TO CONSIDER this topic brings to a focus two contexts wit in which the interpreter stands. In the first place, it reflects the interpreter's attempt to come to terms with himself, with his immediate situation in all its complexity. To measure the meaning of the gospels is to measure the meaning of his own existence within his total environment. And if he be a Christian, any statement about the message of the gospels reflects the fibre of his own faith, his personal relationship to God in Christ. In the second place, the interpreter must speak as an historian, for he is dealing with data of an historical character. He deals with documents and events in the past which condition his existence in the present. The very importance of these documents and events to contemporary faith demands that he examine critically their original nature and impact upon history. This interpenetration of faith and history is no new thing; it has characterized Christianity since the initial interpretation of the events which the gospels narrate. Apart from living faith there would have been no gospels, not to speak of a relevant message therein. On the other hand, apart from concrete historical events, the interpretation of which is the message of the gospels, there would have been no faith. Because the gospels are the product of history and of faith, their interpretation involves a double perspective. Since they are products of history, the student must apply to the gospels historical criteria and methods, seeking to understand their origin, their form, their purposes and functions. The written gospels represent different stages in the crystallization of the Gospel. They contain the precipitate of tradition, both oral and written, in which the first Christian generations articulated their faith. Always pointing back to the eschatological events which ushered in the era of redemption, this tradition always pointed as well to the emerging needs of the eschatological community. And it was always through the medium of living persons that the tradition maintained this lifegiving contact with the crucial needs of Christians, through persons called to responsible tasks of preaching, teaching, worship and defense. Always the core of the tradition was first-hand testimony to the impact of revolutionary events. About this core the tradition developed in response to countless situations, to multiple and mixed motives, which left their mark on he forms which the tradition assumed: proverb and parable, paradigm and poetry, legend and myth, ritual and symbol, miracle stories and the greatest miracle story-the Passion narrative. Because the gospels arose in this way, I am compelled as an historian to adopt the following attitudes toward the message which they tell: (I) The message is a proclamation of events interpreted as divine revelation. Through these events God was believed to have spoken to the faithful, releasing the best news that tragic humanity had ever eard.
Read full abstract