Eslicarbazepine Research Articles

Eslicarbazepine acetate, an alternative for patients with trigeminal neuralgia with hyponatremia induced by carbamazepine or oxcarbazepine

Eslicarbazepine acetate, an alternative for patients with trigeminal neuralgia with hyponatremia induced by carbamazepine or oxcarbazepine

The Initial Experience of Eslicarbazepine in Children at Three Canadian Tertiary Pediatric Care Centers.

Eslicarbazepine (ESL) is a once-daily, third-generation antiseizure medication for focal-onset seizures. The primary mechanism of action is enhancing the slow inactivation of voltage-gated sodium channels. The study objective was to review real-world experience regarding retention rate, efficacy, and tolerability of eslicarbazepine, soon after it became available for children in Canada. A retrospective review was performed on all patients prescribed eslicarbazepine from September 2017 to June 2020, with at least 3 years of follow-up data, at 3 Canadian tertiary care pediatric centers. Fifty patients were identified, and the mean age of eslicarbazepine initiation was 12.4 years (range 3-19 years). Most patients had drug-resistant epilepsy, trying a mean of 5.04 (range 0-14) antiseizure medications before the initiation of eslicarbazepine. Twenty-four patients (48.0%) experienced adverse effects, including dizziness (n = 10), drowsiness (n = 6), dizziness and drowsiness (n = 1), nausea and abdominal pain (n = 4), transient unsteadiness and diplopia (n = 1), and negative mood changes (n = 2). None had serious adverse effects, including rash. The retention rate of eslicarbazepine at last follow-up was 70%. Fifteen (30%) had ≥50% seizure reduction, with 2 of these patients becoming seizure free. Ten (20%) had 25% to 50% reduction, 2 (4%) had worsening of seizures, and 17 (34%) had no change in seizure frequency. The study results support the long-term effectiveness and tolerability of eslicarbazepine in a cohort of children with predominantly drug-resistant epilepsy in a real-life setting from 3 Canadian centers with initial use after approval. Adverse effects were nonserious, infrequently leading to eslicarbazepine discontinuation.

Eslicarbazepine induces apoptosis and cell cycle arrest in C6 glioma cells in vitro and suppresses tumor growth in an intracranial rat model

BackgroundGlioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most malignant brain tumor, with a poor prognosis and life expectancy of 14–16 months after diagnosis. The standard treatment for GBM consists of surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy with temozolomide. Most patients become resistant to treatment after some time, and the tumor recurs. Therefore, there is a need for new drugs to manage GBM. Eslicarbazepine (ESL) is a well-known antiepileptic drug belonging to the dibenzazepine group with anticancer potentials. In this study, for the first time, we evaluated the potential effects of ESL on C6 cell growth, both in vitro and in vivo, and examined its molecular effects.MethodsTo determine the effect of ESL on the c6 cell line, cell viability, proliferation, and migration were evaluated by MTT assay, colony formation, and wound healing assay. Also, apoptosis and cell cycle were examined by flow cytometry, qRT-PCR, and western blotting. In addition, an intracranial model in Wistar rats was used to investigate the effect of ESL in vivo, and the tumor size was measured using both Caliper and MRI.ResultsThe obtained results are extremely consistent and highly encouraging. C6 cell viability, proliferation, and migration were significantly suppressed in ESL-treated C6 cells (p < 0.001), as determined by cell-based assays. ESL treatment led to significant enhancement of apoptosis (p < 0.01), as determined by flow cytometry, and upregulation of genes involved in cell apoptosis, such as the Bax/Bcl2 ratio at RNA (p < 0.05) and protein levels (5.37-fold). Flow cytometric analysis of ESL-treated cells revealed G2/M phase cell cycle arrest. ESL-treated cells demonstrated 2.49-fold upregulation of p21 alongside, 0.22-fold downregulation of cyclin B1, and 0.34-fold downregulation of cyclin-dependent kinase-1 at the protein level. Administration of ESL (30 mg/kg) to male rats bearing C6 intracranial tumors also suppressed the tumor volume and weight (p < 0.01).ConclusionsBased on these novel findings, ESL has the potential for further experimental and clinical studies in glioblastoma.Graphical abstract

Beyond Pills: Synergizing Pharmacological and Physical Activity Interventions in Fibromyalgia Treatment. A review

Introduction and purpose Fibromyalgia (FM) is a chronic condition characterized by widespread musculoskeletal pain, fatigue, sleep disturbances, and cognitive impairment, affecting 2-4% of the global population, with a higher prevalence among women and those of lower socioeconomic status. The pathogenesis of FM is complex and multifactorial, involving central sensitization and neurochemical dysregulation. This review highlights the latest advancements in pharmacological and behavioral therapies for fibromyalgia. State of knowledge Management of fibromyalgia currently is based on a combination of medication use and non-pharmacological approaches, primarily based on physical activity and cognitive-behavioral therapy. This review explores advancements in FM treatments, focusing on novel pharmacological agents such as vortioxetine, eslicarbazepine acetate, and tapentadol, which target specific neurochemical pathways to alleviate symptoms. Vortioxetine offers new mechanisms of action with potential cognitive benefits, while eslicarbazepine acetate and tapentadol provide alternative approaches for pain modulation and central sensitization. Additionally, non-pharmacological therapies, including high-intensity interval training (HIIT) and virtual reality (VR) therapy, demonstrate promise in enhancing physical fitness, reducing pain, and improving quality of life for FM patients. Summary Overall, the integration of these novel therapies into comprehensive, individualized treatment plans can optimize outcomes and enhance the quality of life for individuals with FM. Ongoing research and personalized medicine approaches are essential to further refine and validate these emerging treatments.

Zirconia nanoparticles/carbon quantum dots modified carbon paste electrode as electrochemical sensor for determination of antiepileptic drug eslicarbazepine acetate in bulk and pharmaceutical dosage form

A new, sensitive and selective electrochemical method has been developed for determination of the antiepileptic prodrug eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) that is used for the treatment of partial-onset seizures in adults with epilepsy. It belongs to the class of sodium channel blockers called dibenzoazepine family. A novel modified zirconia nanoparticles carbon paste nanocomposite, carbon dots sensor prepared from banana peels by solvothermal method has been fabricated. The voltammetric method is based on the direct anodic oxidation of ESL at the electrode surface using differential pulse voltammetry. Under the optimum experimental conditions, ESL exhibited a linear relationship in the range of 3.04 × 10-8 to 9.66 × 10-5 M with a lower detection limit of 7.57 × 10-9 M and quantification limit of 2.29 × 10-8 M. The proposed method was validated according to ICH guidelines and was applied for estimating ESL in raw material showing high accuracy and precision with successful application on tablet dosage form.

An Retrospective Study of Commonly Prescribed Antiepileptic Drugs and it’s Interaction with Other Drugs which are Already in use Respect to Other Disease

Antiepileptic drugs (AED) are increasingly used in the treatment of some non-epileptic neurological diseases and psychiatric diseases. Most of the available data on the use of these agents in clinical conditions other than epilepsy are from case series, uncontrolled studies, or small randomized clinical trials, and their apparent efficacy requires confirmation in well-designed large phase III trials. Interactions between antiepileptic drugs or between antiepileptic drugs and other drugs can be pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic. Pharmacokinetic interactions include changes in absorption, distribution ,or eliminate , while pharmacodynamic interactions include synergism and antagonism at the site ,of action. Most clinically significant antiepileptic drug interactions are due to induction or inhibition of drug metabolism. Carbamazepine, phenytoin, phenobarbital and primidone are strong inducers of cytochrome P450 and glucuronide enzymes (as well as P-glycoprotein) and may reduce the effectiveness of concomitantly administered drugs such as oral anticoagulants, calcium antagonists, antimicrobial steroids. Mechanism Oxcarbazepine, eslicarbazepine acetate, felbamate, rufinamide, topiramate (at doses ≥ 200 mg/day) and perampanel (at doses ≥ 8 mg/day) have weaker inducing properties and less tendency to produce interactions mediated by enzyme induction. In contrast to enzyme induction, enzyme inhibition results in decreased metabolic clearance of the affected drug, which can increase serum concentrations leading to toxic effects. Examples of important interactions mediated by enzyme inhibition include valproic-induced increases in serum concentrations of phenobarbital and lamotrigine. There are also interactions where other drugs induce or inhibit the metabolism of antiepileptic drugs. Examples include an increase in serum carbamazepine concentration due to erythromycin and a decrease in serum lamotrigine concentration due to estrogen-containing contraceptives. Pharmacodynamic interactions between antiepileptic drugs may also be clinically important. These interactions can have potentially beneficial effects, such as the combined therapeutic synergy of valproic acid and lamotrigine, or adverse effects, such as the mutual potentiation of neurotoxicity in patients treated with a combination of sodium channel blocking antiepileptic drugs. AEDs are also used to treat psychiatric conditions, particularly bipolar disorder. To date, the AEDs most commonly used to treat this disorder have been carbamazepine and valproic acid, which have shown manic efficacy and likely long-term mood-stabilizing effects in many bipolar patients, including those who are lithium-intolerant. . The availability of new generation AEDs has expanded treatment options for bipolar disorder. Lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, gabapentin, and topiramate appear to show promise in the treatment of bipolar disorder, both as monotherapy and in combination with traditional mood stabilizers. In addition, newer AEDs appear to have a more favorable tolerability and drug interaction profile than older compounds, thus improving compliance

Assessing the Effectiveness of Eslicarbazepine Acetate in Reducing Audiogenic Reflex Seizures in the GASH/Sal Model of Epilepsy.

Eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) is a third-generation antiepileptic drug indicated as monotherapy for adults with newly diagnosed epilepsy and as adjunctive therapy for the treatment of partial seizures. Our aim was to assess the effectiveness and safety of both acute and repeated ESL administration against reflex audiogenic seizures, as shown by the Genetic Audiogenic Seizures Hamster from Salamanca (GASH/Sal). Animals were subject to the intraperitoneal administration of ESL, applying doses of 100, 150 and 200 mg/kg for the acute study, whereas a daily dose of 100 mg/kg was selected for the subchronic study, which lasted 14 days. In both studies, the anticonvulsant effect of the therapy was evaluated using neuroethological methods. To assess the safety of the treatment, behavioral tests were performed, hematological and biochemical liver profiles were obtained, and body weight was monitored. In addition, the ESL levels in blood were measured after the acute administration of a 200 mg/kg dose. Treatment with ESL caused a reduction in seizure severity. No statistically significant differences were detected between the selected doses or between the acute or repeated administration of the drug. To summarize, the intraperitoneal administration of ESL is safe and shows an anticonvulsant effect in the GASH/Sal.

Long-term effects of adjunctive eslicarbazepine acetate in adult Asian patients with refractory focal seizures: Post hoc analysis of a phase III trial.

A post hoc analysis of data from Asian patients included in the study BIA-2093-304 was conducted to evaluate the long-term safety/tolerability and efficacy of adjunctive eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) in adult Asian patients with refractory focal seizures. Part I was a randomized controlled trial, in which patients received ESL (800 or 1200 mg once daily [QD]) or placebo, assessed over a 12-week maintenance period. Patients completing Part I could enter two open-label extension periods (Part II, 1 year; Part III, ≥2 years), during which all received ESL (400-1600 mg QD). Safety/tolerability was assessed by evaluating treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Efficacy assessments included responder and seizure freedom rates. The safety population included 125, 92, and 23 Asian patients in Parts I, II, and III, respectively. Incidence of ESL-related TEAEs was 61.3%, 45.7%, and 17.4% during Parts I, II, and III, respectively. ESL-related TEAEs (most commonly, dizziness, somnolence, and headache) were consistent with ESL's known safety profile. During Part I, responder rates were higher with ESL 800 (41.7%) and 1200 mg QD (44.4%) versus placebo (32.6%), although not statistically significant. Seizure freedom rates with ESL 800 (5.5%) and 1200 mg QD (11.1%) were also higher versus placebo (0%) (p < 0.05 for ESL 1200 mg QD versus placebo). At the end of Part II, responder and seizure freedom rates were 60.3% and 14.7%, respectively. In summary, adult Asian patients with refractory focal seizures were responsive to treatment with ESL as adjunctive therapy and generally showed treatment tolerance well for up to 3 years. No new/unexpected safety findings were observed.

Efficacy, tolerability and safety of add-on third-generation antiseizure medications in treating focal seizures worldwide: a network meta-analysis of randomised, placebo-controlled trials

Adjunctive newer antiseizure medications (ASMs) are being used in patients with treatment-resistant focal-onset seizures (FOS). An updated network meta-analysis (NMA) was necessary to compile evidence in this critical area. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus from their inception until 17 January 2024, evaluating the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of rufinamide (RUF), brivaracetam (BRV), cenobamate (CNB), eslicarbazepine (ESL), lacosamide (LCM), retigabine (RTG), and perampanel (PER) as adjunctive treatments for FOS. Efficacy outcomes included seizure response and seizure freedom. Tolerability was assessed by discontinuation due to adverse events (AEs). Safety outcomes were evaluated based on the number of patients experiencing at least one AE and serious adverse events (SAEs). This review is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023485130). A total of 29 studies involving 11,750 participants were included. For seizure response, all ASMs were significantly superior to placebo, with RTG ranking highest, followed by CNB. Considering dosage, CNB 400mg/d was top-ranked, followed by RTG 1200mg/d. For seizure freedom, BRV was highest-ranked, followed by CNB, with BRV 100mg/d leading, followed by CNB 400mg/d. Regarding tolerability, LCM 600mg/d had the lowest ranking, followed by CNB 400mg/d. For the safety outcome of AEs, ESL 1200mg/d was ranked lowest, followed by CNB 400mg/d. Regarding SAEs, LCM 400mg/d was ranked lowest, followed by RTG 1200mg/d. ASMs at different dosages have varying efficacy and tolerability profiles. We have provided hierarchical rankings of ASMs for efficacy and safety outcomes. Our findings offer the most comprehensive evidence available to inform patients, families, physicians, guideline developers, and policymakers about the choice of ASMs in patients with treatment-resistant FOS. None.

Overnight switch from carbamazepine to eslicarbazepine in a real-life clinical scenario: a retrospective study.

Carbamazepine (CBZ) is a first-choice anti-seizure medication (ASM) whose efficacy is often invalidated by adverse effects (AEs). Eslicarbazepine (ESL) is a structural derivative of CBZ with better pharmacokinetic/tolerability profiles. We describe our experience of the overnight CBZ to ESL switch in people with epilepsy (PwE) to improve seizure control, AEs, and ASMs adherence. We retrospectively included 19 PwE (12 females, 53 ± 21years old) who underwent CBZ to ESL overnight switch due to single/multiple issues: poor efficacy (pEff, N = 8, 42%), tolerability (pToll, N = 11, 58%), adherence (pAdh, N = 2, 10%). 9/19 (47%) had psychiatric comorbidities. Clinical variables, seizure frequency, and AEs were recorded at switch time (T0) after 3.5 ± 3 (T1) and 6.5 ± 1.5months (T2). At T1, in pEff group, 1/8 (13%) was seizure free, 2/8 (25%) were responders (> 50% seizure reduction), 2/8 (25%) had no seizure changes, 3/8 (37%) had seizure worsening; the latter were those with the most severe epilepsy and encephalopathy. In pToll group, all PwE experienced AEs disappearance/amelioration. In pAdh group, all PwE reported adherence amelioration. Four dropouts. At T2, no changes were recorded within groups, while in the whole sample, 6/15 (40%) were responders, and 4/15 (27%) were seizure-free. No one complained of Powered by Editorial Manager® and ProduXion Manager® from Aries Systems Corporation psychiatric worsening, while 6/19 (32%) experienced mood/behavior benefits. CBZ to ESL overnight switch offers an opportunity to improve efficacy, tolerability, adherence, and psychiatric symptoms.

A real-world pharmacovigilance analysis of eslicarbazepine acetate using the FDA adverse events reporting system (FAERS) database from 2013 (Q4) to 2024 (Q1).

The approval of eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2013 marked an advancement in the treatment of adult patients with partial-onset seizures. However, there still remains a paucity of real-world studies regarding the adverse events (AEs) associated with this compound. The principal aim of the present study was to scrutinize ESL-related AEs by leveraging data from the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. By extracting all available data since the FDA approval of ESL (2013Q4-2024Q1), disproportionality analysis was performed using reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN) and multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker (MGPS) algorithms. AE signals that simultaneously met the requirements of all four algorithms were identified as significant positive signals. Demographic information, time of onset and gender-specific signal detection were also examined. In addition, a special screening process for designated medical events (DME) was implemented to focus on the evaluation and comparison of safety signals within DME and System Organ Classification (SOC) level, as well as SMQ (Standardised MedDRA Queries) level. Stratified analysis by logistic regression is employed to examine the variations across different gender (male and female) and age groups (<18years old, 18-64years old, >65years old). A total of 5,719 AE reports and 1,907 reported cases were obtained. ESL related AEs were identified in relation to 27 SOCs, among which the significant positive SOCs were nervous system disorders, injury poisoning and procedural complications, etc. There were 86 severely disproportional preferred terms that complied with the four algorithms. Most AEs occurred within the first month after treatment. According to the 86 valuable positive signals with DME screening results, 3 signals of dermatitis exfoliative, stevens-johnson syndrome, drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms were consistent with PT signals on the DME-list, with the 3 PTs focusing on skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders and hypersensitivity. Males are more commonly affected by seizures than females. Seizures, hyponatremia, and confusional states were more frequently observed in the elderly population, while aggression, irritability, DRESS (drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms), and abnormal behavior were found to be more common in the pediatric population. Both the children and elderly groups exhibited a higher proportion of agitation than the adult group. Our research enhances the safety and tolerability profile of ESL, but the clinical use of ESL should be noticed and avoided in relation to AEs since it raises the risk of dermatitis exfoliative, stevens-johnson syndrome. Particular attention should be paid to DRESS in children and hyponatremia in the elderly.

Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of adjunctive eslicarbazepine acetate in patients with focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures

ObjectiveTo report the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of adjunctive eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) treatment in reducing focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures (FBTCS). MethodsData were pooled from 3 randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of adjunctive ESL in patients with focal seizures. Patients treated with 800 or 1200 mg/day ESL and who experienced ≥ 1 FBTCS during baseline were included. Efficacy was measured using FBTCS standardized seizure frequency (SSF), responder rates (≥50%, ≥75%, and 100%), and time to first FBTCS. Adverse events (AEs) were tabulated for each subgroup. ResultsOf the original 1447 patients, 438 patients in the safety population were included with ≥ 1 FBTCS at baseline (efficacy population, n = 429). Patients with ≥ 2 FBTCS (safety, n = 354; efficacy, n = 346) and ≥ 3 FBTCS (safety, n = 294; efficacy, n = 288) at baseline were also analyzed.The 1200 mg/day ESL group experienced lower least squares mean SSF vs placebo in patients with ≥ 1 baseline FBTCS (P = 0.0395) and ≥ 3 baseline FBTCS (P = 0.0091). The 50% responder rates improved for 1200 mg/day ESL vs placebo (≥1 FBTCS, P = 0.005; ≥2 FBTCS, P = 0.0063; ≥3 FBTCS, P = 0.0016). The 75% responder rates improved with 1200 mg/day ESL vs placebo (≥1 FBTCS, P = 0.0315; ≥2 FBTCS, P = 0.0215; ≥3 FBTCS, P = 0.0099), and with 800 mg/day ESL for ≥ 2 FBTCS at baseline (P = 0.0486). The 100% responder rate was higher in patients treated with 1200 mg/day ESL (not significant). Time to first FBTCS was longer with both 800 (P = 0.0008) and 1200 mg/day (P = 0.0020) ESL vs placebo for the ≥ 1 FBTCS subgroup, and with 1200 mg/day ESL for ≥ 2 FBTCS (P = 0.0060) and ≥ 3 FBTCS (P = 0.0152) subgroups.Overall, AEs occurred at similar rates across subgroups, and were lower than the original RCTs. ConclusionAdjunctive ESL produced a robust response in patients with FBTCS, a seizure type associated with SUDEP and high injury rates. Adjunctive ESL was well tolerated in patients who experienced FBTCS.

Time to sustained responder status in patients with focal seizures treated with adjunctive eslicarbazepine acetate

Rapid and sustained clinical responses are critical in improving long-term outcomes in epilepsy. While a 50 % reduction from baseline in standardized seizure frequency (SSF) is often cited as a measure of clinically meaningful efficacy, sustained response (SR) is an alternative method that allows the assessment of onset and durability of the response. Time to sustained response in SSF of ≥ 50 %, ≥ 75 %, ≥ 90 %, and 100 % was assessed for pooled data from 3 similar randomized clinical trials of adjunctive eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL). Patients with focal seizures on stable doses of 1–2 antiseizure medications were randomized to placebo, ESL 800 mg/day, or ESL 1200 mg/day. SR50, SR75, SR90, and SR100 were defined as a ≥ 50 %, ≥ 75 %, ≥ 90 %, and 100 % reduction, respectively, in SSF compared to baseline occurring anytime during the 12-week maintenance period, sustained through the end of the maintenance period. Safety signals were assessed for patients with SR50 onset within the first 2 weeks of the maintenance period (early responders) and any point following the first 2 weeks (later responders). A total of 1221 patients were included in this analysis. SR50 was achieved as early as Day 1 (placebo, 4.7 %; ESL 800 mg/day, 8.8 %; ESL 1200 mg/day, 10.4 %). After 84 days, SR50 was achieved by 32.1 % of the placebo group, 46.9 % of the ESL 800 mg/day group (p = 0.0002 vs placebo), and 53.7 % of the ESL 1200 mg/day group (p < 0.0001 vs placebo). Both ESL groups demonstrated earlier SR50 onset compared with placebo (p < 0.0001). Time to SR50 onset was not statistically different between the 800 and 1200 mg/day ESL dose groups. SR75 (p = 0.0001), SR90 (p = 0.0019), and SR100 (p = 0.0014) were achieved significantly earlier in the ESL 1200 mg/day groups vs placebo. SR75 was achieved significantly earlier in the ESL 800 mg/day group vs placebo (p = 0.0188), while achievements of SR90 (p = 0.0525) and SR100 (p = 0.0540) trended toward earlier occurrence. A greater proportion of patients in the ESL groups compared to the placebo group achieved an SR50 during the maintenance period, and those patients in the ESL groups also achieved SR50 and SR75 sooner than placebo treated patients. Additionally, patients treated with the higher ESL dose achieved SR90 and SR100 sooner than those treated with placebo.

Long-term quality of life in patients with focal seizures treated with adjunctive eslicarbazepine acetate

By controlling seizures, anti-seizure medications can improve health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Data from a post-hoc pooled analysis of adjunctive eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) was used to describe HRQOL measures, including overall quality of life, seizure worry, emotional well-being, energy/fatigue, cognitive functioning, medication effects, social function, and overall score over a period of up to one year. Patients who completed a double-blind treatment phase (Part 1) of these trials were eligible to enter the open label extension (OLE; Part 2). Patients who continued into the OLE initiated adjunctive ESL at 800 mg/day for 1 month before investigators could titrate dosages based on efficacy and tolerability. HRQOL was measured at baseline and at the last assessment using the Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory (QOLIE-31) in all patients who entered the 1-year OLE and in patients who completed the 1-year OLE. The mean QOLIE-31 scores and mean change in scores were analyzed using paired t-tests. The percentage of patients with improvements in QOLIE-31 scores beyond the minimally important change (MIC) threshold from baseline to end of 1-year OLE is described. Of 1410 patients in the intent-to-treat population, 1120 patients continued to part 2, and 795 patients completed the OLE. In patients who entered the OLE, mean improvements in scores for seizure worry, overall quality of life, emotional well-being, medication side effects, social functioning, and total score were statistically significant. In patients who completed the OLE, the mean change to final assessment was statistically significantly improved for all QOLIE categories. In patients who entered the OLE with a final assessment, the percentage of patients meeting the MIC for social functioning was the highest (46.9%), followed by medication effects (44.9%), and seizure worry (42.9%). Patients who completed the OLE with a final assessment found a similar rank ordering in QOLIE scale improvements compared with those who entered the OLE with a final assessment. For both sets of patient groups, the least number of subjects met MIC criteria for the energy/fatigue QOLIE category. Treatment with therapeutic doses of adjunctive ESL in patients with focal seizures was associated with improvements in HRQOL for a period of up to one year.

Efficacy and Safety of Eslicarbazepine Acetate: A Single-Center Experience

Efficacy and Safety of Eslicarbazepine Acetate: A Single-Center Experience

Thirteen years of experience with eslicarbazepine acetate in the United Kingdom and Republic of Ireland: A safety perspective.

Eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) is a once-daily oral antiseizure medication. Its safety and tolerability from clinical trials have been mostly confirmed by real-world data. The main purpose of this report is to provide an overview of the safety profile of ESL in the United Kingdom (UK) and Republic of Ireland (ROI). Safety data were obtained from the UK and ROI post-marketing sources (October 2009-April 2022) by the marketing authorization holder. All individual reports were included in the Argus Safety™ database. All adverse events (AEs) were coded using MedDRA® version 24.1. Only valid cases (meeting the minimum pharmacovigilance reporting requirements) were included. During 13 years of ESL marketing, with cumulative estimated exposure of 2 210 395 patients-years, 183 reports were received. A total of 402 AEs were reported for the 155 valid reports. The most common reported AEs (≥6% of total reported), per system organ class (SOC), were: nervous system disorders (23.4%), injury, poisoning, and procedural complications (18.9%), general disorders and administration site conditions (12.9%), psychiatric disorders (12.7%) and gastrointestinal disorders (6.7%). The most frequently reported (≥2% of total reported) AEs were: seizure (4.5%), hyponatremia (4.2%), dizziness (2.7%), rash, fatigue (2.5% each), and somnolence (2.0%). Twenty-six percent of events were classified as serious (including six fatal cases). The current analysis supports the known safety profile of ESL, as generally well-tolerated with most AEs being non-serious. The most common AEs were considered either expected according to the disease itself or to the reference safety information. ESL continues to be a relevant medication in the treatment of partial (focal-onset) epilepsy, as also confirmed by the 2022 NICE guidelines.

Value contribution of cenobamate for the treatment of Focal-Onset Seizures (FOS) in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) in Spain through reflective Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA)

IntroductionEpilepsy is one of the most common neurological conditions worldwide. The main goal of its treatment is to achieve seizure freedom without intolerable adverse effects. However, despite the availability of many anti-seizure medications, including the latest options, called third-generation anti-seizure medications (ASMs), approximately 40% of people with epilepsy present drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). Cenobamate is the first ASM approved in Spain for the adjunctive treatment of Focal-Onset Seizures (FOS) in adult patients with DRE. In a chronic disease with a portfolio of available ASMs, the decision to introduce a new therapeutic alternative must follow a holistic evaluation of value provided. Reflective Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) methodology allows to determine the value contribution of a treatment in a given indication considering all relevant criteria for healthcare decision-making in a transparent and systematic manner from the perspective of relevant stakeholders. PurposeThe aim of this study was to determine the relative value contribution of cenobamate in the treatment of FOS in patients with DRE compared with third-generation ASMs using reflective MCDA-based methodology. MethodsA systematic literature review (combining biomedical databases and grey literature sources) was performed to populate the Evidence and Value: Impact on DEcisionMaking (EVIDEM) MCDA framework adapted to determine what represents value in the management of FOS in patients with DRE in Spain. The study was conducted in two phases. The first took place in 2021 with a multi-stakeholder group of eight participants. The second phase was conducted in 2022 with a multi-stakeholder group of 32 participants. Participants were trained in MCDA methodology and scored four evidence matrices (cenobamate vs. brivaracetam, vs. perampanel, vs. lacosamide and vs. eslicarbazepine acetate). Results were analyzed and discussed in a group meeting through reflective MCDA discussion methodology. ResultsDRE is considered a very severe condition associated with many important unmet needs, mainly with regard to the lack of more effective treatments to achieve the ultimate goal of treatment. Compared to third-generation ASMs, cenobamate is perceived to have a better efficacy profile based on improvements in responder rate and seizure freedom. Regarding safety, it is considered to have a similar profile to alternatives and a positive quality-of-life profile. Cenobamate results in lower direct medical costs (excluding pharmacological) and indirect costs. Overall, cenobamate is regarded as providing a high therapeutic impact and supported by high-quality evidence. ConclusionsBased on reflective MCDA methodology and stakeholders’ experience in clinical management of epilepsy in Spain, cenobamate is perceived as a value-added option for the treatment of patients with DRE when compared with third-generation ASMs.

Potential efficacy and safety of eslicarbazepine acetate oral loading in patients with epilepsy.

Eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) is a new antiseizure medication (ASM) approved as an adjunctive therapy or monotherapy for focal onset seizures. We performed this study to explore the potential efficacy and safety of ESL oral loading in selected patients with epilepsy. Thirty adult patients with status epilepticus or acute repetitive seizures were enrolled, and ESL was administered at a single loading dosage of 30 mg/kg. Plasma levels of an active metabolite of ESL, monohydroxy derivative (MHD), were measured at 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 h after ESL oral loading. Two thirds of the patients reached a therapeutic level of MHD 2 h after ESL loading, and most of the patients achieved a therapeutic range within 12 h after loading. Plasma MHD levels did not rise above the supratherapeutic level in any patient throughout the study. The reported adverse effects included one patient with gaze-evoked nystagmus and another patient with a rash. No serious adverse events leading to drug discontinuation occurred. There was no discernible difference in sodium levels before and after ESL oral loading. Our study findings suggest that ESL oral loading could be a useful therapeutic option for patients with epilepsy who need rapid elevations in the therapeutic levels of ASMs.

Antiepileptogenesis after stroke-trials and tribulations: Methodological challenges and recruitment results of a Phase II study with eslicarbazepine acetate.

There is currently no evidence to support the use of antiseizure medications to prevent unprovoked seizures following stroke. Experimental animal models suggested a potential antiepileptogenic effect for eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL), and a Phase II, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was designed to test this hypothesis and assess whether ESL treatment for 1 month can prevent unprovoked seizures following stroke. We outline the design and status of this antiepileptogenesis study, and discuss the challenges encountered in its execution to date. Patients at high risk of developing unprovoked seizures after acute intracerebral hemorrhage or acute ischemic stroke were randomized to receive ESL 800 mg/d or placebo, initiated within 120 hours after primary stroke occurrence. Treatment continued until Day 30, then tapered off. Patients could receive all necessary therapies for stroke treatment according to clinical practice guidelines and standard of care, and are being followed up for 18 months. The primary efficacy endpoint is the occurrence of a first unprovoked seizure within 6 months after randomization ("failure rate"). Secondary efficacy assessments include the occurrence of a first unprovoked seizure during 12 months after randomization and during the entire study; functional outcomes (Barthel Index original 10-item version; National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale); post-stroke depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9; PHQ-9); and overall survival. Safety assessments include the evaluation of treatment-emergent adverse events; laboratory parameters; vital signs; electrocardiogram; suicidal ideation and behavior (PHQ-9 question 9). The protocol aimed to randomize approximately 200 patients (1:1), recruited from 21 sites in seven European countries and Israel. Despite the challenges encountered, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic, the study progressed and included a remarkable number of patients, with 129 screened and 125 randomized. Recruitment was stopped after 30 months, the first patient entered in May 2019, and the study is ongoing and following up on patients according to the Clinical Trial Protocol.

Long-Term Quality of Life in Patients With Focal Seizures Treated With ESL: Pooled Analysis From 3 Phase III Open-Label Extension Studies (P11-1.009)

<h3>Objective:</h3> Data from a post-hoc pooled analysis was used to describe changes in health-related quality of life (HRQOL) measures during treatment with eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL). <h3>Background:</h3> ESL is approved for the treatment of focal seizures. HRQOL may be improved by controlling seizures. <h3>Design/Methods:</h3> Data from 3 randomized clinical trials were pooled for this post-hoc analysis. After completing the double-blind portion, patients were eligible to enter the 1-year open-label extension (OLE), which began immediately after the maintenance period or after a 4-week taper period. ESL was initiated at 400 or 800 mg/day, titrated in 400mg increments to a maximum 1600 mg/day. HRQOL was measured at baseline and last assessment using the Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory (QOLIE-31). Mean QOLIE-31 scores and mean change in scores were analyzed (t-test). The percentage of patients with QOLIE-31 score improvements beyond the minimal important change (MIC) threshold (baseline to final assessment) is described. <h3>Results:</h3> Of 959 patients who entered, 677 patients completed the OLE. Mean change in seizure worry, overall quality of life, emotional well-being, medication side effects, social functioning, and total score were significantly improved for patients who entered the OLE. Mean change ranged from 0.76 (energy/fatigue) to 4.93 (seizure worry). Mean change in all QOLIE-31 categories was significantly improved in patients who completed the OLE, ranging from 2.16 (cognitive functioning) to 6.58 (seizure worry). The highest percentage of patients reached the MIC threshold in social functioning (46.8%–48.9%), followed by medication effects (43.8%–47.4%), and seizure worry (42.1%–45.3%) in patients who entered the OLE and who completed the OLE, respectively. The lowest number of subjects met MIC criteria for energy/fatigue in both patient groups. <h3>Conclusions:</h3> Treatment with therapeutic doses of adjunctive ESL in patients with focal seizures for a period of up to one year was associated with improvements in HRQOL. <b>Disclosure:</b> Dr. Cantu has received personal compensation for serving as an employee of Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc.. Dr. Krishnaiengar has nothing to disclose. Dr. Thomases has received personal compensation for serving as an employee of Sunovion Pharmaceuticals. Darshan Mehta has received personal compensation for serving as an employee of Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc. . Ms. Hall has received personal compensation for serving as an employee of Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc.. Ian Zhang has received personal compensation for serving as an employee of Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc.. Helena Gama has received personal compensation for serving as an employee of Bial-Portela &amp; Cª S.A.. Ana Pereira has received personal compensation for serving as an employee of BIAL, Portela &amp; Cª S.A.. Todd Grinnell, PhD has received personal compensation for serving as an employee of Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc..