment process. HK defended their use of the real adjustment model (RAM) by arguing that the nominal adjustment model (NAM) would be applicable only in the case where the nominal money supply responded passively to any excess demand. The RAM, however, has its own drawbacks. In the context of the adjustment cost model, the NAM assumes that an individual incurs an adjustment cost only when he is actively engaged in altering his