Abstract Background The SELECT trial reported a significant reduction in cardiovascular (CV) outcomes with semaglutide amongst patients without diabetes who had pre-existing CV disease and a body-mass index (BMI) of 27 or greater. Patients undergoing cardiac surgery represent a high-risk subset of those with established CV disease, and may benefit from treatment with semaglutide. Purpose This study evaluated the generalizability of SELECT to a contemporary international cohort of cardiac surgical patients, and assessed whether differences between SELECT-eligible and non-eligible patients translated to altered risks of CV outcomes. Methods Present data was gathered from the TRICS III trial, a multicentre, randomized trial of restrictive versus liberal red-cell transfusion thresholds amongst 5243 cardiac surgical patients with a EuroSCORE I of ≥6. The proportion of cardiac surgical patients eligible for SELECT was determined by applying its selection criteria to the TRICS III cohort. Finally, baseline characteristics and outcomes stratified by SELECT eligibility were compared. Results A total of 4887 patients from the TRICS III cohort had available data for analysis, of which 452 (9.2%) were deemed to have been eligible for the SELECT trial. A comparison of baseline characteristics between SELECT-eligible and non-eligible patients are presented in Table 1; while SELECT-eligible patients were more likely to have preserved left ventricular function (71.7% vs. 61.0%), EuroSCORE I values were comparable between the two groups (7.8±2.1 vs. 7.9±1.9). The rate of a 3-point MACCE of Death, MI or stroke in the present cohort of SELECT-eligible patients undergoing cardiac surgery (16.6%) was numerically higher than those enrolled in SELECT receiving semaglutide (8.1%) or placebo (10.0%), despite the shorter follow-up (6 months vs. 39.8 months). Six month outcomes following cardiac surgery were similar regardless of SELECT eligibility (Figure 1); no difference in risk of outcomes was documented for the 3-point MACCE [SELECT Eligible vs. Non-eligible – 16.6% vs. 14.5%; OR 1.17 (0.9-1.53); P=0.24] and the TRICS III primary composite of Death, MI, Stroke, or New-Onset Renal Failure with Dialysis [17.0% vs. 17.0%; OR 1.0 (0.77-1.29); P=0.98]. There was a trend towards higher rates of MI at 6 months amongst SELECT-eligible patients, but this difference failed to reach statistical significance [8.5% vs. 6.3%; OR 2.0 (0.96-1.39); P=0.08). Conclusions In this large international cohort of contemporary cardiac surgical patients, nearly 10% would have met eligibility for SELECT. SELECT-eligible patients undergoing cardiac surgery in TRICS III had a numerically higher rate of MACCE than those enrolled in SELECT, highlighting the high risk nature of this patient subgroup. However, amongst SELECT-eligible and non-eligible patients undergoing cardiac surgery, no significant difference in CV outcomes was uncovered.