Erroneous Attachments Research Articles

Kinetochores grip microtubules with directionally asymmetric strength.

For accurate mitosis, all chromosomes must achieve "biorientation," with replicated sister chromatids coupled via kinetochores to the plus ends of opposing microtubules. However, kinetochores first bind the sides of microtubules and subsequently find plus ends through a trial-and-error process; accurate biorientation depends on the selective release of erroneous attachments. Proposed mechanisms for error-correction have focused mainly on plus-end attachments. Whether erroneous side attachments are distinguished from correct side attachments is unknown. Here, we show that side-attached kinetochores are very sensitive to microtubule polarity, gripping sixfold more strongly when pulled toward plus versus minus ends. This directionally asymmetric grip is conserved in human and yeast subcomplexes, and it correlates with changes in the axial arrangement of subcomplexes within the kinetochore, suggesting that internal architecture dictates attachment strength. We propose that the kinetochore's directional grip promotes accuracy during early mitosis by stabilizing correct attachments even before both sisters have found plus ends.

Aurora B/AIR-2 regulates sister centromere resolution and CENP-A/HCP-3 organization to prevent merotelic attachments.

During cell division, the accurate capture of sister kinetochores that are built on the centromeres of chromosomes by microtubules emanating from opposite spindle poles governs faithful chromosome segregation. To ensure sister chromatids separate correctly, sister centromeres undergo resolution to achieve bi-polar orientation prior to microtubule attachments. Failure of centromere resolution increases the frequency of merotelic attachments, with microtubules from opposite poles attaching to the same sister kinetochore, causing lagging chromosome, aneuploidy, and even cancer progression. The Aurora B-mediated tension-sensing machinery to correct erroneous kinetochore-microtubule attachments has been well studied. However, preventative mechanisms to avoid merotelic attachments that occur in the earlier mitotic stage are poorly understood. In this study, we found that inactivation of mitotic kinase Aurora B/AIR-2 increases merotelic attachments in Caenorhabditis elegans. On one hand, Aurora B/AIR-2-deficient cells exhibited a delay in the occurrence of centromere resolution and a disruption in targeting condensin II components to chromatin. On the other hand, loss of Aurora B/AIR-2 results in an increased localization of centromeric proteins CENP-A/HCP-3 and M18BP1/KNL-2 as well as the kinetochore protein MIS-12 on chromatin, which may generate ectopic kinetochores causing erroneous attachments. To conclude, this study elucidated that Aurora B/AIR-2 regulates sister centromere resolution and CENP-A/HCP-3 deposition to actively prevent merotely and chromosome instability in cells.

Measuring and modeling the dynamics of mitotic error correction

Error correction is central to many biological systems and is critical for protein function and cell health. During mitosis, error correction is required for the faithful inheritance of genetic material. When functioning properly, the mitotic spindle segregates an equal number of chromosomes to daughter cells with high fidelity. Over the course of spindle assembly, many initially erroneous attachments between kinetochores and microtubules are fixed through the process of error correction. Despite the importance of chromosome segregation errors in cancer and other diseases, there is a lack of methods to characterize the dynamics of error correction and how it can go wrong. Here, we present an experimental method and analysis framework to quantify chromosome segregation error correction in human tissue culture cells with live cell confocal imaging, timed premature anaphase, and automated counting of kinetochores after cell division. We find that errors decrease exponentially over time during spindle assembly. A coarse-grained model, in which errors are corrected in a chromosome-autonomous manner at a constant rate, can quantitatively explain both the measured error correction dynamics and the distribution of anaphase onset times. We further validated our model using perturbations that destabilized microtubules and changed the initial configuration of chromosomal attachments. Taken together, this work provides a quantitative framework for understanding the dynamics of mitotic error correction.

CKAP5 stabilizes CENP-E at kinetochores by regulating microtubule-chromosome attachments

Stabilization of microtubule plus end-directed kinesin CENP-E at the metaphase kinetochores is important for chromosome alignment, but its mechanism remains unclear. Here, we show that CKAP5, a conserved microtubule plus tip protein, regulates CENP-E at kinetochores in human cells. Depletion of CKAP5 impairs CENP-E localization at kinetochores at the metaphase plate and results in increased kinetochore–microtubule stability and attachment errors. Erroneous attachments are also supported by computational modeling. Analysis of CKAP5 knockout cancer cells of multiple tissue origins shows that CKAP5 is preferentially essential in aneuploid, chromosomally unstable cells, and the sensitivity to CKAP5 depletion is correlated to that of CENP-E depletion. CKAP5 depletion leads to reduction in CENP-E-BubR1 interaction and the interaction is rescued by TOG4-TOG5 domain of CKAP5. The same domain can rescue CKAP5 depletion-induced CENP-E removal from the kinetochores. Interestingly, CKAP5 depletion facilitates recruitment of PP1 to the kinetochores and furthermore, a PP1 target site-specific CENP-E phospho-mimicking mutant gets stabilized at kinetochores in the CKAP5-depleted cells. Together, the results support a model in which CKAP5 controls mitotic chromosome attachment errors by stabilizing CENP-E at kinetochores and by regulating stability of the kinetochore-attached microtubules.

Augmin prevents merotelic attachments by promoting proper arrangement of bridging and kinetochore fibers.

The human mitotic spindle is made of microtubules nucleated at centrosomes, at kinetochores, and from pre-existing microtubules by the augmin complex. However, it is unknown how the augmin-mediated nucleation affects distinct microtubule classes and thereby mitotic fidelity. Here, we use superresolution microscopy to analyze the previously indistinguishable microtubule arrangements within the crowded metaphase plate area and demonstrate that augmin is vital for the formation of uniformly arranged parallel units consisting of sister kinetochore fibers connected by a bridging fiber. This ordered geometry helps both prevent and resolve merotelic attachments. Whereas augmin-nucleated bridging fibers prevent merotelic attachments by creating a nearly parallel and highly bundled microtubule arrangement unfavorable for creating additional attachments, augmin-nucleated k-fibers produce robust force required to resolve errors during anaphase. STED microscopy revealed that bridging fibers were impaired twice as much as k-fibers following augmin depletion. The complete absence of bridging fibers from a significant portion of kinetochore pairs, especially in the inner part of the spindle, resulted in the specific reduction of the interkinetochore distance. Taken together, we propose a model where augmin promotes mitotic fidelity by generating assemblies consisting of bridging and kinetochore fibers that align sister kinetochores to face opposite poles, thereby preventing erroneous attachments.

Measuring errors over time: towards a quantitative theory of chromosome segregation error correction

The mammalian mitotic spindle segregates an equal number of chromosomes to daughter cells. Over the course of spindle assembly, many initially erroneous attachments between kinetochores and microtubules are fixed through a process called error correction. Despite the importance of chromosome segregation errors in many human health conditions, we lack quantitative methods to characterize the dynamic error correction process and how it is impaired in disease states. We have developed a novel experimental method and analysis framework to quantify chromosome segregation error correction in human tissue culture cells with live cell confocal imaging of spindle assembly, timed premature chromosome separation, and automated counting of kinetochores after cell division.

A mathematical model of kinetochore-microtubule attachment regulated by Aurora A activity gradient describes chromosome oscillation and correction of erroneous attachments.

Chromosome oscillation during metaphase is attenuated in cancer cell lines, concomitant with the reduction of Aurora A activity on kinetochores, which results in reduced mitotic fidelity. To verify the correlation between Aurora A activity, chromosome oscillation, and error correction efficiency, we developed a mathematical model of kinetochore-microtubule dynamics, based on stochastic attachment/detachment events regulated by Aurora A activity gradient centered at spindle poles. The model accurately reproduced the oscillatory movements of chromosomes, which were suppressed not only when Aurora A activity was inhibited, but also when it was upregulated, mimicking the situation in cancer cells. Our simulation also predicted efficient correction of erroneous attachments through chromosome oscillation, which was hampered by both inhibition and upregulation of Aurora A activity. Our model provides a framework to understand the physiological role of chromosome oscillation in the correction of erroneous attachments that is intrinsically related to Aurora A activity.

Shake It Off: The Elimination of Erroneous Kinetochore-Microtubule Attachments and Chromosome Oscillation.

Cell proliferation and sexual reproduction require the faithful segregation of chromosomes. Chromosome segregation is driven by the interaction of chromosomes with the spindle, and the attachment of chromosomes to the proper spindle poles is essential. Initial attachments are frequently erroneous due to the random nature of the attachment process; however, erroneous attachments are selectively eliminated. Proper attachment generates greater tension at the kinetochore than erroneous attachments, and it is thought that attachment selection is dependent on this tension. However, studies of meiotic chromosome segregation suggest that attachment elimination cannot be solely attributed to tension, and the precise mechanism of selective elimination of erroneous attachments remains unclear. During attachment elimination, chromosomes oscillate between the spindle poles. A recent study on meiotic chromosome segregation in fission yeast has suggested that attachment elimination is coupled to chromosome oscillation. In this review, the possible contribution of chromosome oscillation in the elimination of erroneous attachment is discussed in light of the recent finding.

Chiasmata and the kinetochore component Dam1 are crucial for elimination of erroneous chromosome attachments and centromere oscillation at meiosis I.

Establishment of proper chromosome attachments to the spindle requires elimination of erroneous attachments, but the mechanism of this process is not fully understood. During meiosis I, sister chromatids attach to the same spindle pole (mono-oriented attachment), whereas homologous chromosomes attach to opposite poles (bi-oriented attachment), resulting in homologous chromosome segregation. Here, we show that chiasmata that link homologous chromosomes and kinetochore component Dam1 are crucial for elimination of erroneous attachments and oscillation of centromeres between the spindle poles at meiosis I in fission yeast. In chiasma-forming cells, Mad2 and Aurora B kinase, which provides time for attachment correction and destabilizes erroneous attachments, respectively, caused elimination of bi-oriented attachments of sister chromatids, whereas in chiasma-lacking cells, they caused elimination of mono-oriented attachments. In chiasma-forming cells, in addition, homologous centromere oscillation was coordinated. Furthermore, Dam1 contributed to attachment elimination in both chiasma-forming and chiasma-lacking cells, and drove centromere oscillation. These results demonstrate that chiasmata alter attachment correction patterns by enabling error correction factors to eliminate bi-oriented attachment of sister chromatids, and suggest that Dam1 induces elimination of erroneous attachments. The coincidental contribution of chiasmata and Dam1 to centromere oscillation also suggests a potential link between centromere oscillation and attachment elimination.

A stochastic model for error correction of kinetochore-microtubule attachments in budding yeast.

To divide replicated chromosomes equally between daughter cells, kinetochores must attach to microtubules emanating from opposite poles of the mitotic spindle (biorientation). An error correction mechanism facilitates this process by destabilizing erroneous kinetochore-microtubule attachments. Here we present a stochastic model of kinetochore-microtubule attachments, via an essential protein Ndc80 in budding yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Using the model, we calculate the stochastic dynamics of a pair of sister kinetochores as they transition among different attachment states. First of all, we determine the kinase-to-phosphatase balance point that maximizes the probability of biorientation, while starting from an erroneous attachment state. We find that the balance point is sensitive to the rates of microtubule-Ndc80 dissociation and derive an approximate analytical formula that defines the balance point. Secondly, we determine the probability of transition from low-tension amphitelic to monotelic attachment and find that, despite this probability being approximately 33%, biorientation can be achieved with high probability. Thirdly, we calculate the contribution of the geometrical orientation of sister kinetochores to the probability of biorientation and show that, in the absence of geometrical orientation, the biorientation error rate is much larger than that observed in experiments. Finally, we study the coupling of the error correction mechanism to the spindle assembly checkpoint by calculating the average binding of checkpoint-related proteins to the kinetochore during the error correction process.

The right place at the right time: Aurora B kinase localization to centromeres and kinetochores.

The fidelity of chromosome segregation during mitosis is intimately linked to the function of kinetochores, which are large protein complexes assembled at sites of centromeric heterochromatin on mitotic chromosomes. These key "orchestrators" of mitosis physically connect chromosomes to spindle microtubules and transduce forces through these connections to congress chromosomes and silence the spindle assembly checkpoint. Kinetochore-microtubule attachments are highly regulated to ensure that incorrect attachments are not prematurely stabilized, but instead released and corrected. The kinase activity of the centromeric protein Aurora B is required for kinetochore-microtubule destabilization during mitosis, but how the kinase acts on outer kinetochore substrates to selectively destabilize immature and erroneous attachments remains debated. Here, we review recent literature that sheds light on how Aurora B kinase is recruited to both centromeres and kinetochores and discuss possible mechanisms for how kinase interactions with substrates at distinct regions of mitotic chromosomes are regulated.

Polo regulates Spindly to prevent premature stabilization of kinetochore-microtubule attachments.

Accurate chromosome segregation in mitosis requires sister kinetochores to bind to microtubules from opposite spindle poles. The stability of kinetochore-microtubule attachments is fine-tuned to prevent or correct erroneous attachments while preserving amphitelic interactions. Polo kinase has been implicated in both stabilizing and destabilizing kinetochore-microtubule attachments. However, the mechanism underlying Polo-destabilizing activity remains elusive. Here, resorting to an RNAi screen in Drosophila for suppressors of a constitutively active Polo mutant, we identified a strong genetic interaction between Polo and the Rod-ZW10-Zwilch (RZZ) complex, whose kinetochore accumulation has been shown to antagonize microtubule stability. We find that Polo phosphorylates Spindly and impairs its ability to bind to Zwilch. This precludes dynein-mediated removal of the RZZ from kinetochores and consequently delays the formation of stable end-on attachments. We propose that high Polo-kinase activity following mitotic entry directs the RZZ complex to minimize premature stabilization of erroneous attachments, whereas a decrease in active Polo in later mitotic stages allows the formation of stable amphitelic spindle attachments. Our findings demonstrate that Polo tightly regulates the RZZ-Spindly-dynein module during mitosis to ensure the fidelity of chromosome segregation.

Measuring NDC80 binding reveals the molecular basis of tension-dependent kinetochore-microtubule attachments.

Proper kinetochore-microtubule attachments, mediated by the NDC80 complex, are required for error-free chromosome segregation. Erroneous attachments are corrected by the tension dependence of kinetochore-microtubule interactions. Here, we present a method, based on fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy and Förster resonance energy transfer, to quantitatively measure the fraction of NDC80 complexes bound to microtubules at individual kinetochores in living human cells. We found that NDC80 binding is modulated in a chromosome autonomous fashion over prometaphase and metaphase, and is predominantly regulated by centromere tension. We show that this tension dependency requires phosphorylation of the N-terminal tail of Hec1, a component of the NDC80 complex, and the proper localization of Aurora B kinase, which modulates NDC80 binding. Our results lead to a mathematical model of the molecular basis of tension-dependent NDC80 binding to kinetochore microtubules in vivo.

Minimal Ingredients for Coupled Spindle Assembly and Chromosome Bi-orientation in a Computational Model of Fission Yeast Mitosis

Mitosis ensures the proper segregation of chromosomes into daughter cells, which is accomplished by the mitotic spindle. During fission-yeast mitosis, chromosomes establish bi-orientation as the bipolar spindle assembles, meaning that sister kinetochores become attached to microtubules whose growth was initiated by sister poles. This process must also correct erroneous attachments made by the kinetochores during the attachment process. Our goal is to build a 3D computational model of spindle assembly based on a realistic description of microtubule, kinetochore, and chromosome dynamics, in order to interrogate the role of specific mechanisms in these chromosome bi-orientation and error correction processes. We have added chromosomes to our previous computational model of spindle assembly, which included microtubules, a spherical nuclear envelope, motor proteins, crosslinking proteins, and spindle pole bodies (centrosomes). In the new model, each chromosome is represented by a pair of sister chromatids, and sister kinetochores are represented as chromatid-associated polygons. In preliminary work, we have explored the mechanical properties of kinetochores and their interactions with microtubules that achieve amphitelic spindle attachments at high frequency. A plausible set of minimal assumptions yields simulations that generate chromosome attachment errors, but resolve them, much as normal chromosomes do.

Distinct Roles of the Chromosomal Passenger Complex in the Detection of and Response to Errors in Kinetochore-Microtubule Attachment

The chromosomal passenger complex (CPC) localizes to centromeres in early mitosis to activate its subunit Aurora B kinase. However, it is unclear whether centromeric CPC localization contributes to CPC functions beyond Aurora B activation. Here, we show that an activated CPC that cannot localize to centromeres supports functional assembly of the outer kinetochore but is unable to correct errors in kinetochore-microtubule attachment in Xenopus egg extracts. We find that CPC has two distinct roles at centromeres: one to selectively phosphorylate Ndc80 to regulate attachment and a second, conserved kinase-independent role in the proper composition of inner kinetochore proteins. Although a fully assembled inner kinetochore is not required for outer kinetochore assembly, we find it is essential to recruit tension indicators, such as BubR1 and 3F3/2, to erroneous attachments. We conclude centromeric CPC is necessary for tension-dependent removal of erroneous attachments and for the kinetochore composition required to detect tension loss.

Mps1 Regulates Kinetochore-Microtubule Attachment Stability via the Ska Complex to Ensure Error-Free Chromosome Segregation

The spindle assembly checkpoint kinase Mps1 notonly inhibits anaphase but also corrects erroneous attachments that could lead to missegregation and aneuploidy. However, Mps1's error correction-relevant substrates are unknown. Using a chemicallytuned kinetochore-targeting assay, we show that Mps1 destabilizes microtubule attachments (Kfibers) epistatically to Aurora B, the other major error-correcting kinase. Through quantitative proteomics, we identify multiple sites of Mps1-regulated phosphorylation at the outer kinetochore. Substrate modification was microtubule sensitive and opposed by PP2A-B56 phosphatases that stabilize chromosome-spindle attachment. Consistently, Mps1 inhibition rescued K-fiber stability after depleting PP2A-B56. We also identify the Ska complex as a key effector of Mps1 at the kinetochore-microtubule interface, as mutations that mimic constitutive phosphorylation destabilized K fibers invivo and reduced the efficiency of the Ska complex's conversion from lattice diffusion to end-coupled microtubule binding invitro. Our results reveal how Mps1 dynamically modifies kinetochores to correct improper attachments and ensure faithful chromosome segregation.

Drosophila Nnf1 paralogs are partially redundant for somatic and germ line kinetochore function.

Kinetochores allow attachment of chromosomes to spindle microtubules. Moreover, they host proteins that permit correction of erroneous attachments and prevent premature anaphase onset before bi-orientation of all chromosomes in metaphase has been achieved. Kinetochores are assembled from subcomplexes. Kinetochore proteins as well as the underlying centromere proteins and the centromeric DNA sequences evolve rapidly despite their fundamental importance for faithful chromosome segregation during mitotic and meiotic divisions. During evolution of Drosophila melanogaster, several centromere proteins were lost and a recent gene duplication has resulted in two Nnf1 paralogs, Nnf1a and Nnf1b, which code for alternative forms of a Mis12 kinetochore complex component. The rapid evolutionary divergence of centromere/kinetochore constituents in animals and plants has been proposed to be driven by an intragenome conflict resulting from centromere drive during female meiosis. Thus, a female meiosis-specific paralog might be expected to evolve rapidly under positive selection. While our characterization of the D. melanogaster Nnf1 paralogs hints at some partial functional specialization of Nnf1b for meiosis, we have failed to detect evidence for positive selection in our analysis of Nnf1 sequence evolution in the Drosophilid lineage. Neither paralog is essential, even though we find some clear differences in subcellular localization and expression during development. Loss of both paralogs results in developmental lethality. We therefore conclude that the two paralogs are still in early stages of differentiation.

Building an Accurate Chromosome Segregation Machine in Fission Yeast

In fission yeast, erroneous attachments of spindle microtubules to kinetochores are frequent in early mitosis. Most are corrected before anaphase onset by a mechanism involving the protein kinase Aurora B which destabilizes kinetochore microtubules (ktMT) in the absence of tension between sister chromatids. We previously described a minimal mathematical model of fission yeast chromosome segregation based on the stochastic attachment and detachment of kinetochore microtubules. This model accurately reproduces the timing of correct chromosome bi-orientation and segregation seen in fission yeast. This force-balance model of mitosis describes global spindle dynamics and predicts chromosome segregation defects (Courtheoux J.Cell Biol 2009; Gay, J.Cell Biol 2012).We recently implemented new features to our model that describe kinetochore alignment during metaphase. In higher eukaryotes, efficient chromosome congression relies, among other players, on the activity of chromokinesins. We provide a quantitative analysis of kinetochore oscillations and positioning in S. pombe, a model lacking chromokinesins. In wild type cells, chromosomes align during prophase and while oscillating, maintain this alignment throughout metaphase. Chromosome oscillations are dispensable both for kinetochore congression and stable kinetochore alignment during metaphase. We propose that Kinesin-8 aligns chromosomes by controlling pulling forces in a length dependent manner. Our chromosome segregation model implemented with a length-dependent process that controls the force at kinetochores is sufficient to mimic congression and to prevent aneuploidy. These model illustrate how a motor protein at kinetochores provides spatial cues within the spindle to align chromosomes.Altogether, our work illustrates how a simplified force balance model, with stochastic attachment and detachment events, correction mechanisms (Aurora B, and kinetochore orientation effect) and a length dependent process for kinetochore alignment, can explain the segregation of chromosomes with a timing and accuracy similar to chromosome segregation in living wild-type fission yeast cells.

The molecular architecture of the Dam1 kinetochore complex is defined by cross-linking based structural modelling.

Accurate segregation of chromosomes during cell division is essential. The Dam1 complex binds kinetochores to microtubules and its oligomerization is required to form strong attachments. It is a key target of Aurora B kinase, which destabilizes erroneous attachments allowing subsequent correction. Understanding the roles and regulation of the Dam1 complex requires structural information. Here we apply cross-linking/mass spectrometry and structural modelling to determine the molecular architecture of the Dam1 complex. We find microtubule attachment is accompanied by substantial conformational changes, with direct binding mediated by the carboxy termini of Dam1p and Duo1p. Aurora B phosphorylation of Dam1p C terminus weakens direct interaction with the microtubule. Furthermore, the Dam1p amino terminus forms an interaction interface between Dam1 complexes, which is also disrupted by phosphorylation. Our results demonstrate that Aurora B inhibits both direct interaction with the microtubule and oligomerization of the Dam1 complex to drive error correction during mitosis.

Better check late than never: The chromosome segregation checkpoint (comment on DOI 10.1002/bies.201400140).

Aneuploidy is the result of errors in chromosome segregation and is manifested in two out of three cancers. The spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) has evolved to prevent aneuploidy by inhibiting onset of anaphase until all chromosomes are properly aligned and attached. When the SAC is satisfied and cells progress from anaphase to telophase, the sister chromatids are separated and decondensed, and the nuclear envelope is reformed (NER). While the SAC detects many types of erroneous attachments that can lead to chromosome missegration, including monopolar or syntelic attachments (attachment to one pole only), it does not detect merotelic attachments, (one sister chromatid attached to both poles), as the latter type of attachments produce similar tension across sister chromatids as correct (amphitelic) attachments. When merotelic attachments are not resolved prior to anaphase, chromatids will lag behind during anaphase, compromising their segregation to the correct spindle pole. Lagging chromosomes often result in micronuclei, a major mechanism of chromosomal instability in cancer cells [1]. However, various lines of evidence indicate that incomplete chromosome separation can delay transition to telophase, suggesting a surveillance mechanism beyond the SAC, operating late in anaphase. For example, recent work from Helder Maiato and co-workers identified a