Assessing soil erosion hazards and mapping the spatial distribution of soil erosion have an essential role in sustainable forest management. In this study, the potential soil erosion risk was evaluated through the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Geographic Information Systems (GIS) in the Oltu forest planning unit, Erzurum. Seven erosion-related criteria, including slope, bedrock type, relative relief, drainage density and frequency, rainfall, and land use/land cover (LULC) were used for the present assessment. According to the AHP analysis, the slope was the most influential factor (21%) followed by bedrock type (19%), land cover (17%), and relative relief (14%) in the soil erosion process. The soil erosion risk in the study area was strongly influenced by the LULC where 59.46% is bare land with high erosion risk and 12.07%, with the lowest risk, is in an area with any forest cover. The estimated soil erosion risk was classified into five different classes namely very low, low, moderate, high, and very high. The results showed that this study area is highly prone to soil erosion. The larger proportion of the area (39.16%) is exposed to high to very high erosion, mainly determined by forest cover and geomorphology. To analyze the accuracy of the soil erosion risk map, 40 points were selected randomly in this study area. In these points, predicted values were compared to the real values obtained by Google Earth-colored images. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) method was applied to validate the efficiency of the AHP which showed a satisfactory accuracy of 81.00%. Findings presented that including the more influencing factors with a slope instead of including only the slope contributes to a more accurate erosion risk map. This study highlighted that GIS-based multi-criteria decision-making is a valuable and practical tool for decision-makers and land managers in creating soil erosion susceptibility maps and determining high-priority areas that require conservation measures for sustainable land use management by reducing the economic and ecological impacts of soil loss. Also, this approach can be practically applied in other planning units.