Small Cell Carcinoma Of Esophagus Research Articles

Epidemiology, prognostic factors, and survival analysis in small cell esophageal carcinoma: A population-based study with external validation.

Small cell esophageal carcinoma (SCEC) is a poorly differentiated esophageal neuroendocrine neoplasm with a poor prognosis. This study aimed to explore the factors and treatment approaches influencing the prognosis of SCEC. In this retrospective study, we collected data from the 18 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registries cohort between 2004 and 2019, as well as from a Chinese institutional registry covering the period from 2012 to 2022. We assessed the annual percentage change (APC) in incidence of SCEC. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were conducted to evaluate survival outcomes. Additionally, nomograms were developed for overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) in the SEER cohort for SCEC and validated in an independent Chinese cohort. This analysis included 299 SCEC patients from the SEER cohort and 66 cases from the Chinese cohort. During the period of 2004-2019, the incidence of SCEC reached a plateau, with an APC of -1.40 (95% confidence interval [CI]: -4.3 to 1.40, P > 0.05). Multivariable Cox regression analysis revealed that age, distant metastasis, and chemotherapy were independent factors for OS, while distant metastasis and chemotherapy were independent factors for CSS. The nomograms developed for OS and CSS in SCEC exhibited remarkable accuracy and reliable predictive capacity in estimating 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year OS and CSS. SCEC is a rare malignancy with aggressive behavior. Distant metastasis is significantly associated with worse OS and CSS in patients with SCEC. Currently, chemotherapy remains the primary treatment approach for SCEC.

623. PERIOPERATIVE THERAPY FOR LIMITED-STAGE SMALL CELL ESOPHAGEAL CARCINOMA: A RETROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY

Abstract Background The optimal treatment strategy for limited-stage small cell esophageal carcinoma (LS-SCEC) remains uncertain, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of perioperative therapy in those patients. Methods From June 2005 to November 2022, a total of 156 patients with LS-SCEC who underwent esophagectomy were included in the current study. The primary endpoint was overall survival, and secondary endpoints included progression-free survival. Pathologic staging was determined based on the 8th American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) TNM staging system for esophageal carcinoma. Survival curves were created using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Prognostic factors analysis was carried out using both univariate and multivariate Cox regression models, as well as propensity score matching (PSM) analysis. Statistical significance was defined as P value < 0.05 in a two-tailed test. Results Among 156 LS-SCEC patients, the median age was 62 years (interquartile range [IQR], 56-67), with 120 (76.9%) being males. Thirty-three (21.2%) patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy; and 2 (1.3%) received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Seventy-six (48.7%) received adjuvant chemotherapy, 2 (1.3%) received adjuvant radiotherapy, and 13 (8.3%) received adjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Only 7 (4.5%) patients achieved pathological complete remission after neoadjuvant therapy. Following surgery, 33 (21.2%) patients were categorized stage I, 40 (25.6%) as stage II, 61 (39.1%) as stage III, and 22 (14.1%) as stage IV. The median follow-up time of the entire cohort was 72 months. The median disease-free survival (mDFS) was 12.0 months (95% CI, 10.2–13.8 months), and the median overall survival (mOS) was 21.0 months (95% CI, 16.2–25.8 months). The 5-year OS rate was 25.9%, and the DFS rate was 21.9%. Univariate analysis revealed that clinical T stage (P=0.011), clinical N stage (P=0.009), pathological T stage (P=0.027), pathological N stage (P=0.001), pathological TNM stage (P=0.002), adjuvant therapy (P<0.001), and neural invasion (P=0.001) were significant prognostic factors for overall survival. In multivariate analysis, clinical T stage (P=0.049), neural invasion (P=0.002), N stage (P=0.006), and adjuvant therapy (P=0.001) were identified as independent prognostic factors. Furthermore, a PSM analysis was conducted to evaluate the impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on LS-SCEC patients. Following PSM, 64 patients were matched, with 32 in each group. Both univariate and multivariate analyses indicated that neoadjuvant chemotherapy could enhance the OS of LS-SCEC patients, with a 5-year OS rate of 37.7% compared to 0.0% in the non-neoadjuvant chemotherapy group (P<0.001, HR=0.319, 95% CI: 0.168-0.604). Subgroup analyses further supported the benefit of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with clinical stages T3-4 and nodal positive (N+), where improved outcomes were observed (P=0.001 and 0.013 respectively). Additionally, subgroup analyses revealed that adjuvant chemoradiotherapy was identified as the optimal treatment model for patients with nodal positive status (adjuvant chemoradiotherapy vs. chemotherapy: OS P=0.01, DFS P=0.004) and those categorized as pathological stage III-IV (adjuvant chemoradiotherapy vs. chemotherapy: OS P=0.03, DFS P=0.017). Conclusions Perioperative therapy is essential for patients with LS-SCEC. Patients with clinical stage T3-4 and nodal positive should undergo neoadjuvant chemotherapy. All patients should receive adjuvant therapy, and adjuvant chemoradiotherapy is recommended for those with nodal involvement or pathologic TNM stages III-IV.

Prognostic factors and treatment strategies of limited-stage primary esophageal small-cell carcinoma-a SEER database analysis.

Primary esophageal small-cell carcinoma (PESC) is a rare tumor with poor efficacy, and there is currently no standardized treatment method. Our aim is to explore the prognostic factors and possible optimal treatment modalities for limited-stage PESC. We retrospectively searched the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database from 1975 to 2019 for data of patients with limited-stage PESC. Kaplan-Meier method was used to plot survival curves, calculate survival rates, and Log-rank was used to test the differences among survival curves. Prognostic factors were explored through univariate and multivariate Cox regression survival analyses; Cox regression survival analysis was also conducted to analyze the risk of death among treatment groups and compare the survival differences among each treatment group. The non-single treatment (ST) group was defined as the comprehensive treatment (CT) group and it was compared against the ST group. A total of 186 cases of limited-stage PESC were included in the study, there were differences in survival time among different groups due to differences in age, year, median household income, and N stage (P<0.001, P=0.041, P=0.002, P=0.001). The median overall survival (mOS) of the surgical group (19 months) was longer than that of the nonsurgical group (11 months) (P=0.01). The mOS of the chemotherapy group (16 months) was longer than that of the non-chemotherapy group (4 months) (P<0.001). The mOS of the radiotherapy group (16 months) was longer than that of the non-radiotherapy group (8 months) (P<0.001). Univariate analysis showed that age ≥80 years (P=0.006), year (1997-2007) (P=0.01), year (2008-2019) (P=0.01), N2 (P=0.003), surgery (P=0.02), radiotherapy (P<0.001), and chemotherapy (P<0.001) were prognostic factors affecting overall survival (OS) in limited-stage PESC patients. Multivariate analysis showed that SEER stage (P=0.02), age (P=0.007), radiotherapy (P<0.001), surgery (P=0.006), and chemotherapy (P<0.001) were independent prognostic factors affecting OS in patients of limited-stage PESC. Prognosis was better in the non-monotherapy group than in each monotherapy group. The CT group is superior to the ST group (P<0.001). The surgery combined with chemotherapy (SC) group had the longest mOS and the highest reduced risk of death, but there was no statistical difference. SEER stage, age, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and surgery were independent prognostic factors in limited-stage patients; CT outperformed ST; the SC group had the longest median survival, but showed no statistical difference.

Does surgery and radiotherapy really improve the prognosis of patients with small-cell esophageal carcinoma?

Does surgery and radiotherapy really improve the prognosis of patients with small-cell esophageal carcinoma?

The Applicability of the AJCC TNM Staging 8th Edition to Esophageal Small-Cell Carcinoma: A Multicenter Retrospective Trial from China

Small cell carcinoma of the esophagus (SCCE) is a rare type of esophageal cancer, the incidence of it is only 0.1% to 2.4% in all cases of esophageal cancer. However, the optimal disease staging system has not yet been defined. To comprehensively explore the impact of AJCC TNM Staging 8th edition on survival outcome of SCCE. From January 2007 to December 2020, 909 patients with SCCE who had completed TNM staging from 14 cancer centers in China were retrospectively examined. Univariate survival rate analyses were estimated using the Kaplan and Meier method, with comparisons made between groups by the log-rank test. All statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS 25 statistical software. Statistical significance was assumed for a two-tailed p value less than 0.05. TNM stage also was a statistically significant prognostic factor for OS and PFS in SCCE(p<0.001). Increasing clinical T category using the AJCC8 TNM staging system resulted in progressively poorer survival in patients who did not have metastatic (M0) involvement(p<0.01). However, the results of pairwise comparisons showed no significant differences in survival between patients with adjacent phases except for those between T3 versus T2 (p<0.0001). N staging also showed significant influence on OS, and with significant difference between successive stages (p<0.05) except that between the survival rates of N1 and N2 cases (p = 0.00758). Similar to t category, increasing M category was associated with progressively worse survival. The T and N staging confirmed significant influence on PFS in the SCCE patients (p<0.001). AJCC TNM Staging 8th edition criteria for SCCE patients has a high prognostic impact. Therefore, it is applied to clinical practice and future therapeutic trials.

PD-L1 and HLA-class I expression status and their therapeutic implication in oesophageal small-cell carcinoma.

Oesophageal small-cell carcinoma is a rare and highly aggressive subtype of oesophageal cancer with a dismal prognosis. To explore the potential applicability of immunotherapy, we investigated the expression status of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) and human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-class I and the degree of tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in oesophageal small-cell carcinoma. PD-L1 and HLA-class I expression levels were evaluated in 10 pure small-cell carcinomas and five mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNENs). The combined positive score (CPS) and tumour proportion score (TPS) were used for PD-L1 assessment. Immunohistochemistry for mismatch repair (MMR) proteins was also performed. PD-L1 immunohistochemistry demonstrated CPS ≥1 in nine (60%), CPS ≥10 in five (33%), and TPS ≥1 in five (33%) cases. Overall survival was significantly longer in patients with CPS ≥1 than in those with CPS <1. HLA-class I deficiency (>50% tumour cells) was noted in five cases (33%), with no significant correlation with PD-L1 expression status. Among the five MiNENs, HLA-class I expression was decreased in the small-cell carcinoma component of three cases. HLA-class I deficiency was significantly associated with higher TNM stage and reduced TIL levels. MMR deficiency was not observed in any case. Given that a significant subset (40%) exhibited PD-L1 CPS ≥1 with preserved HLA-class I expression and high levels of TIL, the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway is a potential therapeutic target for oesophageal small-cell carcinoma.

Primary small cell esophageal carcinoma – a single centre experience

Background: Primary small cell esophageal carcinoma is a rare neoplasm with a serious prognosis. The approach to this malignancy is still under debate.

The Survival and Prognosis Characteristics of Primary Esophageal Small-Cell Carcinoma.

Objective To comprehensively explore the survival characteristics of primary esophageal small-cell carcinoma (PSCCE) and identify the main factors affecting the prognosis. Methods The clinical and follow-up data of PSCCE patients admitted to the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University from 2006 to 2010 were retrospectively analyzed. The primary endpoint was five-year survival. Survival curves were drawn using the Kaplan-Meier method, and log-rank test was used to compare the differences in survival rates among the groups. Cox regression models were used to analyze prognostic factors. Results A total of 119 eligible patients were retrieved. Median survival was 27 months (3-100 months). Changes in overall survival (OS) in PSCCE patients were associated with TNM stage (P = 0.007), T stage (P = 0.049), and lymph node metastasis (P = 0.004). When TNM was in stage I-IIb, lymph node metastasis (P = 0.003) or combined adjuvant therapy (P = 0.004) was an independent factor affecting OS. Survival analysis showed that TNM staging had no predictive value for 5-year survival time or disease-free survival (DFS) of PSCCE (P > 0.05). Conclusion TNM stage, T stage, and lymph node metastasis were related to the survival of patients. Negative lymph node metastasis and treatment are independent prognostic factors in PSCCE TNM stage I-IIb patients.

Clinical characteristics of 272 437 patients with different histopathological subtypes of primary esophageal malignant tumors

Objective: To characterize the histopathological subtypes and their clinicopathological parameters of gender and onset age by common, rare and sparse primary esophageal malignant tumors (PEMT). Methods: A total of 272 437 patients with PEMT were enrolled in this study, and all of the patients were received radical surgery. The clinicopathological information of the patients was obtained from the database established by the State Key Laboratory of Esophageal Cancer Prevention & Treatment from September 1973 to December 2020, which included the clinical treatment, pathological diagnosis and follow-up information of esophagus and gastric cardia cancers. All patients were diagnosed and classified by the criteria of esophageal tumor histopathological diagnosis and classification (2019) of the World Health Organization (WHO). The esophageal tumors, which were not included in the WHO classification, were analyzed separately according to the postoperative pathological diagnosis. The χ2 test was performed by the SPSS 25.0 software on count data, and the test standard α=0.05. Results: A total of 32 histopathological types were identified in the enrolled PEMT patients, of which 10 subtypes were not included in the WHO classification. According to the frequency, PEMT were divided into common (esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, ESCC, accounting for 97.1%), rare (esophageal adenocarcinoma, EAC, accounting for 2.3%) and sparse (mainly esophageal small cell carcinoma, malignant melanoma, etc., accounting for 0.6%). All the common, rare, and sparse types occurred predominantly in male patients, and the gender difference of rare type was most significant (EAC, male∶ female, 2.67∶1), followed with common type (ESCC, male∶ female, 1.78∶1) and sparse type (male∶ female, 1.71∶1). The common type (ESCC) mainly occurred in the middle thoracic segment (65.2%), while the rare type (EAC) mainly occurred in the lower thoracic segment (56.8%). Among the sparse type, malignant melanoma and malignant fibrous histiocytoma were both predominantly located in the lower thoracic segment (51.7%, 66.7%), and the others were mainly in the middle thoracic segment. Conclusion: ESCC is the most common type among the 32 histopathological types of PEMT, followed by EAC as the rare type, and esophageal small cell carcinoma and malignant melanoma as the major sparse type, and all of which are mainly occur in male patients. The common type of ESCC mainly occur in the middle thoracic segment, while the rare type of EAC mainly in the lower thoracic segment. The mainly sparse type of malignant melanoma and malignant fibrous histiocytoma predominately occur in the lower thoracic segment, and the remaining sparse types mainly occur in the middle thoracic segment.

Small cell carcinoma of esophagus: Case report

Small cell carcinoma of esophagus is tumor belonging to the family of extra-pulmonary small cell carcinoma. It is a highly aggressive tumor and early diagnosis and treatment is necessary for better prognosis of the tumor. We present a case of 45 year old male diagnosed with primary small cell carcinoma of esophagus and a review of literature of this rare tumor.

Nomogram for the prediction of individualized overall survival of patients diagnosed with small cell esophageal carcinoma.

BackgroundA nomogram was developed for the estimation of individualized overall survival (OS) of patients diagnosed with small cell esophageal carcinoma (SCEC).MethodsFrom the SEER dataset, 427 patients diagnosed with SCEC during the period from 2004 to 2015 were selected as training sets. For the establishment of a nomogram capable of estimating the OS possibility of patients diagnosed with SCEC, a group of independent prognostic factors were identified and incorporated. The effectiveness of the nomogram was then both externally and internally verified among 159 patients from Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center (FUSCC) who were diagnosed with SCEC between 2006 and 2015. The predictive accuracy and discriminative ability of the nomogram were measured by concordance index (C-index). Comparisons between nomogram and the AJCC staging systems (6th and 7th) were performed with calibration plots and area under the curves (AUC) values.ResultsWe identified age, gender, primary site, SEER stage, surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy as seven independent risk factors which were then used to set up the nomogram. Calibration curves indicated that the prediction of the nomogram was consistent with real observations for the possibilities of 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS, and applying the nomogram to the cohort for validation led to reproducible results. Moreover, the C-indices and AUC values were higher in the nomogram than those in the AJCC staging system AJCC which is also aimed at the prediction of OS.ConclusionsThis study resulted in the establishment of the first nomogram for the prediction of individualized OS of patients diagnosed with SCEC. The accuracy rate of prediction of this model may be higher than previously established staging systems.

A Comparative Analysis of the Gene Expression Profiles of Small Cell Esophageal Carcinoma, Small Cell Lung Cancer, and Esophageal Adeno/Squamous Carcinoma

Purpose/objectives: Primary small cell esophageal carcinoma (SCEC) is a rare malignancy without an established treatment strategy. This study investigated the gene expression profile of SCEC and compared it with the expression profiles of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and esophageal adeno/squamous carcinoma (EAC/ESCC).Materials/methods: All patients with SCEC, SCLC, and EAC/ESCC in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database 1973–2014 were included. Overall survival (OS) and prognostic analysis were conducted. De novo expression array analysis was performed on three pairs of frozen primary SCEC tissues and the corresponding normal samples from the institutional tissue bank using the Affymetrix HG U133 plus 2.0 Array. These data were complemented with public domain expression data sets from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) repository using the same working platforms, which included primary SCLC, EAC/ESCC, and normal lung/esophagus specimens (series GSE30219 and GSE26886). After individual normalization, the primary tumors were submitted to statistical analysis (GeneSpring GX 13.0) to identify the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) relative to their paired normal tissues. Enrichments of genes categorized by function and gene interactions were analyzed by DAVID 6.8 and STRING 11.0, respectively.Results: The clinical outcomes of the patients with SCEC were significantly more worse than those with EAC/ESCC and SCLC in the SEER database. SCEC had more DEGs in common with SCLC than EAC/ESCC [829 vs. 450; false discovery rate (FDR) < 0.01; and fold change ≥2], leading to a stronger correlation between SCEC and SCLC (Pearson's correlation coefficient was 0.60 for SCEC vs. SCLC, 0.51 or 0.45 for SCEC vs. ESCC or EAC, and the coefficient was 0.73 for ESCC vs. EAC). Similar findings were obtained by principal component analysis (PCA) using all DEGs retrieved from these four groups. Functional annotation showed that a higher proportion of pathways and biological processes were common between SCEC and SCLC and were associated with the cell cycle (mitosis), DNA replication, telomere maintenance, DNA repair, and P53 and RB pathways (Benjamini p < 0.05). Compared with EAC/ESCC, SCEC shared more co-upregulated DEGs coding for the aforementioned common pathways with SCLC (584 vs. 155). In addition, SCEC and SCLC were found to have possessed overlapping gene-interactive networks, with centromere protein F (CENPF), never in mitosis gene A-related kinase 2 (NEK2), kinesin family member 11 (KIF11), thymopoietin (TMPO), and forkhead box protein M1 (FOXM1) as common skeletons centered by gene regulatory network (NUF2).Conclusions: This study is the first attempt to examine the genomic signatures of SCEC at the transcriptomic level and compare the expression profiles between SCEC, SCLC, and EAC/ESCC. Our preliminary data indicate that SCEC and SCLC display notably similar patterns of gene expression for mitosis and DNA repair. Further validation studies are warranted.

Novel nomogram predicting cancer-specific survival and overall survival in patients with primary esophageal small-cell carcinoma: A surveillance, epidemiology, and end results-based study.

Small-cell carcinoma is a relatively infrequent pathological variety of esophageal cancer. In this study, a novel nomogram model was developed to evaluate the cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) of patients with primary esophageal small-cell carcinoma (ESmCC). In total, 502 patients with primary ESmCC were identified based on data from 1973 to 2015 retrieved from the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database. Clinical characteristics such as age at diagnosis, gender, race, site, tumor stage, surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy were included for multivariate logistic analyses to predict CSS and OS. Nomogram models for the prediction of CSS and OS in ESmCC patients were tested with the concordance index (C-index) method and calibration curves. From our multivariate analyses, race, stage, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy, but not surgery, were significantly associated with the CSS of ESmCC patients, while age at diagnosis, stage, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy were significantly associated with their OS. Nomograms were developed using age at diagnosis, race, gender, stage, surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy to predict the two survival measures; these nomograms were verified as accurate in predicting OS and CSS in ESmCC patients, with C-index values of 0.736 and 0.731, respectively. By utilizing easily accessible clinicopathological information, we established a simple but useful tool for predicting the CSS and OS of ESmCC patients that could help to make personalized clinical decisions for patients with this rare malignancy. Cancer-specific survival, esophageal small-cell carcinoma, nomogram, overall survival, surveillance, epidemiology, and end results.

Clinicopathological Features and Prognoses in Patients With Brain Metastases From Small-Cell Esophageal Carcinoma: A Retrospective Analysis of 18 Patients.

Objective: This study aims to examine the clinical characteristics of patients with brain metastases (BM) from small-cell esophageal carcinoma (SCEC) and to explore the association of the corresponding factors with overall survival (OS).Methods: The data of 18 patients with brain metastases from SCEC, diagnosed from January 1, 2006, to December 31, 2018, in the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University were analyzed retrospectively.Results: The 18 patients who were included in this study accounted for 6.7% of the patients with SCEC diagnosed from 2006 to 2018. Of the 18 patients, 8 (44.4%) were females. For the entire cohort, the median OS was 7 months, the 1-year OS was 22.2%, and the 2-year OS was 0%. For patients who received whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) and for those who did not (13 vs. 5), the median OS was 11.9 and 3 months, respectively, and the 1-year OS was 30.8 and 0%, respectively. When comparing diagnosis-specific Graded Prognostic Assessment (DS-GPA) scores of patients with BM from SCEC ranging from 2.5 to 4 and from 0 to 2, the median OS was 13.1 and 4 months, respectively, and the 1-year OS was 57.1 and 0%, respectively. In the univariable regression, patients who received WBRT had improved OS compared to those who did not (HR = 0.249, p = 0.018), and patients with a DS-GPA score of 2.5–4 were associated with improved OS compared with patients with a DS-GPA score of 0–2 (HR = 0.050, p = 0.005).Conclusion: The incidence of brain metastases in patients with SCEC is low, but the prognosis in those patients is very poor. The DS-GPA score may be a prognostic factor of patients with BM from SCEC. Brain radiotherapy could improve the survival of these patients.

Tumor-Infiltrating Immune Cells and PD-L1 as Prognostic Biomarkers in Primary Esophageal Small Cell Carcinoma.

Primary esophageal small cell carcinoma (PESCC) is a weakly prevalent but lethal malignancy with early metastasis and a poor prognosis. Currently, neither effective prognostic indicators nor curative therapies are available for PESCC. Immunotherapy has now evolved into one of the most promising therapies for cancer patients. Tumor-infiltrating immune cells which are integral to the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) are recognized as highly important for prognosis prediction, while the responsiveness to immune checkpoint blockade may be subject to the features of TIME. In this study, we aim to identify the TIME and provide indication for the applicability of immune checkpoint therapy in PESCC. We found that PD-L1 expression was detected in 33.33% (27/81) of all the patients, mostly exhibiting a stroma-only pattern and that it was positively associated with tumor-infiltrating immune cells (CD4+, CD8+, and CD163+). In 74.07% of PD-L1-positive specimens, PD-L1+CD163+ cells were colocalized more with CD4+ than CD8+ T cells. 83.95% (68/81) of all the specimens were infiltrated with more CD4+ than CD8+ T cells. Further analysis showed FoxP3+ Tregs constituted 13-27% of the total CD4+ T cell population. The Kaplan-–Meier analysis indicated several factors that contribute to poor survival, including negative PD-L1 expression, rich CD4 expression, rich FoxP3 expression, a low CD8/CD4 ratio, and a high FoxP3/CD8 ratio. A nomogram model was constructed and showed good performance for survival prediction. These results highlight that a suppressive TIME contributes to poor survival of patients with PESCC. TIME analyses might be a promising approach to evaluate the possibility and effect of immune checkpoint-based immunotherapeutics in PESCC patients.

20P Quantitative whole slide assessment of CD8+ tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes in small cell esophageal carcinoma in relation to clinical outcome

20P Quantitative whole slide assessment of CD8+ tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes in small cell esophageal carcinoma in relation to clinical outcome

MET-04 A case of Brain Metastases with repeated bleeding from Esophageal carcinoma

Brain metastases from esophageal cancer is rare and the incidence has been reported at approximately 5%. We report a case of brain metastases with repeated bleeding from Esophageal carcinoma. The case is a 76-year-old man. Three years ago he was diagnosed with small cell carcinoma of the esophagus by endoscopic biopsy. Metastasis was found only in the cervical lymph node, but the condition was stable by chemoradiotherapy and no metastases were found throughout the body before 1 month. He was admitted to the hospital because of a sudden convulsion, and CT scan revealed cerebral hemorrhage in the right frontal lobe. We performed conservative treatment, but rebleeding was observed from the same site repeatedly after 1 month and 2 months. Due to the influence of bleeding, it was difficult to distinguish cerebral hemorrhage from brain tumor by contrast MRI. After surgery, the cause of bleeding was diagnosed as metastatic brain tumor of esophageal small cell carcinoma. Postoperative radiation therapy was performed in another hospital, but rebleeding was observed 3 months after the operation. A reoperation was performed at another hospital, and a recurrence of metastatic brain tumor was diagnosed. In the case of highly malignant metastatic brain tumors, it was considered necessary to frequently follow the images.

S2010 Esophageal Small Cell Carcinoma – A Highly Aggressive and Rare Tumor

S2010 Esophageal Small Cell Carcinoma – A Highly Aggressive and Rare Tumor

Treatment and prognostic analysis of patients with primary esophageal small-cell carcinoma

Objective: The study aimed to analyze the clinicopathological features, treatment, and prognosis factors of primary esophageal small-cell carcinoma (PESC). Methods: The clinical records and follow-up data of 100 patients with PESC were collected, and the clinicopathological features and treatments were examined. Log-rank test and Cox regression model were performed to identify the independent prognostic factors. Results: Progressive dysphagia, weight loss, and abdominal pain were the most common initial symptoms in the 100 patients with PESC. The primary tumor site mainly occurred in the middle of the chest (51%, 51/100), and the ulcer type was the most common under gastroscope (31%, 31/100). One or more positive markers of epithelial origin were present in all of the enrolled patients. At the time of diagnosis, 80 cases had limited disease (LD) and 20 cases had extensive disease (ED). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates of PESC patients were 57.0%, 18.0%, and 11.0%, respectively, with a median survival time (MST) of 13.8 months. In all PESC patients, multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that the significant prognostic factors included the lesion length (OR=2.661, P<0.001), TNM staging (OR=1.464, P=0.016), and treatment methods (OR=0.333, P<0.001). Besides, in patients with LD, the lesion length (OR=2.638, P=0.001) and treatment methods (OR=0.285, P<0.001) were independent prognostic factors. The MST of patients in surgery + chemotherapy group (21.6 months) was longer than that of the surgery only group (8.3 months, P=0.021), while patients in surgery+ chemotherapy+ radiotherapy group were also associated with a longer MST than the chemotherapy + radiotherapy group (31.0 months, 9.8 months, respectively; P<0.001). Conclusions: PESC is a rare esophageal malignant tumor with poor prognosis. Our findings reveal that the lesion length, TNM staging, and treatment method are independent prognostic factors for PESC patients. Moreover, surgery-based comprehensive treatments may prolong the survival of patients with LD.

P16 in highly malignant esophageal carcinomas: the correlation with clinicopathological factors and human papillomavirus infection

p16 is generally considered to be a surrogate maker of human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and also a predictive marker of favorable clinical outcome of patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx. p16 overexpression is also known to be induced by deregulation of RB1 in neuroendocrine carcinomas. In highly malignant esophageal neoplasms, however, the status of p16 has remained largely unknown. We immunolocalized p16 and Rb1 in 82 surgically resected esophageal high-grade squamous cell carcinomas (46 poorly differentiated and 36 basaloid squamous cell carcinomas) and 15 esophageal small-cell carcinomas in order to clarify the clinical and biological significance of p16. p16 immunoreactivity was detected in 7/82 (9%) high-grade squamous cell carcinomas and 15 (100%) small-cell carcinomas. p16 immunoreactivity was significantly associated with Rb1 protein loss in both groups (P < 0.001). HPV was detected in none of the p16-positive cases examined. Clinical outcome of the p16-positive high-grade squamous cell carcinomas was not different from that of the p16-negative counterparts (P = 0.687) but significantly better than those with the small-cell carcinomas (P = 0.023). p16 was therefore considered to be induced through an inactivation of the RB1 signaling pathway and not through HPV infection in highly malignant esophageal neoplasms. Nevertheless, patients’ clinical outcome of these neoplasms significantly differs; therefore, small-cell carcinomas have to be carefully differentiated from other neoplasms. In addition, p16 overexpression is not predictive of favorable clinical outcome in high-grade squamous cell carcinomas of the esophagus.