Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Patients Research Articles

Results of the baseline positron emission tomography can customize therapy of localized esophageal adenocarcinoma patients who achieve a clinical complete response after chemoradiation

BackgroundPatients with localized esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) who achieve a clinical complete response (clinCR) after preoperative chemoradiation (trimodality therapy; TMT) or definitive chemoradiation (bimodality therapy; BMT) live longer than those who achieve a <clinCR (Suzuki A, Xiao LC, Hayashi Y et al. Prognostic significance of baseline positron emission tomography and importance of clinical complete response in patients with esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy. Cancer 2011; 117: 4823–4833; Cheedella NK, Suzuki A, Xiao L et al. Association between clinical complete response and pathological complete response after preoperative chemoradiation in patients with gastroesophageal cancer: analysis in a large cohort. Ann Oncol 2013; 24: 1262–1266; Ajani JA, Correa AM, Hofstetter WL et al. Clinical parameters model for predicting pathologic complete response following preoperative chemoradiation in patients with esophageal cancer. Ann Oncol 2012; 23: 2638–2642). We hypothesized that the initial standardized uptake value (iSUV) of positron emission tomography will define novel subsets of clinCR patients. MethodsWe analyzed 323 EAC patients, from our prospective database, who achieved a clinCR. Various statistical methods were used to assess the influence of iSUV on patient outcome. ResultsThe median follow-up of 323 patients was 40.8 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 35.6–47.3 months]. Two hundred six (63.8%) patients had TMT and 117 (36.2%) had BMT. If iSUV was ≥6, TMT patients had a longer median OS (94.8 months; 95% CI 66.07–NA) than BMT patients (31.4 months; 95% CI 21.7–42.1; P ≤ 0.001). However, if iSUV was <6, the median OS of TMT and BMT patients was similar (P = 0.62). iSVU did not influence the pathologic complete response rate in TMT patients (P = 0.85). ConclusionclinCR patients with iSUV of <6 are identified as a new subset that fared equally well when treated with TMT or BMT. Future esophageal preservation strategy may be best suited for this newly identified subset of EAC patients.

Lymphatic vessel density of esophageal adenocarcinoma and its clinical significance

Objective To investigate the differences on lymphatic vessel density (LVD) among esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC),esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and normal esophageal tissues,and analyze the clinical significance.Methods Twenty samples of EAC,24 samples of ESCC and 20 cases of normal esophageal tissues were obtained at the Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College from January 2004 to January 2011.D2-40 was used for immunostaining of lymphatic vessels in EAC,and antibodies of D2-40 and Ki-67 were used together to detect proliferation of lymphatic vessels.The differences in the LVD among EAC,ESCC and normal esophageal tissues were analyzed.All data were analyzed using the analysis of variance or t test.Results D2-40 staining could identify the lymphatic vessels,and antibodies of D2-40 and Ki-67 could detect the proliferation of lymphatic vessels.The LVD of EAC,ESCC and normal esophageal tissues were (3.3 ± 1.7)/0.17 mm2,(4.6 ± 1.2)/0.17 mm2 and (3.8 ± 1.2)/0.17 mm2,respectively,with significant differences (F =5.44,P ＜0.05).The LVD of EAC was significantly lower than that of ESCC (t =3.074,P ＜ 0.05),while there was no significant difference in the LVD between the EAC and normal esophageal tissues (t =-1.022,P ＞ 0.05).There were significant differences in the LVD between the ESCC and normal esophageal tissues (t =2.395,P ＜ 0.05).There were significant differences in the LVD between EAC patients with deglutition discomfort and those with pain (t =3.092,P ＜ 0.05).There were significant differences in the LVD between EAC patients with course ＜6 months and those with course≥6 months (t =3.092,P ＜ 0.05).No statistical difference in clinicopathological parameters including gender,age,site of lesion,tumor diameter,pathological morphology,T stage,N stage,G stage,TNM clinical stage and lymph node metastasis were detected (t ＝ 1.130,1.020,F =0.082,t =0.799,F =0.692,t =0.694,1.820,0.353,0.969,0.969,P ＞ 0.05).Conclusions The LVD of EAC is lower than that of ESCC,but is similar to that of normal esophageal tissues.The LVD of EAC is correlated with the symptoms and course of patients. Key words: Esophageal neoplasms; D2-40; Lymphatic density; Clinical significance

Association of MDM2 T309G and p53 Arg72Pro polymorphisms and gastroesophageal reflux disease with survival in esophageal adenocarcinoma

Although gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a risk factor for esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC), some patients develop EAC in the absence of GERD. A putative mechanism of reflux-induced tumorigenesis involves disruptions in the p53 pathway. We assessed the interaction of GERD and p53 pathway polymorphisms on EAC prognosis. In a prospective cohort of 358 EAC patients, clinical data (including GERD history and survival) were collected. Germline DNA was genotyped for MDM2 T309G and p53 Arg72Pro. Cox proportional hazards models were used to determine adjusted hazard ratios (AHR) for associations between genotype, GERD, and genotype-GERD interactions with survival. Compared with other genotypes, MDM2 G/G (median overall survival 21 vs 30 months; P < 0.001) and p53 Pro/Pro (12 vs 30 months; P = 0.004) were associated with shorter survival. When analyzed by GERD, MDM2 G/G was associated with shorter survival in patients without GERD (AHR 3.4, 95% CI 2.0-6.0), but not in patients with GERD (AHR 1.1 [0.7-1.8]); the MDM2-GERD interaction was significant (P = 0.003). A similar trend was seen for p53 Pro/Pro (AHRs 2.5 without GERD vs 1.4 with GERD). Combined analysis of at-risk variants (MDM2 G or p53 Pro), revealed each additional at-risk variant was associated with shorter survival in patients without GERD (AHR 1.6) but not with GERD (AHR 1.0). MDM2 G/G and the combination of MDM2 G and p53 Pro were negative prognostic factors for EAC patients without GERD but not for those with GERD. There may be biological differences between GERD positive and GERD negative EAC.

Neoadjuvant therapy reduces the incidence of nodal micrometastases in esophageal adenocarcinoma

BackgroundWe evaluated the impact of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) on nodal micrometastases (NMMs) in esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) patients with histologically negative nodes ([y]pN0). MethodsOf 48 consecutively treated patients with neoadjuvant CRT, we selected 20 EAC ypN0 patients (group 1). These patients were matched with 20 pN0 EAC patients who had surgery alone (group 2). Harvested (y)pN0 lymph nodes were examined immunohistochemically (anti-CK8/18 [CAM 5.2]) according to a validated sentinel node protocol. A 3rd group (n = 11) staged as ypN1 after neoadjuvant CRT was used as the control group. ResultsUpstaging to NMM+ occurred in 2 patients (10%) in group 1 and in 8 patients (40%) in group 2 (P = .028). Disease-free and overall survival rates in NMM+ patients in group 1 were worse compared with NMM− patients (P = .014 and P = .003, respectively) but comparable with ypN1 patients (n = 11). ConclusionsA 30% reduction of NMM+ was obtained after neoadjuvant treatment in (y)pN0 patients. NMM+ after CRT had a negative impact on survival in ypN1 patients. These data warrant further investigation in larger prospective datasets.

CIP2A expression and prognostic role in patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma

CIP2A is overexpressed in many cancers, including esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. The regulation of c-MYC and CIP2A expression is characterized by a positive feedback mechanism facilitating the expression of both of them and accelerating cancer cell proliferation in gastric cancer. Increased CIP2A expression is a predictor of poor survival in some cancers. The incidence of positive CIP2A immunostaining and its association with c-MYC and its predictive value in esophageal adenocarcinoma are unknown. All esophageal adenocarcinoma patients from 1990 to 2007 with sufficient material for analysis of CIP2A and c-MYC in two university hospitals were included in the study. In addition, biopsies from Barrett's epithelium from the cancer patients and control tissue from normal esophageal mucosa adjacent to the tumor were included. CIP2A was moderately or strongly positive in 77.9%, and c-MYC in 93.8% of the cancer specimens. These frequencies were statistically different from the expression in normal esophageal epithelium. In addition, there was a positive correlation between CIP2A and c-MYC expression (p=0.018). According to adjusted Cox regression survival analysis, CIP2A and c-MYC had no effect on survival. However, among patients with stage IVA-IVB cancer, there was a trend toward poor prognosis in CIP2A-positive patients. The expression of CIP2A and c-MYC was associated with each other, and their overexpression was found in most cases of esophageal adenocarcinoma. However, CIP2A and c-MYC had no effect on survival.

Clinical response to chemotherapy in oesophageal adenocarcinoma patients is linked to defects in mitochondria

Chemotherapeutic drugs kill cancer cells, but it is unclear why this happens in responding patients but not in non-responders. Proteomic profiles of patients with oesophageal adenocarcinoma may be helpful in predicting response and selecting more effective treatment strategies. In this study, pretherapeutic oesophageal adenocarcinoma biopsies were analysed for proteomic changes associated with response to chemotherapy by MALDI imaging mass spectrometry. Resulting candidate proteins were identified by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) and investigated for functional relevance in vitro. Clinical impact was validated in pretherapeutic biopsies from an independent patient cohort. Studies on the incidence of these defects in other solid tumours were included. We discovered that clinical response to cisplatin correlated with pre-existing defects in the mitochondrial respiratory chain complexes of cancer cells, caused by loss of specific cytochrome c oxidase (COX) subunits. Knockdown of a COX protein altered chemosensitivity in vitro, increasing the propensity of cancer cells to undergo cell death following cisplatin treatment. In an independent validation, patients with reduced COX protein expression prior to treatment exhibited favourable clinical outcomes to chemotherapy, whereas tumours with unchanged COX expression were chemoresistant. In conclusion, previously undiscovered pre-existing defects in mitochondrial respiratory complexes cause cancer cells to become chemosensitive: mitochondrial defects lower the cells' threshold for undergoing cell death in response to cisplatin. By contrast, cancer cells with intact mitochondrial respiratory complexes are chemoresistant and have a high threshold for cisplatin-induced cell death. This connection between mitochondrial respiration and chemosensitivity is relevant to anticancer therapeutics that target the mitochondrial electron transport chain.

PTU-159 Characterisation of Oesophageal Muc1 Expression in the Progression to Oesophageal Adenocarcinoma

IntroductionStudies on oesophageal MUC1 expression have shown conflicting results. One found MUC1 in 100% of 52 oesophageal adenocarcinoma (OA) patient’s using an anti-MUC1 antibody(1), whilst another found no expression in...

Surgery Is an Essential Component of Multimodality Therapy for Patients with Locally Advanced Esophageal Adenocarcinoma

BackgroundExperience with neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CXRT) has raised questions regarding the additional benefit of surgery after locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma patients achieve a clinical response to CXRT. We sought to quantify the value of surgery by comparing the overall (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) of trimodality-eligible patients treated with definitive CXRT vs. CXRT followed by esophagectomy. MethodsWe identified 143 clinical stage III esophageal adenocarcinoma patients that were eligible for trimodality therapy. All patients successfully completed neoadjuvant CXRT and were considered appropriate candidates for resection. Patients that were medically inoperable were excluded. Cox regression models were used to identify significant predictors of survival. ResultsAmong the 143 patients eligible for surgery after completing CXRT, 114 underwent resection and 29 did not. Poorly differentiated tumors (HR = 2.041, 95% CI = 1.235–3.373) and surgical resection (HR = 0.504, 95% CI = 0.283–0.899) were the only independent predictors of OS. Patients treated with surgery had a 50 and 54 % risk reduction in overall and cancer-specific mortality, respectively. Median OS (41.2 vs. 20.3 months, p = 0.012) and DFS (21.5 vs. 11.4 months, p = 0.007) were significantly improved with the addition of surgery compared to definitive CXRT. ConclusionsSurgery provides a significant survival benefit to trimodality-eligible esophageal adenocarcinoma patients with locally advanced disease.

A validated miRNA expression profile for response to neoadjuvant therapy in esophageal cancer.

4078 Background: For patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) preoperative chemoradiation (trimodality therapy) is the preferred approach. We examined several patient cohorts to create and validate a miRNA signature predictive for response to this therapy in esophageal carcinoma. Methods: Pre-treatment tumor specimens from 10 patients with EAC treated with trimodality therapy were examined using a TaqMan Human MicroRNA Card Set (v3.0) for expression of 754 miRNAs, of which 306 were overexpressed. miRNA expression between patients with a pathologic complete response (pCR) and those with a non-pCR was then analyzed. 44 miRNAs differentially expressed between pCR and non-pCR patients were then examined in an additional 42 EAC patientsÕ tumors (model set) using the Fluodigm 48.48 Dynamic Array and were used to generate a miRNA expression profile (MEP) predicting for response in three groups: low, intermediate and high-risk. The MEP was then validated in an additional 72 EAC patients using the Illumina miRNA Expression Array. ROC curves were generated for clinical stage, MEP and a combination of both. Results: For the model set, pCR rates in low risk patients based on the MEP were 75%, 42.9% in intermediate risk and 12.5% in high-risk patients (ptrend=0.008). In the validation set the pCR rates were 66.7%, 36.5% and 15.7% for low, intermediate and high-risk patients respectively (ptrend=0.025). The AUC for the ROC using the MEP was 0.72 (p=7.8x10-12) in the model set, 0.69 (p=1x10-4) in the validation set and 0.7 for the two cohorts combined (p=1.4x10-18). When clinical stage was added to the predictive model, the ROC for each group was 0.79 (p=2.6x10-19), 0.75 (p=8.7x10-27) and 0.77 (p=2x10-41) respectively. Conclusions: The MEP represents the first validated miRNA signature for therapeutic response in esophageal carcinoma and improves significantly on clinical staging. Its use could select patients at high-risk for therapeutic resistance for trial-based therapy, as well as low-risk patients for whom resection may possibly be safely omitted.

The management of dysphagia in esophageal adenocarcinoma patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy: Can invasive tube feeding be avoided?

e15034 Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is an accepted standard for locally advanced esophago-gastric adenocarcinoma. However the dysphagia frequently associated with this condition may interfere with patient tolerance of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Surgical or endoscopic invasive tube feeding (ITF), including stents, is a commonly employed strategy to maintain nutritional support however it can cause significant morbidity in its own right. We sought to determine if an approach of careful dietary counseling and fast-tracked neoadjuvant chemotherapy can obviate the need for ITF. Methods: Pts undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (DCF or ECF Q3 weeks x3 or FLOT Q2weeks x4) for locally advanced (cT3 and/or N+) esophageal or EGJ adenocarcinoma at a single institution from 3/07-9/12 were identified from a prospective database. All received dietary counseling and were closely monitored for signs/ symptoms of malnutrition with serial (baseline/pre-surgery) Body Mass Index (BMI), albumin, dysphagia scores (DS: 0 best - 4 worse), and quality of life (FACT-E). We assessed the response of dysphagia and nutritional status to neoadjuvant treatment and the need for ITF. Data presented as median (Interquartile Range) or median (±SD), paired t-test or Wilcoxon signed ranks test determined significance (*p=0.05). Results: Of 130 patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy 78 had dysphagia scores of 2 or greater, most of whom received DCF (91%). Overall the dysphagia improved in 75/78 (96%) from a DS of 3 (2-4) to 0 (0-1)*. This was associated with an increase in FACT-E QoL scores (117±23 to 140±20)*. Weight (Kg)(70±22:69±24), BMI (24.5±8 to 23.9±7), and Albumin (40±5 to 37±4) were maintained. Only one patient required a stent, and none a jejunostomy, or gastrostomy. Conclusions: Appropriately timed neoadjuvant chemotherapy with a highly effective regimen rapidly restores normal swallowing, maintains nutritional status, and obviates the need for stenting or invasive tube feeding in patients with significant dysphagia from esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Promoter polymorphisms of the SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex molecule, BRM, and esophageal adenocarcinoma outcome.

4077 Background: Better understanding of the biology of esophageal cancer may help improve its treatment. The SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex is an important regulator of gene expression that has been linked to cancer development and outcome. Expression of Brahma (BRM), a critical catalytic subunit of SWI/SNF, is lost in a variety of solid tumors. Two novel BRM promoter polymorphisms (BRM -741 and BRM -1321) have been correlated with BRM loss and elevated cancer risk in upper aerodigestive cancers (Wang et al, Carcinogenesis, 2012) and more recently in lung cancer outcome (Cuffe et al, ESMO, 2012) by our research teams. Objectives: We evaluated BRM polymorphisms and their role in the survival of esophageal cancer patients. Methods: 223 histologically-confirmed esophageal adenocarcinoma patients of all stages were evaluated. The two BRM polymorphisms utilized Taqman genotyping. Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for clinical prognostic variables and determined the association of polymorphisms with overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS). Adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Results: Among our patients, 85% were male; the mean age was 63 years. 37% had stage IV advanced tumors. The median PFS was 1.03 years, while median OS was 1.82 years. After adjustment for known prognostic clinical variables, carrying homozygous variants of both BRM polymorphisms (double homozygotes) was associated with a worse outcome: aHR 1.84 (1.06-2.34, p=0.03) for OS and aHR 1.93 (1.10-2.48, p=0.02) for PFS. The direction and magnitude of associations were similar in subsets of patients by age, gender, smoking status, use of platinum agents, and disease stage. Non-significant trends in the same direction but of aHR magnitudes 1.34-1.54 were seen in the patients who carried one homozygous variant or who were double heterozygotes. Conclusions: We report the initial association of BRM polymorphisms with survival in esophageal cancer. We plan to explore additional relationships and validate these findings in other datasets.

Endoscopic Mucosal Resection Results in Change of Histologic Diagnosis in Barrett’s Esophagus Patients with Visible and Flat Neoplasia: A Multicenter Cohort Study

There are limited data on the effect of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) on changes of histopathologic diagnosis for Barrett's esophagus (BE) patients undergoing endoscopic eradication therapy (EET); especially those without visible lesions. To compare the frequency of changes of diagnosis by EMR compared with pre-EMR biopsy diagnosis for patients with and without visible lesions. In this multicenter outcomes project, patients with Barrett's-related neoplasia undergoing EET at three tertiary-care centers were included. Patients undergoing biopsies followed by EMR within six months were included. The main outcome measures were frequency of overall change of histopathologic diagnosis, change based on pre-EMR biopsy diagnosis, and change based on the presence of visible lesions. One-hundred and thirty-eight BE patients (low-grade dysplasia (LGD) 15 (10.9 %), high-grade dysplasia (HGD) 87 (63 %), esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) 36 (26.1 %)) were included; 114 (82.6 %) patients had visible lesions. EMR resulted in a change of diagnosis for 43 (31.1 %) patients (upgrade 14 (10.1 %); downgrade 29 (21 %)). For HGD patients, EMR downstaged dysplasia grade for 17 (19.5 %) cases and upstaged it to EAC for nine (10.3 %) cases. There was a change of diagnosis for 26 (29.9 %) HGD patients, irrespective of the presence or absence of visible lesions (p = 0.76). For EAC patients, EMR downstaged dysplasia grade in 10 (27.8 %) cases. There was a change of diagnosis for 10 (27.8 %) EAC patients, irrespective of the presence or absence of endoscopically visible lesions (p = 0.48). EMR results in a change of diagnosis for approximately 30 % of BE patients with early neoplasia (with and without visible lesions) referred for EET.

Su1526 Clinical Development of a Proprietary Immunohistochemistry (IHC) Assay to Detect Pathologic Complete Response (Pathcr) in Esophageal Adenocarcinoma (EC)

The standard of care for EC patients is a trimodal approach that includes chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery. Approximately 25% of EC patients exhibit pathCR to chemoradiotherapy, but undergo unnecessary surgical resection procedures. A set of three protein biomarkers (NF-kB, SHH, and Gli-1) were shown to effectively identify pathCR status from diagnostic patient biopsies at MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDA). A standardized protocol for clinical determination of pathCR would be a significant step toward individualized therapeutic options for EC patients. We present the development of a standard operating procedure (SOP) for the execution of a proprietary IHC assay performed in a clinical laboratory that can accurately determine pathCR status from a primary biopsy.

Mo1864 DNA Methylation Markers for Disease Progression and Survival in Barrett's Esophagus

Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC), with its precursor lesion Barrett’s esophagus (BE), accounts for 2% of all cancer-related deaths and has a very poor prognosis with a median survival of less than one year. In addition, the prevalence of BE is rapidly rising in the Western World, resulting in a large number of individuals “at risk” for this disease. However, a major limitation for defining this risk population is the absence of reliable biomarkers, which also affects the development of surveillance strategies and chemoprevention therapies for BE and EAC. The development of BE has been thought to arise largely because of chronic esophageal inflammation and the subsequent the expansion of some sort of an altered stem cell population due to alteration of stromal niche factors. This also leads to epigenetic alterations, which are common in cancer initiation and progression, such as changes in DNA methylation. Many genes show great promise as specific DNA methylation biomarkers, which offer several advantages, as they are easy accessible in body fluids such as blood, sputum, or urine and the DNA containing the methylation information can be isolated from formalin fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) tissue as well; the positive methylation signal can also be detected in the presence of huge amounts of material from normal cells giving a negative signal. We measured two DNA methylation markers, DKK1 (a WNT antagonist, known to be methylated in colorectal and gastric cancer which has a function tumor cell niche formation) and TFAP2E (a novel biomarker for nonresponse towards 5FU in colon cancer) in a retrospective cohort of patients with EAC collected at the Institute of Pathology at the TU Munich (FFPE material), using Methylspecific-HRM-PCR followed by pyrosequencing. Results In a cohort of 60 EAC patients (primary resections), DKK1 methylation was associated with overall survival (ROC analysis, AUC 0.69, 95% CI, p < 0,001) as well as disease free survival (AUC 0.63, 95% CI, p < 0,01). In another cohort of 55 patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (5FU, cisplatin, folinic acid) TFAP2E methylation was found also to be associated with overall survival (AUC 0.64, 95% CI, p < 0,05) but less so if patients who did not receive 5FU (taxol, cisplatin) were included (AUC 0.62,95% CI, p < 0,05).

Transcriptionally Active Human Papillomavirus Is Strongly Associated With Barrett's Dysplasia and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma

The role of human papillomavirus (HPV) in Barrett's esophagus (BE) remains unclear. The few studies that have previously investigated HPV and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) or BE have produced either negative data or positive results of doubtful clinical/etiological significance or have detected only low-risk HPV types. We therefore prospectively determined the prevalence of biologically active HPV in esophageal epithelium of patients representing the Barrett's metaplasia-dysplasia-adenocarcinoma sequence. HPV DNA was estimated by nested PCR and viral transcriptional activity detected by E6/7 oncogene mRNA expression and p16INK4A immunohistochemistry in fresh frozen and paraffin-embedded esophageal biopsies of patients with BE, Barrett's dysplasia (BD), and EAC, as well as controls. Biopsies were obtained from the transformation zone (squamocolumnar junction (SCJ)) and the lesion, or corresponding site in controls, i.e., 2 cm above the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ). Of the 261 patients, 81 were positive for HPV DNA. In controls and BE, the virus was mostly detected at the transformation zone. Compared with controls (18.0%), HPV positivity was significantly more common in BD (68.6%, incidence rate ratio (IRR) 2.94, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.78-4.85, P<0.001) and EAC (66.7%, IRR 2.87, 95% CI 1.69-4.86, P<0.001), but not in BE (22.1%, IRR 1.06, 95% CI 0.60-1.85, P=0.85). Of the patients, 92.6% were high-risk (HR) HPV, i.e., types 16 and 18. Again, p16INK4A positivity was greatest in BD and EAC and much less in BE patients (44.1%, IRR 17.0 (95% CI 4.86-59.6, P<0.001), 44.4%, 17.0 (95% CI 4.87-59.4, P<0.001), and 10.6%, 3.93 (95% CI 1.01-15.3, P=0.048) respectively). In 66 HPV DNA-positive patients tested for E6/E7 mRNA, none of the control (n=16) or BE (n=13) individuals were positive, whereas 9/22 BD and 9/15 EAC patients demonstrated oncogene expression (P<0.001). When HPV DNA, p16INK4A, and E6/E7 mRNA were all positive, there was a very strong association with disease severity (SCJ: odds ratio (OR) 104, 95% CI 20.3-529, P<0.001; lesion: OR 62.2, 95% CI 12.4-311, P<0.001) than when all were negative. Transcriptionally active HR-HPV was strongly associated with BD and EAC, but was largely biologically irrelevant in BE and controls, suggesting a potential role in esophageal carcinogenesis. These data provide robust justification for further detailed longitudinal, interventional, and molecular studies.

Loss of TGF-β Adaptor β2SP Activates Notch Signaling and SOX9 Expression in Esophageal Adenocarcinoma

TGF-β and Notch signaling pathways play important roles in regulating self-renewal of stem cells and gastrointestinal carcinogenesis. Loss of TGF-β signaling components activates Notch signaling in esophageal adenocarcinoma, but the basis for this effect has been unclear. Here we report that loss of TGF-β adapter β2SP (SPNB2) activates Notch signaling and its target SOX9 in primary fibroblasts or esophageal adenocarcinoma cells. Expression of the stem cell marker SOX9 was markedly higher in esophageal adenocarcinoma tumor tissues than normal tissues, and its higher nuclear staining in tumors correlated with poorer survival and lymph node invasion in esophageal adenocarcinoma patients. Downregulation of β2SP by lentivirus short hairpin RNA increased SOX9 transcription and expression, enhancing nuclear localization for both active Notch1 (intracellular Notch1, ICN1) and SOX9. In contrast, reintroduction into esophageal adenocarcinoma cells of β2SP and a dominant-negative mutant of the Notch coactivator mastermind-like (dnMAN) decreased SOX9 promoter activity. Tumor sphere formation and invasive capacity in vitro and tumor growth in vivo were increased in β2SP-silenced esophageal adenocarcinoma cells. Conversely, SOX9 silencing rescued the phenotype of esophageal adenocarcinoma cells with loss of β2SP. Interaction between Smad3 and ICN1 via Smad3 MH1 domain was also observed, with loss of β2SP increasing the binding between these proteins, inducing expression of Notch targets SOX9 and C-MYC, and decreasing expression of TGF-β targets p21(CDKN1A), p27 (CDKN1B), and E-cadherin. Taken together, our findings suggest that loss of β2SP switches TGF-β signaling from tumor suppression to tumor promotion by engaging Notch signaling and activating SOX9.

Utilization of surgery in trimodality-eligible patients with locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma in a nonprotocol setting

Trimodality therapy with neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery significantly improves the survival of locally advanced (clinical stage IIA-III) esophageal cancer patients compared to treatment with surgery alone. This has resulted in an increased use of neoadjuvant therapy in recent years, yet little is known regarding how this increase has impacted the utilization of surgery in the treatment of locally advanced disease. Although previous reports of experimental protocols suggest that 90-95% of patients complete trimodality therapy including a surgical resection, trimodality therapy completion among adenocarcinoma patients eligible for curative resection has not been evaluated in a nonprotocol setting. We sought to (i) assess the completion of trimodality therapy among locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma patients; (ii) characterize the reasons for avoiding surgery; and (iii) identify factors associated with failure to complete trimodality therapy. We identified 296 patients with locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma eligible for trimodality therapy at our institution. All patients were evaluated in a multidisciplinary setting and considered eligible for curative resection after initial staging and physiologic assessment. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with failure to complete trimodality therapy. Of 296 trimodality-eligible patients, 33% (97/296) did not complete trimodality therapy. Reasons for not undergoing surgery included patient choice (27.8%, 27/97), distant progression of disease during chemoradiation (23.7%, 23/97), and physician preference for surveillance (23.7%, 23/97). In addition, 17.5% (17/97) of patients had physical deterioration in performance status, and treatment-related deaths occurred in 7.2% (7/97) prior to surgery. In the total study population (n = 296), multivariable logistic regression identified older age (≥70 years: odds ratio [OR] = 6.611, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.900-15.071), pretreatment standard uptake value (6.8-10.1: OR = 2.393, 95% CI: 1.050-5.455; ≥15.8: OR = 3.623, 95% CI: 1.604-8.186), and a radiation dose of 50.4 Gy (OR = 5.312, 95% CI: 2.365-11.929) as being significantly associated with failure to complete trimodality therapy. Among the subgroup of patients that successfully completed chemoradiation (n = 266), older patients (≥70 years: OR = 9.606, 95% CI: 3.637-25.372), those with a comorbidity score of 2 or higher (OR = 4.059, 95% CI: 1.257-13.103), and those that received a radiation dose of 50.4 Gy (OR = 4.878, 95% CI: 1.974-12.054) were at a significantly higher risk of not completing trimodality therapy. Trimodality therapy completion among patients with locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma in a nonprotocol setting is considerably lower than what has previously been reported in clinical trials. Our findings suggest that a selective approach to surgery is commonly utilized in clinical practice. Trimodality-eligible patients that are older and have a higher comorbidity score are at risk for not completing trimodality therapy.

Next-generation sequencing of endoscopic biopsies identifies ARID1A as a tumor-suppressor gene in Barrett's esophagus.

The incidence of Barrett's esophagus (BE)-associated esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) is increasing. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) provides an unprecedented opportunity to uncover genomic alterations during BE pathogenesis and progression to EAC, but treatment-naive surgical specimens are scarce. The objective of this study was to establish the feasibility of using widely available endoscopic mucosal biopsies for successful NGS, using samples obtained from a BE 'progressor'. Paired-end whole-genome NGS was performed on the Illumina platform using libraries generated from mucosal biopsies of normal squamous epithelium (NSE), BE and EAC obtained from a patient who progressed to adenocarcinoma during endoscopic surveillance. Selective validation studies, including Sanger sequencing, immunohistochemistry and functional assays, were performed to confirm the NGS findings. NGS identified somatic nonsense mutations of AT-rich interactive domain 1A (SWI like) (ARID1A) and PPIE and an additional 37 missense mutations in BE and/or EAC, which were confirmed by Sanger sequencing. ARID1A mutations were detected in 15% (3/20) high-grade dysplasia (HGD)/EAC patients. Immunohistochemistry performed on an independent archival cohort demonstrated ARID1A protein loss in 0% (0/76), 4.9% (2/40), 14.3% (4/28), 16.0% (8/50) and 12.2% (12/98) of NSE, BE, low-grade dysplasia, HGD and EAC tissues, respectively, and was inversely associated with nuclear p53 accumulation (P=0.028). Enhanced cell growth, proliferation and invasion were observed on ARID1A knockdown in EAC cells. In addition, genes downstream of ARID1A that potentially contribute to the ARID1A knockdown phenotype were identified. Our studies establish the feasibility of using mucosal biopsies for NGS, which should enable the comparative analysis of larger 'progressor' versus 'non-progressor' cohorts. Further, we identify ARID1A as a novel tumor-suppressor gene in BE pathogenesis, reiterating the importance of aberrant chromatin in the metaplasia-dysplasia sequence.

Psychosocial factors and their association with reflux oesophagitis, Barrett’s oesophagus and oesophageal adenocarcinoma

To investigate the role of psychological characteristics as risk factors for oesophageal adenocarcinoma (OAC), as well as the reflux-mediated precursor pathway. An all-Ireland population-based case-control study recruited 230 reflux oesophagitis (RO), 224 Barrett's oesophagus (BO) and 227 OAC patients and 260 controls. Each case/control group completed measures of stress, depression, self-efficacy, self-esteem, repression and social support. A comparative analysis was undertaken using polytomous logistic regression adjusted for potential confounders. Compared to controls, OAC patients were almost half as likely to report high stress levels over their lifetime (P = 0.010, OR 0.51; 95%CI: 0.29-0.90) and 36% less likely to report having experienced depression (OR 0.64; 95%CI: 0.42-0.98). RO patients reported significantly higher stress than controls particularly during middle- and senior-years (P for trends < 0.001). RO patients were 37% less likely to report having been highly emotionally repressed (OR 0.63; 95%CI: 0.41-0.95). All case groups (OAC, RO and BO) were more likely than controls to report having had substantial amounts of social support (OR 2.84; 95%CI: 1.63-4.97; OR 1.97; 95%CI: 1.13-3.44 and OR 1.83; 95%CI: 1.03-3.24, respectively). The improved psychological profile of OAC patients may be explained by response shift. The role of psychological factors in the development of OAC requires further investigation.

GERD—Barrett—Adenocarcinoma: Do We Have Suitable Prognostic and Predictive Molecular Markers?

Due to unfavorable lifestyle habits (unhealthy diet and tobacco abuse) the incidence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in western countries is increasing. The GERD-Barrett-Adenocarcinoma sequence currently lacks well-defined diagnostic, progressive, predictive, and prognostic biomarkers (i) providing an appropriate screening method identifying the presence of the disease, (ii) estimating the risk of evolving cancer, that is, the progression from Barrett's esophagus (BE) to esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC), (iii) predicting the response to therapy, and (iv) indicating an overall survival—prognosis for EAC patients. Based on histomorphological findings, detailed screening and therapeutic guidelines have been elaborated, although epidemiological studies could not support the postulated increasing progression rates of GERD to BE and EAC. Additionally, proposed predictive and prognostic markers are rather heterogeneous by nature, lack substantial proofs, and currently do not allow stratification of GERD patients for progression, outcome, and therapeutic effectiveness in clinical practice. The aim of this paper is to discuss the current knowledge regarding the GERD-BE-EAC sequence mainly focusing on the disputable and ambiguous status of proposed biomarkers to identify promising and reliable markers in order to provide more detailed insights into pathophysiological mechanisms and thus to improve prognostic and predictive therapeutic approaches.