Esophageal Dose Research Articles

Prospective Observational Study on Esophagitis in Breast Cancer Patients with Supraclavicular Nodal Irradiation - A Common Predicament

Background: The present study aimed to assess the dosimetric parameters that may be associated with oesophagitis in patients with breast cancer undergoing three-dimensional radiotherapy. Methods: A single-arm study was conducted on 25 breast cancer patients. Enrolled patients received 40.05Gy in 15 fractions to the chest wall and supraclavicular nodes with 3DCRT. Toxicity grading was examined once a week to assess the onset of grade 2 esophagitis in respective patients. Analyzed parameters incorporate mean oesophageal dose and maximum doses to the esophagus, esophagus volume, and oesophageal length within the supraclavicular nodal PTV treatment area. Results: The mean age was 43.48 years and Grade 2 oesophagitis was noted in 13 of the 25 patients (52%). The onset of oesophagitis was significantly associated with the oesophageal length associated with the treating area (p= 0.04). The laterality of disease did not show a significant relation (p=0.93). For the commencement of grade 2 oesophagitis, odds ratios were 2.33 (95% CI=1.1-3.89, p=0.02) for a mean esophageal dose ≥12Gy and 2.5 (95% CI=1.2-5.18, p=0.04) for ≥ 4.5 cm of esophagus length within supraclavicular nodal PTV area. Conclusion: In patients receiving radiation to the supraclavicular area, the mean oesophageal radiation dose and oesophageal length included in the treatment area correlate with the development of acute oesophagitis, which can be minimized by reducing those two parameters.

Dosimetric predictors of acute radiation pneumonitis and esophagitis in hypofractionated thoracic irradiation of non-small cell lung cancer patients with poor prognostic factors: Dosimetric predictors of acute radiation pneumonitis and esophagitis following hypofractionation in NSCLC

PurposeThe proliferation rates of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and associated radiation resistance highlight the potential of hypofractionated radiotherapy (hypoRT). However, radiation pneumonitis and esophagitis remain dose-limiting adverse events. This study aims to investigate dosimetric factors influencing the risk of pneumonitis and esophagitis in highly multimorbid patients undergoing moderately hypofractionated radiotherapy. Methods Forty-seven NSCLC patients with poor performance status treated between January 2014 and July 2021 were included. Dosimetric parameters including mean lung dose (MLD), percentage of normal (ipsi-/contralateral) lung volume (Vx) receiving ≥x Gy [x=20 Gy, 18 Gy, 10 Gy, 5 Gy]; Mean heart dose (MHD), percentage of the heart volume (HVx) receiving ≥x Gy [x=20 Gy, 10 Gy, 5 Gy]; Mean esophageal dose (MED), percentage of esophagus volume (EVx) receiving ≥x Gy [x=40 Gy, 30 Gy, 20 Gy, 18 Gy, 10 Gy, 5 Gy] were analyzed retrospectively. Acute radiation pneumonitis/esophagitis events were assessed within 6/3 months posttreatment. Statistical analyses included Random forests, binary logistic regression, and linear regression. ResultsAmong the 47 patients with compromised lung function and poor prognostic factors, 8 (17%) and 26 (55%) patients developed all-grade pneumonitis or esophagitis, while 4 (9%) and 10 (21%) patients developed CTCAE grade ≥2 pneumonitis and esophagitis, respectively. Exploratory analyses suggest that V10, V18, and mean lung dose (MLD) values are associated with an increased risk of pneumonitis. Linear regressions confirmed this for MLD values greater than 9.2 Gy (p=0.050). Additionally, higher V5 and V10 values in the contralateral lung were associated with a greater risk of pneumonitis (p=0.013/ p=0.032). Dmax proved to be a significant predictor of esophagitis (p=0.020). Moreover, evidence suggests that EV5 and EV40 may portend esophagitis onset. ConclusionThis study provides insights into dosimetric factors influencing pneumonitis/esophagitis development in NSCLC patients undergoing hypoRT. While MLD and Dmax emerged as significant predictors of pneumonitis and esophagitis, the small sample size limited the depth of conclusions. Further research with larger cohorts is warranted to validate these observations, potentially optimizing treatment planning and outcomes in this challenging patient population

Proton ARC based LATTICE radiation therapy: feasibility study, energy layer optimization and LET optimization

Objective.LATTICE, a spatially fractionated radiation therapy (SFRT) modality, is a 3D generalization of GRID and delivers highly modulated peak-valley spatial dose distribution to tumor targets, characterized by peak-to-valley dose ratio (PVDR). Proton LATTICE is highly desirable, because of the potential synergy of the benefit from protons compared to photons, and the benefit from LATTICE compared to GRID. Proton LATTICE using standard proton RT via intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) (with a few beam angles) can be problematic with poor target dose coverage and high dose spill to organs-at-risk (OAR). This work will develop novel proton LATTICE method via proton ARC (with many beam angles) to overcome these challenges in target coverage and OAR sparing, with optimized delivery efficiency via energy layer optimization and optimized biological dose distribution via linear energy transfer (LET) optimization, to enable the clinical use of proton LATTICE.Approach.ARC based proton LATTICE is formulated and solved with energy layer optimization, during which plan quality and delivery efficiency are jointly optimized. In particular, the number of energy jumps (NEJ) is explicitly modelled and minimized during plan optimization for improving delivery efficiency, while target dose conformality and OAR dose objectives are optimized. The plan deliverability is ensured by considering the minimum-monitor-unit (MMU) constraint, and the plan robustness is accounted for using robust optimization. The biological dose is optimized via LET optimization. The optimization solution algorithm utilizes iterative convex relaxation method to handle the dose-volume constraint and the MMU constraint, with spot-weight optimization subproblems solved by proximal descent method.Main results.ARC based proton LATTCE substantially improved plan quality from IMPT based proton LATTICE, such as (1) improved conformity index (CI) from 0.47 to 0.81 for the valley target dose and from 0.62 to 0.97 for the peak target dose, (2) reduced esophagus dose from 0.68 Gy to 0.44 Gy (a 12% reduction with respect to 2 Gy valley prescription dose) and (3) improved PVDR from 4.15 to 4.28 in the lung case. Moreover, energy layer optimization improved plan delivery efficiency for ARC based proton LATTICE, such as (1) reduced NEJ from 71 to 56 and (2) reduction of energy layer switching time by 65% and plan delivery time by 52% in the lung case. The biological target and OAR dose distributions were further enhanced via LET optimization. On the other hand, proton ARC LATTCE also substantially improved plan quality from VMAT LATTICE, such as (1) improved CI from 0.45 to 0.81 for the valley target dose and from 0.63 to 0.97 for the peak target dose, (2) reduced esophagus dose from 0.59 Gy to 0.38 Gy (a 10.5% reduction with respect to 2 Gy valley prescription dose) and (3) improved PVDR from 3.88 to 4.28 in the lung case.Significance.The feasibility of high-plan-quality proton LATTICE is demonstrated via proton ARC with substantially improved target dose coverage and OAR sparing compared to IMPT, while the plan delivery efficiency for ARC based proton LATTICE can be optimized using energy layer optimization.

Radiation-induced Esophagitis in Breast Cancer Patients Treated With Supraclavicular Field Irradiation.

The objective of this research was to assess the frequency and intensity of radiation-induced esophagitis in breast cancer patients treated with supraclavicular radiotherapy field irradiation. This study involved 100 patients with positive lymph nodes receiving radiotherapy to the breast or chest wall along with supraclavicular field irradiation, with toxicity levels assessed weekly. Treatment utilized the 3D conformal technique, and variables, such as mean and maximum dose to the cervical esophagus, mean dose to the entire esophagus, and length of the esophagus within the treated area were recorded. The occurrence of grade 2 or higher esophagitis was 48%, with patients facing the risk of developing such esophagitis at an average dose of 13 Gy. The probability of grade 2 esophagitis occurring at doses exceeding 13 Gy was statistically significantly higher (p<0.001) with an odds ratio of 24.4. Limiting the mean cervical esophagus dose to <13 Gy could help reduce the frequency and severity of grade 2 or higher toxicity.

Feasibility of Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery Sparing Radiation Therapy for Locally Advanced Lung Cancer

Efforts to mitigate radiotherapy (RT) associated cardiotoxicity have focused on constraining mean heart dose (MHD). However, recent studies have shown greater predictive power with cardiac substructure dose metrics such as the left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery volume (V) receiving 15Gy (V15Gy) ≥10%. Herein, we investigated the feasibility of LAD radiation sparing in contemporary IMRT/VMAT lung cancer plans. Single institution retrospective analysis of 54 locally advanced lung cancer patients treated with thoracic RT between February 2018-August 2021. After excluding 33 (5=non-IMRT/VMAT or intentionally LAD-optimized; 28=LAD V15Gy<10%), 21 plans with LAD V15Gy ≥10% were identified for LAD re-optimization with intent to meet LAD V15Gy <10% while maintaining meeting organ-at-risk (OAR) metrics and target coverage with original plan parameters. Dosimetric variables were compared using paired t tests. Most (57.1%, 12/21) were treated with definitive RT, 8/21 (38.1%) with post-operative RT, and one with neoadjuvant RT. The median prescribed RT dose was 60Gy (range 50.4-66Gy) in 30 fractions (range 28-33). LAD re-optimized plans (vs original) led to significant reductions in mean LAD V15Gy (39.4% ±13.9% vs 9.4% ±13.0%; p<0.001) and mean LAD dose (12.9Gy ± 4.6Gy vs 7.6Gy ±2.8Gy; p<0.001). Most (85.7%; 18/21) LAD re-optimized plans achieved LAD V15Gy <10%. There were no statistically significant differences in overall lung, esophageal, or spinal cord dose metrics. Only one re-optimization (1/21) exceeded an OAR constraint that was initially met in the original plan. To our knowledge, this is the first report describing the feasibility of LAD-optimized lung cancer RT planning using the newly identified LAD V15 Gy constraint. We observed that LAD V15Gy <10% is achievable in more than 85% of plans initially exceeding this constraint, with minimal dosimetric tradeoffs. Our results support the feasibility of routine incorporation of the LAD as an OAR in modern thoracic IMRT/VMAT planning.

Factors associated with acute esophagitis during radiation therapy for lung cancer

IntroductionLimiting acute esophagitis remains a clinical challenge during the treatment of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). MethodsDemographic, dosimetric, and acute toxicity data were prospectively collected for patients undergoing definitive radiation therapy +/- chemotherapy for stage II-III NSCLC from 2012 to 2022 across a statewide consortium. Logistic regression models were used to characterize the risk of grade 2 + and 3 + esophagitis as a function of dosimetric and clinical covariates. Multivariate regression models were fitted to predict the 50 % risk of grade 2 esophagitis and 3 % risk of grade 3 esophagitis. ResultsOf 1760 patients, 84.2 % had stage III disease and 85.3 % received concurrent chemotherapy. 79.2 % of patients had an ECOG performance status ≤ 1. Overall rates of acute grade 2 + and 3 + esophagitis were 48.4 % and 2.2 %, respectively. On multivariate analyses, performance status, mean esophageal dose (MED) and minimum dose to the 2 cc of esophagus receiving the highest dose (D2cc) were significantly associated with grade 2 + and 3 + esophagitis. Concurrent chemotherapy was associated with grade 2 + but not grade 3 + esophagitis. For all patients, MED of 29 Gy and D2cc of 61 Gy corresponded to a 3 % risk of acute grade 3 + esophagitis. For patients receiving chemotherapy, MED of 22 Gy and D2cc of 50 Gy corresponded to a 50 % risk of acute grade 2 + esophagitis. ConclusionsPerformance status, concurrent chemotherapy, MED and D2cc are associated with acute esophagitis during definitive treatment of NSCLC. Models that quantitatively account for these factors can be useful in individualizing radiation plans.

Association of Radiation-Induced Acute Esophagitis With Dosimetric Parameters of Oesophagus in Breast Carcinoma Patients Receiving Supraclavicular Nodal Irradiation.

We conducted this investigation to ascertain the dosimetric properties such as the mean and maximum radiation dosage during radiotherapy as well as the extent of radiation exposure to the esophagus. These factors can potentially impact the development of esophagitis in breast cancer patients undergoing supraclavicular radiation. From January to June 2023, an observational study was conducted at Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University in Bangladesh. The patients received radiation therapy (40.05 Gy in 15 parts) to the chest wall and supraclavicular node for three weeks. We were able to guess the following from the dose volume histogram (DVH) data: the length of the esophagus in the treatment area (i.e., the size of the esophagus that was visible on the planning CT scan), the maximum dose (Dmax), the mean dose (Dmean), and the volume of the 10Gy (V10Gy) and 20Gy (V20Gy) doses that were given to the esophagus. During radiotherapy, patients were checked on once a week, and the radiotherapy oncology group was used to evaluate and grade esophagitis Results: Patients with left-sided breast cancer showed a higher Dmean, Dmax, and length of the esophagus compared to those with right-sided breast cancer. Specifically, the Dmean was 6.7 (±2.1) Gy, the Dmax was 39.2 (±1.5) Gy, and the length of the esophagus was 6.1 (±1.2) Gy. Patients with left breast cancer had elevated V10Gy and V20Gy values for the esophagus, but the difference was not statistically significant. The incidence of V10Gy for right-sided breast cancer and left-sided breast cancer was 4.2% (±2.6%) and 19.8% (±9.2%), respectively. The V20Gy was 2.4% (±0.9%) for right-sided breast cancer and 13.09% (±5.0%) for left-sided breast cancer Conclusion: In conclusion, there is a strong association between the mean oesophageal dose and radiation to the left supraclavicular region following surgery in women with breast cancer and acute esophagitis. We can reduce esophageal toxicity by prescribing dose restrictions and performing precise delineation of the esophagus.

Assessing the adequacy of a 5-mm planning target volume margin for 4D-CT scan-based image-guided radiotherapy for locally advanced carcinoma of the lung

In developed nations, 4D-computed tomography (4D-CT)-based image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) has become the standard for treating lung carcinoma patients, with the primary goal of achieving disease cure. However, its usage in India remains limited. Here, we compared target volume delineation for radical radiation planning in patients with locally advanced lung carcinoma using helical free-breathing CT (FBCT) and 4D-CT. In addition, we assessed the adequacy of a 5-mm planning target volume (PTV) margin with 4D-CT planning. Fifty patients with locally advanced lung cancer were enrolled in the study. Each patient underwent contouring based on 4D-CT to generate an internal target volume, and a 5-mm PTV margin (PTV_4D) was added for radical radiation. Subsequently, each patient underwent two intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans with comparable planning and optimization parameters. One plan was based on the FBCT-based volume (PTV_3D), while the other was based on the 4D-CT-based volume (PTV_4D). PTV, organ at risk (OAR) dose, and PTV coverage by 95% of the prescribed dose (PTVD 95_3D vs. PTVD 95_4D) were compared between the two schemes. Results revealed that 4D-CT-based planning reduced PTV (mean PTV volume: 539 cc vs. 782 cc) and lowered OAR doses (mean lung dose: 13 Gy vs. 15 Gy; mean esophagus dose: 18.5 Gy vs. 21.15 Gy; mean spinal cord max dose: 35.59 Gy vs. 37.39 Gy). At 3 months after treatment imaging, 40% of the patients showed a complete response, 48% showed a partial response, 4% showed stable disease, and 8% showed progressive disease. In conclusion, 4D-CT-based radiation planning for locally advanced lung carcinoma with a reduced PTV margin of 5 mm can dramatically decrease the PTV and OAR doses without sacrificing PTV coverage compared to FBCT-based planning. However, daily online image guidance or at least a well-defined offline image guidance protocol is recommended when employing such a small PTV margin.

Re-irradiation spine stereotactic body radiotherapy following high-dose conventional radiotherapy for metastatic epidural spinal cord compression: a retrospective study

Purpose We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of re-irradiation stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in patients with metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC) following high-dose conventional radiotherapy.Materials and methods Twenty-one patients met the following eligibility criteria: with an irradiation history of 50 Gy2 equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions (EQD2) or more, diagnosed MESCC in the cervical or thoracic spines, and treated with re-irradiation SBRT of 24 Gy in 2 fractions between April 2018 and March 2023. Prior treatment was radiotherapy alone, not including surgery. The primary endpoint was a 1-year local failure rate. Overall survival (OS) and treatment-related adverse events were assessed as the secondary endpoints. Since our cohort includes one treatment-related death (TRD) of esophageal perforation, the cumulative esophageal dose was evaluated to find the dose constraints related to severe toxicities.Results The median age was 68, and 14 males were included. The primary tumor sites (esophagus/lung/head and neck/others) were 6/6/7/2, and the median initial radiotherapy dose was 60 Gy2 EQD2 (range: 50–105 Gy2, 60–70/ > 70 Gy2 were 11/4). Ten patients underwent surgery followed by SBRT and 11 SBRT alone. At the median follow-up time of 10.4 months, 17 patients died of systemic disease progression including one TRD. No radiation-induced myelopathy or nerve root injuries occurred. Local failure occurred in six patients, with a 1-year local failure rate of 29.3% and a 1-year OS of 55.0%. Other toxicities included five cases of vertebral compression fractures (23.8%) and one radiation pneumonitis. The cumulative esophageal dose was recommended as follows: Dmax < 203, D0.035 cc < 187, and D1cc < 167 (Gy3 in biological effective dose).Conclusion Re-irradiation spine SBRT may be effective for selected patients with cervical or thoracic MESCC, even with high-dose irradiation histories. The cumulative dose assessment across the original and re-irradiated esophagus was recommended to decrease the risk of severe esophageal toxicities.

Factors that Influence the Need to Start Adaptive Radiotherapy.

Adaptive radiotherapy (ART) is an essential approach to account for anatomical and biological uncertainties. Adaptive radiotherapy is, however, time-consuming, and it is unclear which patients are eligible or when is the best time to start ART. This prospective study was conducted at Kasr El-Aini Center of Clinical Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Cairo, Egypt from January 2019 to December 2020. Thirty patients with pathologically proven, limited-stage small cell or stage I-II non-small cell lung cancer who were either not fit for or refused surgery or had stage III disease were recruited and underwent treatment planning to receive 60 Gy on a conventional 3D conformal radiation schedule with platinum-based chemotherapy. All patients underwent computed tomography (CT) planning within 2 and 4 weeks of starting radiation therapy to assess the need for adaptation. Pulmonary function test and echocardiography findings were assessed at the end of treatment and at 3 and 6 months after treatment, and were compared to the baseline. We found a significant reduction in mean value of the planning target volume (PTV) in the CT scans at the second (331 cm3) and fourth (257 cm3) weeks of treatment as compared to baseline (342 cm3) (p-value < 0.0001). Adaptation decreased the dose to the organ at risk with statistical significance and with improvement of the target coverage. At week 2 of radiotherapy, the need for adaptation was correlated to the conformity index (p = 0.0473), esophageal V35 (p = 0.0488), esophageal V50 (p = 0.0295), and its mean dose (p = 0.0087). At week 4 it was correlated to forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) (p = 0.0303), ratio between the forced expiratory volume in 1 second and the forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC) (p = 0.0024), and echocardiography (p = 0.0183). Conformity index and esophageal dose constraints can predict the need for adaptation at week 2, whereas baseline pulmonary function parameters and echocardiography can predict the need for adaptation at week 4 of radiotherapy.

Explainable deep learning-based survival prediction for non-small cell lung cancer patients undergoing radical radiotherapy

Background and purposeSurvival is frequently assessed using Cox proportional hazards (CPH) regression; however, CPH may be too simplistic as it assumes a linear relationship between covariables and the outcome. Alternative, non-linear machine learning (ML)-based approaches, such as random survival forests (RSFs) and, more recently, deep learning (DL) have been proposed; however, these techniques are largely black-box in nature, limiting explainability. We compared CPH, RSF and DL to predict overall survival (OS) of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients receiving radiotherapy using pre-treatment covariables. We employed explainable techniques to provide insights into the contribution of each covariable on OS prediction. Materials and methodsThe dataset contained 471 stage I-IV NSCLC patients treated with radiotherapy. We built CPH, RSF and DL OS prediction models using several baseline covariable combinations. 10-fold Monte-Carlo cross-validation was employed with a split of 70%:10%:20% for training, validation and testing, respectively. We primarily evaluated performance using the concordance index (C-index) and integrated Brier score (IBS). Local interpretable model-agnostic explanation (LIME) values, adapted for use in survival analysis, were computed for each model. ResultsThe DL method exhibited a significantly improved C-index of 0.670 compared to the CPH and a significantly improved IBS of 0.121 compared to the CPH and RSF approaches. LIME values suggested that, for the DL method, the three most important covariables in OS prediction were stage, administration of chemotherapy and oesophageal mean radiation dose. ConclusionWe show that, using pre-treatment covariables, a DL approach demonstrates superior performance over CPH and RSF for OS prediction and use explainable techniques to provide transparency and interpretability.

Intensity-modulated proton and carbon-ion radiotherapy using a fixed-beam system for locally advanced lung cancer: dosimetric comparison with x-ray radiotherapy and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) evaluation

Objective. To assess the dosimetric consequences and the normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) for the organs at risk (OARs) in intensity-modulated particle radiotherapy of proton (IMPT) and carbon-ion (IMCT) using a fixed-beam delivery system when compared with intensity-modulated photon radiotherapy (IMRT) for locally advanced small-cell lung cancer. Approach. The plans were all designed under the same total relative biological effectiveness (RBE)-weighted prescription dose, in which the planning target volume (PTV) of the internal gross target volume(IGTV) and the PTV of the clinical target volume was irradiated with 69.3 Gy (RBE) and 63 Gy (RBE), respectively, using a simultaneously integrated boosting (SIB) technique. NTCPs were estimated for heart, lung, esophagus and spinal cord by Lyman–Kutcher–Burman (LKB) and logistic models. Dose escalation was simulated under the desired NTCP values (0.05, 0.10 and 0.50) of the three radiation techniques. Main results. Under the similar target coverage, almost all OARs were significantly better spared (p < 0.05) when using the particle radiotherapy except for D1cc (the dose to 1 cm3 of the volume) of the proximal bronchial tree (p > 0.05). At least 57.6% of mean heart dose, 28.8% of mean lung dose and 19.1% of mean esophageal dose were reduced compared with IMRT. The mean NTCP of radiation-induced pneumonitis (RP) in the ipsilateral lung was 0.39 ± 0.33 (0.39 ± 0.31) in IMPT plans and 0.36 ± 0.32 (0.35 ± 0.30) in IMCT plans compared with 0.66 ± 0.30 (0.64 ± 0.28) in IMRT plans by LKB (logistic) models. The target dose could be escalated to 78.3/76.9 Gy (RBE) in IMPT/IMCT plans compared with 61.7 Gy (RBE) in IMRT plans when 0.50 of NTCP in terms of RP in the ipsilateral lung was applied. Significance. This study presents the potential of better control of the side effects and improvement of local control originating from the dosimetric advantage with the application of IMPT and IMCT with the SIB technique for locally advanced lung cancer, even with limited beam directions.

A Comparative Analysis of Implant-sparing Plan Versus Conventional Plans Utilizing Helical Tomotherapy in Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Breast Reconstruction.

To compare implant sparing irradiation with conventional radiotherapy (RT) using helical (H) and TomoDirect (TD) techniques in breast cancer patients undergoing immediate breast reconstruction (IBR). The dosimetric parameters of 40 patients with retropectoral implants receiving 50.4 Gy delivered in 28 fractions were analyzed. Three plans were created: H plan using conventional planning target volume (PTV) that included the chest wall, skin, and implant; TD plan using conventional PTV; and Hs plan using implant-sparing PTV. The H, TD, and Hs plans were compared for PTV doses, organ-at-risk (OAR) doses, and treatment times. Dose distribution in the Hs plan was less homogeneous and uniform than that in the H and TD plans. The TD plan had lower lung, heart, contralateral breast, spinal cord, liver, and esophagus doses than the Hs plan. Compared to the Hs plan, the H plan had lower lung volume receiving 5Gy (V5) (39.1±3.9 vs. 41.2±3.9 Gy; p<0.001), higher V20 (12.3±1.3 vs. 11.5±2.6 Gy; p=0.02), and higher V30 (7.5±1.6 vs. 4.4±1.7 Gy; p<0.001). H plan outperformed Hs plan in heart dosimetric parameters except V20. The Hs plan had significantly lower mean implant doses (43.4±2.1 Gy) than the H plan (51.4±0.5 Gy; p<0.001) and the TD plan (51.9±0.6 Gy; p<0.001). Implementing an implant sparing technique for silicone dose reduction decreases lung doses. Conventional H and TD plans outperform the implant sparing helical plan dosimetrically. Because capsular contracture during RT is unpredictable, long-term clinical outcomes are required to determine whether silicon should be spared.

Comparison of radiotherapy techniques in patients with thymic epithelial tumor who underwent postoperative radiotherapy.

This retrospective study aimed to compare clinical outcomes and dosimetric parameters between radiation therapy (RT) techniques in patients with thymic epithelial tumor (TET). From January 2016 to December 2020, 101 patients with TET received adjuvant RT (median, 52.8 Gy; range, 48.4 to 66.0). Three different RT techniques were compared: three-dimensional conformal RT (3D-CRT; n = 59, 58.4%), intensity-modulated RT (IMRT; n = 23, 22.8%), and proton beam therapy (PBT; n = 19, 18.8%). The median age of the patients and the follow-up period were 55 years (range, 28 to 79) and 43.4 months (range, 7.7 to 77.2). Patients in the PBT group were of the youngest age (mean age, 45.4 years), while those in IMRT group had the largest clinical target volume (mean volume, 149.6 mL). Patients in the PBT group had a lower mean lung dose (4.4 Gy vs. 7.6 Gy vs. 10.9 Gy, respectively; p < 0.001), lower mean heart dose (5.4 Gy vs. 10.0 Gy vs. 13.1 Gy, respectively; p = 0.003), and lower mean esophageal dose than patients in the 3D-CRT and IMRT groups (6.3 Gy vs. 9.8 Gy vs. 13.5 Gy, respectively; p = 0.011). Twenty patients (19.8%) showed disease recurrence, and seven patients (6.9%) died. The differences in the survival rates between RT groups were not statistically significant. In patients with TET who underwent adjuvant RT, PBT resulted in a lower dose of exposure to adjacent organs at risk. Survival outcomes for patients in PBT group were not significantly different from those in other groups.

Proton therapy (PT) combined with concurrent chemotherapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer with negative driver genes

PurposeTo discuss the optimal treatment modality for inoperable locally advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer patients with poor physical status, impaired cardio-pulmonary function, and negative driver genes, and provide clinical evidence.Materials and methodsRetrospective analysis of 62 cases of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients with negative driver genes treated at Tsukuba University Hospital(Japan) and Qingdao University Affiliated Hospital(China).The former received proton therapy with concurrent chemotherapy, referred to as the proton group, with 25 cases included; while the latter underwent X-ray therapy with concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by 1 year of sequential immunomodulatory maintenance therapy, referred to as the X-ray group, with 37 cases included.The treatment response and adverse reactions were assessed using RECIST v1.1 criteria and CTCAE v3.0, and radiotherapy planning and evaluation of organs at risk were performed using the CB-CHOP method.All data were subjected to statistical analysis using GraphPad Prism v9.0, with a T-test using P < 0.05 considered statistically significant.Results(1)Target dose distribution: compared to the X-ray group, the proton group exhibited smaller CTV and field sizes, with a more pronounced bragg peak.(2)Organs at risk dose: When comparing the proton group to the X-ray group, lung doses (V5, V20, MLD) and heart doses (V40, Dmax) were lower, with statistical significance (P < 0.05), while spinal cord and esophagus doses showed no significant differences between the two groups (P > 0.05).(3)Treatment-related toxicities: The incidence of grade 3 or higher adverse events in the proton group and X-ray group was 28.6% and 4.2%, respectively, with a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05). In terms of the types of adverse events, the proton group primarily experienced esophagitis and pneumonia, while the X-ray group primarily experienced pneumonia, esophagitis, and myocarditis. Both groups did not experience radiation myelitis or esophagotracheal fistula.(4)Efficacy evaluation: The RR in the proton group and X-ray group was 68.1% and 70.2%, respectively (P > 0.05), and the DCR was 92.2% and 86.4%, respectively (P > 0.05), indicating no significant difference in short-term efficacy between the two treatment modalities.(5)Survival status: The PFS in the proton group and X-ray group was 31.6 ± 3.5 months (95% CI: 24.7 ~ 38.5) and 24.9 ± 1.55 months (95% CI: 21.9 ~ 27.9), respectively (P > 0.05), while the OS was 51.6 ± 4.62 months (95% CI: 42.5 ~ 60.7) and 33.1 ± 1.99 months (95% CI: 29.2 ~ 37.1), respectively (P < 0.05).According to the annual-specific analysis, the PFS rates for the first to third years in both groups were as follows: 100%, 56.1% and 32.5% for the proton group vs. 100%, 54.3% and 26.3% for the X-ray group. No statistical differences were observed at each time point (P > 0.05).The OS rates for the first to third years in both groups were as follows: 100%, 88.2%, 76.4% for the proton group vs. 100%, 91.4%, 46.3% for the X-ray group. There was no significant difference in the first to second years (P > 0.05), but the third year showed a significant difference (P < 0.05). Survival curve graphs also depicted a similar trend.ConclusionThere were no significant statistical differences observed between the two groups in terms of PFS and OS within the first two years. However, the proton group demonstrated a clear advantage over the X-ray group in terms of adverse reactions and OS in the third year. This suggests a more suitable treatment modality and clinical evidence for populations with frail health, compromised cardio-pulmonary function, post-COVID-19 sequelae, and underlying comorbidities.

Advancing the Role of Proton Therapy for Spine Metastases Through Diagnostic Scan–Based Planning

PurposeMany patients with metastatic cancer live years beyond diagnosis, and there remains a need to improve the therapeutic ratio of metastasis-directed radiation for these patients. This study aimed to assess a process for delivering cost-effective palliative proton therapy to the spine using diagnostic scan–based planning (DSBP) and prefabricated treatment delivery devices. Materials and MethodsWe designed and characterized a reusable proton aperture system that adjusts to multiple lengths for spine treatment. Next, we retrospectively identified 10 patients scan treated with thoracic proton therapy who also had a diagnostic computed tomography within 4 months of simulation. We contoured a T6-T9 target volume on both the diagnostic scans (DS) and simulation scans (SS). Using the aperture system, we generated proton plans on the DS using a posterior–anterior beam with no custom range compensator to treat T6-T9 to 8 Gy × 1. Plans were transferred to the SS to compare coverage and normal tissue doses, followed by robustness analysis. Finally, we compared normal tissue doses and costs between proton and photon plans. Results were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. ResultsMedian D95% on the DS plans was 101% (range, 100%–102%) of the prescription dose. Median Dmax was 107% (range, 105%–108%). When transferred to SS, coverage and hot spots remained acceptable for all cases. Heart and esophagus doses did not vary between the DS and SS proton plans (P >.2). Robustness analysis with 5 mm X/Y/Z shifts showed acceptable coverage (D95% > 98%) for all cases. Compared with the proton plans, the mean heart dose was higher for both anterior–posterior/posterior–anterior and volumetric modulated arc therapy plans (P < .01). Cost for proton DSBP was comparable to more commonly used photon regimens. ConclusionProton DSBP is technically feasible and robust, with superior sparing of the heart compared with photons. Eliminating simulation and custom devices increases the value of this approach in carefully selected patients.

Model development of dose and volume predictors for esophagitis induced during chemoradiotherapy for lung cancer as a step towards radiobiological treatment planning

BackgroundCurrently, radiation therapy treatment planning system intends biological optimization that relies heavily upon plan metrics from tumor control probability (TCP) and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) modeling. Implementation and expansion of TCP and NTCP models with alternative data is an important step towards reliable radiobiological treatment planning. In this retrospective single institution study, the treatment charts of 139 lung cancer patients treated with chemo-radiotherapy were reviewed and correlated dosimetric predictors with the incidence of esophagitis and established NTCP model of esophagitis grade 1 and 2 for lung cancer patients.MethodsEsophagus is an organ at risk (OAR) in lung cancer radiotherapy (RT). Esophagitis is a common toxicity induced by RT. In this study, dose volume parameters Vx (Vx: percentage esophageal volume receiving ≥ x Gy) and mean esophagus dose (MED) as quantitative dose-volume metrics, the esophagitis grade 1 and 2 as endpoints, were reviewed and derived from the treatment planning system and the electronic medical record system. Statistical analysis of binary logistic regression and probit were performed to have correlated the probability of grade 1 and 2 esophagitis to MED and Vx. IBM SPSS software version 24 at 5% significant level (α = 0.05) was used in the statistical analysis.ResultsThe probabilities of incidence of grade 1 and 2 esophagitis proportionally increased with increasing the values of Vx and MED. V20, V30, V40, V50 and MED are statistically significant good dosimetric predictors of esophagitis grade 1. 50% incidence probability (TD50) of MED for grade 1 and 2 esophagitis were determined. Lyman Kutcher Burman model parameters, such as, n, m and TD50, were fitted and compared with other published findings. Furthermore, the sigmoid shaped dose responding curve between probability of esophagitis grade 1 and MED were generated respecting to races, gender, age and smoking status.ConclusionsV20, V30, V40 and V50 were added onto Quantitative Analysis of Normal Tissue Effects in the clinic, or QUANTEC group’s dose constrains of V35, V50, V70 and MED. Our findings may be useful as both validation of 3-Dimensional planning era models and also additional clinical guidelines in treatment planning and plan evaluation using radiobiology optimization.

Estimation of oesophageal surface dose in breast cancer patients undergoing supraclavicular irradiation by thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD) and treatment planning system (TPS)

Estimation of oesophageal surface dose in breast cancer patients undergoing supraclavicular irradiation by thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD) and treatment planning system (TPS)

Predictive Factors for Response to Adaptive Therapy in Thoracic Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy

Online adaptive radiotherapy (ART) has been increasingly adopted for clinical use. However, ART for thoracic malignancies has lagged beyond its implementation for other primary cancers. Efforts are needed to identify optimal patients for ART by finding trends for changes in tumor position, shape, or proximity to OARs are needed. We hypothesized tumor size, histology, pre-RT SUV value, and intrathoracic location could influence how tumors change during cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)-based ART Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy (SAbR) for thoracic disease. Data was collected from a prospective registry of patients who received CBCT-ART and SAbR for primary and secondary lung tumors. Dosimetry data was obtained from the simulation planning and the daily adaptive workflow. Central lung tumors were defined as those located within 2 cm of the bronchial tree. Plans were either delivered as per simulation or through the online adaptive workflow delivery (AD). Change in planning tumor volumes (PTV) were calculated between initial and final fractions (ΔPTV). A total of 42 patients with a median age of 67 (range 17-90) and median 8.3 months follow up, treated between June 2021 and December 2022 were included. Most patients had NSCLC or presumed NSCLC (73.85%, 31/42), and most lesions were peripheral (61.9%, 26/42) versus central (31%, 13/42) or apical (7.1%, 3/42). Mean dose and median fractions were 52.5 Gy (SD 8.07) and 5 (range 3-5) while median initial (i) PTV was 31.75 cm3 (IQR 42.3 cm3). On average, ΔPTV decreased by 4.9% (SD 21) and volume shrunk by 5 cm3 (SD 14.5). AD improved per fraction PTV coverage and conformality while esophageal, cardiac, and spinal cord dose were significantly decreased (all p < 0.05), and most fractions were delivered with AD (73.4%, 138/188). AD was aborted most often for small iPTVs. ΔPTV grew >10% for two lesions though their iPTV were < 10 cm3. 12/42 ΔPTV were >10% smaller by the end of RT and corresponded to larger iPTVs. Age, lung primary, metastatic disease, smoking status, and tumor location were not predictive for >10% decrease in ΔPTV. Among 24 biopsy-proven NSCLC ΔPTV was >10% smaller in 6/12 patients (50%) with adenocarcinoma and only in 2/12 (16.7%) with SCC, although this was not significant on χ2 testing (p = 0.08). There were no differences in local, regional, distant failure or death comparing those with a ΔPTV of >10% vs <10% (all p > 0.1). Comparing pre-treatment PET SUV and tumor response, lower SUVs appear to be associated with more PTV shrinkage, with no significant PTV change plateauing at SUV 20. However, this analysis was limited by the number of patients with high SUV values. CBCT-ART SAbR is associated with improved PTV coverage, target conformality, and reduced OAR dose. Large iPTV and adenocarcinomas were more likely to decrease >10%. High metabolic activity appeared predictive for a lack of significant ΔPTV. Further clinical and radiographic features should be explored to predict response to ART.

Multi-Criteria Optimization and RapidPlan for Improved Organs at Risk Sparing in Treatment Planning of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma

Treatment planning for malignant pleural mesothelioma is complex and time-consuming owing to the large volume of the target as well as its overlap and proximity to critical organs. Knowledge-based planning (KBP) model using RapidPlan (RP) was previously developed and clinically tested at our institution for treatment planning of these cases that had undergone pleurectomy-decortication, and therefore had two intact-lungs. The aim of this work is to investigate if multi-criteria optimization (MCO) can further improve the RP model with respect to organ at risk (OAR) sparing without compromising target coverage. The RP model was trained with clinically accepted plans of 57 patients that used Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) with 2 partial arcs and 6 MV photons. The dose volume histogram (DVH) estimation model was trained to estimate doses to the heart, ipsilateral lung, total lung, contralateral lung, stomach, esophagus, kidneys and liver. Clinical treatment plans for 12 patients were re-planned using RP as well as a combination of RP and MCO. Application of MCO was after RP and used tradeoff exploration to navigate to the improved dose distribution on a Pareto surface. Selection of a plan that further improved OAR sparing while maintaining coverage constraints of PTV D95 and V95 ≥ 94% was made. Dosimetric parameters for clinical plans (CP), plans using RP as well as plans generated with RP and MCO were all compared for 12 new validation cases. Wilcoxon sign-rank test was used for statistical significance testing. The mean heart dose was reduced from 20.9 Gy ± 3.2 Gy for CP to 17.1 Gy ± 4.2 Gy with RP and further to 13.8 Gy ± 3.3 Gy with RP and MCO. The heart V30 Gy was reduced from 23.7% ± 8% to 18.2% ± 9.4% with RP and further to 13.6% ± 5.7% with RP and MCO. The corresponding results for contralateral lung V5 Gy were 68.6% ± 14.1% with CP, 50% ± 26.3% with RP and 45.3% ± 22.8% with RP and MCO, while the mean esophagus dose was reduced from 26.5 Gy ± 3.1 Gy to 21.5 Gy ± 4.7 Gy with RP and further to 19.1 Gy ± 4.2 Gy with RP and MCO. All these dosimetric improvements were statistically significant (p<0.001). However, improvements with RP and MCO for the total lung mean and V20 Gy, liver mean, stomach mean and kidney V18 Gy were marginal over the RP. Sparing of ipsilateral lung V20 Gy was maintained at ≥ 50 cc on average for all plans. PTV D95 and V95 were both normalized at 94%. Combination of RP and MCO significantly improved sparing of the OARs, especially the heart, contralateral lung and esophagus without compromising coverage or doses to other structures. Since doses to the heart, and contralateral lung are known to correlate with incidence of radiation pneumonitis, it would be prudent to consider planning with both RP and MCO to help determine the optimal treatment plan for the individual patient's anatomy.