1. IntroductionBoundaryvalueproblemsonin nite intervalsappearinmanyproblemsofpracti-cal interest, for example in linear elasticity problems, nonlinear uid ow problemsand foundation engineering (see e.g. [1,10,16] and the references therein). Thisis the reason why these problems have been studied quite extensively in the lit-erature, especially the ones involving second order di erential equations. Secondorder boundary value problems on in nite intervals are treated with various meth-ods, such as xed point theorems (see e.g. [1,5,6,10,14-16,23]), upper and lowersolutions method (see e.g. [2,8,9]), diagonalization method (see e.g. [1,18,20]) andothers. An interesting overview on in nite interval problems, including real worldexamples, history and various methods of solvability, can be found in the recentbook of Agarwal and O’ Regan [1].A rather less extensive study has been done on rst order boundary value prob-lems on in nite intervals. One of the major ways to deal with such problems is touse numerical methods, see for example [10,16]. In short, the basic idea in this caseis to build a nite interval problem such that its solution approximates the solutionof the in nite problemquite well on the nite interval. The diculty of this methodlies in setting the nite interval boundary value problem in such a way that theapproximation is accurate. Another way to deal with boundary value problems onin nite intervals is to use xed point theorems. See for example [7,9]. Using thisapproach one will have to reformulate the boundary value problem to an operatorequation and to use an appropriate compactness criterion on in nite intervals forthe corresponding operator (see Lemma 2.2 below).In the recent years a growing interest has arisen for positive solutions of bound-ary value problems. See for example [10,11,17,18,23]. Also, nowadays, functionalboundary value problems are extensively investigated, usually via xed point the-orems (see [6,12,21,22] and the references therein).